1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Watching is an understatement, I was kind of expecting some narration or audio.

Also, I seem to have randomly clicked to the exact spot these images appear. Around the 29 minute mark.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

She was in those awful Tranformers movies wasn't she?

I'll try and forget this information by the next time her name comes up again.

As she is irrelevant.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would ask who they are. But I don't care.

by pkvi
5
by pkvi
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

He doesn't need to. And we don't wish to alienate Democrats on this topic as partisan.

You need to speak to those around you, and tell them not to take the vaccines. They will not listen to Trump, and the media will not report it to the masses even if he did.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't really say this without a reliable testing methodology. At the time, they are still just reporting the common cold.

by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Covid-19 vaccines do not contain "obscure" ingredients like graphene oxide, Reuters reports.

Well that's what Reuters is reporting, but this is not a statement claiming the accuracy of said report. This is only a deferral to others.

But it is usually to protect trade secrets, PoltiFact reports

Political fact reports? Not sure what business they have reporting on vaccines, nor do I see any legitimacy in a statement of 'usually'. Conjecture is not the bases of facts.

by pkvi
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is retarded. And he looks like shit.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

My sources have 100% verified the information on Fairchild Air Force base.

U.S. MASSING MILITARY REFUELING TANKERS

This could be why, last night, word reached our ear that the US military has suddenly begun significant "massing" of KC-135 military in-flight refueling tankers on the US west coast.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is some surface level stuff. It's literally just a rewording of the Great Reset, and the new world order. How can OP be this far off based that he needed this to be explained to him?

My theory has this being a front end for the false world agenda, of moving to the new world, during the age of Aquarius in our land above the black sun.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I know. That being said, I don't believe information on it, would be available to us on a level we could obtain through a FOIA.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you fucking kidding us MagaPede69? Don't you at all feel stupid for posting this?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did not realize he mashed up the two pages. The link is only to provide the exact information in the text. In that we are not to be engaged in offensive weapons research.

by pkvi
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

"making his own peanut butter sandwich late Wednesday night ... and withing 24 hours is fighting for his life"

What am I to get from this? Peanut butter sandwich bad? And how far back do they have to reach to get these stories? April?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

People use this language to talk to those who still don't understand what's going on. It's called testing the water.

"I don't give a FUCK what you're NOT. I care about what you ARE."

Right. You drunk bro? Because if so, you are not a very clear headed drinker.

"Believe in yourself and never be afraid to ask questions and suggest theories."

I work for a living. I can not afford to lose my job. I need to test the waters before I tell a guy the mRNA therapy will kill his wife and children. I'm not just going to tell every person I meet, China has secret bases in the US, or Hillary Clinton is involved in humans trafficking.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://patriots.win/p/13zN1UM8un/audit-war-room-on-twitter-the-dr/c/

"The “draft report” leaked to the #azauditpool freak squad had incorrect information. We know who leaked it."

by pkvi
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

"At this point there should be no more discussion about AOC as she's obviously under someone else's control."

No. That's actually a good reason to talk about here even more.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›