He got a booster in public on 10/27/2021 then dropped out of sight. He appears to have been so stupid as to believe his own lies and got a real one. He got sick with GBS and went into hiding to recover. The military picked him up on 11/1, took him to GTMO, and he was hanged there 1/24/2022.
So everything between 10/27/2021 and present has been some sort of fake: file photos, misdated photos, Photoshops, DeepFakes, maybe a body double, and--who knows at this point--maybe even a clone.
Even though possible, I actually doubt the body double or clone part, because otherwise why would they bother with things like this weak-ass and transparent Target story?
History is also an exciting adventure. Remember when Nazis were bad? Now we know that only certain Nazis are bad. And everyone that likes Trump is a Nazi, and all Nazis are bad.
You never know what history will turn up next!
Right. Well, in the end it's all a bunch of crazy bullshit, but the important thing to keep in mind is that no matter how crazy it seems, these people really do seem to believe it and make decisions based on it, as hard as that may be to believe... lol
What I found absolutely shocking is that a whole lot of people not subjected to this Messianic heretical nonsense also believe we're living in the End Times:
About four-in-ten U.S. adults believe humanity is ‘living in the end times’ (12/8/2022)
I mean, how does that affect a person's decision-making? Who the hell knows, but I guarantee it's not in a good way.
Well, the determinative factor here is the response of the Establishment towards what Trump said. When I heard him say it, I thought, "OMG, he's throwing Israel to their fate and they are going to thrash him for it from now til November! He'll be the 21st Century's Hitler!"
But what did we get? Silence, from everybody. I have never once heard it repeated.
So on the one hand, it's just impossible to come up with the way that this could be "the party line". Things are very confused right now, but no one of any stripe is saying this.
On the other hand, if the statement is anti-Zio-Establishment, well, why aren't They wrecking him day and night, and pressing him to dig himself in deeper with his wanton disregard for the Heebs? He may as well slit all their throats personally!
They won't press him on it because whatever he says, it's just going to draw more attention to the issue and start punching holes in their tissue-thin pretext over an otherwise naked genocide. If he's willing to check and not raise, so are They.
IMHO, he doesn't feel the need to say anything more because he knows it's being handled by other parties like Hezbollah, Iran, Russia, China, anti-war lefties, the UN, the Global South, etc, etc. I would concur that together they have all they need and this may all end in the fullness of time with the (eventually) peaceful dismantling of the Zionist Entity.
It's the best path I can think of, really. Israel is shaking itself apart as we speak, and there are a lot of people that just wish to let it do so.
You know, every time one of these ghey ops comes around and it's soooo lame, there are always people that claim, "Of course! They're mocking us!" Maybe that's true to some extent, but I think there are more important observations to be made.
One is that They clearly don't need to make it more convincing. It achieves the desired effect, as we see, with little effort. But the more important observation based on that observation is that the vast majority of the population could detect it as phony, but it never enters their minds to begin such process. It is real to them because they have been told it is real, and all else must submit to that conclusion
Further, I would claim there's something even more diabolical and pernicious at work. That is, I believe humans judge the truth and falsity of events on a subconscious level, unavoidably, like a reflex. This is then put together with other factors in a longer process, but that T/F judgement is there.
So I came to conclude that, yes, They deliberately leave these phony enough for the subconscious to detect. We see that not many carry that forward, so the vast majority is left in another state, which then works in to something described by a guy named Theodore Dalrymple in a much different context:
In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of.probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.
See how most people end up in this state of DoubleThink? That must be terribly stressful and corrosive, and I believe that's the point.
As to Masonry, what's funny about everything you said is that I believe Masons somehow lack the capacity to notice any of it. I mean, they are as a rule terribly reluctant to comment about Masonry in the first place. What kind of club are you in when you aren't excited to talk about it?
But with any and all the things you mentioned (and so much more), have you ever heard any Mason say something like, "Yeah, that really does seem weird. Can't say I know what's up with it, but it's very odd." Nope, just never seems to occur to them... lol
The crux of the whole matter is "Christian Zionism", and you can find a narrative regarding it and it's effects here:
The untold story of Christian Zionism’s rise to power in the United States
Note that it's the "untold story". If you find that you've never before heard of a lot of the information in it and that is is indeed "untold", that's proof enough there that this is where important truth lies.
Let me note here that I have concluded the author of that article, Whitney Webb, is controlled opposition, so you can interpret everything in it as, "it's at least as bad as this and maybe way worse".
For example, she states there are more than 20M Christian Zionists. I have heard elsewhere both 70M and 1-in-3 US adults. Where can we go for an authoritative figure? Nowhere. It's so huge They wish to keep the number a secret. See how it works?
Spinning off the thesis just in one direction for a moment, one can consider the case of Trump and the Christian Zionists. He steps very carefully around the issue, wears the small hats, has kike grandkids, the whole thing. Shills and the gullible immediately claim this as irrefutable proof he's a Zio stooge. I doubt that.
The thing is, you can't just tell tens of millions of Americans that their religion is devotion to a murderous and outrageously destructive Satanic heresy. Nothing productive would come of it, so he doesn't. Maybe the day will come but it's not today.
Like with this latest war in the Middle East, if you pay very, very close attention, you can tell he gets what's really going on. He may make a little noise and wave his hands against "terrorism" and in support of ordinary Israelis, but when asked if he thought the US should get involved, he said, "Sometimes you just gotta let things play out." Is that something an End Times messianic Zio puppet would say? Of course not.
So you can see the complex situation that has developed, and this is just the tip of the iceberg. I would suggest that anyone who goes around spouting clear and easy answers to any of this is someone you don't need to listen to.
You know, if I had to speculate as to why, it's because real gore is very disturbing and people detect it on a subconscious level. I'm guessing the calculation is, "Hey, we just want to stress people so that they are nudged in the direction we desire. We don't want people so freaked out that they won't soon forget and will demand to get to the bottom of the issue,"
This is actually a specific application of the more general theme: They vastly prefer complete fakery over leveraging real circumstances and real events for Their ghey ops.
I always think of it by analogy as a loose puzzle piece sliding over a surface. If it's not real, not part of the jigsaw of reality, you can easily slide it wherever you want all across the surface at any time, here and there and wherever. If it's an authentic piece and it locks down in to the related pieces of the puzzle, then if you suddenly need to move it you'll have a hell of a time convincing people it doesn't really fit there.
Divorcing us from Reality in all respects can be considered an intermediate goal.
I'd never heard of that book before, so thanks for the tip. I grabbed a copy and, as I did, noticed that it was first published in 1977 and began with this:
Dedicated to those individuals who are trying to pull together diverse aspects of nature into one new, meaningful whole ...
I remember those times and all the varied areas of investigation. Books like this were just one, but people were also interested in ideas like detecting auras with Kirlian photography, regrowing limbs like axolotls, psychic phenomena like telepathy and precognition, personal computers right in your own home, it went on and on.
It felt like the world was on the verge of great leaps of human development. It's impossible to describe that sense of potential, but I can only say it has all been lost. I'm glad you picked up a shard of something that was once much larger.
You know, I remember being intrigued by the idea of the holographic universe as well, way back when I first heard about it God knows how many years ago. Just like the discovery of galaxies outside our own--which was not that long ago--it really raised the possibility of a greatly expanded understanding of the Universe.
But it's depressing to realize that somewhere along the line, I abandoned all hope that Science(tm) would ever get to the bottom of that issue or any other. You know, not unless it meant we should sterilize ourselves or send more money to Israel or something.
Anyone remember the original fat FBI agent, the "Sloppy Sniper" of Sandy Hoax fame?
SANDY HOOK HOAX - DAVID WHEELER THE SLOPPY SNIPER
Then again, I suppose he wasn't really in the FBI. And if I had to guess, he probably wasn't "David Wheeler", either.
But it's always good to bring up these oldies but goodies, because TIL that both "David" and his "wife" were literal (not just crisis) actors. How did I miss that before?
Yeah, it's a strange thing how this has been overlooked. I can't even remember hearing any overly dramatic, emotionally manipulative mentions conjuring the image of that extra chair at Thanksgiving, where that aunt that you never really cared for still sits every year because she didn't die when the flu unmanifested itself briefly from this realm.
Don't worry, I'm going to advise them to build the monuments out of an alloy of adamantium and mithril, which may have some shot at outlasting even Looooonnnnnng Coof.
Also, I find it poetically fitting to use imaginary metals.
Anyone ever heard the phrase, "the color drained from his face"?
It's not just a turn of phrase but a real effect, something having to do with blood circulation that gives our skin a reddish tint, without which it is much more grayish. If you've ever seen it in real life, it's quite startling.
Evidently, we're supposed to believe that if you get your head cut off, that's not enough for the color to drain from your face.
I happened to see a YT video of an American gun enthusiast who traveled to Finland back in the summer to participate in the Finnish Brutality "run-and-gun" shooting competition. He, of course, chatted with some of his Finnish friends and competitors there.
It was clear that those people were actually worried about the Russians invading. It was also clear that they thought that type of training would come into play should such an eventuality come to pass.
I thought, "Wow, they are very close to the situation, yet simultaneously they are entirely deluded about it."
I just wanted to add a bit of legal background concerning one particular aspect of the Constitution. Everyone should be aware of it, which is why it is never discussed.
The Constitution, even as written, provides no protection against totalitarians. That is, in practical terms, They are going to do what They think They can get away with, and--if pressed--They will tell you the Constitution says so.
The item here in point is a single sentence, the boring-sounding "Commerce Clause". The wiki page, albeit a ways down, finally admits it's significance:
The Commerce Clause represents one of the most fundamental powers delegated to the Congress by the founders.
You will also find it spelled out a bit more directly in this article:
Commerce Powers Under Article I of the U.S. Constitution
The Commerce Clause serves a two-fold purpose: it is the direct source of the most important powers that the Federal Government exercises in peacetime, and, except for the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, it is the most important limitation imposed by the Constitution on the exercise of state power.
See why no one ever mentions it?
Use of it really kicked into overdrive in the 1942 case of Wickard v. Filburn. A guy in Ohio grew wheat on his farm in Ohio to feed to animals on that farm in Ohio, and the Feds said he grew too much for their liking. Got him with the old Commerce Clause!
But back to what my point was about totalitarianism, if you browse through the wiki and that article, you'll find a real hit parade of all your regime favorites: the Civil Rights Act, the Controlled Substances Act and the Drug War, the Affordable Care Act, Gun-Free School Zones Act, "gender-motivated violence", etc. IOW, everything that comes to mind when you think "Commerce among the several States".
I recall hearing that something shocking, like 1/4 or 1/2, of all Federal legislation was based on the Commerce Clause. While I obviously support all legislation being tied back to the Constitution for the sake of understanding and transparency, the ultimate source of trouble is that They will not limit Their actions because of that document or any other.
I really wanted to lay a lot of this at the feet of the Christian Zionists and the "third temple/Moschiach/end times" type of regular Zionist (and they are all answerable for their own actions), but I was shocked to find out the rot has gone much deeper:
About four-in-ten U.S. adults believe humanity is ‘living in the end times’ (Pew Research 12/8/2022)
What to note in that report is that this "end times" mindset is already very common (23%) even among the unaffiliated
I mean, how bad is it when one of the looniest aspects of religious extremism has seeped over into 9% of atheists? At least the religious can declare that God is going to bring the world to an end, but WTH do the atheists think is going to happen? Do they think the Bible was right, except that it isn't going to be the "Day of the Lord" but the "Day of Greta Thunberg"?
I tend to be much more optimistic than that. I think that a big part of the horrible trauma put upon us is that we have little idea what human nature is really like. And I would add that that optimism is not just happenstance of my own personal nature, but I would have to take you back to the days of the "Four-minute mile" controversy to see why.
You can see in this article that it was widely thought impossible, and not just from pessimism, but from long experience and even scientific reasoning:
Did doctors/scientists say that breaking the 4-minute mile was impossible?
So I see humanity's current situation as analogous: we're suffering under a tremendous Satanic oppression (literally, as I came to find out), and that's like a runner back in the early 50's wondering if he can run the 4" mile but he hasn't noticed he's wearing a full suit of knight's armor over coveralls made from lead dentist's aprons. Well, there's no way.
But if he notices that extra weight and removes it, most people (as we saw in that Quora article) would still disbelieve, that being again from all experience and very good reasoning.
But fast-forward to today: all competitive middle-distance runners can do it and many talented high-schoolers. Who saw this coming? Who predicted such a simple thing? No one. They had no idea what was not only possible for humans, but commonplace.
So there's my analogy: we have all reason for pessimism, and also no idea what is really possible.
OMG, modern warfare is terrifying. We see war movies and they're dodging around during an artillery strike and exciting stuff like that. The real deal is that you're standing around smoking a cigarette on a sunny afternoon and then you're dead.
But you know what I see as the biggest "conspiracy" about warfare, modern of historical? You can find discussion on just about any aspect of it, but you'll find very little about the single most crucial aspect: how can this insanely anti-human activity even begin in the first place?
Even the Russians, for whom this is a just and necessary military action entered into reluctantly, talk very little about that. Why? I would say that the Russian leadership understands that the vast majority of the populace--in the West especially but even in Russia itself--is so far away from understanding how the world really works that it is a pointless task.
When you consider what "They" have done to people's minds, the details of warfare begin to fade. I mean, you can build a drone to blow up a whole giant steel tank, but how do you build a drone to convince someone the world they live in is not at all like they think it is?
Coincidence? Shelbyville | Simpsons Wiki | Fandom
Yes, I'm pretty certain it is.