You're right, I didn't have to surrender the mott at all. I could easily disprove your claim and say that your constitution will be made void on demand because it already has been multiple times after 9/11 and during the coof. You have rights until you don't have them because tptb have taken them by force and they don't care about made up rights on a paper - they keep the illusion so that normies and magatards don't get fidgety. Actions speak louder than words.
That is a motte and baily debate tactic you just engaged in. I've taken the outer walls, and now you're defending the inner bailey.
I'm not saying your point in your reply is wrong, but it's not the original one, and thus not the one that should have been made.
You're right, I didn't have to surrender the mott at all. I could easily disprove your claim and say that your constitution will be made void on demand because it already has been multiple times after 9/11 and during the coof. You have rights until you don't have them because tptb have taken them by force and they don't care about made up rights on a paper - they keep the illusion so that normies and magatards don't get fidgety. Actions speak louder than words.