Start with Peter daszak and ecohealth alliance

💯

NIH was responsible for safety and efficacy of the jab and for compelling its use. Yet they held the patent from their research going back 20+ years and made $400 million licensing it!

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nih-refuses-release-details-covid-19-vaccine-royalty-agreement

It's agitprop for boomers to get them to green light ww3

The invention of nuclear has caused all modern conflict with top tier states to become hybridized proxy conflicts

They've clearly tried to shut down O'Keefe.... So, why haven't they done worse? Probably because he pushed passed the barrier of insignificance such that they can't just disappear him without making him more influential. He also likely passes a treasure trove of unpublished insurance docs.

You have to be compromised to gain power. Proof

Isn't it odd the way they tried to make it a left vs right issue... almost as if they're trying to cull the dems

It's literally: do whatever you can get away with

At a high level this is confusing because of the idea of informative and conditioning. As humans we're naturally used to explaining things based upon events that have happened this is a hack that enables us to process information. Unfortunately it backfired in cases such as these.

The probability of it being behind your door (1/3) or the other doors (2/3) doesn't change, it's independent of the events. When a door is opened we know that it is not behind one door so the 2/3 probability now only has a degree of freedom of 0 whereas before it has a df of 1. So the offs haven't changed but the df has.

Here's another way to look at it. The average probability does change however (1/3 + 2/3)/2 --> 1/2. This differs from what it was at the beginning (1/3+1/3+1/3)/3-->1/3 because there are fewer degrees of freedom.

So notice there at first there were N-1 or 2 degrees of freedom for the entire context. And N-2=1 for the other doors. Opening a door removes the only degree of freedom for the subgroup. It is this added constraint that increases the rate at which you can infer about this subgroup, especially upon the last guess. It has no more degrees of freedom to vary.

According to the article it's officially happening now through the end of May but only in San Francisco.

I haven't heard of this term used before but I've referred to this tactic. I'm going to use this. There's a related technique where they make up new words and use coordinated media to manifest it.

https://twitter.com/sciam/status/1776006058370089330

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/secretive-experiment-shoot-aerosols-sky-over-san-francisco-increase-cloud-cover

Predator prey dynamics. They're probably tuned to emerge at an interval that exceeds the lifespan of their primary predators

I think it's fake here's why: the remote control (which uses diodes) seems directionally insensitive and yet the diodes at the ends are directionally sensitive.

I think you've figured it out before, what's really going on, if I recall you passed about it a while ago. Anyways those things have amped up for reasons related to recent events. From there we can connect the dots

It also hit the support head on which is super suspicious. That said, the video loss could be explainable based upon the power being shut off. So, why was power off? They were trying to power cycle the system?

Food is a weapon

And autos. Though some of that is due to scarcity. What's interesting is that commodities are soaring. I think we'll see inflation continue in those and consumer goods but deflation in discretionary and luxury. Japan 1980s 🤷‍♂️

Thank God for the courage of this man to come forward

Don't own nothing Zh/https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/americas-minsky-moment-approaches

Could be the chemtrails

Would explain how they had intelligence informing them of the attack

This is not the type of behavior that inspires confidence in the ability to responsibly manage advanced weaponry.

Remember when peer reviewed research into alternative treatments were determined to be dangerous misinformation by fact checking groups funded by pfizer? I remember.