doctor
A docked oar (doctor) prevents one from steering.
naturopath
One needs to resist (life) the natural path (inception towards death) to sustain dis-ease (physical comfort by separation).
charge them
Consent withdraws suggested...only perceivable charges perception. Ones adaptation to perceivable implies a re-charge.
interaction with God
Inter (life) action (inception towards death) aka each Christ within God.
connection
Connect implies binding together, thereby ignoring that action sets internal reactions free from one another.
Humans were more connected
a) The hue of man implies separation of rays within visible spectrum of light.
b) The suggested word color/colos/kel - "to cover" tempts one to ignore appearance aka each ones perception of all perceivable aka each rays sight within the visible spectrum of light aka ones unique perspective within moving differences.
Consenting to suggested colors...paints others alike.
direct relationship with God
Many ignore being a ship (life) within direction (inception towards death) of God for relating consent to suggestions by few.
To relate implies "to recount, tell" aka fiction shaped within reality aka suggesting other ones what all perceivable is...it's ones consent given to this which affirms fiction within ones mind/memory during an ignored reality.
Faith works both ways
There can be only one...God, hence one way (inception towards death) for each anointed one (life). Faith implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence establishing both/bho - "two; one and the other".
Vaccines...
Vacca (cow) implies herd mentality aka many willingly giving consent to suggestions by few. It's irrelevant what others put into vaccines if one already follows herd mentality aka suicidal consent given to genocidal suggestions.
fluoride...
Flouride/flour/fluere - "to flow". Form (life) needs to resist the wanted temptations of flow (inception towards death). Consenting to suggested fluoride is already self destructive...no matter what compounds fluorine is mixed with.
The point was to cut off the direct relationship with God
a) Direction (inception towards death) cuts reactions (life)...separation implies a cut, hence perceivable knowLEDGE; whole cutting into partials; "cut my life into pieces this is my last resort" etc.
b) God sentences life from inception towards point of death. Few suggest many to make rhetorical "points" during circular logic.
Point implies end of sentence...circular logic tempts one to ignore that direction implies beginning (inception) and end (death) for each reaction (life) within.
It's called "point of no return", because ones response (re) turning against another within conflicts of reason puts an end (point) to ones life sentence.
to suppress the soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only", hence whole impressing (inception towards death) partial expressions (life). Consenting to the suggestions of another represses self, while permitting few to suppress many from expressing themselves.
who is heading these agencies
a) Nature implies top (inception) and bottom (death) of each body (life), hence action heading; bottoming and embodying reactions.
b) Few suggest artificial agencies to trick consenting many to follow artificial agendas, while ignoring to be employed (living) within natures agency (dying).
c) An example for artificial agency...if an actor follows directions, then he "reacts".
There are no actors, just influencers (flow) suggesting information (form) to tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Many reasoning against each other about suggested information represents "information warfare"...
ultimate agenda
a) Ultimate/ulter/al - "beyond" implies being (be) at a distance (yond) aka ones divided (dis) stance within all.
Being implies in-between (life) origin (inception) and outcome (death)...to measure towards outcome, shortens ones being.
b) Agenda implies action (cause); being implies reaction (effect)...seeking to reach an ultimate tempts one to ignore the cause of ones reactions.
unknown to outsiders
Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...one cannot be outside.
It's one consent to a suggestion of another, which establishes an insider vs outsider conflict of reason, with oneself being stuck in circular logic inside a conflict of reason against others, and those making the suggestions on the outside.
market domination
Being implies free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...others trick one into a marketplace aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion). The price of buying into is selling ones choice into bondage to a chosen one.
That's why the market domineers buyers and sellers.
outcome for all
Being implies one within all, hence each one (life) coming in (inception) and out (death) of all. Any outcome implies death for those who came into life.
what the point of your plan actually is
Being implies life sentenced from inception towards point of death aka ones plain/plan of existence.
the overarching goal
a) Inception > life > death implies an arch; a curvature; a temporary growth within ongoing loss...any goals flatten the curve.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a contract aka an ark of covenant... https://www.etymonline.com/word/covenant Those who suggest are permitted by those who consent to become "raiders of the lost ark"
playing lots
A lot implies ONES (partial) share within all (whole)...playing implies gambling oneself away to others aka casting lots.
all possible resources
Resource implies ones response (re) within source of all. Viewing others as resources (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore source.
Possible implies able of potential aka ones response-ability (free will of choice). Choosing others as resources prevents ones potential from growing, while consuming others as well.
Within all...if one exploits other ones as resources; then that implies drainage of potential.
Google's Endgame
Few suggest many to put on google/goggle, hence viewing perceivable through the lens of suggested...consenting to that implies gambling life on death (end).
Google is called a search engine...if one searches for outcome, then one ignores being within (en) generation (gine), hence within energy.
claims
Holding onto ignores being moved. Motion changes the shapes of what was into what is. Holding onto shapes (apparition; spectre; ghost) possesses one.
period
Periodos aka peri (around) hodos (way)...the former implies a shape; the latter the motion within one shapes. A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles into circular logic, while ignoring the perceivable way of life from inception towards death. Notice that living within the process of dying implies being in shape.
impostor
Consent given to suggestion deceives oneself within perceivable by giving others a false appearance.
a) Few suggest globe to confine many within a shape.
b) Few suggest techno/tekhnē - "artifice" to distract many from natural.
c) Few suggest cracy/kratos - "strength" to tempt consenting many to weaken themselves.
d) Few suggest what is to distract many from what was perceivable.
e) Few suggest outcome (end) to distract many from origin aka beginning/be-ginnan - "opening being"
f) Few suggest games to tempt many to gamble.
mason to shriner
A mason of free (will of choice) shapes suggested information outside ones consenting mind/memory; while a shriner learned to shape within it.
the height of the whole
Only within whole can each partial choose in-between high and low.
to Allah
To al-lah (law of all) aka natural law.
sword of islam
Sword/swer - "to cut" + Islam/salam - "peace" aka Allah (motion) cutting (momentum) into pieces (matter) aka motion cutting momentum (inception towards death) into matter (life).
Decide. Who killed Jesus Christ?
Deciding for others shirks ones response-ability (free will of choice)...that's what kills, because it permits others to wield ones weapon of choice.
Romans
An allegory (rome/roam) for the wandering jew, just like egypt (a gypsy)...
our sins
Singular (one) consent to suggested pluralism (our) implies sin/syn (violation of divine/divide law). Nature sets each one apart from one another, which few (jew) invert by tempting many (gentiles) together.
Nature differentiates being...few sin/syn-chronize many to follow orders; follow leaders; flow with the mainstream; consent to suggested etc.
God's will
God (need) gives each being will (want)...each being needs to resist wanted temptation. Wanting implies from one another (suggested), while ignoring all needed (perceivable).
Shriner Fez hats
- Con-fez-ion..."making an avowal or admission".
- Shrine/scrin - "repository; arc of covenant"
Ones consent to the suggestions of another implies a covenant, which shapes ones mind/memory into an arc/vault/repository for the suggested information. Those shaping the suggestions are con-fez-ing to that by wearing a hat atop the repository.
Another title for those who do that...Raiders of the lost Ark
human beings
a) To be implies within (matter) the hu (momentum) of man (motion).
b) Motion through momentum into matter implies singularity separating internally into each unit of being...not plural (beings), but singular (be-ing aka to be within).
Sovereign
Sove/super (over) + reign/reg (move in a straight line)...
Being implies moved within (life) a straight line (inception towards death), hence in-between over (living) and under (dying).
The suggested word "sovereign" tempts ones consent to claim power over another, which contradicts each ones "free" will of choice.
not liable to follow
Li/leig (to bind) contradicts being enabled to use free will of choice to for example follow the suggestions of others.
only common law
a) Com (plural) contradicts only (singular).
b) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies separation from one another; suggested com (together) mon (to move) -ism tempts one to ignore natural law, hence many following the suggested orders by a chosen few.
living soul
Soul implies substance (inception towards death) moving through essence (life), hence living within process of dying.
Soul/sole - "one and only" aka motion dividing (divine) through momentum (spiritual) into matter (corporeal).
free people
Plural (people) binds singular (free)...if one consents to suggested pluralism by free will of choice.
they are being
Again...plural (they) binds singular (being). It's the singulars choice to join the plural. The singular represents a real being, while the plural represents a fictitious golem...held together by each beings ignorance of self for others.
My whole existence is in the Mind of the Eternal.
Eternal implies whole; existence implies partial/temporal. Mind/memory implies temporal processing of eternal input.
Taking possession (my) tempts one to ignore temporal procession of eternal input.
Everything else is counterfeit.
The CO in counterfeit implies forming together, hence ones consent given to the suggested in-form-ation by another. Meanwhile; everything implies perceivable in-spirat-ion passing through each thing.
Have you existed before this life?
a) "Before" implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life)...a being can only exist in response to being forwarded, hence after/aft/opo - "off; away".
Others suggest "before" and "after" to distract the forwarded being from discerning self in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death).
b) "Have you" implies possession; being implies potential. A potential expresses outwards; while possession depresses inwards.
Nature generates potential beings; few within tempt many to waste potential by holding onto possessions.
reincarnation
Aka ones response (re) within (in) the flesh (carna) of action (tion).
past life
Life can only have presence (present) in-between inception (past) and death (future)...few suggest past; present and future to distract many from presence aka from what is presented to ones senses.
Or did you only come into existence during this life you have now?
a) OR contradicts ONLY...there can be only one aka one for all and all for one.
b) Now implies the perceivable moment (momentum) of all perceivable (motion) from the perspective of each ones presence (matter).
There can be only now...before and after tempt one to mentally hold onto; shape ahead, while ignoring what now moves through one.
I want to hear
Wanting or not wanting to hear suggested words prevents one from hearing perceivable sound needed. To hear implies to perceive by the ear...giving consent to suggested words shaped within sound tempts one to ignore that.
thought
Thought tempts one to hold onto; th(r)ough cannot be held onto...R (phonetic are) implies being. https://www.etymonline.com/word/are hence being (life) passing through (inception towards death). Try thinking about that...
a) Being + monster aka red + blue aka hot + cold aka blood + water aka living + dying...
b) The tongue represents the living moving in (inception) and out (death) of the process of dying.
c) Coat of arms aka arm/ar - "to fit together", hence a joint, and coat/cote - "cloak"...nature reveals by separation; artifice conceals by unification.
d) Shield/skel - "to divide, split, separate"...that's what the coat of arms conceals aka outside unification to protect inside separation.
e) Notice that being (living) cannot get out of the monsters (dying) grasp, hence being an integral part of the whole. Notice then the reaction of monster to the struggle of being...
f) Dragon/drak/derk - "to see"...to look/lock onto an artificial depiction prevents one from seeing nature move.
g) Notice that the being represents male and female aka a trans-formation of flow (hence the winding dragon).
h) Abyss aka a-byssos (without bottom), hence being form (life) WITHIN flow (inception towards death) aka primordial chaos formed within the natural order of flow.
I) Fauci/faux - "false"...
tl;dr...it begs the question if any of this is questionable.
cbdc
Coin/cuneus - "a wedge"...it's ones manual consent given to suggested digital/deik - "to show", which permits another to put a wedge between ones perception and all perceivable know-ledge.
Wedging one from the ledge of knowing tips one off center.
That's the foundation of temptation...wanting to go within (life) the way (inception towards death), while ignoring the need to resist wanted temptation.
In other words...applying "go away" to being alive implies dying.
The death of others does not grow ones life. Stopping others does not help one move. Making others go away does not free ones way.
Whatever you want implies fiction...resisting want implies needed reality.
a) Need cannot be stopped. Wanting to stop ignores needing to adapt to change.
b) Artifice can only lie if one ignores natural change for artificial truth. Only then can the contradiction between natural change and artificial truth be sold as a lie.
c) To stop implies towards what one wants to stop...that's the most dangerous position for handling a moving object.
CATHedrals
a) Cathode + anode aka cath/cata (down) + an/ana (up) + hode/hodos (way)...
Living implies being moved a-cross the way (inception towards death), hence upwards (living) during downwards (dying) aka resistance during current velocity...
b) To pray (putting hands together) implies an entreaty (enter into negotiations)...what do you think gets nego/nega/neg - "negated" when seeking entreaty from another?
Beggars can't be choosers...
a) Zion-ist implies ones consent to suggested zion-ism, hence choosing a side, which in return permits the suggesting jew control over both sides of consenting gentiles.
A being (life) in-between sides (inception/death) cannot hold onto either, since its being moved from one towards the other. Any suggested side implies an artificial construct by few to tempt the choices of many against each other within a conflict of reason.
b) Tube; noun - "hollow cylinder" aka hollow/kel - "to cover; conceal; save" + cylinder/kylindein - "to roll".
Ones consent to any suggestion by another...covers perceivable; conceals ones perception; saves suggested within ones memory, which rolls self into circular logic, while turning against others within conflicts of reason.
That's how the jew tube operates...gentiles representing the tube, into which each jew channels crafted spells aka informing by influencing.
Bonus: the "play" button represents a pyramid, hence tempting those who push (stoke) it to be "amid pyr"...in the middle of fire.
Porn is definitely degenerate. But then again so is fornicating.
Fornicate/fornus/gwher - "to heat; warm"...hence wanting to generate friction to keep warm.
Now look at the etymology of friction/fricare - "to rub down", and notice "resistance to motion" and "mutual irritation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/friction#etymonline_v_14177
Fornication with others and masturbation by self represent a mutual irritation tempted by suggested pornography...not a resistance to motion.
Being implies resistance (life) within the temptation of motion (inception towards death), hence the struggle of ones choice to need to resist wanted temptations. That's what regenerates warmth from within...not rubbing the outside against something.
If you're freezing in winter, then rubbing your hands together only gives temporary relief.
We have to have community to keep us accountable and a pool of potential...
a) A unit cannot be kept for long, since it implies temporal potential within ongoing procession. Also; a com-UNITY doesn't need to be counted, since it can only be comprised of each ONE UNIT.
Only during one procession (inception towards death) can there be each one unit (life)...separated from one another.
b) How is it that no human community can keep together besides each jew setting self apart within all human communities? Who holds a chosen one accountable?
like minded
Aka an artificial hive-mind, established by many giving consent to suggestions by few.
Nature separates each unit of mind from one another...few within tempt many to "commemorate" aka to remember suggested information together, hence alike one another. That's also what communication; community and communism is based upon.
to network
Only a spider is free to work a net...anyone within a network struggles to get free.
out of the frying pan into the fire
That implies ones birth. Notice that an infants first breath implies a gas-exchange, hence lungs on fire triggering a scream of ignition. Being an anointed one implies coming through the birth-channel, hence out of oil...
otherwise
a) Consenting to the suggestions of others does not make one wise...it corrupts ones self discernment.
b) The opposite of otherwise implies in (life) the same way (inception towards death).
c) If energy, then otherwise...?
What is a theme?
A thesis tempting those who consent to it into establishing the anti-thesis, thereby dis-solving each other in conflict.
Themes are not morals
a) Each side within suggested moralism (good or bad) implies a theme/thesis/proposition for ones consent.
b) Not implies ones consent to the anti-theses (no) of a thesis (yes) within suggested conformism.
morals are not messages
Morals implies ones consenting response to a suggested message in themes (thesis and anti-thesis). As in...if another suggests whats moral, then ones consents establishes everything else as immoral.
Those who consent to morals are mutually fighting each other within a conflict of reason (moral vs immoral), while ignoring the messenger of suggested moralism.
These are all different and unique tools.
a) Only each ones free will of choice implies a unique tool; differentiated from one another, hence FREE.
Themes; morals and messages are suggested by the free will of choice of another, which tempts ones free will of choice to willingly submit self by consent.
b) All cannot be different. All (whole) differentiates (partials) internally by separating each part from one another, hence setting FREE.
Namely, a theme is a frame work and touch stone for the author that should remain unseen to the viewer.
a) Names imply a frame within the work of sound.
b) Work (all perceivable) authorizes viewer (ones perception)...suggested frames distract viewers from work.
c) All gives each one sight...few suggest many to look/lock, which in return makes most of perception "unseen", hence ignored.
themes should never take
Viewers GIVE consent to suggested themes...which was never theirs to give, since only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life).
center stage
Choice implies center. A suggested stage (horizontal division) tempts one to ignore that horizontal (inception towards death) divides into vertical (life).
A stage tempts many viewers to centralize consent towards few suggesting stagers aka producers; directors; writers; actors etc. That implies mass inclination from natural center towards an artificial center.
Advanced technology
a) Techno/tekhnē (artifice) + logy/logic (reason) tempts one to ignore being (life) advanced (inception towards death).
b) Perception implies natural; suggestion implies artificial. Holding onto suggested artifice by giving consent to it establishes circular logic within self, which turns into conflicts of reason against others.
Deployment against humanity and nature
Nature sets the hue of man (color of man) apart from one another, while deploying ones mind within a conflict of reason against others tempts together.
implications in contexts
Implication implies "if/then" aka a setting apart of action into reactions through motion. Context implies weaving (text/texere) together (con).
Context contradicts implication, and establishes reason aka conflict, based on consent to context.
gamification of life
Life implies choice; game implies chance. Choice reacts to origin; chance tempts choice to gamble itself on outcome.
Chance contradicts choice...if one chooses to take a chance suggested.
a) Nature cannot be stopped...trying to stop ones behavior doesn't resonate with natural law. Stopping tricks ones memory to hold onto a state, while ignoring that everything else continues to move.
b) WE devalues the worth of ONEs ship. Joining an artificial plural diminishes the value of each single part of nature.
c) Saturn/satus - "to sow"...suggesting another to give consent implies artificial sowing; perpetuating oneself through another (intercourse for off-spring) implies natural sowing.
Nature sets apart; artifice joins together.
Bonus: If saturn (seed) + obelisk (penis); then oil and vagina imply?
d) Like implies an idol (mental image; apparition)...ones eyes can only perceive moving differences. Any likeness tempts one to ignore ongoing differentiation.
the Scientific Method
One cannot acquire knowledge...only discern self within all knowledge. Nature moves all knowledge (perceivable) through each one (perception).
Few trick many to seek the acquisition of suggested "knowledge" by consent given, which implies understanding aka standing-under aka ones willing submission to another aka ones choice selecting a chosen ones offer.
In short...perceivable inspiration (knowledge) cannot be held onto; suggested information (understanding) tempts one to ignore former by holding onto latter.
That's how many are tricked to enslave themselves to few masters.
666 aka Carbon (6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, 6 Electrons) aka motion (proton/protos/first) balance (neutron/neutral) choice (electron/elect/to choose)