Because their outward projection is the opposite...
Their outward projection is multiple and for each there are 'meanings' by which to be fooled designed to fool specific target groups.
The problem of getting to a first replicator...
We know organisms change, many natural occurring situations pushing for new strategies all the time even in the few years we live. We see the butterfly change color in a few years by adapting to new environment, thanks to its fast lifecycle.
You are assuming no direct proof of a specific instance of the mechanism happened millions of years ago equals no reality, yet it is in line with everything else and only logical as a source.
Considering man crushes insects, herd animals and eat almost anything he wants in the world, there may have been some benefits to it?
So i would not stop to see it as the logical thing just because of that.
The same goes for other beneficial complex systems that were formed by this blind process like snake venom...
I have my thoughts about evolution and do not go necessarily by any common belief beyond the core of it.
But it's feasible that a snake slowly evolved into that from many many 'speciation' processes, and by the way you don't see the 'losers' that it costed around...
I don't see a problem here neither.
But I prefer to take it at the philosophical worldview level...
Haven't understood your point about naturalism and determinism. Perhaps it's the semantics. You are saying those two oppose each other as models?
Yet according to the evo materialist worldview minds are identical to brains which didn't exist for a very long time.
Evolutionism and materialism are two completely different beasts to me. So are minds and brains.
All the weird degenerate shit they engage in is occult in origin. Don't look for scientific or pragmatic reasons.
How do you know you are right in this and that's not the desired thought outcome of their outward projections?
Much like some demon books in the end just being about coded communication, a lot of so called 'occult' may just be a decoy culture unless one can 'know' it from the inside.
There are also many purely logical internal contradictions that render such a process impossible.
Could you please reference some?
Because climate change is a vital narrative to their plans.
Only under that cover they can use HAARP how they want and justify building (finalizing) the 'global control grid' (later to be repurposed as a killbox) of their dreams.
With everybody's sweat and money (and lots of tacit acceptance), ofcourse.
Literally 90% of the userboard took him for a shill as he only acted as one.
Bro, he linked fema.gov to make an argument.
I understand the shill warning, but if it was just someone that retarded, you'd have to be compassionate about it, it is quite heavy a handicap.
My god dude, you actually linked fema.gov to respond.
You are your own league!
Good read. Leaves little doubts over the MO and what it is for.
Listen to Goatis on YT.
Don't nig, just post the link aswell.
Might have more to do with hugely nosed people though
Don't know about the chinese but
-
why are those mutually exclusive in your mind, exactly?
-
what do you make of all the rabbi videos saying exactly that they want so?
He can have lied about stats.
How did you get a better comment score than me, without commenting then?
I think people can assess a new user by their words.
So an old one too.
There are multiple definitions of it.
Why would yours stand exactly, when its not even what people are talkking about?
You won't help anyone by pointing them to a redirect mate.
This is one of the most important topics around, i commend you for taking it up whatever way.
Didn't read yet. Will do.
It depends on the size of the board and user base.
Here you only got 1 or 2 clowns in deployment because observers are few and most of the user base is well aware of this happening and won't be nearly as affected.
On reddit is the opposite, so this works perfectly and has high ROI.
Yes, it's a fishing pool for psychopaths or to corrupt people into becoming one.
But back then it was probably just a higher culture club. Even today the low branches are mostly about socializing and golfing for well off people.
See Manly Hall for an author you missed who wasn't a mason but became one after attracting their interests as he revealed stuff they didn't know at the time. He was a truly honest mind imo.
Because freemasonry used to be where culture was discussed and evolved the most in society.
There's a reason the usual suspects targeted those circles the most
Probably wasn't so bad mid 1800 yet in the suburban circles.
That's the same hoax as solar flares, ice age, polar shifting or whatever...
You need a proper definition before calling them a hoax.
You deny it if you just swap meanings like you did.
If you thought so, you could say it without redirections, which makes this of yours an awkward defensive comment.
Would have took just a second not to look dumb there mate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil_(cosmology)
Words and phrases can have multiple meanings... ikr
Yo, thanks.
Seems to have found a good archive link with only the OP answers, if you ever need one
Rothschild said in his 2009 Q&A
Do you have a link for that perhaps? Or some possible search query.
How does alternative earth theories contradict evolution? There's a gap in your worldview.
Would you contradict the 2+2=4 math that academics believed in because other academics believe in a wrong model of something else?
Hardly a logical step.