1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imo he should go ahead and get rid of whiteness but start with himself.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see two downvotes so I'll link this: nukelies.com forum archive. There's also this video. It's a reading of a Miles Mathis paper, but please give it a try anyway, it should be about arguments and not about who's making them. (I'm suspicious of Mathis for the ridiculous conclusions he jumps to and the lack of sources, although you can often learn from someone even if they're controlled opposition, often they just give away nuggets of truth.)

by DrLeaks
1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

His name checks out.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for the pointers.

leanr who controls [...] the peer reviewed systems Is it not Skull and Bones?

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm open to terrain theory, but I don't feel like you've sufficiently explained the examples I listed. The scientist became ill early in 2020 before the lockdown, and like I told you, he exercises every day. He's doing research into healthy lifestyles and practices it. And the other things are so severe that I think those likewise can't be attributed to a lack of exercise or sunshine. You mention food again, but that's why I initially asked if they have approved new drugs and our foods have been altered to make us more sick. That would be required. 5G could be a contributing factor, but can a correlation be shown between 5G rollout and disease? I believe there are areas all over the world where covid symptomps were experienced even though there was no 5G network. They were only in the beginning stages of the rollout in 2020.

Another argument for virus theory is that people become sick together. People who share a household, for example, but also people who are having dinner together. I have read many such anecdotes, including in conspiracy aware forums from users I trust not to be shills. This phenomenon unto itself demonstrates the virality of some diseases, regardless of what happens at the microscopic level. It shows that socialization carries with it the risk of becoming diseased. How does terrain theory explain this?

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The title at least makes it seem like you want to talk about covid symptoms. Something markedly different has been happening since 2020. I can tell because I noticed it around me, and I'm only paying attention to more severe symptomps than a regular flu. A scientist who was already skeptical of all MSM and who exercises every day reported more severe symptomps than a regular cold or flu or whatever. I've heard second-hand of someone with obesity getting hospitalized after getting what was probably Covid. I personally know someone who had no energy and took almost 6 months to fully recover from his disease, going to a revalidation centre for help with his muscle movements. Someone else visibly lost muscle mass. Someone from /r/conspiracy whose handle everyone here would recognize reported feeling like he would faint each time he stood up when he got the delta variant. These things didn't happen so routinely to people before 2020.

3
LarrySwinger 3 points ago +3 / -0

It isn't Christian to stone people. Forgiving people is.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hello everyone. While this tweet is an alarming threat, it should be noted that part of the trans women showing off guns are a psy-op to recruit horny men into the army. I'm not sure which other transgenders people have in mind. It's important to distinguish between these two phenomenon.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well-spotted parallel.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes you cringe, right?

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

What an academic way of presenting yourself.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many of these have been been approved since 2020, when people started reporting becoming more severely ill than normally? And were these added to the same foods people usually digest? This doesn't explain much.

2
LarrySwinger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder how common that type of thing is and how they're making sure that none of them ever get spotted.

2
LarrySwinger 2 points ago +2 / -0

On the other hand, the stuff he is covering is pretty important and he's on the right side about them. You can always find another subject and declare a source a limited hangout for not covering it but in reality they need to select. He also gets harassed by the spy agencies.

I'm suspending my judgment here. His attitude about 9/11 is damning, but he may have developed a courage now. There's a danger of us not recognizing our heroes anymore because of paranoia.

2
LarrySwinger 2 points ago +2 / -0

As in, he couldn't have known so much if he wasn't one of them? I don't think he would've been killed by the police if he was a Freemason. He was cleared because he was in the DeMolay society as a child, his superiors may have been lax about it when they learnt that. But that doesn't mean he continued down that path. Lots of people turn against the religion they are born into when they become adults. Or develop strong moral feelings.

I'm looking for some kind of admission, such as him signalling that he's a Freemason unambiguously, that's what might convince me.

2
LarrySwinger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Disinfo works by telling the 99% truths and 1% falsehoods that will turn out to be fatal when believed. There's plenty of information sources nowadays, we should filter.

1
LarrySwinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did he do any signalling? Cooper seemed authentic in his Christian beliefs. Him falling for some hoax or other isn't the same thing as him being controlled opposition, it can happen to the best of us.

3
LarrySwinger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. I didn't explicitly use the term "controlled opposition" but that's my point. He pretends to address the concern, but then tells a bullshit story that only a child would believe, but with a delivery that suckers in the masses. Freemasons love boasting about their wickedness in a way that makes it obvious, but doesn't quite incriminate them. He's doing that.

He's also creating his own elite, supposedly as a solution to what the existing elite is doing. That's no use if he himself is part of the existing elite. So the people who are only just discovering about conspiracies will get assimilated while we get disenfrenchised despite knowing better what's going on. 'Controlled opposition' really isn't an exaggeration, this is exactly what it is.

5
LarrySwinger 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's basically insulting your intelligence by veiling his real views so thinly. Everything he says in the video is in line with illuminism. And if that wasn't enough, he promotes Luminary Original podcast in the description. I wonder why it has that name. 🤔

view more: ‹ Prev