1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, see, you seem to think you're good, right? Maybe it's not the underlying nature itself, but the very certainty about it that's the problem.

10
Primate98 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think we always have to keep in mind that the number of people pushing this degeneracy is very, very small. Everybody else is just along for the ride. Demonstrably, none of them ever thought it up by themselves.

My point is that if the force of this tiny group went away, everything would return back to normal. I would even go so far as to say that society would steadily improve, given that most people are inherently good and that numerous people work in the spirit of enlightenment and universal beneficence.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that was the series I watched in it's entirety and that I think comprises the bulk of her work. Fomenko isn't the focus, but comes up a lot as you're trying to put back together WTH really happened on this planet in the past.

Definitely "must-see" videos, in my book.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

It finally crystallized for me just this morning that the purpose of this entire recent "AI" phenomenon is solely to convince everyone that "artificial intelligence" exists. Inherent in that is the sense that AI is or can be made to be superior to human intelligence.

You see, after that it's a direct move to "let the machines run everything". The idea sells itself. Jillions of people, both normies and the "awake", will go right along with it, having never developed enough human intellect to see through it for themselves.

Of course, after that, whatever catastrophes result can be explained quite simply: "Can you imagine how bad it would have been if the machines had not been in charge? Those who criticize SkyNet endanger us all!"

For anyone that cares to weigh in with some reply which is an elaboration along the lines of, "No, you're all wrong, AI does exist, and it is superior," then I welcome it as a perfect illustration of my point.

"They" have been planning this for quite some time, really since the dawn of modern "thinking machines". Here's something from half a century ago:

I like to think

     (it has to be!)

of a cybernetic ecology

where we are free of our labors

and joined back to nature,

returned to our mammal

brothers and sisters,

and all watched over

by machines of loving grace.

"All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" by Richard Brautigan (1967)

10
Primate98 10 points ago +10 / -0

Funny, right up until you consider the innumerable ways their behavior can and does affect your life and mine, including things like taking everything you have and killing you.

Then terrifying.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not directly. Only through Sylvie Ivanowa's work, with one exception.

I read Chapter 1 of 'Tsar of the Slavs', which I found very rigorous and completely convincing of the facts that the Nativity was in what we call 1152 AD and the Crucifixion was in what we call 1185 AD. (I started to read Chapter 2 but it seemed way off and I didn't know if it was him or me so I just gave up.)

I matched exactly that work with other research by Sylvain Tristan and his book, "Re-Dating Ancient Greece: 500 BC = 1300 AD?" I watched a two-hour video presentation/interview on it someone posted here a bit ago, and that was enough for the penny to drop.

I would contend that the 1800 year gap that Tristan is seeing actually the gap from 600 BC to the time of Christ, ~1200 AD in Fomenko's new dating. All of real history got copypasta'd and misdated and jumbled throughout that period, but the point is that I already knew 600 BC was an extremely pivotal time in human history. There's no way that time gap is a coincidence.

Much, much longer story about 600 BC, but I almost never post about this stuff because you can see you have to have a decent grasp on a few things most people have never even heard of.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

FWIW: I only ever saw one video on the "Ghost Cities" many years ago, so I wouldn't die on this hill, but the new construction was very, very shoddy. Totally unacceptable by American standards. If the superficial finish residential stuff I saw was bad, the more demanding infrastructure would have been significantly worse.

I think that even though their standards may be lower there, I suspect that if real people had ever actually relocated to them to any extent, we would have heard at least a small amount of, "Chinese complain their brand new cities suck dead donkey dick."

All this is a long way of saying I believe they were always just an enormous fascist grift by the (Communist In Name Only) CCP and developers and builders. No one was ever going to live there and no one ever did. Later, the corrupt fucks took their money, ran off to America, and are living in my neighborhood.

I would take this opportunity to add that The World's Most Horrible Dictator Since Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, is on to this grift and will not put up with it:

President Xi Chaired The July Politburo Meeting Today: Here's What Happened (ZeroHedge 7/28/2022)

On property, the statement restated "housing is for living in, not for speculation"... and highlighted that local governments should take responsibilities in "guaranteeing the delivery of homes",...

So now we start to see why They want you to think Xi is The World's Most Horrible Dictator Since Donald Trump.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Puts me in mind of this classic of classics from Orwell:

Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten... every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered... History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.

Long, long story--and you'll have to trust that I wouldn't say it unless I believed it and had the backup--but I recently came to the conclusion that all of "recorded history", from Herodotus to the present, has taken place in the last 850 years or so.

I found it so disturbing when Morpheus told Neo they didn't really know what year it was, but now I come to find out that Reality is literally more disturbing than the Matrix. You can only laugh at this point!

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have concluded it's not possible even to formulate an educated guess. People fantasize and fear, but that's about it.

You see, I've come to realize that the Satanic agenda weights over the globe like a person wearing a full set of knight's armor, and underneath it a bodysuit made of those lead dentist's X-ray drapes. It's like asking, "How fast can this person run a mile with some training?"

Pressing the same analogy without all the extra weight, it's still difficult to tell. Younger people won't remember this being a live question, but it was doubted by many that a human being could ever run a four minute mile. Then someone finally did. The odd thing is that now talented high-school runners can do it.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe mid to late 90's or so. I saw this guy walking through the mall with a denim skirt, a Barbie backpack, a completely ill-fitting blonde wig (IDK if "ill-fitting" is the right term, because it was just sort of atop his head like a hat), and about 5 days of stubble.

I knew just from that experience that it was about something other than people wishing to snap their fingers and "become a woman" in a way undetectable to others.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some years ago--researching a topic I don't remember--I stumbled on data which caused me to fundamentally distrust all these types of population stats. I write this up because it's a little different angle and a little easier to digest than the linked post.

Everyone thinks, "Well, maybe these numbers are not exact, but we can all agree there's some sound basis to them. Nope, I think they're just making a lot of them up at this point. They all have to be viewed through the lens of, "This is what They would have you believe," or "This is what They will admit to."

At that time, I wanted to know how prevalent Catholicism was in France, and I found this:

CIA World Factbook: France

Roman Catholic 83%-88%

It stuck in my mind because, of course, I had always thought of Italy as the preeminent Catholic country. I don't remember what I found for Italy at the time, but it was significantly less.

When I went to search for that same stat a few years later, I found this:

Religion Facts: Religion in France

Christian (overwhelmingly Roman Catholic) 63-66%

Did it really fall that far in a couple of years? Seems unlikely. But if you look now in the Book of Knowledge, you'll find this:

Wikipedia: Religion in France

Roman Catholicism (47%)

Down forty points in a decade? No, no population changes religion that fast, even if all the old people dying off were Catholic and all the young people were atheists.

"They" want to destroy organized religion, as well as the cultures into which such religions are integrated. Part of the war against them is to make them less popular, and the primary and easiest method of psychological warfare to achieve that is simply to tell everyone they're less popular.

Final observation: Note that the first number, probably closest to correct, was from the CIA itself. So over the course of the last 10-15 years, their lies have gotten much more egregious. I always claim that "They" are getting more desperate just in the recent past, and this is one more small, concrete reflection of that.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's somewhat related to the last thing you said. I try to put up a low-key resistance to Simulation Theory. and I keep it low-key because--let's be honest--people don't want to hear about things they don't already believe.

But there's a huge problem: if we're in a simulation, then there can be no morality. At best "morality" would simply be what was arbitrated by the designers of the Simulation, and could be altered at any time in any fashion.

I've smoked hundreds of thousands of Stormtroopers and Covenant and Flood, but I don't feel bad because it was only a game. Nothing really counts. If They can persuade people that Reality itself is just a big game and nothing really counts, what then?

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would just put the finer point on it and say that it's not AI that's going to kill us, it will be the next genocidal ploy They are going to pull on us--whatever that may be--after which They'll say, "Uh, it was AI!"

And then all the dumb jerkoffs will say, "Called it!"

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Quite odd. Maybe They finally sacrificed him, and this is Their disgusting little occult way of announcing it.

But since Gosch ushered in the "milk carton kids" program, let me use this opportunity to point something out I've never seen discussed elsewhere. These ads are not common any more, but the next time you see one take a good, close look at all the information on it.

I've noticed the strangest indications that make me think most or all of these are fake. For example, a 12yo that has been missing for 8 years, shown with an age-progressed photo. People change substantially over those years. How could they possibly do better than a potentially misleading guess? This is particularly true with women, due to what can be drastic changes in hair length, style, and color.

Not convinced? How about an ad for a girl missing since she was 20, and has been gone 40 years? Uhhh, pretty sure she'd be back by now if she was ever coming back, right? She never had the chance to ask someone for help in four decades, but someone's going to spot her on the street? Really?

And the thing is, aren't there any children that went missing yesterday, or last week, or last month? Aren't the chances of finding them astronomically higher?

Well, it all makes sense if no one is actually looking for these children (or adults and seniors, as we have seen), and this is all just a subtle part of the phony world people accept as Reality.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

For those of an open and adventurous curiosity, I refer you to this article:

Military Raids NIH Biolab in Montana (RRN 12/8/2023)

The informant told the general’s office that he had seen NIH employees escorting a busload of “hypnotized homeless” into the secure compound. He assumed the passengers were homeless because they were unclean and unkempt and wore tattered clothes. And once they set foot inside the portentous lair, they never came out.

We saw the footage, eerie, surreal. Looked like they were in a trance, maybe drugged. The NIH guided them off the bus inside, and call me crazy, but I don’t think they were really there willingly. So, the individual who got the video, well, tracked the lab for a week, and he says they never left it,” our source said....

The man recounted a macabre tale to the Marines. The NIH had exposed the homeless to an aerosolized smallpox-hemorrhagic fever mutation. Over days, they developed boils and pustules that ruptured, and their organs shut down, and they bled out through every orifice on their bodies....

In closing, he shared a final tidbit of info: “The prisoner says that FEMA abducted the homeless off the streets of San Francisco ahead of Xi Jing’s visit. Our investigation is ongoing.”

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know what's interesting is that in the second link, the first thing they say is:

... investigating irregularities in the cosmic microwave background (the 'afterglow' of the Big Bang), have found there is substantial evidence supporting a holographic explanation of the universe—in fact, as much as there is for the traditional explanation of these irregularities using the theory of cosmic inflation.

I had, of course, never bothered researching Simulation Theory, but now I see that it's nonsense based on nonsense. It's the standard MO: "Spot me one miracle and I can prove the rest."

It's well worth looking up the work of physicist Stephen Crothers, who shatters the existence of both black holes and the Big Bang. You have to look around because his work is technical and you have to find one of his presentations for the general populace (although a technical background is very helpful).

I recall that in his presentation on the CMB, he discusses the fraud of the WMAP satellite that was the source for all the data here analyzed for Simulation Theory. Because the signal was expected to be extremely small, they used two copies of the detector, subtracting out noise from the detector itself which would not come through both.

They could not get any signal at all. Surprise! So what did they do? Disconnected the detectors from one another and just recorded what was actually detector noise. Voila--the Cosmic Microwave Background and, later, Simulation Theory.

Every damn rock you kick over has bullshit underneath it.

8
Primate98 8 points ago +8 / -0

Simulation Theory.

It's like this black hole that people who want others to think that they are smart and edgy conspiracy theorists fall in to whenever something comes up they don't care to even try to find an explanation for.

I've always been of the opinion that general knowledgeability, an awareness of little known and anomalous evidence, a wide-open imagination, and disciplined reasoning make you a smart and edgy conspiracy theorist.

So I guess this demonstrates something about the real state of affairs.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

I noticed something similar in Jesus's famous "not of this world" line. Actually, it was just before that when he says, "I am from above, you are from below". The word translated as "above" was "ouranos" in the original Greek. See anything familiar?

Yes, it's one and the same as the name of the planet Uranus, as they will admit right on the wiki. But then in the Etymology section they go on to spout a bunch of conflicting opinions.

I argue it's much simpler than that: the name is a slight corruption of "ur anu", or roughly, "The Foundation of Anu". Anu was the king of the gods in the Sumerian pantheon, and his name was itself used as a synonym for "sky" or "heaven". That ties us right back to the translation, but they sure left a lot out.

A similar name from a much different angle is "Jerusalem", which they also admit is a corruption of "uru shalem". That would mean "The Foundation of Shalim" but is virtually always translared "The City of Shalim". Shalim was of the Ugarit pantheon, a mirror of the Sumerian pantheon, and was the son of the king of the gods, i.e. Anu.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I always try to view it from the perspective of the Elites. They've got to be saying something like, "Nothing is working out like we planned and shit's falling apart all over the place. What the hell am I going to tell His Infernal Majesty at the next quarterly ritual?"

In accord with what you say, I think this "al-Aqsa Flood" false flag was just such a huge gamble. Militarily, it's already a catastrophe. Internally, even the people that believe it was an organic event think the government is totally fucked up. The blowback across the board and around the world is like nothing I have any knowledge of. The Ike battle group just left the Persian Gulf. And all the IDF can do is drop more bombs on civilians and stroll into a shooting gallery.

Q always said "Zionists last", and, well, IMHO they're staring at a pretty damn bleak picture.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

That definition of authenticity puts me in mind of the hardest lessons Jesus taught, such as "a man's enemies will be those of his own household", "leave your family to follow me", and "let the dead bury the dead".

I feel like all of these are actually talking about the same core principle of how to live a moral life, or perhaps pointing out the reality of the very dear cost (as it stands) of doing do.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Totally off-topic: The latest marketing collateral out of the Israeli false flag is the mother of a girl "kidnapped" from the EDM party claims she was drugged by her abductors with ketamine.

It's obviously anti-Semitic to even think some Jewess rave thot was on Vitamin K. Also, she was holding that molly for Allah, so blame him.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you're looking into Nixon and that time period, another little angle you may want to toss into that dumpster fire of "history" is the fact that the Pentagon did not trust him and was spying on him (quelle surprise!):

Nixon and the Chiefs (The Atlantic, April 2002)

The Atlantic's spin, of course, is just more Nixon blackwashing, but you can gain insight by reading carefully. Take a look at this quote:

In his 1976 memoir, On Watch, Admiral Zumwalt lamented "the deliberate, systematic and, unfortunately, extremely successful efforts of the President, Henry Kissinger, and a few subordinate members of their inner circle to conceal, sometimes by simple silence, more often by articulate deceit, their real policies about the most critical matters of national security." Scarcely alone in his views, Zumwalt marveled "that rational men could think that running things like that could have any other result than 'leaks' and 'spying' and all-around paranoia." Indeed, he said, "they had created a system in which 'leaks' and 'spying' were everyday and essential elements."

I read this as an excellent illustration of the mindset of Deep Staters: To themselves and each other, they are the true heroes of this story. They are the rational ones, the patriotic, those who have the will to do that which is necessary, which they must do in secret because (the unspoken part) the masses could not possibly understand.

It never, ever occurs to all these Deep State types that if they were elected President, they would not tolerate Pentagram fuckwads who were certain they knew better spying on and undermining them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›