by DrLeaks
2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

As an aside, make sure that you’re always running at minimum a strong adblocker when you go to mainstream websites like this. My dns filter blocked 48 different ads and trackers on this one single webpage. I think that’s the most that I’ve ever seen on one site.

7
LandoNorris 7 points ago +7 / -0

Frequencies? So you’re suggesting that the sound waves coming out of your phone will have some negative consequences? Doesn’t sound right.

Edit: don’t get me wrong, I’ll probably turn off my devices lol but that’s only because of my massive distrust for any govt agency doing anything.

1
LandoNorris 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ironically it’s a guy on this site who doesn’t blindly agree with everything posted here and is thus called a shill. While this confirms your notion that “anyone who disagrees must be a shill” definitely does happen, I do think 100% that at least on larger sites like Reddit, paid shills absolutely are everywhere.

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am planning on switching to Linux but I have a problem that roughly 60% of people in the US have. I have an iPhone. I hear that you can work around this but it’s presumably not for laypeople.

Also I have the newest gen (13th I think)intel processor on my new computer and apparently that isn’t supported by many distros. Kernels or drivers or some shit I don’t know

1
LandoNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Everyone who doesn’t know everything that I know is lazy and weak and just a generally awful person… probably ugly too” -OP

Troll or real life asshole?

4
LandoNorris 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wish I understood what this was saying. Maybe someone can help me out as I’m new to this sort of tech stuff. I do run a dns filter and I’ve blocked cloudfare previously. A search of my logs for cdn brings up mostly Apple dns queries, a few random websites and other ones that are already being blocked.

Any help or insight is appreciated and any beginner type articles or resources for related content is always helpful. Thanks.

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, what parts are different? Some parts that are the same -Dent on his skull, right side -Forehead crease slightly higher on our right side -Same eye shape, he’s looking slightly down in the right pic -Bridge of his nose where his glasses sit -tip of his nose slightly pointier and lower on our right -ears the same although it’s hidden by the glasses

The left pic looks to be an official photo? One can assume they are retouched to even out skin tone, remove blemishes, etc.

by DrLeaks
4
LandoNorris 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’d say this is a good thing in a way because many people, including myself, never even gave a second thought to what our phones and electronic devices emit and whether that has any effect on our health

1
LandoNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that’s like, textbook odd behavior

4
LandoNorris 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Four women are alleging sexual assaults between 2006 and 2013.”

“The Sunday Times said all the women felt ready to speak only after being approached by reporters. The newspaper said several felt compelled to do so given Brand's newfound prominence as an online wellness influencer.”

4
LandoNorris 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t have a specific answer but within a decade of the incident would be preferable. Before the whole “me too” movement it was more understandable why some women didn’t come forward at the time. Strikes me as somewhat odd that 4 women would sit on this for over a decade, then simultaneously feel this is the moment they must speak out.

6
LandoNorris 6 points ago +6 / -0

And it was an all but unknown theory, never talked about or given any serious thought until that one Netflix documentary from 5-7 years ago. Then it became mostly trolls, the few people that are easily convinced, and bad actors talking about it.

by DrLeaks
1
LandoNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

The article is certainly eye opening to a lot of people and that’s good, but I’m pretty sure that the article is referring to data scraped from your phone and not your sex life that takes place in the car itself.

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally organic how any Republican that starts to gain a little steam is immediately demonized and hit pieces come one after the other. And conveniently you never bother to address the point I made.

Trump is going to be the nominee but he’s going to need a running mate and/or someone charismatic to take the reigns at some point soon. And his running mate is going to have to bring Republican normies to the voting booth so lake or green won’t work.

0
LandoNorris 0 points ago +2 / -2

It’s certainly a fair point and this should be considered but I try not to judge people by what they did 20 years ago. I was a Democrat in ‘04 and couldn’t be further from that now.

Consider the fact that when Vivek did his little list of things that are true in the debate. God is real, there’s only two genders etc, that is literally what most democrats thought in 2004. If Vivek simply kept the same ideals for the last 20 years then he, like many of us would now be considered far right when we used to be democrats.

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

We find new unknown settlements and civilizations pretty frequently so there’s not really any reason to believe they’re hiding anything here. Some squared off rocks doesn’t mean it’s definitely man made.

It should be pretty easy to find some sort of pottery or some remnants of something from humans in the area and the fact that they haven’t found anything in the almost 40 years since it was discovered makes me skeptical that there’s any to find.

It’s still possible they might find something in the future, you never know

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m definitely into ancient civilizations and the mysteries surrounding them and have been for years. There’s more that we don’t know than what we do know but I’m extremely doubtful that every megalith has these legends.

Maybe a few do, and if so I’d be interested in info on that if you have any links or anything. Thanks

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve never used Twitter but I don’t see anywhere that says you have to provide a phone number. Just name and email.

3
LandoNorris 3 points ago +3 / -0

In case anyone else is thinking they misspelled fires lol. It stands for

Fire Information for Resource Management System

1
LandoNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

Concerning the posted picture, how would you have people verify their identity if not like this? As long as verification isnt mandatory then I don’t see the issue.

3
LandoNorris 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember seeing something on the news like 10-15 years ago about how someone could “hack” almost any new car and take control. That includes probably 90% of cars on the road by now. The cia probably uses it sparingly, save it for special occasions

3
LandoNorris 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which brings up the question of why when I was looking for streaming devices, it was only google, Amazon, roku, Apple. Why is basically nobody else making these things?

2
LandoNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

I posted a link below if you’re interested but the short answer is the fbi claims they don’t want the info released in case they have a retrial so they don’t influence jurors and hurt their case against her

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›