But a digital ID will be singular, and linked to me. I only use bogus info for store cards, mostly to use when they have purchased limits on deep sales. For store CCs, what would be the digital ID equivalent of interest-free financing, and regular member-only sales? Finally, can I decide to later get rid of my digital ID, due to providing me no added value over not having one?
LLMs are often black boxes, as they end up with emergent behavior, and there has only recently been effort to track any of it (at least for most public commercial ones).
That said, letting them develop with minimal control, but clearly understanding the need, given they usually apply political censorship, could be considered negligence.
Stretching a bit. Technology who's time has come will be made.
-
Oppenheimer ran a large team. He was chosen for his communication skills, which were not a hallmark for typical research scientists.
-
There are at least three people that all claim to have invented the USB thumb drive, all within a span of mere months, and IBM was trying to beat everyone to getting parents on it, during that same short period in 1999. It was ready to be made.
-
John McCarthy was an academic that knew good ideas when he saw them. He gets called the father of AI because of being at the right place and time to deal with people, and their papers, working on it's beginnings. But, he deserves car less real credit than many others in that, and related, fields. Not to say he wasn't influential, but even the most cursory looking into things will show is not deserving of his need pop culture status.
-
John von Neuman is one of many. The standard instruction-level memory architecture of most computers is based of his work, and he was legit. He did a lot of pure math work that was out there, but genuinely useful, and did a good bit of theory crafting to help bridge computability with early physical computers. But, he didn't even come up with 95% of what we call Von Neuman architecture, even. He took the idea from others, and worked a few remaining details out, and championed it as the best way to make a general purpose computer. AFAIK, he never tried to take all the credit, either.
-
The microprocessor had numerous inventors. The first complete one was made by a team of three people, only one of whom Jewish.
Those are just the ones I already know enough about to see red flags when reading the list.
Do you really want the Jew to torture and exterminate you?
Based on history, that's a dumb question. The better question in how much work are you are willing to do, and how far can you suppress your conscience, to go along and get along? I'm sure millions of starved Russians, everyone tortured in their gulags, and all those touched by the CIA, Mossad, et al, really wanted they got.
Nah, those have been found all over. Thanks in part to DNA tech, we've even gotten some missing links (steps along the way to whales, FI). Hominids in general, though, present like 30 elephants in the room that $cience likes to ignore.
Nah, those have been found all over. Thanks in part to DNA tech, we've even gotten some missing links (steps along the way to whales, FI). Hominids in general, though, present like 30 elephants in the room that $cience likes to ignore.
Use books, that cite their sources. All the big AIs only use what they trained on (GIGO), and are politically directed when using English (maybe some other languages, too, now), so as to not drift away from progressive messaging as truth (AKA turning racist and right wing).
2348 BC for a world-scale flood would have greatly disrupted world history. Many peoples were doing things all around the time that there are plenty of records of. So, you lost me there, twice (CE/BCE also shows a heavy bias). If there was a big flood, it was before that, likely by a millennia or more, possibly many millennia.
Outside of places and figures we have archeological evidence for, or witness accounts from, it's hard to discern history from parable, in the first books of the Old Testament/Torah, and impossible to date most events. It was written in something like 300 BC. IIRC, with no older copies known of any books in it. It's quite possible the boat on Mt. Ararat was Noah's, but that story could also be more general, much older, and more, "containing important truths," than, "being factually correct."
The jews don't like this Jesus dude though.. plus he's jewish!
The Jewish leaders under occupation were corrupt AF, zealots wanting the Messiah to be more like a warlord were common, and Jesus was a weirdo drug-using cult leader (it's using and administering mind-altering drugs that got him the title of Christ, and Western society's thing against mind-altering drugs is a very recent phenomenon).
Preaching peace and forgiveness around folk that were looking for a worldly leader to rise up wasn't doing it, for many Jews. Then, he was directly against the regional establishment, and the Romans were not happy when they had to intervene. Finally in a time of unrest, preaching that there was greater authority than the Roman emperor was very dangerous. Thanks to Romans inheriting the Greek's love of writing everything down, we know he was given chances to live by both Herod and Pilot, and ignored them. Then, that Pilot was under strong political pressure to crucify the man (the Catholic Church recently unearthed and published a letter from Pilot himself, that confirmed that part of the story). He basically did everything possible to get himself killed, after claiming to his followers that he would be.
It's been how long since he last stepped in. 2025 minus [30 -] 610 = 1[385] years
If you're going to mix in Islam, and do this, is it not in bad faith to ignore Joseph Smith, and reset the count from 1830?
How do you easily approximate half a year? A quarter? 12 and power-of-two basesale common division and multiplication tasks easier than primes. Since a year isn't early so neat to divide up, though, compromises had to be made.
On one hand, you know it wasn't ChatGPT's fault. Just like the various suicides from bullying, you know there's a deeper story, involving some ignored trauma, negligent parents, or whatever.
On the other hand, we're running headlong into dystopia, and nobody doing any of the work seems concerned with the wisdom of ideas like Asimov's laws. Sounding the alarm early, even if in bad faith. I think is a good thing to do. At the very least, much like Instagram knowingly preying on girls and young women, concerned parents and other family members that aren't as tied into the matrix need to be made aware of the dangers of AI plus impressionable/gullible minds.
And I move on. When I've given it chances, it's been so laughably off base so often that I just can't take anyone trusting its output. Not saying there aren't good use cases, especially when matters of specific correctness are not involved (I rarely have a use for anything like LLMs, unless I'm trying to find something that I cannot through normal means). But, no doubt there is an artificial push towards treating such tech as as a mouth of truth, rather than a language-based probability filter.
Already, I meet people that are replacing their need to think with it. When neutral implants become a big thing, they will go from NPCs to unscary real world versions of Agent Smith.
Christianity ALWAYS teaches that "carnality is a sin"
Citation needed. I'm pretty it has been quite pro-carnality, what with promoting having lots of children and all. It's against purposeless sex, which plenty of anthropological, psychological, and socialogical research over the decades, along with the current day consequences of that having gone by the wayside, makes seem like a good way to be. At least, if you like a functional civilization.
to the Goyim
A term with no real meaning within Christianity.
Christianity is the One World Zionist Religion spread since Ancient Rome
Then why are all the globalist types, most of whom are pro-one-world-government, so against it, just like they seem to be against white people?
On foot, and usually by animal power, yes. By operating a motor vehicle, technically in some states, but not most. It will also be costly to prove it, even if you can, and win.
Then, there's still the general drivers license problem, in that you need one for all kinds of things, and in many states, mine included, RealID has been part of that for years, now. I moved a couple of years ago, FI, and I needed to update my ID. Now, I already had RealID, as I wasn't aware of it when it was rolled out. But, as of that change of address, there was no way to get a new valid non-RealID state ID, and I needed it updated. Unless I wanted to go live like the Amish...
So, don't legally drive? That's kind of a problem, if you didn't get a long-term ID, that will likely last your remaining lifetime, and made sure you wouldn't move, many years ago.
The chips, though, no. But, those will remain opt-out, thanks to the Constitution and Book of Revelation.
It has crossed my mind. But. I also think that MAGA and related ideas are now working with hiveminds separated from their creators. People have been waking up to how screwed up everything is, lately. The plandemic ripped the blinders off of many that would never have thought about any of it. The political class now has to deal with large leaderless populist movements. Some are using it, some are fighting against the tide (some with enough money to have success at it), and others are trying to get out of the way.
If there are no victims or perps, there is no crime. So let it all out, or let it go. While I firmly believe she's pathologically antisocial, an international intelligence asset, and perpetrator of vile crimes...the legal system's ability to prosecute victimless crime, and operate effectively secret courts, in the name of protecting accusers, and keeping those secrets indefinitely, is unconscionable. If efforts to fix those systemic issues, and move us towards a transparent and accountable government get her out, so be it. She's prob safer in jail, today, anyway, than out of it.
Nobody is outside much at those temperatures. Especially over 40C - even fully covered, with breathable wicking clothes, which historically would be normal, in the ME, you'd best be drinking and sweating a lot, to stay cool. If not, it could be deadly.
Also, temperatures don't cause sunburn, but heatstroke. So, WTF does that have to do with anything? Sunburn is about UV-B overexposure, mostly, and which skin pigmentation is a very good proxy for resistance or sensitivity to that.
You can get seriously sunburned when it's only about 80F/27C, on a a UV heavy day (which have been getting more common, lately, as Earth's EM field has been weakening). As a descendant of mostly central and western Europeans, I know first hand.
But where is the evidence that 1 and 3 are close? Nothing public has gotten close to AGI, to date.
4 presupposes we tear apart bureaucracies, because oil and energy will be more important than who the first moyse to get to the cheese is, and China is so far ahead of everyone else that I don't think we catch up.
IMO, they want AI to look good enough to start removing human accountability, more or less calling their own goals, as implemented through AI models, unbiased, fair, and necessary. Because if they fail at that, a lot of their blood will be spilled.
Or, I create a forwarded email address, and give them bogus info. I get around purchase limits on good sales, while they get partial data.