▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a conspiracy

a) A glacier on which (((mountain)))?

b) Freezing (glacier) and joining (app) disturbs transportation within sound (phone).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

because they have rejected...Christ

The separation of BE (being) within CAUSE implies Christ (to anoint)...they (plural) implies a beings (single) rejection thereof.

Followers

God moves forwards which inspires resistance; Christ represents resistance...following represents the temptation to ignore resisting.

Follow implies "falling low", while resisting implies "rising up".

followers of the Synagogue

Syn (together) agogue (put in motion)...God puts in motion; each jew within tempts gentiles together. Falling for temptation implies SYN/SIN.

synagogue of satan

Being implies OF AGOGUE (from motion)...SYN/SIN implies opposing (satan) Gods motion, while turning against (ad-vert) one another.

It's committing a sin to hold SYN + AGOUGE together.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

you can draw the parallels with modern pop culture and Roman culture.

Roman culture implies drawing parallels...as temporary culture is artificially drawn for many; few are roaming parallel within ongoing nature. Nature pops any culture.

Cultivation requires adaptation to animation.

death-mongering

Death implies a process for each potential life within...mongering implies life buying and selling artifice from one another while ignoring nature.

Globalists working

Only nature works...few suggest globalism (-ism aka consensus) to tempt many into artificial employment (-ist aka consent). Nature works against those who employ themselves to artifice aka idolaters.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

why 'Christians' are so in love with anti-Christ...

Because the -IANS in christians implies a collective attachment to, while Christ implies a separation from. Attaching oneself to any collective implies turning against Christ (anti-Christ) and against each other (love vs hate).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

things I want to hear

a) Besides influencer who say what you want to hear and influencer who say what you don't want to hear...are there influencer who tell you what you need to hear?

b) Why is it called influencer when propagation of information makes one an informer?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

energies of

There can be only one EN (within) ERGY (work) aka all Gods work and each power employed within.

who literally is

LITER (each artificial letter) AL (all natural sound)...only within sound can a letter be shaped. A jew shapes letters to tempt gentiles into accord (agreement), which when agreed to permits a jew to plug at a gentiles heart (cordis) string (cord).

wizard’s art, strengthening thereby the words of

Only within natural sound can any word be articulated.

God-defying power

Aka ones free will of choice to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) which is how one renounces one's allegiance to all for one another.

angelic Power

Shaping within a line establishes the power of angles/angels...holding onto a shape permits another to exploit symbolic angles during de (to divide) monic (to provide) possession.

Azazel: you, by the destroyer marked

AZAZ (to go away) EL (God)...to depart from God marks one for destruction.

The jewish religion

A jew adapts to THE (theos; God) while tempting gentiles RE (to respond) LIG (to bind) ION (action).

God acts; jew reacts...gentile binds self by joining another.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tanya and souls

Tanya implies incipit (the beginning of) as opposed to explicit (the unfolding of)...a jew adapts to soul (sole; singular) by its beginning, which gentiles ignore for the unfolding of souls (plural).

Differentiation implies singularity; unification implies plurality...the former heightens; the latter lessens.

Ideological concept of Lubavitch

Ideological concepts imply a plurality to contain gentiles, while a jew utilizes Chabad aka Chokmah (Wisdom), Binah (Understanding), and Da'at (Knowledge) to free self from containment.

Con (together) cept (to take) ion (action) tempts one to ignore in (within) cept (to take) ion (action)...being within allows one to take; while "together" implies one already took.

A jew realizes that taking contradicts given, hence tempting gentiles to ignore given by taking ideological concepts into possession.

possess Divine soul

Soul (motion) > divination (momentum) > potential (matter)...taking possession lowers given potential.

The other nations of the world are compared to vomiting and filth

There can only be NAT (native) ION (action) aka the divination of singularity into each single unit within. Nations (plural) represent com (together) par (equal) aka a likeness which divination discharges (vomit) for impurity (filth).

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The opposite...limited use of free power (life) within unlimited energy (inception towards death).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Waking up gets lonely...few can handle that.

b) Sharing contradicts free...free energy cannot be shared. Energy sets free which makes each power within a share aka an internal division.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

mRNA technology is safe & effective

The "m" in mRNA stands for messenger aka the one sending the RNA technology, who is safe & effective; while the one receiving it becomes unsafe & subjective...hence "don't shoot the messenger".

Erica Schwartz

Erica/eirikr (honored ruler) + Schwartz (black; absence of light)...nature directs light within a straight line, which when honored (honesty) allows each ray within to shine. Dishonor (dishonesty) implies the division of light and dark, which darkens each shining ray.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will technology change what it means to be human?

Only change generates being...techno (artifice) logy (logic) manipulates the will of a being to ignore change, which continues until willingly resisted.

You don’t have to be a computer...for technology

Com (together) puter (to reckon)...putting artifice (techno) and logic (logy) together makes one a computer. The artifice becomes the input which allows others to use ones logic as a binary operating system.

Physical computer technology represents a distraction from the mental computer (ones consent) techno (artificial suggestion) logy (ones circular logic).

We all wonder

a) We cannot be all...only within all can each one join one another to form a we.

b) All cannot wonder because there's nothing more to all for all to wonder about. It's each one within all, who by ignoring all, start wondering about one another.

Wonder implies amazement aka ones mind stuck within a maze.

where we’re headed

Each one heads from inception towards death aka the living essence heading along the process of dying. Another one suggests pluralism (we) to mentally join many heads together to distract potential (living) within process (dying) with possession (draining life).

technology having impact on life

Holding onto techno (artifice) logy (logic) burdens life, which isn't an impact from outside, but a circumvention from within.

John Lennox believes that there are credible responses

Believing implies ones response giving credit (creed) to another.

questions that AI poses

Nature poses native > native shapes artifice > artifice reposes native. AI simply regurgitates all the stuff (questions and answers) natives ignore nature (solution) for.

in particular, artificial intelligence.

AI only works if one particular consents to the suggestion of another particular, which by joining together inverts particularity into commonality.

Only nature particularizes each from one another; while artifice communizes many under few.

systems with insights

Sys (together) stem (to stand) obscures each ones sight within. Insight requires proximity from one another so that each one can see what all offers.

The way AI is changing

The (theos; God) implies the one and only way of linear change for each native within all nature...artifice implies circumvention thereof aka AI regurgitating input to distract from change.

The urgent need for regulation

Regul (to move in a straight line) ation (action) implies nature regulating each native (life) within urgency (inception towards death). Living implies expression; the process of dying implies impression...this pressure implies urgency.

Few suggest technology to distract many from urgency with triviality, more specifically into a Trivial Pursuit of technology. It's as usual just a game... https://img.gvid.tv/i/Q43VGw6e.jpg

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is NO trick

No implies "nothing"...so where is nothing? If you're a trucker; then you transport from origin towards destination, so what's the origin of nothing; how do you transport nothing, and what destination you transport nothing to?

Imaging atruckdriver coming from nowhere; carrying nothing into no man's land, while expecting to get something out of it...

What if "no" represents the trick which deceives one into de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of perception?

If one uses diagnosis on nothing, then one gets a division (dia) of nothing and everything...which of those can one perceive (gnosis)?

You are an idiot.

Idiot/idios - "one's own; private"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/idiot

If the public (dēmosios) placates the private (idios) as an idiot; then the public acknowledges lack of privacy.

The jewish trick is about tempting gentiles into a conflict (genius vs idiot) to distract from genius (nature) generating idiot (native) by dividing essence from one another to allow privacy.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

sharing the same blood

Nature implies same; being implies differentiated from one another. Blood/bloma/bhel - "to thrive; bloom" implies the growth effort of each native within nature to thrive among each other...as seen by ones off-spring aka the fruit of ones labor.

Entrance blood banks and transfusions to curtail the thriving of each by mixing many aka "mud-blood". This is also why an alchemist utilizes menstrual blood for pollution during synthesis.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Metabolic/metabolē - "a change, changing, a transition"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/metabolic

Being implies anabolic (life) within metabolic (inception towards death)...the trick here is the use of labels like ADHD to establish a condition which ignores change.

The CON (together) in condition contradicts DI (to divide) TION (action)...action represents the metabolic flow of nature; divide implies the anabolic form of each native within. Tempting natives within nature to hold artificial labels together is the trick being played here.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

ADHD is fake

Dia-gnosis implies analysis (setting apart)...using any label to diagnose any disorder implies a synthesis (putting together).

Ignoring this represents the attention deficit disorder putting synthesis beyond (hyper) analytical activity.

ADHD is not a medical condition

Con (together) di (divide) tion (action)...the suggested label "ADHD", put together by ones consent, tempts one to ignore natures dividing action.

Anything held onto mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) establishes a con-di-tion aka a contradiction in terms.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

mandela...cern

Notice that ELA (all) implies God, then notice (de) MAND + (dis) CERN...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the trend of mixed

Based on the trendsetter Abraham aka abh (father) raham (multitude).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nature moving implies agenda (singular)...the counting of dates attached to agendas (plural) tempts one to ignore the natural for the artificial.

From a different perspective...movies (plural) are designed to distract from motion (singular).

agenda about sustainability

Waiting for the "next" agenda corrupts ones temporary sustainability (life) within ongoing motion (inception towards death).

actually happens by the date rolls around?

Dates and rolling around represent fictional descriptions for actual motion. Furthermore...the word "date" tempts one to take a measurement, while ignoring date/dare/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/date

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

hang normies

Norm, from the Greek gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm Now compare the carpenter's square to the structure used to hang someone aka a gallow.

Edit: Why is the hanged man on the tarot card suspended upside down from his ankle/angle? Why is it called suspension of disbelief? Why is the game "hangman" about guessing the correct word to prevent the man from getting hanged?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

absolute power

Absolute (inception towards death) power (life) aka nature absolving (setting free) native.

corrupt

Aka cor (together) rupt (to break apart)...it's artificially putting together what nature breaks apart which corrupts the power of each being.

exercise influence

To exercise (life) influence (inception towards death) implies the struggle to sustain self...not the corruption of others by temptation.

authority

Author/autor - "father", hence the one who is in heaven...not any one authorized below.

superadd the tendency

Tendency implies "inclination towards an end".... being implies the opposite thereof aka re (life) pulsion (inception towards death) aka ones response to being thrown forwards.

Here's an example for superadding tendency and the certainty of corruption by authority... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2ivLt1GK.jpg

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

good original Israel

  • GOOD...there's only one God, no matter how good or bad anyone within responds.
  • ORIGINAL implies each one originating (orig) within (in) all (al) of God.
  • ISRAEL aka yisra'el aka each ones struggle within all of God.

Who they are exactly?

a) Out (ex) of action (act) implies singularity...not plurality (they). Each chosen one knows that.

b) Each jew responds exact (out of action), while most gentiles respond inept (within inclination)...each jew represents the exact opposite of gentiles.

A gentile believes that opposites are turning against each other, while a jew knows that opposites are divided from one another. That's why a gentile inclines towards a side; which in return permits each jew to operate in-between, while undisturbed by most conflict.

After any gentile conflict...nature divides the conflicting sides from one another, which permits each jew at center to rise like a phoenix from the ashes of gentile conflict. Again and again and again...

everything that...are not.

What if nothing isn't the opposite of everything...what if each thing is the opposite of everything, and nothing implies each things de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

By holding onto any product these features become a burden upon oneself...the real feature is about resisting the temptation to hold onto, which grows ones resistance.

Nature uses the ongoing process of dying to assure that the temporary feature of life cannot be a burden for long...technology is utilized to distract from that.

Notice that the opposite of feature (life) implies downfall (inception towards death)... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/feature.html

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

can the One True God be an idol

a) Only a being can idolize God by for example taking a true or false measurement, which ignores all given by God.

b) God cannot "be"...BE IN G(od) implies each one within all. Each being implies a lesser part of all God aka effect within cause aka reaction within action aka power within work aka form within flow etc.

is He the Only One with rights to worship

Rights (plural) contradicts only one (singular)...right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies all delineating (inception towards death) each one within (life).

Worship implies the attachment of worth unto ship, while ignoring that all flow (value) sets each form (evaluation) apart from one another.

The word "worship" represents a suggested synthesis designed to prevent ones perception from analyzing WOR (value) SHIP (vessel) and thereby discerning self as one vessel (perception) within all value (perceivable).

Idolatry refers to holding the synthesis together, hence committing a sin/syn, which one has to atone (action) for, because action divides anything synthetic from one another.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christ's Father ABBA is NOT yhvh aka saturn/satan who is the wicked father of the jews!

Father WAS before child (christ; jew) can suggest what father IS. The conflict about who is vs isn't father only happens among the children who ignore the one and only father "which is in heaven".

Heaven/heave - "to rise" requires one to rise up...not put each other down.

As for ABBA (father) + IMMA (mother) + YHWH + ELOH...each represents a tetra (four) gram (letter) written within aton (action).

Only within aton can a tetragram be shaped, and therefore only ATON implies the father "which is in heaven", which is also why one has to ATON(e) for sin/syn (synthesis). ATONE implies being "at one".

The Tetragrammaton is also absent in the writing of

God implies "all", within which absence implies the sense of one choosing to abstain from all (perceivable) by sustaining (consent) one another (suggested). The potential to shape a tetragrammaton or writing was always made available by all for each one within...both of which are corrupting ones sense if consented to.

In short...you compare writings, while ignoring the line God offers you to write aka delineate within.

“Tetragrammaton” means “four-letter name.”

Name implies meaning attached to something. A tetra (four) gram (letter) aton (action) wasn't a name until one chooses to apply it to something, which implies idolatry.

God implies sound, within which each instrument can shape letters into words to name each other as meaning.

God doesn't give meaning...God gives mind the potential to measure; meaning implies taking possession of measure within mind, while ignoring God given.

consists of

Con (together) sist (to stand) represents ones choice to join another...not the status quo of existence, which implies standing apart from one another. There can be only one letter...oneself LETTING another shape LETTERS.

The exact pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton is not universally agreed on

a) Ex (out) act (action)...only God acts each reaction in (inception) and out (death) of being (life).

b) Pro (fourth) noun (name) represents the obfuscation of God acting out of sound. A name represents the articulation of natural sound aka spell-craft.

c) Uni (one) vers (to turn) al (all) implies the ones within all turning against each other, while ignoring all delineating each one apart from one another. Universalism represents a jewish trick to tempt consenting gentiles into a consensus against each other.

the ineffable name

Sound implies the ineffable name. A name shaped within sound cannot express sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all; el; God".

Sound gives one a tongue...a jew suggests language/lingua (tongue) to split ones tongue within natural sound into the articulation of words. Naming anything covers the ineffable from ones perception.

In other words...nature moves. If a native names what nature moves; then the native obfuscates the perception of movement.

You don't exist to give God a name (or anything else), but to adapt to all given by God.

THE (ONE) BEING

The implies theos (God) aka oneness...being implies each one within. A being can only BE IN G-od.

The Great Work

The (theos; God) implies work (to do). Work (action) delineates power (reaction)...within which a jew tempts gentiles into a circle (greater vs lesser) to drain and relocate power.

Apotheosis

Aka apo (change) theos (God) aka action aka motion aka work aka energy aka the unmoving mover.

Only during apotheosis (inception towards death) can a nadir (life) come into being.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Techno (artifice) logy (circular thinking) cannot be reached...only chased after. Logic represents a hamster-wheel confining ones mind from thinking straight.

Col (together) lapse (to fall)...the former is artificial; the latter natural. Holding together artifice prevents one from rising during the natural fall. It's using technology which holds artifice together, while preventing the user to rise within nature.

Technology tempts self-abuse.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›