Any questions???
Is tessellation (tesla) an auto-motive force? What force motivates auto (self)? Can an integrated and packaged mind be more advanced than a departed mind?
circuit board
Aka circuit (circle) + board (line) aka alpha + omega aka 1 + 0...
Light was before en-lighten-ment (mind within light) comes into being. The process of coming into being by division of all light into each mind establishes the division of clear/obscure (balance), which permits ones free will of choice in-between to discern self by clearing (discern) or obscuring (ignore) ones mind.
Suggesting to another that it IS clear or obvious tempts one to consent to obfuscation and obliviousness. Why? Because consenting to any suggestion represents a synthesis, while all (perceivable) enlightening the mind of each one (perception) implies analysis.
If one applies a synthesis to an analysis; then one obfuscates ones analytical mind into oblivion with all the information others are suggesting one to hold onto; believe in; define reality as etc.
what follows is not clear...
...because following implies in the shadow of a leader.
is a source of
There can be only one source for each one within.
of good will
Being within good/god implies being given free will of choice. Everything implies God...each things response to God (good) or one another (bad) is based one free will of choice.
minerals. Seems like a simple concept
Mineral/minera/mine - "a body destitute of organization, and which naturally exists within the earth or at its surface"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/mineral
Being implies a body destitute (stand divided) of mental organization (organ aka in-stru-ment aka mind structured within aka that with which one responds to work).
So mineral isn't a concept, but living existence.
mineral
Notice that taking anything into possession as MINE...underMINES oneself. One does not need to take any SUPPLEMENT into possession, when one was given the INSTRUMENT.
The suggested word MINE-R-AL tempts one to supplement self aka MINE ARE ALL...that's a trick.
"The powerlessness of pacifism lies, as it did then, in the fact that many wish for peace, but very few want it; many fear war, but only few fight it." ~ Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi - Practical Idealism
Asia’s symbol is the all-encompassing sea, the circle - Europe’s symbol is the forward-looking power, the straight line. Here, the deepest meaning of the cosmic symbols, the Alpha and Omega, is revealed. It conveys to us the mystical, recurrent polarity, of force and form, time and space, man and cosmos, that hides behind the souls of Europe and Asia; the capital Omega, the circle, that opens the gate to the cosmos, is a symbol of the divine harmony of Asia; the capital Alpha, a sharp upwards-pointing arrow that pierces through the circle, is a symbol of the action and determination Europe’s which breaks the eternal calmness of Asia. A and O are also in the Freudian sense unmistakable symbols of masculinity and femininity: the union of these symbols signifies conception and life, as well as reveals the eternal dualism of the world. The same symbolism probably exists in the numbers 1 and 0, as the finite 1 against the infinite 0 – “yes” against “no”."
~ Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi - Practical Idealism
a) Lionel Messi aka the anointed (messi/messiah/mashah) lion of God (el) with the lion representing the lion of judah, hence not anointing (to christen) jesus but judah.
b) 10 aka 1 (singularity) + 0 (nought/nothing/nihilo aka nihilism)
c) Compare the quality of this statue with for example Guan Yu in China...speculative masonry in the west; operative masonry in the east.
he trusted his friend
"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him,and he shall direct thy paths." ~Proverbs 3:5-6
Trusting another implies fiduciary (holding in trust) which permits another to BANK ones TRUST. To hold implies taking into possession (suggested) while ignoring how all procession (perceivable) gives each one potential (perception).
my boss isn't lying
You are lying to yourself by believing that another can be ones boss/baas - "master"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/boss
Your "boss" cannot speak truth, because you hold "boss" as a lie within yourself.
Maybe back then it was only one place.
Place/plat - "to spread"...only within singularity (cause) can each unit (effect) spread.
game
Gaming/gambling implies choice taking a chance...choice is situated above any game until the moment a chance is taken.
wins the game
You viewing the world as sides (win or loose) instead of yourself as choice in-between implies the game few set up to tempt many to play each other for fools.
playing pieces
Piece implies one part of whole...divided from one another. Pieces implies a game of pluralism tempting one to ignore singularity.
dimensions
Aka the division (di) of mind (mens) within action (ion)...implying a singular process; not a multi-dimensional position.
orientations
Only within a line aka during delineation can each divided being choose in-between orient (east) and occident (west). More importantly...the word orient/oriri - "to rise" implies ones position (life) within loss (inception towards death).
the rules
There can be only one rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
The way i see it we have 2 choices.
There can be only one.
change the name
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven"...change implies the one and only father, which by calling it a name, permits another to speak in the name of the father (in nomine patris).
dad
Aka dada/papa - "father"
one...or two
Again...there can be only one. Two exists in name only and requires ones ignorance of the one and only.
celebration
Celeb aka Caleb from Hebrew Kalebh, literally "dog-like," from kelebh "dog." aka the inversion of GOD.
God makes private; celebration makes public...that's why the use of celebrities to gather the crowds together.
Outlaws
Being implies within natural law...outlaw represents an artificial inversion thereof. Furthermore...there can be only one law for each one within. Pluralism represents yet another artificial inversion of nature.
free speech
Natural sound sets each being within free, while the articulation of sound into speech binds ones free will of choice to a chosen ones crafted spells.
Speech is crafted by LETTERS aka ones choice LETTING a chosen ones craft spells.
history
Story implies a "connected account or narration, oral or written" shared among beings. Nature doesn't store...it transfers the essence of each being, which allows each one the free will of choice to draw from and writing within nature.
It's storing (mind) and connecting information among beings (hive-mind) which distracts from nature with artifice.
the bible...
...was not written by THEOS (God); but by each being who crafts spells in the name of God.
Could there be a difference in-between drawing from (perceivable inspiration) and writing within (suggestible information)?
police toned down
TONE (to stretch) + ATONE (to agree)...what if law enforceMENT requires agreeMENT to tone down any stateMENT? Could any of this have anything to do with ONEs MIND?
Your logic is flawed
Flaw/flow implies linear procession; logic implies circular thinking. The circle is utilized by each jew (kike/kikel/circle) to prevent gentiles from thinking straight... https://circleofgerona.com/
all secret societies of the "cabal" are
a) How could ALL be OF anything?
b) ALL implies singularity; ARE implies the plurality of being... https://www.etymonline.com/word/are
c) You are trying to define what secret societies are; I try to describe the contradiction of SEC (apart) SOC (together) within your definition. You are stuck within a circle (contra) hence seeing anything contradicting logic as a flaw.
For me...logos > logic > reason implies a delineation aka a straight line. For you...logos represents a definition to hold onto; logic a circle to think within, and reason a turning against one another.
There's no flaw...only flow (inception towards death) delineating form (life).
kabbalistic and luciferian
Aka to receive light...that's the status quo for coming into being.
another renowned
All (procession) cannot be owned (possesion) by anyone (potential) within...taking anything into possession during a procession permits another to parasitically usurp ones potential.
the Sephiroth
THE implies theos (god); SEPHIROTH aka sefirot/sefirah implies "enumeration" aka counting units together while ignoring the singularity of God dividing each unit within apart from one another.
There aren't TEN (10) emanations of God only 1 (singularity) + 0 (ones denial of singularity when counting one another).
origins
There can be only one origin (cause) for anyone (effect) within.
Freemasonry...it's origins.
FREE-MA-SON...son/sonos (sound) implies all; free implies each one within, and ma/mag (to knead; fashion; fit) implies all making each one.
Being implies FREE (matter) within MA (momentum) of SON (motion)...that's how origin delineates.
just one more writing
Only within a just line (inception towards death) can one (life) write more or less...doing so is unjust aka against natural justice.
the doctrines of Lucifer
Luci (light) fer/bher (to carry)...if all implies light; then each one within is being carried by light representing enlightenment aka mind within light.
It's ones consent to any suggested doctrine/dogma by another which tempts one to carry extra burdens of sin/syn (together with, jointly; alike; synchronous). The more enlightenment is burdened...the darker ones mind gets.
Only free will of choice can protect enlightenment (discernment) from darkness (ignorance).
An example for a doctrine who inverts this: https://genius.com/Metallica-enter-sandman-lyrics
- Exit light (discernment)
- Enter night (ignorance)
- Take my hand (consent to my suggestion)
- We're off to never-never land
the Spirit of Babylon
Aka ones breath (spirit) animating confusion; babble (babylon) by speaking artificial words within natural sound.
Kaaba-Allah
What does allah imply? ALL LAW. What does kaaba (cube) imply? TO CUE BEING. All natural law (allah) giving cue to each being within (cube).
all secret societies are kabbalistic
All reveals each one within. SEC implies the division from one another; SOC implies unification with one another. The latter conceals the former.
Kabbalah from qibbel - "to receive, admit, accept" implies ones response to all OR to one another...the former representing revelation; the latter representing concealment.
The issue isn't what "all" + "secret societies" or "kabbalistic" mean, but about your response. If you use "secret societies"; then you aren't responding to "all" but to a contradiction shaped by another. Your response to another while ignoring all represents your denial of "kabbalistic" reception.
The simple foundation...nature doesn't hide anything from being. It's the being who can be tempted to hide from nature.
The Jesuit Order is at the top of all kabbalistic secret societies
a) Order (natural way) > qabbalah (to receive) > jesus (I am)...not a top vs bottom conflict; but a line of progression.
b) All cannot be kabbalistic...only each one within can receive from all offered.
c) Secret Society aka sec (to divide) soc (to unite) are contradicting each other. There's no such thing as a secret society...only the society of many together permitting few to remain apart in secret.
As seen by the clothes...these ain't typical New York schoolgirls; but privately schooled girls of Hasidic Judaism; within which women are organized in the harem system. Not the harem system showed to goyim about satisfying the lust of few men with the offering of many women, but as a harem/haram (safeguard). In such a place...women of all ages are teaching one another how hygiene; breeding; husbandry etc. work.
The tunnel angle for the goyim imagination is about scared kids lost in the darkness, while the jewish angle is about protecting jewish eugenics from the eyes of gentile disgenics. If you promote miscegenation to the united states of gentiles; then having a bunch of segregated/apartheid breeding operations out in the open may offend the amalgamated masses sweating in the melting pot.
to assume the great dying will arrive
Only while dying (inception towards death) can will (life) arrive...suggested assumptions about outcome tempt ones perception to ignore origin. To assume (a sum) represents a burden to one.
Focus on material that will not be available
Focusing narrows ones perception within all perceivable to the suggested material of another. It's ones focus which permits another to artificially restrict what nature made available.
they won’t keep us alive
Life cannot be kept if it's a potential (life) within a process (inception towards death).
I've been amassing a digital library...
Whatever you are amassing represents a digital liberty by few to amass many into a world wide web. Anything amassed within a web implies a burden for the prey and a fattening for the predator.
At one point technology will simply cease to exist
Nature moves living sentience/sentence towards point of death...techno (artifice) logy (logic) shapes a circle to trick sentience into abstinence.
adding more Technology just makes things worse
Because one (effect) within all (cause) cannot add more...few suggest technology (affect) to make efficiency among many worse.
Only nature adds (inception) + subtracts (death) so that each divide (life) can be fruitful and multiply...
adding more people makes problem solving take longer
There can be only one solution (inception towards death) for each problem (life)...it's ignoring each (person) for each other (people) which takes mental precedence, hence burdening the mind while thinking.
If you think in terms of social formalities; then you are not free to think...suggested social-ism and formal-ism binds ones choice, while leaving a chosen one free to think.
due to managerial overhead
Ones consent to any suggestion puts another over ones head. All perceivable divides each ones perception from one another, hence in-between above/below.
Nature dues being...being doesn't owe anything to one another.
not all people are equal
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies equal sound generating different byproducts by separation from one another.
A jew suggests nihilism (not); pluralism (people) and egalitarianism (equal) to tempt gentiles together aka against one another.
A people can never be "all" only a sum of partials within all...the attempt the shape each person into a people to reconstruct all represents tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
shorten the time
Time implies a measurement one takes within all given...doing so confines ones perception within a circle (short or long). The more measurements one takes; the shorter the length of time given will be perceived by one.
Technology has become a human time consumer
Techno (artifice) logy (logic). Few suggest artifice to tempt many to logically chooses a side (want or not want)...doing so amounts (sum) many together (con).
What's the opposite of a sum? A withdrawal (inception towards death) of a unit (life)...
it takes longer to do the same thing.
a) Thing implies a differentiation within sameness aka everything (cause) dividing into each thing (effect).
b) Same does; difference re-does. A difference cannot do anything without already being differentiated aka being done.
c) Only sameness gives (inception) and takes (death) difference (life)
d) Life cannot take any length without ignoring that beginning (inception) and end (death) cannot be defined while living in-between. Attempting to take shortens the life given to one.
wander off to a bad part
Only within a way (inception towards death) can each part (life) wander/wendh - "to turn"...doing so tempts parts to turn against (good vs bad) one another.
There are no good or bad parts within nature...only different parts within the same way. It's choosing to turn off the way and against each other which establishes war. A jew shapes logos (word of god) to turn gentiles mentally (logic) and physically (reason) against each other.
I'm still waiting for an example of factually wrong etymology...
factually wrong etymology
Example?
None of this actually "implies"
Everything (cause) implies each thing (effect). All of nature implicates; each being within either responses to implication (perception) or reason (suggested) depending on ones free will of choice.
What isn't actual is none/nan - "not one, not any, no person; not the least part"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=none
some stream of consciousness nonsense you strung together.
Free will of choice analyses by setting apart, hence utilizing etymological and phonetic roots upon spells few crafted together to deceive many with synthesis.
if God didn't intervene this time.... Why not?
God moves. Anything build within; God moves apart. A jew builds not/nothing/nihilo aka nihil-ism to tempt gentiles to deny being moved.
The longer you choose to hold onto nihilism (not); the more damage Gods motion does to you, while benefiting israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
The origin of nothing represents creatio ex nihilo...
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)." ~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Here's a jew selling "nothing" to gentiles aka "everybody does something; we do nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
"Because it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness...nothingness without end". ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
Js take it as a war metaphor
A jew suggests metaphors to tempt gentiles to TAKE. Taking anything puts one into opposition of all given, and at war against one another.
if God intervened
God inter (inception) venes (life) outer (death)...vene/venire - "to come" implies coming into being (living) while getting taken out (dying); which represents Gods simultaneous work.
the first tower
First God; then being; then a beings free will of choice to build a tower in-between above/below.
God intervened on the first tower but not this one
Look at the world right now and tell me that whatever was build up isn't also falling down? Like...as the tower of babel goes up in Europe; isn't Europe simultaneously going down?
Whatever goes up (life) goes down (inception towards death) aka as above/so below. It's the physical tower of babel (confusion of sound) and the mental tower of babble (utter words indistinctly) which distract from Gods work and ones position in-between.
the first Freemason
First > free > mason. First implies all for each one within. Free implies freed from one another within all. Mason implies fitting together what all set apart from one another.
nimrod
Aka NIM (to take) ROD (a unit of linear measure)...first all sets each unit (life) of linear (inception towards death) measure free from one another, then others suggest one to take measurements of one another. That's how free-masonry works.
Is it suicidal to hold onto the land of ire; noun - "anger, wrath, violence" aka aistra - "violent passion"?