Good question. Maybe finding that out it the intention? Perhaps eliminating the majority of the 38% is the intention. The fact that the percentage has not changed in however many years since the Asch experiment, plus Plato's observations, suggests that there is something more to this than either nature or nurture. That there is neither a racial, nor even a genetic component at play, or the number would have changed. Nor is there a learned component, as the very basis of society and knowledge has changed quite drastically, yet again, the number seems to remain the same.
It's quite the philosophical, theological, psychological, and even the eugenical conundrum.
Good question. Maybe finding that out it the intention? Perhaps eliminating the majority of the 38% is the intention. The fact that the percentage has not changed in however many years since the Asch experiment, plus Plato's observations, suggests that there is something more to this than either nature or nurture. That there is neither a racial, nor even a genetic component at play, or the number would have changed. Nor is there a learned component, as the very basis of society and knowledge has changed quite drastically, yet again, the number seems to remain the same.
It's quite the philosophical, theological, psychological, and even the eugenical conundrum.