"I don't know if there is a client list"
To know implies ones perception...client (one who lives under the patronage of another) implies ones consent to the suggestion (list) of another.
If one doesn't see a client enlisting, then one doesn't know if there is a client list.
Just like any narration..."epstein list" implies a fictitious contract between consent and suggestion to distract from perception of reality.
Do you agree with...
Agreeing minds contradict each ones perceiving (knowing) mind.
Do you agree...that the reason
Only if one agrees or disagrees aka chooses a SIDE can there be a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree), which obstructs ones perceiving SIGHT.
we won't see
Because seeing implies each singular ones perception within all perceivable...not a suggested pluralism (we) tempting an aggregation of singulars to consent to what others show their deceived eyes to look/lock at.
Example...watching tell-a-vision isn't seeing.
tucker carlson
A video showing "Tucker Carlson" shows those looking at it a fictitious representation of what ones real sight doesn't see. Branding a video transmission "live" doesn't make it "alive" to ones living sight.
It's this mass ignorance of sight, which willingly permits few to abuse children out of sight. One doesn't need a list of who does what to whom out of ones sight...one needs all perceivable moving through ones perception to enable sight. Others obscure ones sight by suggesting what one wants or not wants to look/lock at; thereby tempting ignorance.
Being implies im (within) mobile (motion)...
technology that alters the way we sense things
Techno/tekhnē (artifice) + logy (logic)...consenting to a suggestion alters ones perception within the perceivable way of nature. Reality moves linear (all perceivable through each ones perception); artifice alters linear perception into circular thinking through suggestion.
see us as a resource
Seeing implies responding (perception) to source (perceivable)...looking implies locking onto one another's suggestions, which distorts ones sight.
act like
Action implies same; reaction implies difference...unless ignored for reacting alike one another, like "I'm just following orders".
need to alter society
Being implies want within need...a separation from one another (analysis). Society implies an aggregation of separate units (synthesis).
Few alter natural analysis by tempting many into artificial synthesis aka "society", yet alternation requires each ones free will of choice to join, hence to synthesize, while ignoring to analyze.
taxes are used to control inflation by reducing money in circulation
a) Taxes imply suggested information aka a self imposed burden (debt) if consented to.
b) Inflation implies ones growth of discernment within perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for suggested information.
c) Circulation implies circular thinking (logic) turning into conflicts against others (reason) when consenting to suggested information.
d) Reducing implies the process of dying sustaining living growth...unless ignored by burdening self with the suggested information by another.
e) Money aka m-one-y (my one) implies the suggesting one gaining control over the consenting one.
Holding onto suggested currency, while ignoring perceivable current permits others to utilize money velocity to make profit/prophet aka pro (forwards) bha (to speak)...consenting to what others speak forwards implies authoritative sanction aka FIAT (let it be done).
- Principal/principle/primus - "first", which is followed by second/seco - "to divide".
The struggle to sustain matter (flesh and blood) implies within motion (principality) aka secondary (reaction) struggling within primary (action).
against principalities
Effect struggling within cause implies A-GAIN (growth)...not against (loss).
Some of you dumb nigger white nationalist types want to make everything into a battle
Some vs none; you vs me; dumb vs smart; nigger vs cracker; white vs black; native vs foreign; want vs not want; everything vs nothing...these represent battles against others (reason) based on circular thinking within ones mind (logic).
The only way to dissolve these conflicts (reason) implies choosing to let go of either side (logic) by utilizing implication (if/then) over reason (vs).
spiritual battle
Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" implies ones struggle within linear procession aka inhaling and exhaling that which moves through one...not a battle against another, but ones struggle to inhale the living spirit, while exhaling the dying ghost aka balancing by free will of choice.
spiritual forces
Motion forces spirit (momentum) through matter...a singular force.
throw jews under the bus
Bus implies "public transportation"...each chosen one implies a private vessel. A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consensus among gentiles towards "understanding" aka standing-under public transportation of information.
Notice that the information highway utilizes serial bus and computer bus for transportation...it's gentiles who are throwing themselves and each other under the bus by willingly consenting to any suggested information from a jew.
forces will remain in place
Force/fortis - "strength"...motion gives matter strength; matter using strength to remain in place diminishes strength.
to know if we are dealing with a fraud or an honest person
Deal/dæl - "a part of a whole", hence de (to divide) al (all)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal
It's called the "art of the deal" because dealing with one another implies artifice, while being apart from one another implies a natural deal.
Consenting (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell) implies the artificial deal made, and that results in a conflict of reason like fraud vs honesty.
what gives us discernment
Suggested pluralism (us) prevents ones self discernment as perception within perceivable. Why? Because pluralism implies a synthesis, while discernment requires analysis.
feelings don't matter when they are actually very important.
Feeling implies emotion (to move from)...import implies by motion into matter. Emotion tempts matter to ignore motion.
want you to think
Thinking implies all perceivable moving "straight" through each ones perception...want vs not want reasoning implies "circular" thinking aka logic. That's the psycho-LOGICAL-operation.
All knowledge comes directly from God
God implies all directed knowledge...within which each one comes into being.
translate that information into the brain
That's another psyop...translating perceivable inspiration into suggestible information; held within ones mind/memory by articulation of sound aka words (spell-craft).
you can know a LOT more than you think
a) Again...more vs less implies circular thinking; ones choice at the ledge (perception) of known (perceivable) implies thinking straight.
b) Lot implies a "share"...others cast suggested spells to tempt one to share consent, which spell-bounds ones free will of choice.
Sharing implies caring/carrying aka burdening self with sin...nature already shared ALL (perceivable) through each ONE (perception).
God's all knowing mind
God (motion) frames (momentum) mind (matter) which moves all known through each ones mind. It's the frame which divides being in-between mental/physical.
sent to these 2
There can be only one...the oneness of all sending each one forwards. Two implies the synthesis of ones consent and another ones suggestion. Holding onto suggested information implies taking measurement aka mind taking measures into possession.
the mind has to be in a blank, thoughtless state
All perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception isn't blank or thoughtless...holding onto any information simply implies noise, hence distorting ones mind to draw blanks, while thinking thoughtless thoughts.
Sound of silence distorted by noise of words.
communication is translated into words
a) Trans (across) + lātus (carried)...the former implies all (perceivable) moving across each one (perception); the latter one carrying (consent) the burden (suggested) by another.
b) COM (together) contradicts UNI (apart) within ACTION.
Illuminati Globalists WILL
NATI IL LUMI aka native within light implies being given free will of choice...GLOB AL IST implies amassing consent within all aka willing submission.
a) Fiat (let it be done) from bheue (to be, exist; grow)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fiat
b) Nature implies all moving value; each being within the evaluation thereof.
c) Evaluating moving value implies natural fiat...holding onto suggested values implies artificial fiat. If one measures fiat in BTC; $ or gold, then ones mind holds onto suggested value...an artificial fiat utilized by others to tempt one to devalue self.
translate
Trans implies natural transfer of evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable)...Late/lātus (to carry) implies ones consent holding onto the suggested values by another.
Trans (transfer) late (to carry) ion (action) implies ones choice to carry artifice, while ignoring the natural transfer (inception towards death) of being (life)...that's a self imposed burden aka a sin.
photon...twin-photon
Photon aka photo (light) on (unit)...no matter how often a unit (ray) gets divided; the whole (light) continues to act through each reacting unit.
While photon implies natural analysis...twin-photon implies artificial synthesis. In this case...suggesting an experiment tempts each photon into synthetic mass consensus.
take a single photon and cut it into two
A deception...cutting apart separates units apart from one another. Suggesting dualism (two) tempts each singular unit (one) to ignore oneself for one another.
two identical
Two cannot be identical (same), since each one thereof implies a different position from one another, hence the cutting apart.
Photon implies each different unit within same light.
fiber-optic cable
Fiber/bheid (to split) + optic/pos/okw (to see) + cable/kap (to grasp)...splitting ones sight in-between perceivable reality and suggested fiction; tempts one to grasp at the suggested.
Consenting to a suggestion implies "data-transmission" by fiber-optic cable.
seven miles
S(plit)even + mile (unit of linear measurement)...it's consenting to the suggestion of "seven miles" which establishes an uneven split (reason) + circular measurement (logic).
the other photon acts
Light acts; photon re-acts to being enlightened...or to one another, while ignoring light.
same experiment
Ex (out of) per (by) ment (mind)...all perceivable separating into each ones perception implies differentiation of mind; many consenting to suggestions by few implies a hivemind...that's the experiment.
A plural is made of multiple singulars
a) Aka artificially putting together what nature sets apart from one another...
b) A plural doesn't multiply singulars...it's still each singular one within plurality; pretending to be more than oneself aka shirking response-ability onto one another.
c) Made/make/makia/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit" aka magic; make-belief; made-man; member by association etc.
Sleight of hand... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE_zts-QQhE aka initiation of bimbo (monosyllable)
Bimbo - https://www.etymonline.com/word/bimbo Mono - https://www.etymonline.com/word/mono- Syllable - https://www.etymonline.com/word/syllable
d) If you multiply, then by inter-course for off-spring...a process of further separation. Afterwards you are tricked to play make-belief "family" aka "servants of a household". That's the artificial plurality each natural singular gets domesticated by membership association.
"The word “familiar” is from the Latin familiaris, meaning a “household servant,” and was intended to express the idea that sorcerers had spirits as their servants, ready to obey their commands." ~ https://christiananswers.net/dictionary/familiarspirit.html
It's a trick... https://genius.com/Sister-sledge-we-are-family-lyrics
Every element
Each mind (ment) within all (el)..."every" implies an aggregation of unitary parts, hence establishing a cryst/crust within line of all aka cryst-al-line.
Line implies ones lifeline, while being moved from inception towards death, and the crust/kryos - "frost" implies dying, as opposed to the heat of living.
lowest energy state
a) Energy aka en (within) ergo/reg (move in a straight line) aka being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
b) State implies to be firm/form within flow aka reaction (living) within action (dying)...as above/so below.
c) Low vs high reasoning tempts unitary states into an aggregated state...hence the aggression.
I don't know of any elements that have this structure
a) Element implies each ones mind (ment) within all (el).
b) Structure/structura (fitting together) from stere - "to spread" implies few spreading suggested information to fit consensus of many together.
Nature separates each ones perception within all perceivable inspiration from one another.
layout
Suggested lay (to cause to lie or rest) + out (motion from central point) inverts nature causing being to react from within (perception) to outward action (perceivable).
We the human are at department
"We" implies a hivemind; not a departed mind...
nucleotide
Nucleus; noun - "central mass, about which others cluster or matter collects".
Each ones choice implies central unit within all balance...consenting to a suggestion by another amasses central units into consensus aka a hivemind, which clusters ones departed mind.
ones
One implies singular...not plural.
Nature has growth and decay.
Each being implies growth potential (living) within the natural process of decay (dying).
Has implies "to own; to possess"...that's a rhetorical trick tempting one to sacrifice potential by trying to take possession during natural procession.
Nature doesn't have/has anything...it implies all giving. It's each being within which struggles with the need to adapt to given, while resisting the temptation to take from one another.
The wages of sin is death.
Consent implies wage; suggestion implies sin...if given/taken. Life cannot sustain itself by giving consent to one anther, while taking suggested information into possession, because doing that ignores the need to adapt to the process of dying.
That's why the wages of sin imply death.
Both God and ha'satan
There can be only one. Both implies suggested pluralism tempting ones perception to ignore singularity.
Ha'satan implies "adverse" aka turning against one another, while ignoring that singularity separates each unit within from one another within (life) a straight line (inception towards death).
In short...God implies all for each one within. Satan implies each ones free will of choice to turn from all against one another.
immortality
Aka living within (im) the dying (mort) of all (al).
life has a balancing process
a) Living (matter) within balance (momentum) of process (motion).
b) Possess (has) contradicts process.
after death
Before implies "forwarded being"; after/aft implies "away" aka way (inception towards death) forwarding being (life).
Living (matter) within process of dying (motion) implies the only position...before life implies motion; after life implies motion.
One has to deal with the pouring out of bowls the other wont.
a) Deal/dail - "to divide"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal hence DE (division) of AL (all) into each one. The deal with the devil implies with one another, when buying into (consent) what another sells (suggestion).
b) Pour/pure - "to flow, issue forth in a stream" implies natural flow issuing forth formed being.
Flow moves through form, which allows form to draw from it, as to purify self from the formed burdens (of sin) one chose to take on.
c) Wont implies want, which tempts one to ignore need. One doesn't need to do what others wont...one's tempted to want or not want to.
to make coke and diet coke to taste the same
All nature offers implies same; each being within implies difference...mass manufactured drinks and flavors are being suggested to shape alike consensus.
goals
There's only one goal within nature for each living being...death. Few suggest artificial goals to distract many from natural origin towards natural outcome.
elite
Elite implies "selection; choice" aka ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion.
at the top
Top vs bottom represents a conflict of reason among many...not the position of few, who direct from within and produce from without how many are reacting against one another.
this kinda sounds like they just crammed a bunch of new agey terms and talking points together.
That's what words do, while distracting from sound separating instruments. Sound doesn't talk...words imply the articulation of sound for talking aka spell-craft.
impossible to know at this point
a) Impossible implies potential (possi) enabled (ble) within (im) procession...others suggest it to mean "not possible", which tempts one to consent to nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
It's consent given to "not", which disables ones potential.
b) Point implies end of sentence...being alive implies send from inception towards point of death, hence given sentience.
Others utilize "point" within rhetoric (what's your point; make a point; come to the point; pointing out etc.) to corrupt ones sentience from discerning self to be sentenced alive towards point of death.
Living implies death sentence aka one can only live within the process of dying.
From a different perspective...if nature moves, and a being within makes a point, then motion shapes point into line.
no...a giant conspiracy
Nature doesn't con (together) spire (to breathe)...nature breathes life through each separated being.
Reason (yes vs no) implies a mass consensus to a suggestion by few aka an artificial synthesis of what nature separates for analysis.
It's viewing the world as yes vs no or giant vs small, which conspires conflict.
who make no money
Nature sets each ones perception free within all perceivable; suggested artifice tempts ones free will of choice to pay a price of admission to another.
resonance chamber
Aka chamber (momentum) within which one responds (matter) to all sound (motion)...
projected
Aka thrown (life) forwards (inception towards death)...
harmonic
Aka harming (dying) one (living)...
layered
That's the masonic layer/liue - "binding" utilized by the suggestions of few upon the consensus of many. Nature sets free; artifice binds free will of choice under layers of suggested information.
multidimensional
a) Being implies one mind (mens) within action (ion) of all (al).
b) Others suggest pluralism (multi) and dualism (di) to distract one from discerning oneself within all. It's ones consent to any suggestion, which establishes an artificial "multi-di" within natural "mens-ion-al".
c) The suggested word "multidimensional" implies an artificial synthesis; taking it apart "multi-di-mens-ion-al" implies natural analysis, which only ones free will of choice can perform.
broadcasting station
Few cast suggested information broad among many; each ones consent to it makes one stationary by mentally holding onto the suggested information.
Nature casts (all perceivable) narrow (ones perception), which cannot be held onto since it moves...only drawn from, hence drawing spirit/spiro - "to breathe" from within (in) action (ation).
changes its form
Aka flow (inception towards death) changing form (life)...
collective frequency
Aka few utilizing suggested information to collect mass consensus by frequent consent given.
For example...suggested account tempts frequent login (lock in), which permits another to hold one accountable.
lowest vibration
Vibra/weip - "to turn"...understanding (standing-under) implies the lowest vibration, because it turns ones mind in circles (logic); while turning ones body against one another (reason).
Being implies alternation (life) during procession (inception towards death), hence vibrating to and fro aka above/so below. It's the living heart (German Herz), which implies the frequency (hertz/Hz) of being...
Time implies a mass consensus, based on few tempting many to take artificial measurements aka mentally holding onto affixed numbers, while ignoring that nature moves.
Notice the round shape of the clock...a circle can only be shaped within linear motion.
Gnosis in the "Gnostic" religious cult sense
a) Gnosis/gnostic/gno - "to know" aka ones perception of all perceivable. It's suggested gnosticism, which tempts one to ignore perceivable.
Modern gnosticism is hidden underneath scientism aka science/scio - "to know".
b) Religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind) implies suggestion tempting responding consent to bind itself willingly.
c) Cult/colony/kwel - "to revolve; move around"...it's consenting to a suggestion, which establishes circular thinking (logic) within self, which then turns into conflicts (reason) against one another.
Few utilize suggestion to cultivate mass consensus into conflicts of reason...entering the cult of mass consensus implies religion aka the binding of self to another.
the first antichrist
First implies God. Christ implies second/seco - "to divide", hence the divine/division of all into each anointed one. Anti implies ones choice to turn from all against one another.
The G-unit implies to Gilgamesh who is Nimrod, Marduk and Ninurta
Suggesting a name for a generated unit tempts the unit to ignore generation by holding onto the name. Unit implies apart from one another (analysis); name implies given by another; taken by oneself (synthesis).
Jesus Christ is the only...
God implies one and only. Jesus (je suis; I am) + Christ (to anoint) implies a synthesis of two units into one contradiction aka taking possession of self (jesus) and being separated from one another (christ).
Nailed to the cross (jesus) implies ones de-nial/nail of being moved a-cross during anointment (christ).
way to the truth
Way to implies procession; truth tempts possession. A process cannot be taken into possession aka matter (life) cannot hold onto motion (inception twoards death).
ye shall know the truth
a) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable moving through one...the suggested labels truth + lie tempt one to ignore all perceivable for one another's suggestions.
God doesn't lie, nor does God give truth to hold onto...God sets free. Choosing truth or lie binds ones free will of choice.
b) Truth implies truce - "temporary intermission of hostilities mutually agreed upon by commanders of opposing forces"...hostility among opposing forces implies reasoning (truth vs lie); each ones free will of choice implies the commanders, and ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested implies temporary intermission mutually agreed upon.
the truth shall make you free
Only free will of choice can choose truth or lie...choosing either binds ones free will of choice to one another.
Only within dominance (dying) can one be free (living)...
the jews answered to him, We be the seed of Abraham
Abh (father) raham/ruham (multitude)...a chosen one implies singular, hence sowing each seed apart from one another to allow growth.
how sayest thou, Ye shall be free?
Saying implies articulation words within natural sound...one is free to do that, but doing it tempts one to ignore all, while binding self to one another.
To be implies free (perception) during dominance (perceivable)...to say "free" suggests liberty.
Jesus answered
Question and answer implies among one another, while ignoring that all implies solution (perceivable) for problem (perception).
God neither questions, nor answers...God offers all (motion) trough each one (matter).
I say to you, each man that doeth sin, is [the] servant of sin.
Any suggested saying tempts ones consent into service to another, hence sin/syn-chronizing consensus among many, which burdens each servant on behalf of few masters.
a) FE(minine)MALE aka the feminine (momentum) within masculine (motion).
b) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > child (matter)
c) MOM-entum generating matter/mater - "mother".
d) Father time (motion) > mother nature (momentum) > native being (matter)
e) Adam (progenitor of man) splitting a rip for Eve (first female) aka the internal separation of motion into momentum.
f) WO(mb)MAN aka the womb (momentum) within man (motion) for each off-spring (matter).
g) S(plit)HE aka the split (momentum) of he (motion) transferring form (matter)
h) Motion ejaculates; momentum admits...matter springs off by ejaculated admission.
I) Action implies motion; reaction implies matter...the separation in-between RE+ACTION implies momentum.
j) "Mother (momentum) tell your children (matter) not to walk (life) my way (inception towards death)"... https://genius.com/Danzig-mother-lyrics
k) Explain aka expressed (life) plain (inception towards death) aka matter expressed (child) within momentum (mother) by impressing motion (father).
l) Linear (penis) before circular (vagina)...only within linear motion can circular momentum be shaped by matter.
m) What came first...chicken (matter) or egg (momentum)? Answer...god (motion).
rhetorical
Let's try analytical...badge/bagia - "emblem" aka emballein...en (within) ballein (to throw), hence thrown (inception towards death) within (life) as the generative aspect (matter) in-between male (motion) and female (momentum) balance.
Each G-unit also implies gnosis - "knowledge"...
Once an agent, always an agent.
a) Agent (one who acts); from ag - "to drive, draw out or forth, move"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/agent
Agent implies sustaining action...being implies each ones re-action within, hence ones struggle to sustain self within all.
b) Always implies way of all (inception towards death) for each one within (life).
It's like a gang.
Action implies same; reaction implies difference...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consenting gentiles to gang up by reacting alike, while ignoring to be a differential (perception) within equal (perceivable).
Candace/cadance/kad (to fall) + Owens (to own)...owning the fall.
If being implies rise (life) during fall (inception towards death), then tempting those rising, to lower themselves to influence, permits those influencing to own the fluence/flow/fall of those ignoring to rise, who're burdening themselves with information by influence.