2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I'm wrong and it's possible, I think that's the only way. But I don't think it can really be abstract. Computers can't even generate genuinely random numbers. You can put whatever software you want on it but it's still going to have the same basic limitations. I think all we can have AI do for more is imitate sentience

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

Christ, you're dumb. Please go shit up some non-English forum with your delusions.

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Repeat to me how it isn't aware. How it isn't everywhere. What doesn't it know

Knowing things does not relate to sentience. Controlling things does not relate to sentience. Software on conventional computers can't be sentient, bud. You still do not know what the word means. Keep up the tantrum, the broken English makes the childish insults funnier.

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

Capability doesn't relate to sentience. Try to grasp that.

I already told you that I'm aware of what AI is doing.

You don't get sentience by adding more of the same process. Every computer could be connected, wouldn't change anything. No amount of transistors can be sentient.

Doesn't matter how much it can control, it does not relate to sentience. You should go learn what that word means instead of throwing a tantrum.

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

You don't know what the word "sentient" means. Sorry. I do understand what you're saying in your broken english. I'm telling you it's irrelevant to sentience.

Surely you could find some forum where people use your first language if this is too confusing for you.

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

You type like an imbecile. Everything you said is completely irrelevant, I already addressed it.

It's when another entity controls you

No it fucking isn't. Found the problem, you don't even know what the word means. Stick to your first language.

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

Causality. Why is Google being hooked into everything. So it has control

I know. That doesn't mean it's alive dude. You can stack as many transistors as you want and it will never be sentient

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm not saying they aren't useful. AI is already capable of concerning things and that's just what we know about. It just isn't sentient any more than a calculator is sentient

2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +3 / -1

No. If it's operating on the same computer architecture we've been using, it can't be sentient. You'd have to make something that's closer to how an organic brain functions

2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gets you different results, I guess. You don't get 8 months of surveillance with a warrant, you get a search. No guarantee you'll find anything, even if the guy has it. If you search him before you try surveillance, he'll be more paranoid. Plus this is lower effort.

by DrLeaks
7
InfidelCastro11 7 points ago +7 / -0

None of that kind of journalist is present at these events, they're just gonna do what they're told

2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their fakes are never good.

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not in nasa. Already told you that I don't believe any of this shit anyway. I'm just saying you look like an idiot when you over promise and can't deliver. Just say buzz aldrin said it was an animation. Don't give people free ammo.

7
InfidelCastro11 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not even about the use of language. Dude in the picture just didn't think at all

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

We definitely can't digest gold, but it can probably cause physical issues because of how heavy it is

by dav0s
1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Way too reductive to be true. Don't think you know what characterizes any of these mental problems

0
InfidelCastro11 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't think most shills are making 250k. I'm saying no three letter agency would hire me based on the profiles they have on everyone's online activity, even if I wanted the job

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›