a) Debt to whom? If the answer is Rothschild, then how could Macron's government be on the verge of collapse while working for Rothschild?
b) The opposite of debt implies asset aka "sufficient estate"...what's sufficient for the estate of being?
c) Verge/virga - "edge"...doesn't free will of choice position one at the edge of balance? Doesn't ones perception within all perceivable imply knowl-EDGE?
What if ignoring assets for debt implies hEDGEing a bet aka gambling?
If the answer is Rothschild, then how could Macron's government be on the verge of collapse while working for Rothschild?
Systemic collapse is an opportunity for a lot of profit, if you already have assets. Off the top of my head, the IMF usually makes it a condition of their "help" that the victim has to sign away a certain amount of sovereignty.
Since France is a democratic government (alledgedly) any control is temporary. However, if a country signs away control to a foreign entity, it's almost impossible for the people of France to regain control once thr leadership changes.
a) Debt to whom? If the answer is Rothschild, then how could Macron's government be on the verge of collapse while working for Rothschild?
b) The opposite of debt implies asset aka "sufficient estate"...what's sufficient for the estate of being?
c) Verge/virga - "edge"...doesn't free will of choice position one at the edge of balance? Doesn't ones perception within all perceivable imply knowl-EDGE?
What if ignoring assets for debt implies hEDGEing a bet aka gambling?
Systemic collapse is an opportunity for a lot of profit, if you already have assets. Off the top of my head, the IMF usually makes it a condition of their "help" that the victim has to sign away a certain amount of sovereignty.
Since France is a democratic government (alledgedly) any control is temporary. However, if a country signs away control to a foreign entity, it's almost impossible for the people of France to regain control once thr leadership changes.
This simply a consolidation move.