Celeb/kelep - "dog; male prostitute"... https://biblehub.com/hebrew/3611.htm hence being kept on a leash or muzzled.

Phan implies all light; tasy implies each rays response to it. The former implies natural; while the latter becomes artificial if held onto.

Sleight of hand: "Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality"... https://genius.com/Queen-bohemian-rhapsody-lyrics

a) Imagination implies an image (form) shaped within action (flow)...the shaping isn't the issue; holding onto shapes is.

b) Napoleon and Eratosthenes imply suggested names held as mental images within physical action. The names represent fiction; the ones carrying them represent reality distorted by fiction.

c) Never implies a contradiction in terms aka nothing-everything...nothing implies ones de-nial (nihilo) of everything perceivable for suggested nihil-ism.

N implies the artificial image; EVER implies the natural action.

They're taunting

Chutzpah/khutspe - "impudence, gall". According to Leo Calvin Rosten: "that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan."

Thank you, google translate bot.

Can you show me an example of a google translate bot (or any other bot) writing what free-will-of-choice wrote?

Like for example: "A being holding onto denies a beings free will of choice."

can you do the same

Being implies differentiation (perception) during sameness (perceivable)...a difference cannot do the same, but can be tricked with likeness to ignore differences.

redundant

Suggested redundant (exceeding what is natural or necessary) tempts one to ignore natural necessity for artificial exceed, which few promote to many through for example Buzz Lightyear - "to infinity and beyond".

Perceivable redundancy implies re (response) + undare (rise in waves) aka each ones formed response as waves rising (living) within all flow (dying).

Once again...which bot could adapt to inspiration like this?

A lot of "what ifs" in here...

If implies then, which is based on motion, and motion allots by separating matter apart from one another.

As for what...energy. What else could sustain being?

What if your imagination/database can't go against facts?

a) Imagination implies images shaped within action...I describe the moving action to those who react to shaped images aka symbolism aka idolatry.

b) Nature transmits perceivable inspiration through motion...few within tempt many to mentally store suggested information. The latter represents the "database" you wrote of, which is artificial and in ignorance of nature.

c) If/then (implication) prevents reason (can vs can't)...unless ignored by holding onto a suggested side, which then turns one against one another.

d) Fact implies fictitious act. Nature acts; each being within has the free will of choice to either react to it or to one another...the latter shapes fiction (suggestion) within reality (perception).

translate...

Whatever one translates words into only distracts from the original transfer...sound through instrument.

Being implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound...suggested words represent a translation error within ones consenting mind.

Totally spontaneous and not planned way ahead...

The major people, who created Communism, are jewish.

a) A jew suggests both creation-ism and commun-ism...it's each gentiles consent to it which permits a jew to create communities out of gentiles aka artificially bringing together (com) natural units.

b) If there's more gentiles then jews, then jew implies minor and gentile major. What if a jew knows how to operate in-between minor/major, simply by tricking gentiles to side against each other?

c) What if ideology implies suggested ideas by a jew tempting consenting gentiles first into logic (circular thinking), which then turns them against each other within conflicts of reason like minor vs major?

communist philosopher

a) What if -ist implies each gentiles consent to a suggested -ism by a jew?

b) What if consenting to a suggestion establishes logic within ones mind, which distracts one with sides PHI-lo-SOPH from center phi-LO-soph?

What if logic (lo) tempts one to ignore knowledge (sophia) for a conflict of reason (love vs hate aka philo vs miso)?

How about resisting the temptation of philo to remain sopher/sober?

Yes vs no aka a conflict of reason against others, based on ones circular logic...reasoning cannot dissolve the yes vs no conflict, only those fighting each other within it.

Hold your breath...does yes vs no reasoning prevent nature from forcing being into adaptation or is reasoning (vs) a distraction from implication (if/then) aka an artificial conflict distracting one from natural progression?

i can just leave

If energy implies internal/inherent power, then how could anything within energy leave?

end times

If beginning towards end implies a measurement of time, then does time continue if the measuring mind within "leaves"?

How could time exist outside of measurement aka within a measuring mind?

What if one (life) cannot measure beginning (inception) and end (death) of self, hence being in-between? Who suggests one to measure time?

wait are you, like, using the original language to make these....corrections?

a) Not alike one another...differentiated (life) from one another within sameness (inception towards death).

b) Origin of language implies sound. Language/lingua - "tongue" represents the split tongue when articulating words within natural sound.

As for sound... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics

• People talking without speaking; people hearing without listening
• People writing songs that voices never shared; and no one dared
• Disturb the sound of silence

Free-will-of-choice DARES...

c) Correct vs incorrect implies a conflict of reason based on circular thinking (logic); while doing that one ignores cor (heart) rect/reg (to move in a straight line).

Ones heart (life) is being moved in a straight line (inception towards death)...others suggest logos (word) to tempt logic (circular thinking) into reason (turning against one another).

there's a purpose, i know it.

a) Purpose implies forwarded (inception towards death) position (life)...being implies pose within pur. Seeking to understand (stand-under) tempts one to ignore ones position.

b) To know implies ones perception within all perceivable, which any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore. Suggested tempts one free will of choice to bind itself to a side aka true or false; yes or no; belief or disbelief; agree or deny; upvote or downvote etc.

Whichever side one chooses puts one into conflict with the other side, which is called a conflict of reason. One needs to resist either SIDE to sustain ones SIGHT; otherwise inclining towards one side, while turning against another implies tunnel-vision aka a reduction of sight.

do you want me to learn something from this?

a) One needs to resist want. Others tempt one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want); which distracts both sides from need.

b) To teach self implies learning and to learn implies teaching self...others represent the temptation to ignore that.

Wanting to learn from a teacher implies slave selecting master. The difference between master/slave; leader/follower; teacher/student; few/many; suggestion/consent etc....are the different words used to distract one from like-minded behavior.

The inversion of chosen one implies one's choice, for it's one's choice which selects a chosen ones suggestion, and selection/choice implies "élite". Consent implies inversion of choice...suggestion is utilized by others to tempt ones free will of choice to willingly submit to inversion, and it's the easiest temptation to fall for...shirking response-ability onto another.

i never did find Seinfeld to be funny or educational

Only during drama (inception towards death) can there be humor (life), and education isn't by others, but from all through each one.

It's not about what others are suggesting, but what one draws from perceivable...the former tempts one to hold onto it as information; while the latter implies inspiration and cannot be held onto, since it moves.

Seinfeld implies his (sein) field (feld) of vision...not yours. And Jerry/jeremiah/yirmeyah - "may jehovah exalt" implies all giving to each one....not watching "seinfeld" as suggested by others.

are you calling me a jew?

If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then every other one becomes a you (phonetic jew). Jesus aka je suis (I am) represents the suggested trick to establish the you/jew identity, which others are hiding behind.

One cannot destroy a jew/you without choosing to let go of "me; myself or I"...hence en-e-my implying "within me".

As for "call" aka order by way (inception towards death) of designation (life)...that implies each ones call of duty within all...not towards one another.

Ask yourself...do I C(see)ALL or do each others suggestions tempt one to ignore all perceivable?

totally agree

Being implies partial within total...agree vs disagree implies partials turned against each other, while ignoring totality.

Few suggest "summa totalis" to tempt many together into a sum of all things...that's the foundation for mosaic law; tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together); abrahamism (father of multitude) etc.

you can't make something from nothing

a) Make/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-

Making represents the foundation for magic and masonry and amassing many together under control of few. Nature doesn't make...it separates whole into partials aka transformation of everything...not creation out of nothing.

b) Something implies sum-thing aka the sum of things put together, which tempts one to ignore being each thing (partial) withing everything (whole) set apart from one another.

c) If nothing represents ones denial of everything perceivable for the suggestions of one another; the others can make something out of nothing.

Using the word "nothing" implies ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing). That's what establishes nothing (suggested) within one thing (perception) during everything (perceivable).

Whatever one holds onto mentally represents "nothing", because when holding onto suggested, one de-nies everything perceivable moving through ones perception.

Motion cannot be held onto...yet matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) has the free will of choice to deny being moved, while holding onto each others suggestions.

there is a Creator

a) Being implies center (perception) of all (perceivable) aka here within everywhere. Others suggest "there and there or there etc." to tempt ones perception off-center.

One can only perceive HERE...if one goes over there, then at arrival one perceives HERE, not there. Choice (life) can only exist at the center of balance (inception/death)...not on either side.

There implies a suggested description; here implies the position of matter (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, which one ignores when holding onto any description aka division (de) of action (tion) by scripture (script).

b) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > trans-formed off-spring (matter)...that ain't creation by creator, but transformation aka action (motion) transferring (momentum) form (matter).

Basic alchemy...separation of ingredients within base. The base cannot create anything; it was everything before each thing can come into being within it.

Effect can only come into being within cause aka reaction within action aka form within flow aka one within all aka partial within whole aka want within need aka expression within impression aka resistance within velocity aka living within process of dying.

A jew suggests creationism aka creatio ex nihilo to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing.

Genesis 1:1 - "In the beginning; God created..."...that puts the generated (gin) being (be) before God.

That's the islamic gin/jinn/djin aka the shapshifter aka the genie in the bottle..."I'm a genie in a bottle...you gotta rub me the right way". To rub implies to anoint aka being the anointed one (christ).

https://genius.com/Christina-aguilera-genie-in-a-bottle-lyrics

i did just understand

Choosing to stand-under puts one at odds with one another aka under vs over. Having choice implies being within "just" balance.

Others suggest the word "understanding" to tempt ones consent to "stand-under" the suggested, hence submitting self while seeking to understand others. That's a simple inversion spell.

i'll be sure not to speak words out loud if i'm in enemy territory.

a) Enemy implies "within me", hence ones consent permitting suggested words into ones mind/memory.

b) Speech implies articulation of sound aka artificial words shaped within natural sound aka spell-craft.

Example...a word is shape by LETTERS aka ones choice LETTING another one suggest words.

A suggested DEFINITION shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound)...if consented to.

If you do it again i'm NOT answering

Not/nothing implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested, and it's based on creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo

"Cause it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness. Nothingness without end"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k

• George: "It's about nothing...everybody does something; we do nothing".
• Jerry: "I think you might have something here"
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI

has anyone ever told you

All the fucking time...others cannot stop telling free will of choice what to choose.

you're difficult to follow

Following another denies each ones FREE will of choice being differentiated from one another. It's ones choice to follow another which binds diffi into cult.

One was different before one chose to follow alike...

I like you

There's the issue...like one another contradicts being "free" from one another.

And to make it even harder to follow...I implies jesus aka je suis (I am), which brands everyone else into a you (phonetic jew).

I (jesus) and YOU (jew) are bound to each other, hence establishing an IOU aka ones acknowledgement of debt to another.

That's a glimpse into the levels of spell-craft few are utilizing to enslave the minds of many.

But the yoke I have on is easy

a) But/butan - "from without"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/but

Being implies within and all (perceivable) moving through each one (perception) allows expression from within outwards..."but" inverts that, and many use it to "butt in" aka interrupt/interfere with one another.

Whatever ones writes after "but" is based on an inversion. Meanwhile...if all, then each one within...no buts.

From a christian perspective...how could one use "but" in response to God?

b) Having implies putting the yoke around self by taking possession within self...which is easy because it implies falling for the temptation of choosing want (to hold onto) over need (to let go of). Choosing to let go of what one has...that's hard.

I have no need to trade it for any thing the world provides.

a) Suggesting "I have no" implies taking possession over self (I), while denying (nihilo; nothing) that all provides each ones potential by separation from one another during procession.

b) Trading implies with one another aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion), which makes one a trader/traitor to all (perceivable) giving each one (perception) the FREE will of choice to evaluate moving value.

c) Thing implies everything separating into each thing, which trading within one another contradicts through a contract.

d) Being implies want (temporary growth) within need (ongoing loss)...hence the need to resist want at the moment(um) of being.

If one suggests "I have all I need", then one ignores being want, hence being tempted by one another within all need...it's the suggestion to one another which draws temptation closer to each other, while binding consenting choice into a contract (religion aka re-ligo aka response to bondage).

Read further... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Islam

Islam as suggested to ones free will of choice implies "submission" of self to another...if consented to. YET...Islam/aslama/salam - "peace/piece" implies being one piece within all, separated from one another and given free will of choice.

There WAS islam (piece) before ones submission to what another suggests islam IS... as soon as one consents willingly to suggested islam, one isn't at piece/peace anymore, but at war with one another.

Sub (under) mittere (to send)...before one can submit to one another, one (life) was send (inception towards death) from below (dying) above (living), while now struggling with the temptation to go under (dying) while having ones head above (living).

Being implies in-between the water above (living) and the water below (dying)...that's submission aka resisting (growth) temptation (loss)...not following each others suggested orders towards promised outcome.

US inserts itself into Israel

Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each chosen ones natural separation; US (united states) implies artificial unification in ignorance of natural separation.

Unification doesn't insert itself into separation...it permits those who separate to insert at the center of unification.

War implies units turning against each other, while ignoring separation from one another. It's consent to a suggestion aka following orders which self inserts one into a conflict of reason against others aka war.

Join/yeug/yoke - "collar or harness for fastening a pair of draft animals"...that's what happens to many when joining the suggestions by few...they become cattle, while being drafted as units into war against each other.

Looking At Islam Vs Christianity

Looking implies locking onto a side within a conflict of reason, which turns both sides against (vs) each other. That versus/verto - "to turn" also implies adversary aka satan/stn.

Few are suggesting many what to look/lock at, thereby tempting each being to be-hold by consenting to the suggested fiction, while ignoring perceivable reality...

Islam/aslama/salam - "peace/piece" + christian/khriein - "to anoint" implies a setting apart from one another...not a turning against one another.

possessed

Being implies potential (life) within procession (inception towards death)...possession implies a being holding onto each others artificial suggestions, while ignoring the natural separation of procession (perceivable) into potential (perception).

Forgive the clickbain thumbnail, it's a tactic to get the info out, I think

a) Forgiving clickbait implies giving forward bait (suggested information) to tempt others to click aka the sound of a key in a lock aka to fall into context when giving consent to a suggestion.

b) Tactic aka being touched (tac) by a tick (tic) aka touching by consent the suck-ing sugg-estion of another. Tactic/tekhnē - "artifice"...

c) Outward information tempts one to ignore being within inspiration aka within the spirit of action.

the increase of tension

Tension/tendere/ten - "to stretch" aka procession (inception towards death) stretching potential (life)...consenting to a suggestion by beholding information attaches a string to ones mind (attachment), while binding ones free will of choice to another one...thereby prostrate self to another through submission. That the tension one feels within religion/religio (to bind anew).

don't be scared, be prepared

Being scared implies towards outcome...so does preparing. Both tempt one to ignore adaptation to origin.

In reality...prepare/praeparare/pere - "to produce" implies nature producing being, which is given the opportunity to re-produce.

circle around cube

Circular logic represents the artificial circle, while ones perception within perceivable implies the natural cube aka left/right + up/down + front/back.

The circle shrouds the cube in darkness...

What if the false flag has been flying for a while... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company#/media/File:Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_(1801).svg

behold, I will

A being holding onto denies a beings free will of choice.

synagogue

Aka synagein - "to gather, bring together, assemble" from syn (together) + ag (to drive, draw out or forth, move) + ein (one)

A driving force doesn't assemble...it disassembles passengers from one another.

satan

Choosing to behold assembles beings together (syn) hence turning them against each other as adversaries aka satan; from root s-t-n - "one who opposes, obstructs, or acts as an adversary"

revelation

Suggested revelation tempts one to respond (re) to veil (vela) of action (tion). The trick...action doesn't have a veil; it's ones reaction to one another's suggestions which casts the veil of ignorance over self.

The VELA in revelation implies "vail" (value) hence ones responding (re) evaluation of enacting (tion) value (vela). Ones perception within all perceivable implies formed evaluation during flowing value. It's suggestion which tempts a being to hold onto (behold) and thereby establish the veil over the vail.

The world behind the curtain

Curtain/cortina/cauldron - "round vessel"...vessel implies being (esse) within all (el), and the curtain within self (circular logic) turns into a cauldron (reason) among others.

Reasoning against others and circular logic within self hinders being (be-hind)...

Nothing is as it seems.

Seem/sem - "same"...everything perceivable implies same; each ones perception within implies different. Nothing implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable for the suggestions of one another, which then tricks ones perception with semblance aka likeness.

PressingTowards

Aka suggested progressivism tempting form (life) within flow (inception towards death) into ignoring expression by resistance to temptation.

Dying implies progressive; living implies expressive...progression inspires expression, while tempting repression, which others exploit by suppression.

That's why suggested information can only suppress those who by consent choose to repress self.

can you...

Can vs can't tempts free will of choice into imbalance. A trick to distract from can/cunnan/gno - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/can

Furthermore; notice...cunnan/canaan

oriel moran

A real moron...

a) Allah aka al (all) lah (law) aka law of all...for each one within. Natural law.

b) All impressing law for each ones existence (expressed stance) within.

c) Almighty aka all + might/mag - "to be able" aka all enabling each ones being.

consume Googles resources

What if responding to google as source consumes one? What if putting on the google/goggle narrows ones sight? What if repression of self permits suppression by another?