I appreciate hearing the insights here. I find Cliffs Intel interesting at times but have to leave it in that limbo gray area of "maybe/maybe not". I've really yet to look back at anything he's said and find it to have been prophetic or profoundly on target. He does something of a mind game that I don't believe would be necessary if he were really 100%. He goes out of his way to call out others in the field as being BS as if he needs to limit your field of valid information so that he appears more relevant. It's a bit of a subtle thing but he does it often enough to show that something about it is calculated. And his discredit to them isn't countered with any solid proof, just his own conjecture that counters theirs. So why do that except as some sort of psyop, I don't get it . He has been at this for a long time and so his observations are interesting, like a talkative neighbor with gossip that is really neither here nor there in the end.
I appreciate hearing the insights here. I find Cliffs Intel interesting at times but have to leave it in that limbo gray area of "maybe/maybe not". I've really yet to look back at anything he's said and find it to have been prophetic or profoundly on target. He does something of a mind game that I don't believe would be necessary if he were really 100%. He goes out of his way to call out others in the field as being BS as if he needs to limit your field of valid information so that he appears more relevant. It's a bit of a subtle thing but he does it often enough to show that something about it is calculated. And his discredit to them isn't countered with any solid proof, just his own conjecture that counters theirs. So why do that except as some sort of psyop, I don't get it . He has been at this for a long time and so his observations are interesting, like a talkative neighbor with gossip that is really neither here nor there in the end.