1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I agree there is too much over reach and the response is over agressive, they should be held accountable as well. The truth is though, there are no government resources given to fund rehabbers and what little help from trained and qualified wildlife experts gets quickly overwhelmed. From working in the rehabber's world, I can say honestly that people do weird and stupid shit to defenless animals. The answer seems to lie, like most things with government over reach is the need for citizens to get involved in government instead of letting bureaucracy take over. This is clearly a case of over reach and we need to establish some means of taking back our say in how government is allowed to respond. Believe me, there are times when they are needed to respond, as there are many things I can't unsee with regard to the treatment of animals. Even rehabbers in this social structure become groomed to have an over reach mentality. My difficulty in seeing the conspiracy of this is that this is a wide ranging social problem in most all systems and not at all hidden.

-4
Lavanderfields -4 points ago +2 / -6

Most states have clearly defined laws regarding wildlife. Often it seems like over reach and the enforcement is heavy handed, but what is the conspiracy?

2
Lavanderfields 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nay

If dissuading new users is the concern consider not stigmatizing and marginalizing hand shake accounts across the board. Also some of the regular posters on this thread alone are a pretty good example why people don't frequent here to interact in respectful and mind broadening conversations.

by DrLeaks
6
Lavanderfields 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup, I recall the recorded statements of "were just safe guarding the facilities and ensuring a safe and orderly shut down and disposal of everything" The coverage is all there in public record, it really should be investigated more openly and broadly. There is clearly a money trail that should be accounted for from our government.

1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, the question was meant for ghost_of_aswartz.

2
Lavanderfields 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate hearing the insights here. I find Cliffs Intel interesting at times but have to leave it in that limbo gray area of "maybe/maybe not". I've really yet to look back at anything he's said and find it to have been prophetic or profoundly on target. He does something of a mind game that I don't believe would be necessary if he were really 100%. He goes out of his way to call out others in the field as being BS as if he needs to limit your field of valid information so that he appears more relevant. It's a bit of a subtle thing but he does it often enough to show that something about it is calculated. And his discredit to them isn't countered with any solid proof, just his own conjecture that counters theirs. So why do that except as some sort of psyop, I don't get it . He has been at this for a long time and so his observations are interesting, like a talkative neighbor with gossip that is really neither here nor there in the end.

2
Lavanderfields 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good read. To answer the question it would be worth considering the concept of entropy verses syntropy or also may be called negentropy. As a matter of time and space we have formed a collective reality based on entropy. This suits those who wish to keep the majority powerless. It's even said that Einsteins relativity theory was only partially released. To have syntropy, or future potential as a known factor would have left the middlemen of the government and church out of a job. It was deemed best that we remain bound to the trajectory of limited events on the narrative of a controlled timeline over the unlimited potential of eternity.

1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can see that scenario. And then I can see the dawn of the ego, that wants to thrill at the conquest of power over others so it goads and toys with the offering telling it to use it's freewill all the while knowing the nets and veils have it trapped in a matrix of cycles. At this point however, the very nature of a cycle means that it reaches an end 🙃

1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, interesting stuff. I believe in a multi deminsional reality and so I'm pretty open to considering a lot of the alternative history theories out there. One thing I'm sure of, the history we are given, ain't anywhere near the truth.

1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, thanks. I think it was probably more recent so somebody else maybe.

2
Lavanderfields 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you don't mind my asking, we're you previously on Great Awakening? I thought I remembered and enjoyed your posts there unless I have the name confused with something similar....I used to post there as milgal but I got burnt out on several aspects of the site and left. Anyway, was just curious if I had the connection correct.

1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

At whatever point, the whole basis of our perspective was shaped by a science of entropy, a death concept that forms from an event of creation along a timeline trajectory to death. We were cut off from the concept of entropy, or an open ended limitless source outside of a definitive timeline of death, or in other words, access to our unlimited future potential. We were taught that only the past can create our present instead of the understanding that it's our future vision of what is possible that fully allows our full potential to express in the moment. This was a very paternal approach brought about by the religion that then instructed our science to lead us to believe it was the law rather than the observer or server of a higher order. That kept us in check from getting to fully understand our full power.

1
Lavanderfields 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, I get what you're asking and it's hard to convey because we are so invested in this course. We took a path in the fork of the road so far back, it's hard to see what the other choice was, or as you're asking, what we could do different. Geomancy was lost and people who try it today just get laughed at but if enough people put stock in it, the outcome would be different. As it is, we have bought off science saying no no, this is the reality, it's about the co2 stoopid. Allopathic medicine was another fork in the road with antibiotics and vaccines instead of natural immunity and gut health. I truly believe the corruption and manipulation goes so deep that our planet has to be restored from the cell and microbe level in order to heal the entire biome. But respect for these natural processes I've named just for starters would be steps toward shifting the energy from left brained logic to right brained creative thinking. Much of this is very subtle but a tipping point accelerates it . When we stop round upping the fields with no till farming and restore the organic process of life in food and farms, that is restorative in our bodies as well. When we stop jamming the air with microwaves, we could likely learn to transmit with our minds through higher senses as our planet and the entire galaxy enter higher vibrating conditions that make it possible.

2
Lavanderfields 2 points ago +2 / -0

It requires a perspective change by enough people to shift reality. There are so many things that we take for granted as being etched in stone reality. I was amazed recently after I thought about someone's comment "paternalism causes droughts". It was dan winter who said it and I sort of rolled my eyes because it sounded to broadly conceptual to really be true. But as I thought about it, even if he meant it in an esoteric way, the reality of the way we approach life, managing resources etc from a dominant and paternal mindset clearly does have a drastic footprint on the environment. So, it may well be like the butterfly effect.

by nicebot
2
Lavanderfields 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do believe as well we are reliving Atlantis, likely many of the miscreants of then have reemerged for this shift of the ages. I was hearing some things on this subject and Gayce's murmerings that a portion of the stone had been secreted away to a certain university in PA had piqued my interest. I came across this writing which gives good description to the object. With the lore of Atlantis, whether to use the tech for elite power verses the good of all and seeing the results being what they were, clearly we would fare no better today. Just the same, I still believe divine creation wins over evil. Although the prize may ultimately be the saving of souls over the preservation of those egos who fancy themselves as immortal. http://huttoncommentaries.com/article.php?a_id=69