To observe implies holding onto, so what about the different perspective of each being able to hold onto? What differentiates perspectives from one another, and how could one hold onto anything while being differentiated aka separated?
I'm confident knowing the truth
If one confidence is based upon holding onto truth, then doesn't sharing truth with others contradict ones observation (to hold onto)?
Its simple common sense.
a) If common sense implies simple, then does ones particular sense imply complex? What if it's the opposite? What if COM-mon COM-plexity distracts one from simplicity?
b) Sense/sentire - "to perceive" implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence be able to become aware of differences within ones surrounding.
How could perception be common without corrupting each ones different perspective? How is common sense different from "hive mind"?
If it's not a...
What if matter (life) can only be shaped within motion (inception towards death)?
What if a conflict about shapes (flat vs round) tempts one to ignore the implication of shaping? Holding onto one shape, while fighting those who hold onto another shape...doesn't that contradict shaping.
What if few suggest both shapes to shape the minds of many into a conflict called reason, based on "circular" logic?
If the earth isn't curving
Doesn't life, while being moved from inception towards death, represent a curvature of growth within a flat-line of loss?
Ask yourself who defines; redefines and contradicts the meaning of the word "space" to distract many from wandering within into wondering about?
how did do this world start?
As form within flow. The fundamental question you so far failed to ask yourself is...can start (inception) and finish (death) only be measured from within (life)?
What if only a partial within a whole can have a measurable beginning and end?
I can't be sure how big it is either
Only within all (whole) can one (partial) grow big or small. Theorizing about how big or small ALL is...curtails ONES growth potential.
we can also throw out
What does it imply if a partial within whole throws something "out"?
a mental trap they programed since we were too young to speak
What if speaking implies using the suggested abc/abecadary/abacadabra of others? What if the shape of words distracts one from sound enabling one to shape? Does holding onto the definition of words contradict the movement of sound?
Teaching a child to respond to a word is called "to civilize"...do it to a dog and it's called "to domesticate".
infinite miles in all directions
Miles aren't infinite, they tempt ones mind to confine itself to a measure-ment in-between start and finish.
What if direction (inception towards death) implies infinite; while directed (life) implies finite?
We were placed
Ones position implies apart from one another. It's place-ment (place within mind) which can be tempted to ignore that, when consenting, and thereby joining, suggested pluralism (we).
overlords
Understanding tempts one to stand-under, while permitting others to lord-over one...
high level
Level implies balance; being implies choice...choice within balance implies as above/so below.
Level implies horizontal aka flat...
will forget where they came from
Will/want implies within need. Forget (forwards getting) implies towards wanted outcome, while ignoring needed origin.
secret societies
SEC (seco; to divide) SOC (socius; together)...nature divides beings from one another; few tempt many together with artifice.
jews are the only ones who know more truth
a) Plural (jews; ones) contradicts singular (one)...not the jews, but each chosen one.
b) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable. Therefore...each one knows all. It's ones consent seeking understanding from the suggestion of another, which tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
A jew doesn't know more...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore all perceivable value for less, and less, and less valuable suggestions.
A jew doesn't rise above...it's gentiles who keep digging below.
A jew doesn't hide information...a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hide from perceivable inspiration by ignorance/denial.
A jew doesn't control reality...gentiles give each jew control over fiction (suggestion), while ignoring reality (perception).
owned like property
a) Being implies differentiated from one another...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to give consent "alike".
b) Nature sets each being free (will of choice)...a jew tempts gentiles to believe aka to hold onto aka to take into possession suggested information, hence believing that buying (consent) into what others are selling (suggestion) gives one ownership over it.
In reality...potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot be taken into possession aka matter cannot hold onto motion, only onto each other, which represents the wanted temptation to ignore the need to resist being moved towards DEATH of LIFE.
Whatever a gentiles thinks he owns represents a self imposed burden, which makes it harder and harder to resist (living) temptation (dying). Once a gentiles chooses to let go of self imposed burden...he will "own nothing and be happy".
We are
All was before one can come into being within. We implies the accumulation of many ones by few ones, while ignoring the separation of all into each one.
God is a fake
a) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > trans-formed-off-spring (matter). From the perspective of matter...motion represents the "unmoved mover".
b) Real implies ones RE-sponse to AL...fake implies ones ignorance of all for one another.
spirituality is that we cannot deny
Free will of choice implies being enabled to bind self by both agreement or denial to one another, while ignoring that all sets each ones free by internal separation from one another.
Separation permits mental denial or agreeMENT of physical. The mental conflict (agree vs denial) is called "reason", and it's artificial aka a hoax.
Coronavirus showed that psychical spirit/spiro (to breathe) can be mentally tricked into denying that "I can't breathe" leads to death, which was then psychically symbolized by putting a mask over ones mouth and nose.
we have a soul
Soul/sole implies one and only...suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore that.
To observe implies holding onto, so what about the different perspective of each being able to hold onto? What differentiates perspectives from one another, and how could one hold onto anything while being differentiated aka separated?
If one confidence is based upon holding onto truth, then doesn't sharing truth with others contradict ones observation (to hold onto)?
a) If common sense implies simple, then does ones particular sense imply complex? What if it's the opposite? What if COM-mon COM-plexity distracts one from simplicity?
b) Sense/sentire - "to perceive" implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence be able to become aware of differences within ones surrounding.
How could perception be common without corrupting each ones different perspective? How is common sense different from "hive mind"?
What if matter (life) can only be shaped within motion (inception towards death)?
What if a conflict about shapes (flat vs round) tempts one to ignore the implication of shaping? Holding onto one shape, while fighting those who hold onto another shape...doesn't that contradict shaping.
What if few suggest both shapes to shape the minds of many into a conflict called reason, based on "circular" logic?
Doesn't life, while being moved from inception towards death, represent a curvature of growth within a flat-line of loss?
Space/spatior - "to wander" aka distance or interval between (life) line (inception towards death)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/space
Ask yourself who defines; redefines and contradicts the meaning of the word "space" to distract many from wandering within into wondering about?
As form within flow. The fundamental question you so far failed to ask yourself is...can start (inception) and finish (death) only be measured from within (life)?
What if only a partial within a whole can have a measurable beginning and end?
Only within all (whole) can one (partial) grow big or small. Theorizing about how big or small ALL is...curtails ONES growth potential.
What does it imply if a partial within whole throws something "out"?
What if speaking implies using the suggested abc/abecadary/abacadabra of others? What if the shape of words distracts one from sound enabling one to shape? Does holding onto the definition of words contradict the movement of sound?
Teaching a child to respond to a word is called "to civilize"...do it to a dog and it's called "to domesticate".
Miles aren't infinite, they tempt ones mind to confine itself to a measure-ment in-between start and finish.
What if direction (inception towards death) implies infinite; while directed (life) implies finite?
Ones position implies apart from one another. It's place-ment (place within mind) which can be tempted to ignore that, when consenting, and thereby joining, suggested pluralism (we).
Understanding tempts one to stand-under, while permitting others to lord-over one...
Level implies balance; being implies choice...choice within balance implies as above/so below.
Level implies horizontal aka flat...
Will/want implies within need. Forget (forwards getting) implies towards wanted outcome, while ignoring needed origin.
SEC (seco; to divide) SOC (socius; together)...nature divides beings from one another; few tempt many together with artifice.
a) Plural (jews; ones) contradicts singular (one)...not the jews, but each chosen one.
b) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable. Therefore...each one knows all. It's ones consent seeking understanding from the suggestion of another, which tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
A jew doesn't know more...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore all perceivable value for less, and less, and less valuable suggestions.
A jew doesn't rise above...it's gentiles who keep digging below.
A jew doesn't hide information...a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hide from perceivable inspiration by ignorance/denial.
A jew doesn't control reality...gentiles give each jew control over fiction (suggestion), while ignoring reality (perception).
a) Being implies differentiated from one another...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to give consent "alike".
b) Nature sets each being free (will of choice)...a jew tempts gentiles to believe aka to hold onto aka to take into possession suggested information, hence believing that buying (consent) into what others are selling (suggestion) gives one ownership over it.
In reality...potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot be taken into possession aka matter cannot hold onto motion, only onto each other, which represents the wanted temptation to ignore the need to resist being moved towards DEATH of LIFE.
Whatever a gentiles thinks he owns represents a self imposed burden, which makes it harder and harder to resist (living) temptation (dying). Once a gentiles chooses to let go of self imposed burden...he will "own nothing and be happy".
All was before one can come into being within. We implies the accumulation of many ones by few ones, while ignoring the separation of all into each one.
a) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > trans-formed-off-spring (matter). From the perspective of matter...motion represents the "unmoved mover".
b) Real implies ones RE-sponse to AL...fake implies ones ignorance of all for one another.
Free will of choice implies being enabled to bind self by both agreement or denial to one another, while ignoring that all sets each ones free by internal separation from one another.
Separation permits mental denial or agreeMENT of physical. The mental conflict (agree vs denial) is called "reason", and it's artificial aka a hoax.
Coronavirus showed that psychical spirit/spiro (to breathe) can be mentally tricked into denying that "I can't breathe" leads to death, which was then psychically symbolized by putting a mask over ones mouth and nose.
Soul/sole implies one and only...suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore that.
Few suggest US (united states) to CONNECT (e pluribus unum; out of many, one) many together, which in return permits few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Nature separates all (whole) into each one (partial)...few within invert this by tempting many together.