in that Fantasia movie
When the apprentice (perception) ignores the source (perceivable), then magic (suggested) gets a life on its own.
to prove spiritual
Proving implies "making credible" aka tempting ones creed to hold onto the suggested proof, while ignoring that spiritual implies "animated".
Being alive implies being (life) animated (inception towards death), hence proof to be found only in the pudding/putting.
harmless
Only during harm (inception towards death) can there be peace/piece (life)...reasoning (more vs less) tempts one to ignore that.
a pact with a negative entity, you can't see, that moves the matter
a) Consenting to a suggestion implies entering a pact among entities, which in return prevents the consenting entity to see perceivable.
b) Ignoring perceivable by holding onto suggested prevents ones self discernment of being matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
c) Those who consent (agree or disagree) to a suggestion put themselves into a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree), which those who suggest are permitted to rebrand into for example...positive vs negative.
how magicians do that
Suggestion tempts ignorance of perception. Consenting to a suggestion makes the magic happen, hence establishing a fictitious happen-stance within ignored reality, which is being shaped by those who suggest it.
One cannot be a magician until another consents to ones suggestion.
Ford published rather than wrote The International Jew, which was not written in his voice but was written primarily by his secretary.
"God published rather than wrote The Ten Commandments, which was not written in his voice but was written primarily by Moses"...just blurring the point of mosaic law, right?
globetrotting like Herzl
The wandering jew...
You missed a bunch...Alfred Binet + Théodore Simon aka founders of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Test, which William Stern latter coined "Intelligenzquotient" (IQ).
Meanwhile in reality...intelligence/intelligio - "to understand" implies ones consent to stand under those who suggest a test of mind (test-a-ment). As for quotient/quoties - "how often"...as often as consent is given to suggestion.
Edit: Invent/inventio aka coming towards (inception towards death) being within (life), hence the sleight of hand...necessity (motion) is the mother (momentum) of invention (matter).
how yahweh operates
To operate implies "to be in effect", which contradicts yahweh as the cause for each affected being within. Cause separates into effects...a jew suggests operating systems to tempt consenting gentiles together.
yahweh's bad
Good vs bad implies effects (beings) turned against each other, while ignoring cause (yahweh). Good or bad tempts ones choice to choose to hold onto a side, which implies imbalance for ones choice.
somehow replicate
You already did. Using AI implies replicating natural with artificial from within, while ignoring the nature from without. Ones consent to suggested (artificial) tempts ones perception to ignore perceivable (natural).
I don't like
Yahweh implies same; each being within implies different from one another. A jew utilizes suggestions to tempt gentiles to give ALIKE consent, which turns them against each other within conflicts of reason (i vs you; do vs don't; like vs dislike).
Yahweh continues to rip apart whatever you like or dislike, while you choose to ignore being differentiated from one another for pretending to behave like one another. As yahweh continues so beings perish...die alike or live apart...ones free will of choice.
black nobility
a) Noble/gno - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=noble implies ones perception of all perceivable, choosing to ignore that for each others suggestions makes one ignoble; common; abased; proletarian.
b) Black and white refer to ones discernment (white) within perceivable or ignorance (black) when holding onto suggested.
One cannot perceive white (pure light) or black (absence of light), while being within the visible spectrum of light.
c) Light represents the natural order, which generates a spectrum for each ray within the visible spectrum of light. Each ray/race of being represents a "noble gas", hence gas; noun (from Greek khaos) - "proper elements of spirits"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=gas
Khaos/chaos (life) within order (inception towards death)...
to turn you...reverse psychology
Logy implies circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others. Reverse implies ones response (re) turning (verto) from psyche to logy.
Christianity...psychology
a) Psycho/psyche implies the animating spirit for each being, while to christen (anoint) implies each being coming into being within the animating spirit.
b) Spirit (perceivable) animates being (perception)...ones consent to a suggestion turns one (logic) against others (reason).
c) The -ity behind christian implies a relation to, which contradicts the anointment (christen) of each through separation (life) from one another within animating spirit (inception towards death).
by Christianity I mean...
Each being implies an anointed one (christ)...it's ones consent to suggested christian -ITY, which permits relations of suggested meaning to be added by others. This destroys ones anointment aka ones mind (ment) within oil/all (an-oint).
death and genocide
a) Being implies living within process of dying, hence the animating spirit simultaneously representing the departing ghost of each being aka inhaling spirit and exhaling ghost.
b) If being (perception) within spirit (perceivable) consents to the suggestions of another, then others are permitted to withdraw the departing ghost from the living spirit aka tempting ones life sentence towards point of death.
c) If one ignores self (perception) for others (suggestion) by ignoring living for dying, then that corrupts anyone else holding onto the suggested aka "one bad apple spoiling the whole bunch"...that's how ones consent to self destruction (suicide) destroys others (genocide).
Consenting to a suggested -ism puts one into (in) a division (divi) of two (dual), hence into a conflict of reason...an ethical corruption.
Ethos (perception) within pathos (perceivable) needs to resist the wanted temptation of logos (suggested).
"gilded cage" (ˈɡɪldɪd keɪdʒ )
Thanks; that's the one I was thinking of. Anyway...gild/guilt, hence "guilt by association" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another or in the case of celebrities...the Faustian deal.
where he or she has very little freedom
Liberty. Being choice (free) within balance (dom) is always available. It's ones willing ignorance of perceivable for suggested, which puts one at liberty to another, while binding self.
a) Do you realize how few surrounding a celebrity care about anything underneath the product?
b) Do you realize that signing contracts with others constricts the signer? It's called a "golden cage"...
c) A jew influences gentiles with suggested information, which in return tempts consenting gentiles to ignore both the influencer and the directing "hidden hand" above the influencer, for the suggested information.
Millions of skater-boys spanking their meat to Avril Lavigne memorabilia only know her image from imagination, which makes them spell-bound idolater who ignore reality for artificial delusions shaped by others.
Is CERN the Only One?
a) There can be only one.
b) Dis-CERN implies the separation of each one from one another.
c) Con-CERN implies ones joining together in ignorance of separation.
d) Few tempt many together to establish concern aka collective (con) perception (cernere), which contradicts nature separating each ones perception within all perceivable from one another.
Ones collectivized...few utilize a LHC (large hadron collider) to strike together (collide) the bulk (hadron/hadros) of many within conflicts of reason.
e) If nature separates perceiving partials within perceivable whole through the momentum of motion, then collectivizing particles together accelerates the demise of each particle.
In other words...a jew suggesting gentiles to move forwards ( https://forward.com /) implies "particle acceleration", which when consented to shapes gentiles into a colliding hadron.
f) The hadron collider refers to the jewish Bar Kokhba revolt against HADRIAN... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Kokhba_revolt
Nice reasons not to answer
Utilizing implication (if/then) over reason (vs) avoids conflicts like naughty vs nice or nothing vs everything or answer vs question.
You got definitions, wow.
Definition implies DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who is deaf to sound (phonic) when consenting to words.
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound). That's how spell-craft works.
nothing new
a) Nothing represents ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable, hence a jew suggesting gentiles to believe in "nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
b) New/néwos - "now"...as perception within perceivable; one can only have presence NOW...not before (old) or after (new). Few suggest "new" to tempt many to ignore "now".
Oh yeah, picture: blablabla.
a) A suggested picture implies a captured moment, which in return tempts one to ignore perceivable moment-um of ongoing motion. Movies aka moving pictures are then artificially moving captured moments.
Few suggest actors under directors to distract many from discerning self as reactions (life) during direction (inception towards death).
b) Blablabla aka yadayadayada is a yiddish expression for "so on; and so forth" aka suggested progressivism tempting consenting gentiles to move forwards.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0 Notice the differentiation of shapes (life) during the same base line (inception towards death).
Or will it be impressions?
Nature impresses...
- DOM-inance into FREE
- Need into WANT/WILL
- Into out OF
- Balance into CHOICE
Hunger and thirst represent pressure (press) for each being within (im), hence natural law impressing (dying) expressions (living) simultaneously.
You simply didn't answer my question
A question implies a quest towards outcome, which for life implies death. The seeking of answers turns one towards suggested outcome, and away from perceivable origin. Self discernment cannot be gained from another.
Look for a mirror
a) To look implies to lock, which narrows ones sight.
b) Being implies ray within spectrum of light...consenting to each others suggestions implies a reflection aka a mirror image aka sight through a looking glass.
back to topic
What if trying to define Eden as a place outside of self, prevents one from discerning ones position within Eden?
I believe one thing to be true and share it freely, therefore i fail
a) To believe implies ones consent to the suggested information by another, while ignoring perceivable inspiration. Fundamentally...nature moves sound through each being; which many ignore by holding onto words shaped by few.
b) Nature implies moving balance giving each being within "free" will of choice. Sharing choices aka ones consent given to the suggestion of another, binds ones free will of choice to another.
c) Being implies temporary growth (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence continuously failing ones endeavors representing the struggle of being.
Should i just have no thoughts at all?
a) Should implies ones suggested question towards the suggested answer of another, while ignoring natures perceivable solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life).
b) No (nothing) implies the suggested inversion of all (everything) perceivable. Few suggest nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to tempt consenting many to de-nial everything perceivable.
Nature doesn't offer "nothing"...each being within nature has the free will of choice to ignore everything perceivable for each others suggestions, with ignorance representing de-nial/nihilo - "nothing".
c) Thinking implies perceivable inspiration moving through each ones perception...not holding onto suggested information within ones mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves.
Sound permits being to shape; words tempt being to hold onto shape.
Furthermore...sound moves "directly" through ones mind; while holding onto words establishes "circular" logic within ones mind. Direction implies motion; circular implies a shape within the direction of motion.
Believe nothing?
To believe implies holding onto suggested "nothing", while ignoring that everything perceivable moves through ones perception.
That would be a suggestion too
Suggestion represents temptation for being to willingly give consent, which then shapes artificial (information) within natural (inspiration).
Nature doesn't suggest, it moves perceivable through perception for each ones free will of choice to adapt to; draw from; shape within.
Also, what would be an alternative?
Alternative implies to alter (inception towards death) native (life)...ones consent to the suggested word "alternative" tempts one to affix its definition, hence contradicting alternation.
my take
Aka taking (suggested) while ignoring what is offered (perceivable) for free (perception). You're still falling for the temptation of wanting to take the apple of forbidden knowledge into your possession.
eden
- Eden/edhen/de - "a place that is well-watered throughout".
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each being lives within a place that is well-watered throughout.
theodore herzl
Theos (god) doron/do (to give) herzl (heart)... gentiles ignore heart for mind.
palestine
Palestine/philistine /philister - "enemy of gods word"...gentiles ignore god (sound) by filling their minds up with words, hence enemy...en-e-my...within me.
automobile
Auto (inception towards death) mobilizes manual (life)...
christ consciousness
Con-scious (to perceive together) contradicts Christ (each anointed one).
bring light
Bring/bher - "to carry"...light moves; carrying obstructs movement.
mysticism
Myst/myein - "to mute"...ones consent to a suggested -ism mutes ones perception.
gospel
Ones consent to a suggested good-spell (truth) establishes a bad-spell (lie); both of which distracting from sound, which doesn't craft spells.
Consenting to a suggested spell...spells-binds ones "free" will of choice aka religion/religio - "to bind anew".
- Tax/tag - "to touch"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tax
All separates each one within from one another by anointment (to christen). Only separated from one another can there be intercourse for further off-spring.
Thirst and hunger moves through one and cannot be touched by one. Perceivable inspiration moves through each ones perception and cannot be held onto. Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" implies ones adaptation within a process of inhaling and exhaling a force coming through.
Touching implies the wanted temptation one needs to resist. Touching the apple spoils the fruit. Consenting to a suggestion implies the mental touch of taking into possession, hence becoming possessed with a self imposed burden (tax).
Taxation implies assessment aka ones mind seizing the suggestions of another.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam#/media/File:Michelangelo_-Creation_of_Adam(cropped).jpg Notice they DO NOT TOUCH...
- https://genius.com/Stan-bush-the-touch-lyrics Produced by Richie Wise aka extension (rich/rego) of knowledge (wise/weid)...
a) I'm formed (life) within flow (inception towards death)...not under the influence of suggested substances.
b) "Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person."
c) Bong/baung - "cylindrical tube"...a channel (tube) for circular (cylindrical) logic aka a narrowing of thought. There's both a physical and a mental alchemy to "hitting a bong".
Notice furthermore the phonetic similarities between BONG/BANK...do river banks narrow current?
A whole lot of
A lot of cannot be whole...only partials within whole.
words that say nothing
a) How could a word say anything if it cannot utter sound?
b) How could a word describe "nothing"?
you make senseless points
a) Inception implies ones life sentenced towards point of death. Any points made within distract from ones life sentence/ sentience.
b) How could anything made be transferred without use of senses?
c) Sense/sentire - "to perceive"...not suggestions by another.
back to topic
How could circular rotation exist outside of straight direction? How could anything be shaped without preexisting motion to shape within/out of/in response to?
religious freedom
Religon/religo - "to bind anew" contradicts being free (choice) within dominance (balance).
mandate
Mandate/mandare aka manus (hand) + dare (to give) aka manually giving consent to the suggestion of another, and thereby binding self.
remove
Aka ones response (life) to being moved (inception towards death)...
a) Gripping implies taking a stake aka gambling/gaming...hence texas hold 'em (tax us; hold them)
b) Gripping a side (good or bad) imbalances ones choice within a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Choosing a suggested side implies "chancing" ones choice on others, hence gambling aka loosing at the game of life.
ruining their credit
Credit/creed/credo - "belief" implies holding onto a shape while ignoring being (life) run (inception towards death) within motion.
Few suggest a credit of artificial currency to bank trust among many, who in return ignore natural current.
Current ruins credit; currency distracts from current by banking trust aka by tempting each trustee onto a riverbank aka aside of current aka running dry on both sides like a fish out of water.
we cannot fall into counter-heresy to fight heresy.
Heresy/hairesis - "a taking or choosing for oneself" aka taking (consent) into possession (suggested) what nature processes (perceivable).
One cannot take what nature gives freely without taking from one another, hence the conflicts.
the etymology of the word "jew" and show where it came from
Sound (perceivable) shaped into word (suggested) and taken into possession by a letter (consent)...
Carl/karl/ceorl - "bondsman; common man, man of low birth; freeman" aka marking (marx) the freeman (carl). It's applied freemasonry.
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and consent gained as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others.