Hey duder,
Redshift and expansion are intrinsically linked, yes?
Yeah, our best evidence for the inflation/expansion of spacetime is the fact that we observe every galaxy receding away from our respective (as I’m sure you know, things travelling “away” from you are redshifted, things travelling toward you are blueshifted) indicating that either the Milky Way galaxy really is in the center of the universe (basically geocentrism ) or that perhaps there’s “no such thing” as the center of the universe, and everything is receding from everything else which is the standard interpretation of the data, so-called cosmic inflation or expansion
And I agree, it’s one thing to believe something strongly based on evidence, but so much of science is strong belief based on philosophy, which is to say, people rule things out which fit the evidence but don’t fit their preconceived bullshit way too readily.
I was reading about this yesterday and came across a great comment:
The cosmological models are based off two assumptions, that the universe is homogeneous at large scales and that the universe is isotropic at at least a single point. These assumptions essentially mean that the universe looks the same wherever you are. These assumptions are supported primarily by observation of the CMB. However, the evidence does not rule out a geocentric universe. Indeed, the evidence certainly seems to imply that Earth occupies some special place in the universe. When we combine the CMB observations with the observation that other galaxies seem to be receding from us, there is a lot of support for a geocentric model. It is very easy to think that the geocentric model is the only possible model. However, of course, there is a perfectly good alternate explanation, the one I gave initially, that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. In particular, as implied by this model, any other galaxy also sees all other galaxies receding from it.
So what makes us choose the current model over geocentrism? We appeal to the so-called Copernican principle, which states that Earth is not in some special, preferred position in space. Earth is not the center of the universe. You will also read this principle as "humans are not privileged observers". This principle rules out the geocentric theory entirely.
It is crucial to understand that there is no evidence for or against the Copernican principle. (That is not to say that there is not evidence that supports the principle, but the geocentric model is an alternate model which is also consistent with the evidence.) Of course, there is good reason to believe it. A principle of modesty is also often invoked, since it would be incredibly remarkable if the Copernican principle were not true. But there is no way to decide based on observed evidence. We are using a fundamentally philosophical criterion to choose our cosmological model. There is nothing wrong with that per se, but it certainly does lead to many interesting questions in the philosophy of science.
Actually, universal redshift does support, as one of its two main interpretations, a geocentric universe:
The other obviously being spacetime expansion.
Journalists:
Whitney Webb
Aaron Mate
Ron Unz & a couple of the people he republishes on his site unz.com
When it comes to (pre)history and such, things get a lot more dicey and motivations become less obvious but I’ve always had a soft spot for Graham Hancock and his crew (John Anthony West rip, Robert Schoch and some other associated acts). Robert Sepehr is good, if a bit myopic
What kind of mentally ill faggot reads 5 year old reddit comment threads
That’s a classic, and helped bring Robert Schoch and Graham Hancock to the mainstream
But I didnt see one comment, out of thousands. If someone mentioned it, it was likely downvoted, buried, collapsed.
It is a bit of a lesser known theory, iirc the only place I’ve come across it was in the doc Revelation of the Pyramids, and even there it was only like 5-10 minutes out of 2 hours. That’s before we even consider how astroturfed and manipulated the feed and comments on deaddit are.
Reminds me a bit of the assassins creeds game. Ive only beat 1 and 2, but werent they about aliens creating humans and advanced technologies and stuff?
Yeah, like you say the early games in that series had some of the most captivating mixtures of reality and fiction to create something that both hadn’t been seen before but simultaneously felt like it really could have explained some of the mysteries of the world (or atleast, a similar story). Basically, the First Civilization arose on Earth, genetically engineered humanity in their image, but lacking their “6th sense”
I never heard asimov was a degenatron....that’s a shame
Like the antikythera mechanism, which was an “impossible” feat of engineering for Ancient Greece, demonstrating a mastery of astronomy, math, and precision machining considered “not possible” for thousands of years. So they make an Indiana Jones movie about it, call it the dial of destiny and say it was a time machine.
Wonder how they’ll twist the truth of this one?
Learned all about this freak in the excellent book Going Clear about L Ron Hubbard and the founding of Scientology - Hubbard was good friends with Parsons and they often engaged in sex/blood rituals based on Crowley’s “works”
Here is Anne Frank’s step-sister confirming as much:
Free Will D’Choice
It’s like any great work, there is the surface, and what lies beneath; the thing, and what it represents; the literal reading, and the esoteric reading. I’m pretty sure this goes back to pre-“history”. Not this specific conflict mind you, which is rather recent, but the larger War in which this battlefield is but a proxy
Because the entire conflict has been crafted to produce maximum bloodshed for the blood gods
“A single post”
You literally undid a different nuke of this faggot by another one of your moderators either yesterday or the day before.
Lmfao
That’s certainly the aura he attempts to present. You’d need quite a more intimate knowledge of what happened there over the last few years to pierce that veil and see it isn’t “free speech” which drives his decisions.
Atleast, that’s the conclusion I’ve come to (along with most of the actual, human users over there with attention spans long enough to care).
There’s a reason 95% of posts made there are made by accounts which don’t post comments, and it ain’t about freeing speech, but controlling it
It’s because the head mod of ConPro is a subversive faggot who undermines the moderation decisions of those below him. It’s happened multiple times, most often for a specific proven subversive shill named fagsurgent
Isn’t that right u/elvis_interstellar ?
Fuck off fagsurgent
Shakespeare wasn’t even Shakespeare....
And the real Shakespeare also spearheaded the writing of the King James Bible
Give this a read:
https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/17s5fbO9MB/troll-spamming-conspiracy-with-p/c/4Z7T34rGbXG
I would send it in a message but that messes up the formatting - in that comment, there is a line between the two “commands”, it should actually just be 3 dashes
Lemme know if that works
https://communities.win/c/Manna/config/filter
You should be able to copy n paste from there to any of your other communities
I’ve been thinking the same shit basically every year since 2012 or whenever that “the disclosure project” thing started gaining momentum. Sometimes I wonder if it’s almost a trap to keep us docile... “worlds ending any day now, why bother organizing/resisting/etc”
Not saying things are one way or another, just that I find myself oscillating on the topic
Sounds a lot like the Hidden Hand interview / Law of One stuff - it’s pretty freaky how many seemingly distinct sources I’m seeing make these similar claims, especially recently
Good points made with this post, easy to get lost or overlooked in the furor of some new /ourguys/?!?!?!?!?!? agit-prop
It also says “traumatic brain injury”
This post is fucking trash