2
GoldenRatioed 2 points ago +2 / -0

We’ve been tracking normie perception since the outbreak of this fraud. This post is just another data point.

You’re either the worst at straw-manning an argument, or the biggest fucking moron on this forum (which is incredibly impressive)

4
GoldenRatioed 4 points ago +5 / -1

And as long as he maintains the public perception of being a “good guy” he’ll keep his blank check for moving the ball as far in that direction as possible. God it’s so obvious it hurts.

1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it’s because your arguments are weak and appear intentionally ignorant. Now you’re segueing this into religion out of nowhere, further demonstrating my point.

1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

I honestly don't believe you're arguing in good faith.

1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also if it was such a good idea, why is no one doing it today?

His methodologies are unknown to our current model of physics (which isn't an accident, by the way). His tower was destroyed under the guise of national security, and all of his records were confiscated upon his death.

A dark power structure exists in this world that you seem to be conveniently ignoring, especially considering you're on this conspiracy forum. If wireless power technology was ever allowed to flourish, said dark power structure would evaporate over night. There would be no more justification war, famine, or resource scarcity. Westinghouse and JP Morgan are a part of the power structure that won't ever allow that to happen. Your eagerness to suck their dicks is palpable.

Nobody has that power.

Adorable.

1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

His competitor... Marconi? They guy who used multiple Tesla patents without attribution to develop his technology?

12
GoldenRatioed 12 points ago +12 / -0

His technology for wireless power delivery could be repurposed to wirelessly transmit information. When JP Morgan and Westinghouse (who were also HEAVILY invested in copper) discovered his true motive, they pulled the plug because it greatly threatened their other investments (as well as the established power structure)

1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +2 / -1

I still hold a tremendous amount of blame and vitriol for our former friends who bought into this. The evil at the top would be powerless without the lemmings’ willingness to play along.

3
GoldenRatioed 3 points ago +3 / -0

So I read that title as the Holocaust being referred to as a Jewish cultural center, and that made me laugh so hard

2
GoldenRatioed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed for the most part. If you're overweight, you already have the caloric fuel onboard--- filling up the tank with anything more than critical nutrients just hinders the process of emptying the tank.

Just want to add-- taking carnitine tartrate after exercising will trigger your body to burn fat rather than glucose. I'm likely being crazy reductionist and missing some key points, but it's worth looking into.

Also, a quality green drink powder (if it's heavily advertised, it isn't quality) to cover the bulk of your nutritional needs. You'll be amazed at how satiated you feel when you're getting your nutrient needs covered even without the calories (sort of the inverse of how non-satiated you feel 30 minutes after eating nutrient-depleted calorie-dense meals like Chinese takeout)

2
GoldenRatioed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for these links. I learned something this morning.

by DrLeaks
1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

So is your argument to not have anything of value otherwise people will eventually kill your family for it?

To your point, long-term hobbyist self-sufficiency isn't a viable option in a societal collapse. That said, to assume people would keep behaving as they did pre-collapse is a bit unrealistic, especially over any reasonably time frame. People adapt to survive, and the people already putting in the work to understand survival stand a much better chance than ill-prepared opportunists, especially if you pit the two against each other.

Your scenario still makes the assumption that these half-ass bandit gangs make all of the right decisions, which doesn't happen when people lack training, nutrition, and rest. All they have to do is make one mistake and they're out of the game forever. Hungry, unskilled bandits will be far more prone to making mistakes when attacking people who are well-armed and well-fed. Casing a potential target takes time-- at least weeks if done correctly. Time is a precious resource when you're desperate and starving. I'd be far more concerned with an angry mob than I would be a team of novices who think they're operators.

Your scenario also seems to assume targets are islands. I can't speak for anyone else, but I know all of my neighbors and more than half of them are legitimately capable people- we're all one SOS text away from surrounding any given house. I realize that's not a typical situation, but this is America and it's not as rare as one might think.

All of this to circle back to my original point- if you're going to have anything of value, it behooves you to have enough firepower to defend it. Keeping valuables isn't an automatic death sentence.

by DrLeaks
1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

You assume that people desperate enough to rob others would have the skill sets to succeed, and that resistance would be useless regardless of one’s prior training- does that about sum up your position?

by DrLeaks
1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excellent point. Damn.

by DrLeaks
2
GoldenRatioed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who brags about having gold? Do people do that?

Edit to add: people rob people all the time without knowing what they’re going to get. When things get bad, everyone’s a target whether you’re a braggart or not. The more value you possess, the more dangerous you have to be to maintain that value.

by DrLeaks
4
GoldenRatioed 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only fighting chance one has against bandits is guns. I don’t keep gold.

by DrLeaks
6
GoldenRatioed 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you're going to stock up on gold, you'd be wise to have enough lead to defend it.

1
GoldenRatioed 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Overton Window must be shifted incrementally for there to be any hope whatsoever of winning over any portion of the blind masses

by DrLeaks
8
GoldenRatioed 8 points ago +8 / -0

Going to thoroughly enjoy this pendulum swing

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›