They are just protecting their "property." The user agreements signs over all data to facebook, so that they can sell it to the highest bidder. This is because they want the university to buy the data. Getting it for free is illegal for anyone else, because facebook writes the privacy laws.
I've been trying to tell people: "Internment Camp" "Worker Camp" even "Concentration Camp" were at the time politically correct, "nice" sounding terms.
They did not have the connotation of "Prison Camp" that they have now, and there was a common acceptance that they were necessary. It wasn't until after the fact that people realized that allowing the government to round people up for any reason is a bad idea.
Did you read the part about cameras that monitor your eye movements?
"We must save the children!" is the campaign funding speech to get support for this.
They already HAVE full legal immunity for "approved" vaccines. The waiver was only because an unapproved treatment was outside the scope of the previous liability free agreement.
They're preconditioning people to accept the symptoms of the injection are actually the virus.
No other coronavirus has ever done the shit they claim this one might be doing long term, but no, this one is totally special, it causes all the negative effects we've been warning the injection would do all along.
"Breaking." As if the meeting notes didn't directly leak 7-8months ago saying that's exactly what they planned to do.
OmegaCanada is run by a liberal controlled op who bans right wing opinions he doesn't like for "racism" like a reddit mod.
And while FreeCanada.win exists for the above reason, it isn't part of the .win network.
Not even just the seventies, dystopian features even into he 2000s were anti-cooperate. They just started dressing "corporate" up as "capitalism.
And even that happened mostly outside the narrative. It happened in reviews, it happened in opinion pieces which made reference to them, it happened in bot run reddit echo chambers.
They convinced the current generations, and much of the older ones, that those futures were REPUBLICAN. And that to prevent the evil capitalist-republican-Christians from ruling the world like the hunger games, they needed to take all of that power for their own hedonistic imperialistic desires.
Then they reenact the fing movie at the installation of fake president.
The one major gap in the current revolution, something that every other communist revolution in history had, is a leader.
It's not just a gap, it's not merely an oversight, it's an actual requirement for the success of a color revolution. Out the other side is ALWAYS a charismatic leader. The elite have been preparing for this for a long time, they have run tests and experiments on country wide scales, and always they had a leader for the revolution.
They are most definitely preparing the world for that leader. And I fear what happens if they are actually smart about it. If he comes out against lockdowns and mandated injections, and like every color revolution before, pushes back against and condemns "degeneracy" and the failure of multi-culturalism. But this time, he'll have a world wide platform. He won't be censored. The media and the elite will fall in line and say "He's right, we shouldn't have done that. We're sorry. Let's put him in charge."
It could happen practically overnight.
She sliced her fucking palm down the middle to hate hoax against antivaxers.
There's no physical way for that shitty placement to cut down the center of her palm.
So, exactly what happened to the ferrets in the original trials for a SARS mRNA vax? Huh, if only they could have seen this coming.
AND that was an actual vaxine, not an mRNA treatment.
With what we know about the clotshot, there is no immunity in the first place, so being a leaky vax is unlikely, even if it's creators intended it to work that way.
People should be questioning it though. ANY kind of questioning would be welcome at this point.
You might see it that way, but to the brainwashed masses it means "It's a scandalous lie that never had any proof."
Most of this stuff does in fact have proof, so they are deflecting by claiming their is no proof. The direct response to sharing the proof to a brainlet would be "snopes says there is no proof, so you're just spreading misinformation."
Shock testing.
All I need is proof on that first bit, that the founders are CIA. The rest is common sense if that's true.
The fact they were already outed as dem supporters is pretty much proof that at least the spying on conservatives is part of their actual business.
"Police BEAT people"
"Government will now face multiple lawsuits."
One of these things is not like the other.
There was a research paper floating around about pesticides being the cause the last time flocks were falling out of the sky. Of course big agro shut down anyone trying to prove it and we're back to "Who could have done this??"
The psyop was making sure the left believed that Trump did it. They were very effective at that, without even a shred of evidential reasoning behind it.
"Epstien didn't kill himself" == "Is still alive"
^ From day one.
He still had access to his twitter account.
View this from the DS side.
-
You know JM has a deadman's switch, and you don't want it to go live.
-
He's finally arrested.
-
You make damn sure he has a way to keep his switch active. Like, making sure he has daily access to the internet.
-
Bonus points if you track all of his activity for a year to identify his switch.
-
Kill him as soon as you figure it out.
(I don't believe for a minute that he's dead. Of all the people on planet earth, John is the one most likely to fake his death to escape a prison.)
A QRD is the inverse of a tl;dr, as a tl;dr is supposed to be placed voluntarily. So where asking for a tl;dr is like an insult a previous poster who shared a lot of info, asking for a QRD is a much nicer way of asking for info when no one has currently provided it.
And unlike asking for a tl:dr, which directly implies you have the attention span of a goldfish, asking for a QRD doesn't imply that the information needs to be dumbed down to goldfish levels.
Of course, I had never actually seen the term QRD used before this point, but since this is a MacAfee thread, I felt like just bullshitting my way through something for the hell of it was the way to go.
The problem is that the elite are likely to succeed in "reshaping" the world their own way on the other side. If there isn't enough coordination to stop them, there sure as hell isn't enough coordination to take them out during the collapse and reform society the right way (without the "elite" in it).
Sterilization with the not-a-vax would be:
- Easiest to pull off.
- Very effective at achieving a rapid, but no too fast reduction.
- Create a new "panic" for taking more control. Ala, Children of Men.
But, sterilization would bring a LOT of risks.
- People WILL notice. Those people will still be alive, and pissed off.
- Blame will be shifted internationally and hard to control.
- Wars will happen.
Now, either those WARS are the goal, which will only further reduce the population and can be used to secure even more control by the winning parties. Or, there is something even more nefarious at hand that will cause a more rapid decline in population.
The goal may only be to initialize the conditions for a collapse, and watch it happen. Lockdown isolation and polarization and diversification of society are the preconditions for collapse. When society stops functioning as a society and they only thing they do is stuff their gobs, cliquing and direct withdrawal from social interaction are the main precursors. Then comes violence.
Sterilization may even be engineered for the purpose of controlling the population on the other side of the collapse. That way they can "rebuild" society in short order, in their own vision of what that society should be, and then not have to worry about a post collapse population boom putting us back into the 1930's problem all over again.
Picturing an inverse Robbin Hood, dressed up as a beggar with a tin cup: "Tax write-offs for the rich! Tax write-offs for the rich!"