Entering the charged galactic zone is a regular occurrence and Humanity's latent "junk" DNA is prepared to Ascend with Earth into a higher dimension, where magic is real.
Are you doing anything in terms of physically preparing for this? I’m pretty well convinced that something like this explains our ancient history better than the alternatives. On that note:
https://communities.win/c/HumanPotential/p/141rVOZOu0/perhaps-the-most-important-video/c
Some/most either dismiss this aspect of reality or if they ever do acknowledge it, often it is purely through a negative culturally-imposed lens. To me, it appears to be a tool or muscle more than anything. What are your thoughts on that whole aspect?
No doubt, though I take from the detail you’re putting into the plans that will get us to that point, that you still think it’s atleast a little ways off? On the order of years or decades?
At most Trump and Barron can glide the deranged empire into a soft crash landing.
Have you ever read the Foundation books? Hari Seldon and his plan to shrink the interregnum between galactic empires seems oddly relavent here. That and/or the ole “millennial reign”
Do you expect much travel to be possible when SHTF or are you planning what you’ll do until then?
You might enjoy this thread on Christianity where I make much the same argument to the head mod there:
https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/17teSZySMY/freeforall-thread-community-disc/c/4ZCc8gk9YHv
Not much resolution but some good discussion I think
Cya round soon
I saw that action of his and thought it was dumb and counter productive. That said, I stand by my call to be vigilant against the ongoing efforts to flood post and concern troll over that floodposting until the mod/board culture can be forcibly changed.
As a religious concept “cursed blood” is a valid area of discussion. One can then parley that discussion into one of genetics and culture, without ever “violating rule 16”. It is a fact that the Bible quotes representatives of the pharisees, aka the originators of modern talmudic rabbinical judaism, as saying “Let his blood be upon us”. Also scholarly work like “The Culture of Critique” make a similar case in the modern day.
Though I was only able to see the first sentence or so of your comment. You know, he has said he will readily unban anyone who edits the “offending” comment, so maybe just see if he’s willing to clarify exactly what he took issue with?
(Note the article contains links to background and supporting information, and continues on for 2 more sections)
When a violent, shocking, spectacular American-history-turning event occurs—examples include the sinking of the USS Maine and Lusitania, the attacks on US ships at Pearl Harbor or the Gulf of Tonkin, the Kennedy assassinations, and 9/11—history teaches us that things are seldom what they seem. All of those incidents, and more, were deceptions orchestrated by forces that stood to benefit. The schoolbook narratives of all of these events, and many more, are lies.
The key that unlocks the truth is the Latin phrase cui bono: who benefits? In all of the above cases, a powerful faction that wanted war—call it the war party—orchestrated deceptions that enabled the wars they wanted.
Does the alleged shooting of Donald Trump last Saturday fit that pattern? Like the others, it was a spectacular act of violence that, in retrospect, is likely be seen as history-changing:
“The election is likely to be a landslide. This probably reduces uncertainty,” said Nick Ferres, chief investment officer at Vantage Point Asset Management, citing polls that showed a surge in support for Reagan after the attempt on his life.
The weak counter-argument admits that the shooting significantly improved Trump’s odds, but those odds are not 100% since “nothing is set in stone.”
The long and short of it is that those who want a second Trump presidency were the obvious beneficiaries of an apparently random event that, were it a PR stunt, would have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars to the Trump campaign. The iconic photo of Trump fending off the Secret Service agents tasked with whisking him away ASAP and shaking his fist defiantly as he yells “fight! fight! fight!” could not have been more perfectly scripted. Reality TV actor Trump has never been more in his element.
Nor could the shooting have been more perfectly timed. It occurred at the ideal moment to interrupt the news cycle that was about to force Biden to step down in favor of a stronger Democratic candidate. And it happened in the best possible time-frame for energizing the Republican base—and taking the wind out of the anti-Trump media’s sails—just ahead of the Republican convention, which became a spectacularly unanimous coronation-by-acclamation.
The “shot that winged Trump’s ear” was even luckier for Trump than for the world’s-worst-marksman who allegedly took it. Most obviously, it gave Trump some blood for the photo op. It also gave him the opportunity to put on an ear bandage that served as a sort of purple heart, or rather a white badge of courage, at the convention. If billion-to-one odds had not been defied, and the world’s-worst-marksman had just plain missed—or, vastly more likely, never been allowed to get off a shot—the whole thing would have fizzled and been forgotten, like the failed attempt against RFK Jr. last September. Indeed, of all human beings throughout all of recorded history, Trump may have been “the luckiest to have gotten shot.” Had he “turned his head at the wrong moment such that the bullet completely missed” he would face much better odds of spending the rest of his life in the big house rather than the White House…or of being actually assassinated, presumably by efficient and deniable means.
Indeed, the “shot in the ear” was like another kind of shot we have been hearing a lot about—an inoculation shot. It inoculated Trump against further assassination attempts, including the professional kind that rarely miss. Prior to his miraculously lucky ear shot, Trump was vulnerable to being taken out by any of a long list of deniable methods available to his deep state enemies. They could have laced one of his diet cokes with an untraceable heart attack agent, poisoned his toothbrush as happened to J. Edgar Hoover, or had him shot in such a way as to keep him out of the White House rather than to put him in it. But in the wake of the “lucky ear shot” and apparent Secret Service breakdown that enabled it, if anything happens to Trump, his base will burn down the country. That ear shot quite likely saved Trump’s life, not to mention his political career.
That the first serious amateur attempt on Trump’s life actually got off shots, and—mirabile dictu—winged his ear, providing hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars worth of PR for the Trump campaign, proves that Yahweh, or his agents, must have had a hand in it. On the assumption that Yahweh delegated the job to his agents, rather than just rolling up his sleeves and doing it himself, the question arises: “How did Yahweh’s agents manage to pull it off?”
Some of my excitable friends will no doubt exclaim: “It was all done with crisis actors! Nobody really got hurt or killed!” They will troll the web for photographs that faintly resemble the gunman and his victim, point out that they are still alive, and claim they have proved that the whole thing was a hoax. Alternately, they will dig into birth, death, and social security records, as well as social and mainstream media, and claim that whatever they find isn’t enough to support the presumption that Thomas Matthew Crooks, Corey Comperatore (who died from a gunshot at the rally) and “a 57-year-old New Kensington, Pennsylvania, resident and a 74-year-old resident of Moon Township” ever existed.
These are the people who insist that no planes hit the World Trade Center and that most or all of the 9/11 victims never existed. They think nobody really got hurt at the Boston bombing or the Las Vegas shooting or Sandy Hook. It’s all crisis actors, they say. False flaggers who stage violent events actually hate real violence, so they fake as much of it as possible…sometimes all of it.
I am, to say the least, not convinced by those arguments. My study of spectacular, spectacularly deceptive deep state events suggests that the perpetrators generally manipulate perceptions of actual violent events, rather than simply staging fake ones. (The violent events, of course, are generally orchestrated or steered by the perpetrators.)
…
Continued in article
you’ve made 6 posts about dom/kia in the last two weeks, while a network of shills are trying to flood the forum, who you give cover to.
Get over it, faggot
I saw live as the Pauline monks underwent schism, split between trumpies tendies and bernies beanies. When the shill farm really kicked into gear (2016 dnc primary, as it was stolen live by the hilldawg) I watched a million Bernie bros allow themselves to be snuffed out like Scalia, under a pillow and without a whimper
Buddy…it’s a post about the Illuminati card game, try to focus
At any time, at any place, our snipers can drop you. Have a nice day.
Your descriptions are correct, but both are talking about the many achieving unity in the one.
OP calls them the “same picture”, perhaps more accurately the first is the “photo negative” of the second
See also: The Human Instrumentality Project
Though I think Sheldrake is coming from and still seeking the right place. He’d be on the side of the Children.
Is tech part of the solution or not?
Imagine making it to this forum and still being this dumb
this user has no posts
Oh, one of those accounts. How’s the TuMOR these days?
Never heard of Yahweh being into these sacrifices things
You should try reading instead of “talking” to chat bots sometime then:
Genesis 3:21
The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. 22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”
Genesis 4:3
Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil. 3 In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the Lord. 4 And Abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering
Those are just in the first few dozen pages...
Good 10m follow up video on solutions:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v-c3nR3TwGE&pp=ygUbcmFuZGFsbCBjYXJsc29uIGFmdGVyIHNrb29s
Longer 2h lecture of which this is the ending:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=R7oyZGW99os&pp=ygUbcmFuZGFsbCBjYXJsc29uIGFmdGVyIHNrb29s
I think he’s spot on in the follow up. Humanity’s future, should we choose to live up to it, is in the stars. But how do we start inhabiting that reality?
Except your retarded ass still hasn’t answered
That’s what I thought bitch
Would you forward this post to anyone you know irl? Why or why not?
There is literally nothing linking this to the clotshot. I can’t think of a more unimportant topic for a conspiracy forum than “some YouTuber hit his head”, can you?
Now the clotshot makes people fall off ladders?
Dogshit post.I wouldn’t show this to my friend with vaccine induced autism because even he would say “that post is fucking wetarded!”
Some random chick said her husband got a TBI, and you post it here as a “potential vaxxident”. Someone then checks the comments of the post to find a story of falling off a ladder and you say “that’s just a rumor” LMFAO
“Just a rumor”, as opposed to what, this bullshit you pulled out of your ass?
Fuckin monkey
It also says “traumatic brain injury”
This post is fucking trash
Hey duder,
Redshift and expansion are intrinsically linked, yes?
Yeah, our best evidence for the inflation/expansion of spacetime is the fact that we observe every galaxy receding away from our respective (as I’m sure you know, things travelling “away” from you are redshifted, things travelling toward you are blueshifted) indicating that either the Milky Way galaxy really is in the center of the universe (basically geocentrism ) or that perhaps there’s “no such thing” as the center of the universe, and everything is receding from everything else which is the standard interpretation of the data, so-called cosmic inflation or expansion
And I agree, it’s one thing to believe something strongly based on evidence, but so much of science is strong belief based on philosophy, which is to say, people rule things out which fit the evidence but don’t fit their preconceived bullshit way too readily.
I was reading about this yesterday and came across a great comment:
The cosmological models are based off two assumptions, that the universe is homogeneous at large scales and that the universe is isotropic at at least a single point. These assumptions essentially mean that the universe looks the same wherever you are. These assumptions are supported primarily by observation of the CMB. However, the evidence does not rule out a geocentric universe. Indeed, the evidence certainly seems to imply that Earth occupies some special place in the universe. When we combine the CMB observations with the observation that other galaxies seem to be receding from us, there is a lot of support for a geocentric model. It is very easy to think that the geocentric model is the only possible model. However, of course, there is a perfectly good alternate explanation, the one I gave initially, that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. In particular, as implied by this model, any other galaxy also sees all other galaxies receding from it.
So what makes us choose the current model over geocentrism? We appeal to the so-called Copernican principle, which states that Earth is not in some special, preferred position in space. Earth is not the center of the universe. You will also read this principle as "humans are not privileged observers". This principle rules out the geocentric theory entirely.
It is crucial to understand that there is no evidence for or against the Copernican principle. (That is not to say that there is not evidence that supports the principle, but the geocentric model is an alternate model which is also consistent with the evidence.) Of course, there is good reason to believe it. A principle of modesty is also often invoked, since it would be incredibly remarkable if the Copernican principle were not true. But there is no way to decide based on observed evidence. We are using a fundamentally philosophical criterion to choose our cosmological model. There is nothing wrong with that per se, but it certainly does lead to many interesting questions in the philosophy of science.
Actually, universal redshift does support, as one of its two main interpretations, a geocentric universe:
The other obviously being spacetime expansion.
For real lol
“Bombshell leaked photo”
lmoa even