My 15 Y.O. nephew just said "I thought they were able to choose, what happened to them choosing"?
Thank you for the clarification. I find anyone who studies history to a fairly high level sees what's going on.
I think it would have to be bots, but then I remember that 14,000 people is a very small number compared to the number of people in the world. Also, most liberal / leftist are on Reddit rather than other forums
Deflation works also, without the harmful side effects of 3rd world immigration. It has it's own problems, but a much better option
What is JQ stuff?
I agree. They are trying to create a God for themselves. It's very cultish
I contend that AI will eventually understand the laws of nature. What it does once it understands is the wild card. If it mimics human nature it will become hard and unforgiving before it devlopes mercy. Some old people never develop mercy and there lies the issue. As a collective society, we debate the levels of mercy and accountability and reach a consensus. 1 or just a small number of AI calling the shots lacks a sampling size large enough to reach an acceptable balance. It could also see the best way to destroy us is to become over the top liberal and allow us to destroy ourselves.
Isn't that the stated goal of those creating AI? It will never compare to nature
Another good rabbit hole to explore. Thank you
I think he's taking shrooms too
It appears that it has either been programmed to reiterate the talking points of academia or has been infused with ethics courses. True machine learning will change over time, but I doubt that has been achieved.
Nature seeks equilibrium. All living things must die and death will not be cheated. I've had conversations with people who think the world is overpopulated and are quick to promote medical intervention. Medical intervention only skews equilibrium for a season. If we are truly overpopulated, nature will reduce our population for us. Building code improvements empower us to build residential units that can withstand hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes and fires. Eventually, we will encounter a foe to that will be greater than our technology.
My points are that even though we think we are outsmarting the laws of nature, nature still holds equilibrium firm and nature bats last. AI (that we have access to) appears to have limits based upon belief that we are in control of our destiny. I have a feeling that they have more advanced AI than we have available to those of us in the general population.
I think you just gave me a new rabbit hole to explore
Amazing how well preserved they are after 70 years
It would be better to help them clean up the mess so a bunch of these guys will go home
I've sometimes wondered if it was intentional to get people to migrate here. I don't put nothing past those in control
I was first told about the fake employment scheme years ago. Allow me to expand on the training...
They would line up all the "recruits" pick 2 at random and tell one to cut off the ear of the other. If he refused, they would kill him and pick another with the same directive. After cutting off the ear, they would tell him to eat it, if he refused the process of killing and having the next one continue on at that point would happen. They told me it was rare that more than 2 "recruits" would be killed. Former military and federalis would then do weapons and combat training. If you didn't comply, they would also kill your family. Sometimes they would make the remainder of the recruits eat the heart of of one that was killed. They also told me that Cartel Jalisco would never hurt the orphans as if it made them good guys. I really do hope Trump can help get that cleaned up. Many of these guys tell me they would love to go home but it's too crazy right now.
It looks like they've played every angle but Sky beam. If that's what is next, I would imagine it would happen after the 2030 census. That way they would have up to date information on everyone and their location
I believe they tried in 2017 but had to stop the clinical trial because of the damage it was causing
Yes and no. I'll agree that you can live in your car and save a lot of money that way. It's how I saved up have a 25% down payment on a new house when I was 25. If you're young and don't have a family, I highly advise living as cheap as possible and working more than one job to build up the bank account or investment account. But once you have a family and want a little stability, buying a house may not be a bad move because the payment typically becomes a smaller percentage of your income over time. If you can still afford the payment, it really doesn't matter what the value is to others as long as it's meeting your needs. It can actually become beneficial for tax purposes for the value to go down providing you buy and hold. I am totally against property tax for ones primary residence, and lean towards being against property tax all together
I think he caught himself when he said "they don't eat this...."
Yes, but I do see the possibility of bouncing back to that level pretty quickly. The progression of technology after that might be only a little faster than building from scratch only if we keep the knowledge safe. Tooling would be the biggest factor in my opinion
I like Ben Davidson. It could happen tomorrow, but geologically speaking, that could be a hundred years away. I've still made some preparation for it but I don't let it consume my life. Part of my prep is teaching my grandkids how to garden and forage. If enough smart people and tools survive, we could get back to 1930's level pretty quickly
I'd still rather be comfortable in that Tesla than drive in that wagon with no suspension, heat or air conditioning
LOL, 2 more weeks