a) Consenting to suggested psychoanalysis implies a synthesis. That's how a jew gets permission to analyze the synthetic mental disorders of gentiles.
It's seeking to be analyzed by a jew, which implies a gentiles admission of mental sickness.
b) Sameness (inception towards death) generates difference (life) by analysis...a jew synthesizes gentile consent into likeness as a treatment for differences within sameness.
That's why Leo Kanner is described as "one of the most" aka set apart (analysis) from those set together (synthesis).
c) The desire for aloneness implies the status quo of being set apart from one another. Desire implies ones wish to obtain, being implies the will to resist desire...will/wish implies ones free will of choice balancing in-between need/want.
Most artificial conditions
Both "most" and "condition" represent artificial structures. Nature implies ION (action) and therefore ALL for each one within...not a most vs less conflict condition.
created by jews
a) Creationism; pluralism and judaism imply suggestions tempting consensus among many under few.
b) By/bhi/ambhi - "around"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/by
A jew shapes psychology by synthesizing psyche (linear animating power) and logy (circular thinking)...gentiles represent a by-product of that process aka stuck within circular thinking, while ignoring linear progression.
Circular thinking (logic) within each gentiles mind, outwardly turns into physical conflicts (reason) among gentiles.
how to transform
How to transfer form (life)? Within flow (inception towards death)!
autistic disturbance of affective contact
Aut/auto (self) implies separation from one another allowing intercourse with one another for further separation (off-spring) from one another aka self sustenance.
Dis (to divide) turbid (to crowd together) implies each divided being choosing to crowd together, which a jew establishes with the suggested contradiction in terms "disturbance" aka a synthesis of contradictions.
Being implies effect (perception) within cause (perceivable)...affecting (suggested) one another. Consenting to any suggestion establishes contact with alien/alius (another).
3 b's aka bbb aka 666...
Main article...September 11 attacks
Main; noun - "power, bodily strength; force, violent effort; strength of mind or will; efficacy; supernatural power" from megin (power) and magh (to be able)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/main
Main article implies the artificial use of power aka a jew utilizing suggestion to shape a consensus among gentiles called "September 11 attacks aka 9/11"... that's an egregore/system/construct drawing power from gentiles aka artificially disabling what nature enables.
Silverstein has said...
...implies a suggestion by a jew broadcasted among consenting gentiles aka mass mediation, which distracts from nature not saying anything aka not articulating words...just moving sound.
he usually spent
Usually/usualli - "normally, typically, commonly; according to custom"; from usual - "generally recognized; commonly encountered; ordinary/ordained; customary/customer"...that doesn't describe a jew, but gentiles.
Suggestions are shaped by FREE will of choice...consent spends choice as trust, which a jew banks.
all of the buildings
Only within all can one build...there's no such thing as "all of" anything within all of everything. That's another egregore.
of relevance?
Relevant - "to the purpose, applicable, pertinent to the matter at hand" implies motion putting (pose) forward (pur) matter.
Any relation between matter implies irrelevancy aka ones denial of relevancy.
sacrifice for the greater good
Greater vs lesser + good vs bad, as well as suggested the-ism represent artificial egregores to distract from "sacrifice for" aka from nature forwarding sacred/sacrare - "to set apart" aka motion (inception towards death) forwarding matter (life) by internal separation.
Here's a sleight of hand for "sacred"... https://genius.com/Blind-guardian-sacred-worlds-lyrics
๐๐ณ๐ช-๐๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ช๐จ๐ฏ ๐๐ต๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ด
Motion > Momentum > Matter
๐๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฏ ๐๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ 3สณแต
Guarding (ward) the radius; ray; radix; root (rod) of man during tri-sovereign states.
by Humans agreeing
They already did...to use the smartphone; internet; information; words suggested to them by a chosen few. Neither agreeing, nor disagreeing represents real life, but an artificial conflict (reason) among many over suggestions by few.
Suggestion within a world of perception implies a "planned error"...
That's the dogma of relativism and subjectivism. Can't escape that.
Dogma implies "to take"... -isms are suggested to tempt ones consent to take part in it, which includes escapism.
Nature gives being by separating each one from one another...one needs to resist wanting to take what nature gives to each for free (will of choice).
transfusion is not the same as blood consumption. You got creative with interpretation.
Notice ION aka tranfus-ION and consumpt-ION...that's the same origin within which differences can be shaped for interpretation. Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore origin (everything separating into each thing).
TAKE what you like, don't be dogmatic.
Dogma/dokein/dek - "to take; accept"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dogma
they also created...
THEY (pluralism) ALSO (alike one another) CREATED (creationism)...each suggested for ones consent to take. It's taking which shapes given.
forbidden
a) Aka for biding/bidda - "to ask", hence ask and ye shall receive...
b) If God implies all answering, then why question one another?
c) Answer aka and (against) swerian (to swear) aka a sworn statement (suggested) rebutting a charge (perceivable).
In short...all gives forwards; making a bid/bet by taking a bit from one another implies thrusting back (rebut) what all gives.
consume
Aka con (together) sumere (to take)...nature gives being apart from one another; taking together consumes being.
transfusion
ION (action) implies all; TRANS (transfer) implies the transference of all into each one by internal separation...FUSE (melting together) implies uniting what all divides.
what does society call people who do that, who give their blood...
Donor/donare - "to give as gift", from German Gift (poison)...it's taking what others give which ignores all given to each one for free.
arc of covenant
Being alive implies within linear progression (inception towards death)...consenting to each others suggestions establishes an arc of covenant aka one bowing to another by contract.
target protected by entities
Entity (being) pro (forwarded)...that's natural. Target (border) tect (to cover)...that's artificial.
Reasoning tempts beings to turn against each other by free will of choice, which covers the borders of balance.
entities trying to open the container are being destroyed.
Entity implies each beings choice; which nature contains within balance...choosing to fight each other (imbalance) opens container (balance) to destruction of being.
CIA using demons
a) Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/demon
Nature provides (inception towards death) division (life).
b) Using provided division to centralize few among many, while tempting many with intelligence/intelligo (to understand) to stand under few, requires many to ignore natural agent (perceivable) for artificial agent (suggested).
c) Sleight of hand for demon/daimon..."diamonds are forever" aka division provided ever forwards.
a) Ritual implies rite within all, and sacrifice each one offered by the rite aka ritual (inception towards death) sacrifice (life); hence being passed over representing a sacrificial rite of passage.
b) If being implies holy by division from one another, then any so called sacrifice implies holy by association aka taking from one another what all is giving for free to each.
c) Counting also implies by association, hence taking into account and being held accountable by another.
d) Heifer aka "high fearr/pere (to produce)"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heifer
Nature produces each being in-between high/low...few tempt many into association with one another, which implies the lowering of self for a high yield of many by few.
Fundamentally...nature leads, suggested norms tempt one to follow instead of resisting where nature leads (from inception towards death), and suggested terrorism (Latin terrere; to frighten) tempts one to ignore natural origin for being afraid of artificial outcome.
As for superficial...body (followers) over head (leaders) represents the bigger/easier/securer target.
a straight-line drop...should be automated
Aka a straight-line (inception towards death) drop (life); self (autos) thinking (matos) by manual free will of choice.
energy
Aka within (en) work (ergos). Others cannot take energy from one unless one ignores being within energy...ignorance gives self away manually to another, hence a shirking of response-ability (free will of choice).
smoothing the demand curve
If being implies want (life) within need (inception towards death), then ignorance smooths the demand curve of being. One needs to resist wanted supply...not demand from one another.
people already purchased the EV (electric vehicle)
To elect implies choosing; vehicle implies transmitting...ones consent to any suggestion by another transmits (vehicle) ones choice (electric) to a chosen one for the purchase price of selling self out.
compliance isn't requested...it's automated
Nature moving all perceivable through each beings perception implies an automated process...consenting to any suggestion by another implies complying to a request manually.
a) Infinite soul aka finite (matter) within (momentum) sole (motion). Suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore soul/sole, while binding self to others, and caging ones perception.
b) Left/right + up/down + front/back implies ones squared perception within a cube...circular thinking (logic) about anything suggested draws a circle within a cube, which permits others to manipulate the corners aka angles of attack.
Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies an intersection of any two converging lines aka "corner" aka corna/ker - "horn; head" (devil)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/corner
Imagine a cube around your head...
Cube (square) Around (circle)...that's how others shape ones imagination by circling (logic) the square (measuring right angles).
that city has risen up...to make those men stop work, so that this city will not be rebuilt
That ain't a Kings decree, but guarded speech aka political correctness.
the document which you sent to us has been translated and read before me.
And here we have the justification for the guarded speech...somewhere "jews" was lost in translation.
a) If one picks; then one ignores self (ones choice) for another (chosen one).
Notice furthermore that picking one doesn't equate, but puts one at odds with one another.
b) Life being moved from inception towards death implies "a road to death". A jew tempts gentiles to pick a side, which turns them against each other as "road warriors" aka tempting others out of ones mind (mad) towards maximum level (max).
Ban/bha + bind/bhendh...hence the inter-NET and the world wide WEB. The trick...tempting FREE will of choice to LOG/LOCK in.
The Elite is neither left nor right, they only use left and right to their bidding.
a) Elite/รฉlite - "selection; choice"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/elite
Ones choice implies within balance (left/right), hence balancing in-between. Selecting the choice of another implies holding onto one side over the other, hence imbalancing (left vs right) self.
b) The Elite implies ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempting one to ignore being within EL (all), which btw also represents ones greatest ALLy.
c) Consenting to a suggestion implies biding ones choice to a chosen ones offer aka abiding/abandoning ones free will of choice.
only use left and right
AND (one and another) contradicts ONLY (only one). The trick...and/en - "within", hence not left and right, but choice being within left/right balance.
Left and Right Politicians wanting it to pass
Nature passes anything within in a straight line...left vs right reasoning implies many "turning" against one another, hence establishing a circle/city/polis. Few suggest politics to fortify at the center of a conflicting many aka the eye of the storm.
All perceivable moving straight through each ones perception implies nature empowering each central being...anything suggested tempts ones central choice off-center.
How does each jew off-centers? By erecting at center while cutting off circumference aka circumcision.
genetic disease
Nature generates (inception towards death) stress (life), hence a division of ease...mixing together what nature divides compresses stress.
3 people
There can be only one...person aka per sonos (by sound) aka one sound for each instrumental one within.
CRISPR Is Changing Humanity
a) Crisp/crispus/sker - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/crisp hence few tempting many to turn inwardly (logic) and outwardly (reason).
b) Human aka the hue (color) of man implies the differentiation of each ray (child) within the visible spectrum (woman) of all light (man) during change.
Change delineates...turning within a circle tempts one to ignore that. Aka thinking straight or circular logic based on ones free will of choice.
c) Baby-lon aka infant/in-bha (within speech) + loan/leikw - "to leave"...
Stop claiming everything is consensual.
a) If everything moves; then nothing within can stop it. Yet; nothing/nihilo aka suggested nihilism and ones denial of perceivable for suggested can be utilized to tempt ignorance.
b) Claiming prevents FREE will of choice. Choosing to take possession of a suggestion, by giving consent, tempts one to ignore being potential (life) within procession (inception towards death).
c) Everything implies each thing within, hence a separation from one another, not con (together) sentire (to feel).
being gay
GAY, adjective - "merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome. It denotes more life and animation than cheerful."... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/gay
Full of cheer...like where everybody knows your name?
a) Man implies whole, man-kind implies each one within all, hence all being full of power.
b) Orsini/usrsus - "bear" aka man bearing each kind (German kind; child) within.
c) Earth/heart aka each one at the heart of all, and resistance to the frequency (Hz, hertz) of one another.
Ones consent (ignored resistance) to any suggestion (frequency) establishes parasitic inductance...
odin; thor...sounds like...zeus; dionysus
Sound differentiates instruments. Words are shaped alike to distract instruments from sound.
Odin; thor; zeus; dionysus etc. represent articulations within sound, which tempt those who hear them to hold onto, which is how natural (giving) becomes artificial (holding).
Good job, my children
Sound doesn't address instruments...it generates each naked instrument as a free expression within sound. Add-dress implies the added instrument freely choosing to dress.
keep debating over scripture we wrote instead of listening to God's own voice
Both inscription (scripture) and intonation (voice) are suggested by a jew to tempt consenting gentiles to keep holding onto it.
God implies the moving sound within which each instrument wields the free will of choice to inscribe or intone...both of which are tempting one to ignore that sound cannot be kept, since it moves.
to believe in one thing
To believe implies one things consent to another things suggestion, while ignoring everything perceivable.
Monotheism represents a contradiction in terms, since the suggested -ism implies the consent of an -ist...hence a dual synthesis; not a mono analysis.
you all believe
Each one within all who chooses to believe; permits the one suggesting what to believe, to shape a consensus of many aka a belief-system.
ALL cannot believe...ONE ignores ALL when believing each other.
Notice that believe implies "being on leave" from "being alive"...another crafted spell to mock the ignorant.
Even more mockery: The Monkees - "I'm a Believer"... https://genius.com/The-monkees-im-a-believer-lyrics
The proof is history
Nature doesn't store...it moves, hence proof being in the pudding/putting. It's moving nature which puts matter into being.
He-brew His-story to make you/jew fall for it...
origin of civilization
To civilize implies to domesticate those within natural origin. Nature (all perceivable) sets being free (ones perception)...ones consent to any suggestion by another implies the domestication of free will of choice, hence inverting FREE-DOM.
Let's look at history
That's the trick...looking/locking onto his-story by storing it within ones memory, hence history being based on remembrance.
Nature moves and cannot be locked...it's each being within which has the free will of choice of locking self by looking at one another.
Egyptians
Aka egypt...a gypsy, nomad; rootless; vagabond aka each wandering jew who also roams/romes. That's the foundation of the Egyptian and Roman empires. If you go to Egypt and Rome today, then you'll notice that neither Egyptians, nor Romans are running these empires.
The jews lived in ancient
a) Each jew suggests pluralism (jews) and to distract gentiles from singularity (chosen one).
b) Suggested ancient/anti - "against" tempts gentiles into a conflict of reason (ancient vs modern) against one another, while ignoring to be recent aka RE-sponding to CETU (first cause).
c) There's no ancient or modern nature...only each recent being within natural animation.
All of these peoples are nothing
A gentile consenting to suggested pluralism (people) and nihilism (nothing) ignores ALL perceivable...which each jew exploits ruthlessly.
successful
a) Success requires suckers...
b) Full implies fall (inception towards death) for each rise (life) within.
c) A jew tempts gentiles to get sucked back into fall, which in return permits each jew a successful rise.
most jews
Most vs least implies gentiles reasoning against each other...a fictitious synthesis. Nature is based on analysis aka separating all into each one, not turning them against one another.
A jew operates from outside of reason by a) suggestion to tempt gentiles into reasoning; b) revisionism by continuously rebranding both sides within any conflict of reason, and c) talmudic reasoning aka deliberately contradicting both sides to keep them incited against each other.
cultural influence
Culture (to till; move onward) + al (all)...being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence needing to resist the wanted temptation of moving onward.
A jew suggests progressivism to tempt gentiles onward; hence "just following orders"...
their sorcery is everywhere
Source implies everything for each thing within. Sorcery implies utilizing the source (perceivable) to make others believe (consent) in magic (suggested)...
All versions
Version implies the turning (vers) of action (ion)...all implies action; each one within implies reaction. Only reactions can turn against (versus) one another.
One can only turn within a line.
jesus fake
Jesus aka je suis aka "I AM" implies one taking possession over self, while ignoring all given.
Being within given implies real; taking what's given implies fake.
If Jesus were real, the entire idea of him
a) If IAM was real; then ones RE(sponse) to AL(l) would be fake.
b) Entire implies all for each one within. Ideal implies suggested idealism by another one tempting ones consent to idolatry, while ignoring all perceivable in its entirety.
the entire idea of him would be buried so deep
Ones consent to suggested idealism buries ones perception so deep underneath the suggested information by another, that one feels like having to overcome a mountain (zion) to find enlightenment, and so down the rabbit hole one digs instead.
How to get out of the deep? If one resists understanding (standing under); then ones self imposed burden dissolves within all of nature.
know the name
Knowledge implies sound separating into instrument...name implies instruments holding onto noise, while ignoring sound.
Name/nombre/number implies the designation of each unit aka unitas/unus - "one"...not the brand others tempt one to hold onto.
In nature there can be only one...each one.
What we get is 100 levels of psy op
a) It doesn't matter how many zeros ONE puts behind ONE...there can be only ONE. Zero implies one denial of being one.
b) Level implies balance...there can be only one balance (inception/death) for each ones choice (life).
Levels stacked above tempt one to ignore the level foundation below...being implies as above/so below, hence in-between.
c) Psy op hides the trick aka psycho-LOGICAL-operation...psyche implies natures animating power, operation implies each being in operative effect of animating nature.
It's logic which twists ones mind against one another.
That which was before one came into being aka the mother/matris/matrix of in (within) vention (to come).
Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > invention (matter)...