What seems more likely...
...the consent given to whatever is being suggested about "Pam Bondi". Before alike consent was given by many towards suggestions by few...each ones free will of choice was different from one another.
privately revealed
Nature revealing each being implies private/privatus - "set apart".
Beings like "O'Keefe" or "Bondi" artificially making private revelations public towards a common audience implies "held together".
Consenting to a suggested revelation implies partaking aka taking a part and holding onto it.
summarize
Aka your mind on tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka trying to establish the sum of all things as the inversion of nature dividing all into each one.
It's a jewish suggestion which summons consenting gentiles into a sum aka into the unwashed masses aka the amounting of many under few aka collectivization.
Wish AI
That implies wanting artifice, while ignoring the need of natural.
Is Everything an 'op?!'
The differentiation from every into each thing aka from cause into effect implies operation/operari - "to have effect, be active, cause".
If effect ignores cause for other effects, then that implies artificial idleness during natural operation, which is commonly called a psychological operation.
the important stories
Nature doesn't import stories...it influences (inception towards death) form (life) through perceivable inspiration. Those within utilize suggestion and consent to import information into memory, which is where they "store" it.
Another word for storing is "deposit", which implies each ones divided (de) position (posit)....not ones pledge into a contract with another for safekeeping as suggested.
viral
Viral/virus - "poisonous substance" aka each ones poise (vir) within all (al)...not anything by others.
Few can suggest anything on a screen, yet only if many consent to look at it, does it go viral aka spread like a virus. It's ones consent to a suggestion, which distracts from ones poise within al, while positioning one in a subordinated stance under the poisonous influence by another.
I don't...I don't ...NO...zero...NINGUNA...cero...nobody...ไม่มีคำพูด...ไม่มี...Hakuna...sifuri...hayaeleweki...
Each of these implies your belief in nothingness aka your consent to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) aka your de-nial of perceivable aka your own choice to desensitize yourself to reality with fiction.
Nothing implies essence ignoring substance for each other...a simple trick used by a jew to tempt gentiles into becoming senseless.
I don't care
Both nihilism (don't) and Jesus aka je suis (I am) are carried within you as shown by the words you carry forth.
None of anything your bot says makes sense to anyone.
How could "none" be sensed? What if it desensitizes one to believe in nonsense?
What if nonsense aka nothing at all is based on a yiddish merchant word called "bupkis"? https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5447386/jewish/What-Does-Bupkis-Mean.htm
You just push good comments down
Good and bad are pushing against each other within a conflict of reason...others utilize suggestion to pull one into it.
Notice that I neither down-vote; not up-vote any comments. Why? Because choice within balance has to resist the temptation of choosing sides.
jews are the smartest.
Smart/smerten; verb - "to cause pain, to suffer pain"; from mer - "to rub away, harm"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/smart
A jew suggests gentiles SMART criteria... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMART_criteria or smartphones; smart automobile; smart contract; smart TV; smartpass etc. to tempt gentiles to harm themselves aka "to be punished; to bear penalties or the evil consequences of any thing".
"He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it" ~Proverbs 11:15.
I doubt...
Doubt implies fear of outcome...a jew suggests progressivism to tempt gentiles towards outcomes, thereby distracting from perceivable origin.
Furthermore...doubt relates to dubious (to have to choose between two things), hence a chosen one tempting ones choice to attach self to another aka 1+1=2.
Within nature...origin (inception) and outcome (death) imply the same motion for each one unit of different matter (life) within.
Doubt has to be caste; a jew directs spell-casting at gentiles... https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/incantations-spells-adjurations/
The foundation of spell-casting implies the incantation of suggested words within perceivable sound, which when consented to, permits further modulation of spells.
why allow control to be lost?
a) Nature implies ongoing loss; each being within implies temporary growth. Only loss allows growth...allow implies all (loss) + low (growth). Only low can grow higher.
b) Control (rolled together) represents a jew CON-ning and TROLL-ing gentiles.
Here's an example of such... https://www.conning.com/ (insurance and asset management based on diversity, equity and inclusion).
Which is btw under the wing of Generali Investments... https://www.generali-investments.com/global/en/institutional/ (your partner for progress)
jews are mostly harmless slaves like us.
a) A chosen one was selected by slaves as master.
b) A jew suggests gentiles to be alike, as to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
c) A jewish suggestion represents "less harm"; a gentile consent to it represents "more harm".
Suggesting porn is less harmful than watching porn...that's how a jew utilizes talmudic reasoning to cast doubt into the minds of consenting gentiles during a conflict of reason (less vs more).
A gentile's mind gets stuck reasoning (less vs more); while ignoring that choosing either side (less or more) is less damaging than choosing VERSUS from both sides. Versus/verto - "to turn" implies circular logic, which is what a kike/kikel - "circle" does, when using the freemasonic compass & square.
the friendly jew from your accounting department
Holding one accountable, while dividing a part of ones mind...does that sound like friend or foe?
Without a jew doing that...how would nature establish an accounting department?
jews that supposedly run the world can be tied...
Tie/deuk - "to lead"...it's gentiles who choose to follow jewish leads. Does israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" sound like someone who follows leads?
More contradictions for those with eyes to see...
a) Secretary implies a confidant of private matters; not someone who airs private matters in public.
b) Theo (God) dore/do (to give) + Barrett/barra/bar (barrier) aka erecting a barrier (suggested) in-between what God gives (perceivable) and those it being given to (perception). The work of a free-mason.
c) Press implies together; secretary/secret/seco (to divide) implies apart.
d) A house cannot be white...each house (body of Christ) can only be build within white aka pure light (God).
A noose bound around ones neck...hence also BUNDES-republik, from jewish bundism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundism
Too many over-think Ukraine vs. Russia
a) Versus implies turning against one another (reason); which is based on thinking in turns (logic).
b) There cannot be TOO anything within nature, only each partial within whole.
Nature isn't about too much vs too little; but about whole adding (inception) and subtracting (death) partials (life) through internal separation.
disposing of
Joining together contradicts disposition (divided position). Nature disposes (inception towards death) beings (life)...few tempt many to turn (versus) against each other, hence joining in conflict.
moving money
How could money not move? Doesn't currency imply current?
no changes
Again...no changes to a current?
authenticity
Aka autos (self) + hentēs (being)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/authentic
How could one be self without being separated from one another during motion/current/change?
some degree of separation between the government and the central bank
Aka center cutting off circumference (circumcision). It's suggested banks (sides within circumference) which government (control mind) by tempting one to ignore center.
central bank power is regulated to the Rothschilds
Each Rothschild operates at center (life) of regulation (inception towards death)...others ignore this by paying trust into suggested banks, which empowers each Rothschild to de-regulate aka to remove regulatory restrictions by feeding others into the regulating natural order.
How does nature "remove regulatory restrictions"? By setting each being within as "free" will of choice, hence remove implying each ones RE-sponse (life) to being MOVE-ed (inception towards death).
debt
a) Debt cannot be forgiven by another; only let go of by oneself.
b) Debt aka death implies the process of dying for each one living within...when choosing to hold onto anything else.
If form (life) within flow (inception towards death) chooses to hold onto anything, then form owes a debt to the flow of death.
come out of servitude
Coming (inception towards death) into (life) implies being set "free" from one another. It's therefore ones "free" will of choice to go into servitude to one another, while ignoring this.
Solon, who is credited for building some of the foundations of ancient Greek democracy
Demos (common people) + kratos (strength) aka solo (singular) using common (plural) for strength aka each ones choice collectivized into a commonwealth; becoming the strength of each sovereign chosen one.
If ones choice selects a chosen ones suggestion, then a legislator (solōn) has been selected for the proposition of laws.
partial debt
Because holding onto anything puts the temporary partial into debt to the ongoing whole.
jubilee
Jubilee/yobhel - "rams horn"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shofar
Which is about what? Causing (inception towards death) to swell (life) aka blow/bhel/ball/ba'al etc. A jew drives by impact, while blowing gentiles away....
defense minister: "we will bomb"
Another contradiction served to the blind...
Iran
Iran/arya - "self designation"...the suggested labels "minister" + "magister" tempt one to ignore self designation, hence permitting the magister above to design the minister below.
a) Following a narrator who breaks narratives...permits the seizing (lucre/lukro) of dominance (dom) over those who joined by free will of choice.
b) Narrate/narrare/gno - "to know" implies the separation of whole (perceivable) into particulars (perception)...suggested narratives tempt particulars together.
Others cannot give knowledge which nature not already gave, yet each one wields the free will of choice to TAKE artificial knowledge from one another, while ignoring nature.
jews don't support a black child being called a nigger
Hence the jewish use of "parental advisory for explicit content" labels, while suggesting children that blacks are "Boys from the Hood" + "Public Enemies" + a "Menace to Society" + "Niggaz Wit Attitudes"...
a) Artificial intelligence requires human will to take it.
b) Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to compete with each other, while ignoring that nature moves even; steady; stable; balanced etc.
Thank God we can still own things".
a) Things implies the separation of potential (partials) within procession (whole)...owning aka taking possession of potential during procession contradicts itself.
b) God implies giver; being implies ones struggle to resist taking. A being wants to take the apple; which ignores God separating seed and soil, so that each tree of life can grow fruit.
own nothing and be happy
Happy implies happen "coming to pass", hence others tempting one to seek happiness from whatever happens next, while ignoring that coming into being (life) implies within a passage (inception towards death).
Ignoring origin (everything) for seeking happiness from outcomes (nothing) requires one to hold onto (own) happenstance (chance)...chance implies the inversion of choice.
policies
Policy implies body together; being implies body apart. Few suggest policies to tempt many to follow "a line of conduct" together.
Conduct implies to lead (duct/deuk) together (con) and line implies ones lifeline of being moved from inception towards death.
Line moves life-sentence towards point of death...few utilize corpus-oration to shape policies, which tempts many to follow the lead towards death.
discord
Aka dividing (dis) the heart (cordis/cor) by turning (logic) minds against each other (reason). Turning against each other implies a concord aka agree to disagree, which generates palpitation for the heart.
Child safety
A child aka "fruit of the womb" isn't safe but prone to injury, hence exposed, not just to being spoiled through natural decomposition, but through artificial composition aka by anyone else being tempted by the fruit.
The fruit of the womb implies the fountain of youth gushing forth what the old/ala - "to nourish" seek to sustain themselves.
to turn on you
a) YOU is based on a being turning from ONE towards ME, hence from being a unit of potential within a whole process towards taking possession of self, which empowers every other one into a chosen one aka into a jew/you.
b) ALL implies the natural origin of ONE...ME implies the artificial origin of YOU. In-between operates free will of choice; struggling with self discernment, while being tempted by others.
If one reddit, then ones mind was tempted to ignore perceivable change (inspiration) for fixing suggested (information).
Inspiration has to be adapted to on the fly, since it moves, while information tempts ones memory to hold onto it, which then permits others to "reddit" again and again and again...
the 7 chakras which is how we connect back to God.
a) From one to seven implies a separation apart from one another, not a connection together. More than one would also contradict mono-theism.
b) Chakra/cakra - "circle" implies a shape within linear motion...separation can only be linear; not circular. The circle shape implies beginning and end put together aka ouroboros.
the mind can override anything...
...by letting go; not by holding together. Why? Because memory can only exist within a linear "ride", hence getting rid of.
the mind can move mountains if there is faith
Faith implies holding onto; hence "amounting" together within memory, while being (life) moved (inception towards death).
If we do NOT believe, the mind puts a block on our intended activity
a) Action cannot be blocked by any reaction within. Action sets reactions free from one another.
b) Intention implies redirecting ones attention towards outcome, while ignoring that only action directs reactions from origin.
c) Not implies ones belief in suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing).
if we are self-aware enough
We (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore self for others.
the visible deep state
a) State/stat - "circumstance" implies ones stance within a circle aka ones entrapment within circular logic.
b) Deep state implies ones ignorance; discernment heightens ones deep state.
c) During a state (circular logic) others are showing (suggestion) what is visible (perception) to one. It's oneself ignoring perceivable by holding onto suggested, which makes this deception work.
Whose behind it all?
a) Who hinders (hind) being (be)? Only ones free will of choice can do that.
b) All forwards (fore) being (be).
density of their body naturally blocks access
a) A chosen one (singular) isn't affected by the density of "their" (plural).
b) Being one within all implies "all access", hence each being given FREE will of choice.
c) Nature reveals; artifice conceals.
in certain ways
Way implies motion; matter within motion cannot be certain (fixed), since it's being (life) moved (inception towards death).
these groups
a) Few group many together to remain partials within whole.
b) The endless groups suggested by few are tempting many to seek power by joining together.
Life is like
Being implies living (different) within process of dying (same)...likeness diminishes the living expression of differences, hence few tempting many to respond alike.
Life is like a watch. If one gear destroys another gear, hellish chaos ensues while Life adapts itself to keep itself functioning.
Each gear implies chaos; that which moves gears implies order. Motion goes on, while gears are grinding each other to death. That's why no matter how gears react; the enacting motion sustains order.
Few suggest order out of chaos to tempt many to ignore being chaos within order.
Birth children the old fashion way.
By nature setting each off-spring apart from one another, instead of joined together within an artificial family (familialism); community (communism); society (socialism) etc.
analyze
- Color implies light separating into spectrum...analysis.
- Jesus implies name attached to being...synthesis.
Only within natural analysis can there be artificial synthesis. Asking me if I agree implies an artificial synthesis, which I naturally analyzed by taking it apart into the (a)GREED it implies aka you putting things together aka to seek agreement from others aka wanting more (artificial) than needed (natural).
Spanish
- Greed in Spanish...codicia
- Agreed in Spanish...acordado
A-CODICIA/CORDADO...same phonetic origin.
should I speak
a) Sound implies natural; word implies artificial; language implies artificial layers.
b) Should/sceal/skel - "to be under an obligation"...a being is not under the obligation to speak; but set free from one another within sound.
The longer one watches; the lesser one feels the drain.
The trick...nature drains (inception towards death) being (life); while artificial entertainment "entering and taming ones mind" tempts one to ignore nature.
Nature moves; watching a movie tempts one to ignore being moved.
aGREED or disaGREED implies ones desire to possess, which corrupts ones potential to express.
The jews stole the Hebrew identity and inserted themselves in history.
a) Identical implies "same"; being implies different from one another. What if a jew tricks gentiles to hold onto identity, thereby behave alike, while ignoring to be differentiated from one another?
Wouldn't that permit a jew to change likeness at will aka switching in-between identities aka shape-shifting?
b) Where is his-story stored? What if a jew suggests a story to tempt consenting gentiles to store it within mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be recollected?
c) If he-brew the same (identity), then what different ingredients does he use?
d) If HE BREW HIS STORY within a gentiles mind, then that implies cook/coquere - "turn over in the mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook
What if steering the pot (circular vessel) implies the use of suggested information to misguide the course of circular logic?
e) What if a chosen one cannot insert self into others without ones choice inviting in? Consenting to a suggestion sounds like an invite...
color of jesus
a) Color/colos/kel - "to cover"...if nature reveals; then what does color conceal?
b) Jesus aka je suis - "I am"...if one takes possession over self (I am) during the process of natural revelation, then...?
c) The visible spectrum of light implies a separation of hue (color) during motion, for each ray of matter, bend apart from one another.
d) What about the difference between color and chroma - "intensity of distinctive hue, degree of departure of a color-sensation from that of white or gray" ?
e) If chroma/ghreu - "to rub, grind" is applied to christ (each anointed one), then it would grind off the anointment...
James O'Keefe makes a suggestion about Pam Bondi...every viewer consented ALIKE to the suggestion. Before viewing...each one had a DIFFERENT point of view.
This is why viewing anything others are showing..."seems more likely".