How do you easily approximate half a year? A quarter? 12 and power-of-two basesale common division and multiplication tasks easier than primes. Since a year isn't early so neat to divide up, though, compromises had to be made.
On one hand, you know it wasn't ChatGPT's fault. Just like the various suicides from bullying, you know there's a deeper story, involving some ignored trauma, negligent parents, or whatever.
On the other hand, we're running headlong into dystopia, and nobody doing any of the work seems concerned with the wisdom of ideas like Asimov's laws. Sounding the alarm early, even if in bad faith. I think is a good thing to do. At the very least, much like Instagram knowingly preying on girls and young women, concerned parents and other family members that aren't as tied into the matrix need to be made aware of the dangers of AI plus impressionable/gullible minds.
And I move on. When I've given it chances, it's been so laughably off base so often that I just can't take anyone trusting its output. Not saying there aren't good use cases, especially when matters of specific correctness are not involved (I rarely have a use for anything like LLMs, unless I'm trying to find something that I cannot through normal means). But, no doubt there is an artificial push towards treating such tech as as a mouth of truth, rather than a language-based probability filter.
Already, I meet people that are replacing their need to think with it. When neutral implants become a big thing, they will go from NPCs to unscary real world versions of Agent Smith.
Christianity ALWAYS teaches that "carnality is a sin"
Citation needed. I'm pretty it has been quite pro-carnality, what with promoting having lots of children and all. It's against purposeless sex, which plenty of anthropological, psychological, and socialogical research over the decades, along with the current day consequences of that having gone by the wayside, makes seem like a good way to be. At least, if you like a functional civilization.
to the Goyim
A term with no real meaning within Christianity.
Christianity is the One World Zionist Religion spread since Ancient Rome
Then why are all the globalist types, most of whom are pro-one-world-government, so against it, just like they seem to be against white people?
On foot, and usually by animal power, yes. By operating a motor vehicle, technically in some states, but not most. It will also be costly to prove it, even if you can, and win.
Then, there's still the general drivers license problem, in that you need one for all kinds of things, and in many states, mine included, RealID has been part of that for years, now. I moved a couple of years ago, FI, and I needed to update my ID. Now, I already had RealID, as I wasn't aware of it when it was rolled out. But, as of that change of address, there was no way to get a new valid non-RealID state ID, and I needed it updated. Unless I wanted to go live like the Amish...
So, don't legally drive? That's kind of a problem, if you didn't get a long-term ID, that will likely last your remaining lifetime, and made sure you wouldn't move, many years ago.
The chips, though, no. But, those will remain opt-out, thanks to the Constitution and Book of Revelation.
It has crossed my mind. But. I also think that MAGA and related ideas are now working with hiveminds separated from their creators. People have been waking up to how screwed up everything is, lately. The plandemic ripped the blinders off of many that would never have thought about any of it. The political class now has to deal with large leaderless populist movements. Some are using it, some are fighting against the tide (some with enough money to have success at it), and others are trying to get out of the way.
If there are no victims or perps, there is no crime. So let it all out, or let it go. While I firmly believe she's pathologically antisocial, an international intelligence asset, and perpetrator of vile crimes...the legal system's ability to prosecute victimless crime, and operate effectively secret courts, in the name of protecting accusers, and keeping those secrets indefinitely, is unconscionable. If efforts to fix those systemic issues, and move us towards a transparent and accountable government get her out, so be it. She's prob safer in jail, today, anyway, than out of it.
Nobody is outside much at those temperatures. Especially over 40C - even fully covered, with breathable wicking clothes, which historically would be normal, in the ME, you'd best be drinking and sweating a lot, to stay cool. If not, it could be deadly.
Also, temperatures don't cause sunburn, but heatstroke. So, WTF does that have to do with anything? Sunburn is about UV-B overexposure, mostly, and which skin pigmentation is a very good proxy for resistance or sensitivity to that.
You can get seriously sunburned when it's only about 80F/27C, on a a UV heavy day (which have been getting more common, lately, as Earth's EM field has been weakening). As a descendant of mostly central and western Europeans, I know first hand.
But where is the evidence that 1 and 3 are close? Nothing public has gotten close to AGI, to date.
4 presupposes we tear apart bureaucracies, because oil and energy will be more important than who the first moyse to get to the cheese is, and China is so far ahead of everyone else that I don't think we catch up.
IMO, they want AI to look good enough to start removing human accountability, more or less calling their own goals, as implemented through AI models, unbiased, fair, and necessary. Because if they fail at that, a lot of their blood will be spilled.
I don't think they're intentionally throttling any of it. You've got known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns. Then, you gave different goals. They keep hitting new unknown unknowns, as they advance.
The military guys need to prevent hallucinating, and that's hard. It's known unknown in general, but the devils in the details are unknown unknowns, and they playing whackamole with them. They want the learning capability, but want to stay in control of the controls. A lot of the MIL AI work is using AI on top of already proven deterministic software and hardware, too, and with narrow development focii. The same software isn't being used to waste 100Wh giving you a crab boil recipe, then turning around and using that for summarizing SEA metal markets.
FI, flying in the air should actually be easier than driving busy streets, by orders of magnitude. They had pre-AI tech that do that pretty well. The same is likely going on in big pharma, gluing AI, as a way to dump data in, and filter results, 10000x faster than before, with their old software designs at the core. It not that military AI, or any other software based technology, is way ahead of the private sector. It's that they're not trying to do the general cases LLMs and the like are, but have more targeted goals. It's not way ahead, so much as it is designed for a task, where what we get is tech companies throwing more spaghetti at more walls, with bigger spoons. I would daresay it's likely more dangerous than most of what the military is doing, though, as it's threatening to tear apart the few trusted communication channels we have left, after COVID showed us how bad the old ones were.
The tech bro side of things can accept some breaking of things, and hallucinating, if the overall results improve. They are working with technology they can't even understand, open source or not, now. As long as it looks to be able to depress wages better, or get closer to destroying the fact vs fiction distinction in video and audio content, they go full steam ahead. Even there, like most tech, they show demos that are carefully crafted, to make investors think the product is better than it really is.
Eh, most people are at the least being influenced by demons. Some get possessed by bad choices, or trained weakness (childhood trauma and all), but some people don't like being alone in their own heads. The degeneracy of our elites very much hints at childhood trauma, so no big stretch. Is this really a big secret, except to hard-line atheists?
That said, I don't believe for one second that demons are why they can commit evil acts. Maybe for regular folk, that seem to have mental breaks, but not movers and shakers doing well-planned stuff. Humanity is capable of great evil, with no extradimensional help at all. Being aligned with other evils does not absolve them, IMO. More likely, IMO, the demons are able to aid them in gaining more worldly power. At low levels, there are stories voices have helped people get drugs, money, sex, and more. If you're stable enough to not let the secret out, and smart enough to look to the future, then they can help get you good stocks, foreign connections, and property deals, instead. You just have to give in to what you see as minor demands. They clearly are bound to space and time, but now how we are, and have knowledge of at least some short-term future events.
The death hypothesis, maybe. How our elites are obsessed with youth and immortality is weird, given that most of us just aren't, and most of them have children. It would also match up with voices (demons not getting to to the point of possession, not oppression, but mental influence) not caring if someone they're messing with dies, even though they seem to feed on their living, "energies."
What argument have they tried to use, to get AI regulation away from the states? I mean, constitutionally. Conner would not work. Copyright could, but that's can of worms that needs to be opened ASAP, for AI, and they're not opening it.
Just ignore that he was half-Jewish,if you going to go there, and ignore those others that weren't, at all, and easily contributed far more, over their careers. Not to knock McCarthy's work, but Claude Shannon vs John McCarthy is like comparing square footage of both WTC towers vs building 7.
ChatGPT
Is a for-profit software as a service project, invested in by those who already had deep pockets and connections. So, what are the chances it will be made and run by Jews? 80%, on the low end, easily. The conspiracies went on many steps behind the technology, and the results are incidental to the technology.
2348 BC for a world-scale flood would have greatly disrupted world history. Many peoples were doing things all around the time that there are plenty of records of. So, you lost me there, twice (CE/BCE also shows a heavy bias). If there was a big flood, it was before that, likely by a millennia or more, possibly many millennia.
Outside of places and figures we have archeological evidence for, or witness accounts from, it's hard to discern history from parable, in the first books of the Old Testament/Torah, and impossible to date most events. It was written in something like 300 BC. IIRC, with no older copies known of any books in it. It's quite possible the boat on Mt. Ararat was Noah's, but that story could also be more general, much older, and more, "containing important truths," than, "being factually correct."
The Jewish leaders under occupation were corrupt AF, zealots wanting the Messiah to be more like a warlord were common, and Jesus was a weirdo drug-using cult leader (it's using and administering mind-altering drugs that got him the title of Christ, and Western society's thing against mind-altering drugs is a very recent phenomenon).
Preaching peace and forgiveness around folk that were looking for a worldly leader to rise up wasn't doing it, for many Jews. Then, he was directly against the regional establishment, and the Romans were not happy when they had to intervene. Finally in a time of unrest, preaching that there was greater authority than the Roman emperor was very dangerous. Thanks to Romans inheriting the Greek's love of writing everything down, we know he was given chances to live by both Herod and Pilot, and ignored them. Then, that Pilot was under strong political pressure to crucify the man (the Catholic Church recently unearthed and published a letter from Pilot himself, that confirmed that part of the story). He basically did everything possible to get himself killed, after claiming to his followers that he would be.
If you're going to mix in Islam, and do this, is it not in bad faith to ignore Joseph Smith, and reset the count from 1830?