If the foundation of the shooting is unclear, then why build research upon a faulty foundation?
Yes.
Yes implies versus no aka circular conflict ignoring the linear progression of "ever forwarding".
Have you met the Guy‽
To meet implies assembling together what all dissembles apart from one another. Why is dying called "to meet one's maker"?
There's enough to go around.
a) Around implies a shape...only during motion can matter be shaped. One goes straight before choosing to go around.
Others suggest a "merry go-around" to distract one from being a carous-el aka running within all.
b) Enough (enoch btw) implies a limitation...being implies given free will of choice.
All sets each one free, so there's no insufficiency supplied unless one ignores all by taking from one another until it's enough...which temptation ever erodes ones resistance to.
shooting
Have you seen the perpetrator shoot or any victim being shot?
I could talk...forever
Only during ever forwarding sound can temporal speech be shaped.
I could talk about Jesus Christ...forever
Notice that the written name "Jesus Christ" has a defined beginning and end, so where does the idea come from that something defined can be articulated forever?
my God
If God gave being, then what does it imply to take that which gives into MY possession?
If God is mine, then what is yours?
obsessed with the antiChrist
Obsession stands in opposition to possession aka those who chose to be pro or anti-christ.
The trick...few tempt many to believe that "obsession" implies to mentally affix something, while ignoring ob (against) sedere (to sit). It's believing aka consenting to a suggestion, which tempts one to mentally affix something by taking "possession" of it.
"The anti-christ takes over by talking about armageddon" ~Peter Thiel
a) Armageddon (final conflict) refers to gentiles seeking an end to any conflict of reason (good vs bad; truth vs lie; love vs hate; pro vs anti etc.) which is impossible as long as one holds onto either side within it.
Versus/verto (to turn) stands in opposition to christ (anointed one).
b) Taking over implies gentiles using consent to take suggested into possession, thereby becoming possessed by the suggestions of another aka demonically possessed...demon/dai-mon (divider-provider).
c) Talking implies the articulation of natural sound...the former tempts ones mind/memory to hold onto it; while ignoring that the latter moves through one and cannot be held onto.
a) Christen (to anoint) implies separated states...United States contradicts that.
b) "In God we trust" tempts each being to hold a share as a trustee, while ignoring that all sets each one free from one another.
To HOLD onto implies by FREE will of choice...
They started everything, they financed everything.
Aka the East India Company expanding westwards...
The jews have always been in the USA
United States implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)...
Columbus, a crypto-jew
Cristóbal Colón aka Christ of Ba'al Kohn...a sephardic aka se-phar (seafarer and seeing far).
it became their stumbling block of iniquity
If partiality (life) within equity (inception towards death) holds onto anything...one stumbles upon the mental block of ignorance.
gold will be like refuse
Refuse implies "pour back, flow back" which implies partiality (life) flowing back into equity (inception towards death).
Gold isn't about any value held onto, but about the implication of its "malleability" during motion.
Hypocritical and Contradictory
CON implies together; CRIT implies apart...a hypocritical jew tempts gentiles into contradiction.
Logic tempts each gentile to choose a side within a conflict of reason in contradistinction to one another...being apart from one another implies the natural hypocrisy, which gentiles ignore for artificial contradiction.
God's law says
To say implies the articulation of sound. God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each instrument within. The internal separation of all sound into each instrumental one implies law aka the separation of L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
We also see
Sight implies singular (perception) within singularity (perceivable) which makes each one a CRITIC...a jew suggests pluralism (we) to tempt each gentiles perception in contradistinction to the suggested plural aka to one another.
WE also implies nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
abide by this rule
- Abide (dwelling within onward motion)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/abide
- Rule/reg (to move in a straight line)...https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
If nature moves each being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death), then abiding by any rule implies suicide of being.
A jew suggests endless rules to follow as to a) trick gentiles to fight each other over which ones to abide vs reject, and b) to distract from there being only one rule (inception towards death) for each one (life) within.
Ask yourself this...if jew represents leader and gentiles follower, then why do the follower continue to reach their final destination (death) faster then the supposed leader?
Aren't you ashamed?
Shame/skem/kem - "to cover"...if jew implies insolence, and gentile ignorance, then it's the gentiles who put shame on self, while being tempted to blame a jew.
A jew wearing a mask (face cover) requires a gentile to willingly ignore reality (face) for fiction (mask)...that's a blemish within self.
a) Because how could it be "free" will of choice if others had the choice to ban it...
b) If others are offended, then an offer was taken which free will of choice didn't offer. Being offended implies condemning self...banning others is misused to justify that to self.
c) To get back to the seemingly unquestionable topic...how could "future" be real-time if it hasn't happened yet?
Let's try Rule 1 again...how does taking possession affect a product within a process?
the future of productivity
Only a process (inception towards death) generates a product (life)...consenting to suggested "future" tempts product during procession to take hold of possession.
Process separating into product implies "analysis"; product taking into possession implies "synthesis"...process dissolves synthesis unless product resists by analysis.
Ritual and Magic
Ritu/rite/reg - "to move in a straight line" + Magic/magh - "to be able" aka motion enabling being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
Being implies MAGI within RITU of AL...others distract one from this by making a spectacle out of ritual magic.
A suggested ritual tempts ones consent to follow, while the perceivable rite of passage (inception towards death) needs to be resisted (life).
Natural magic implies being given choice...artificial magic implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion, while ignoring self within perceivable.
occult practice
Practic-al (to follow all) occults within one what all reveals. All separating into each one implies an analytical process...following along implies a synthetic shape within analytical process.
Notice occult (to conceal) + oculus (eye)...it's choosing to ignore what all (perceivable) reveals to each one (perception) which keeps one blind. Others exploit ones ignorance by suggesting ritual magic and occult practices to maintain ignorance and distract from ones self discernment within all revelation.
cursive
a) Cursive/curse/course/ker - "to run" implies a flow-state.
b) To distract form (life) from flow (inception towards death)...first cursive set words apart, then print set letters apart.
handwriting
a) Hand implies man/manus/manual aka man (hand) within al (all) aka hand of god.
b) Write/writan - "to score, outline, draw the figure of" implies all drawing the figure of each one (life) within line (inception towards death).
c) Cursive to print automated the manual process...hence allowing a jew to automate the print, while leaving the cursive/curses to the gentile manual signing thereof. Mentally by consent; physically by signing on the dotted line.
A dot aka a point implies the end of a sentence...being alive implies sentenced from inception towards point of death. A dotted line interrupts the continuity of one life sentence.
A dot also implies a spot/speck/mark aka a blemish upon self within the light of God...
"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye." ~ Matthew 7:5
Did they stop teaching
a) Nature cannot be stopped...all moves, which brings each one into being.
b) They (plural) cannot teach...only one (singular) can teach self to learn, while learning how to teach self.
Notice that the hierarchy of any school is based on many students under few teachers...the plural submits to the singular.
Google is locking down Android.
a) Android aka andros (man) + eides (form; shape)
b) Being implies form/matter (offspring) within momentum (woman) of flow/motion (man). Notice that woman implies wo(mb) of man, and that off-spring implies springing off from the womb of man.
c) How could form (id) within flow (andro) be locked? By tricking form to put on a google/goggle (suggestion) while ignoring flow (perception).
Ignorance locks/looks ones ability to see...
d) THEY LIVE shows a fight among gentiles about putting on the glasses (goggles/googles) to see the jew...in reality one has to resist the fight (reason) by letting go off the glasses (logic). The enemy is within YOU (phonetic jew)...residing there rent free by invitation aka by ones consent to the suggestion of another.
end of free
Only in-between beginning (inception) and end (death) can one (life) be free (choice).
Free cannot experience beginning or end from in-between...hence the struggle to find balance without being able to hold onto either side.
What is Zionism?
Zion/sion - "city of david" aka center of division. Each being within nature implies center (life) of division (inception towards death).
Giving consent (-ist) to any suggestion (-ism) tempts a being off-center and together with others into a conflict called "reason".
What is religious Zionism?
Re (to respond) ligo (to bind) aka consent (-ist) binding self to suggested (-ism) and thereby off the center of division (zion).
The word Zionism has many meanings.
a) A word can only be shaped within sound.
b) A plural (meaning of words) can only be shaped within singularity (sound).
c) Consenting to suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound...implies taking measurement (meaning) while ignoring given.
I want to focus on one in particular
a) I implies YOU, hence not "one in particular", but two sides opposing each other.
b) Only within need (inception towards death) can want (life) be shaped. To sustain self...each being needs to resist wanted temptation.
As in...one (potential) cannot take (possession) what nature gives (procession) without destroying self.
six beliefs
BELIEF implies holding onto, BEING ALIVE implies let go. This letting go implies a process (inception towards death) of division (life) aka six/sex/seco - "to divide".
In christian terms...this division implies holy (whole) divination (partial).
six must occur...seven will emerge
Six/seco - "to divide" must occur so that s(plit)even will emerge aka the division of all balance (inception/death) into each ones free WILL of choice (life).
Look at the star of david...division (six) split even (seven) with a G at center aka generated aspect aka particular one aka one within all aka gnosis (knowledge) as in...each ones perception within all perceivable.
Six must occur (inception towards death division) so that seven (life) will emerge within an even split.
who are religious Zionists?
Anyone consenting to suggested zion-ism, while ignoring perceivable.
why do they pursue these beliefs?
Nature moves being forwards...holding onto any belief tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for pursuit of suggested outcomes.
What is their goal?
Goal implies one GOing (life) within ALL (inception towards death)...not an outcome to reach; but ones departure from origin.
Their goal is to force the coming of the Messiah
a) Messiah/mashiah/mashah "to anoint" implies each anointed one coming into being within all. The trick...a jew tempts gentiles to wait for another messiah or the return of a messiah, while ignoring to sustain self as the anointed one.
The resulting conflicts of reason among gentiles are removing the anointment of each one by rubbing against one another.
b) Force implies motion > momentum (inception towards death) > matter (life) aka father > mother > offspring etc.
accept many sacrifices
Acceptance implies versus denial...both sides tempt ones choice to sacrifice itself. Why? Because choice originates within balance, while choosing a side establishes imbalance for choice.
Consenting to any suggestion implies both acceptance (suggestion) and denial (perception) simultaneously.
was caused by
There can be only one cause for each effect within.
what did war achieve
War aka "reason" implies each one within holding onto a side, while trying to achieve victory over the other.
Nature gives temporary sight (life) in-between ongoing sides (inception towards death)...there's nothing to achieve during a departure; only the journey aka each one's path in life.
Israel will be broken
Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies the separation of God into each striving being within aka cause breaking effects apart from one another, hence being given FREE will of choice.
A jew suggests gentiles to fix what is broken aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together). That's the inversion of reality (analysis) into fiction (synthesis).
Gentiles allow themselves to be tricked into artificially puzzling together what nature sets apart from one another. This game of puzzle (mosaic law) permits each jew to remain broken aka a people apart from one another... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
There is so much blame (and sin) to go around...the cowards in the ring
One cannot think straight within a ring...only around.
actions...have consequences.
CON (together) tempts one to ignore action > reaction aka the sequence of separation.
Nice try... https://img.gvid.tv/i/27ohPDQG.jpg
everything seems like a conspiracy.
If everything (perceivable) implies a differentiation into each thing (perception), then "likeness" aka mass consensus aka hivemind aka egregore etc. benefits only a conspiring few...
want to believe...bio-engineered
a) How; where and why was belief engineered?
b) Does belief represent bio or zoe?
c) What came first...want or need?
Bring it in with warp speed...ban it at a snails pace.
But I ask why?
"Ask and ye shall receive"...that's why. If ONES CHOICE is ignored by asking another for an answer, then another becomes a CHOSEN ONE.
Am I an anti-Semite now?
a) AM I implies i am (je suis)...if I AM (jesus), then YOU (phonetic jew) are.
b) Semite/sem - "same, equal, like"...being implies differentiated from one another. To sustain diversity one needs to resist equality, which makes one an anti-semite aka one against semblance.
why are the jews criticized everywhere?
Because "everyone's a critic"...being within nature implies crime within law, hence natural law dis-criminating beings from one another.
a) Gaza/az - "force, strength"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Gaza
b) Annihilate (reduce to nothing)...choosing a suggested side within a conflict of reason (love vs hate) reduces ones sight within everything perceivable to nothing aka nihilo aka de-nial.
c) Resisting temptation grows resistance aka strength (life) during force (inception towards death).
Falling for the temptation of wasting strength reasoning against one another multiplies the force of temptation...because of lack of resistance.
d) https://genius.com/Rage-against-the-machine-killing-in-the-name-lyrics
- "Killing in the name of"
- "Some of those that work forces...are the same that burn crosses"
going forward than argue
Arguing (circular logic turning into conflicts of reason) distracts one from being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death)...which one needs to resist.
to sabotage their plans
Plan/planus (level) from pele (to spread) implies being spread (life) level (inception towards death)...it's arguing in circles which sabotages the spread of being.
Level implies balance for ones choice...choosing to take a side within any argument implies imbalance of choice.
Here's the sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Beastie-boys-sabotage-lyrics
- "I'm a set it straight (inception towards death), this Watergate (life)" aka solid opening (living) during fluid closing (dying).
- "I can't stand rockin' (reasoning to and fro) when I'm (choice) in here (balance)"
- "So, so, so, so listen up, 'cause you can't say nothin" because one cannot say words without ignoring sound.
- "Scheming (consent) on a thing (suggestion), that's a mirage...I'm trying to tell you now, it's sabotage"
But how do you convince NPCs WWII was fake too?
a) To convince implies "overcome in argument"...arguing aka reasoning implies a circular conflict, hence it going on and on and on, on, and on...
b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies as temporal (life) during ongoing (inception towards death)...real vs fake arguments only distracts ones mind from thinking straight.
c) To play implies gambling choice (consent) on chance (suggestion), which makes one a non-player character, because suggestion tempts one to deny (nihilo; nothing) everything perceivable.
A non-player gambles on taking chances, while denying given choice.
d) Character/kharaktēr - "engraved mark," also "symbol or imprint on the soul". Ones consent to any suggestion permits another to characterize one.
To cleanse self one needs to wipe consent out of ones mind by letting go of all the contracts aka contradictions one stains self with, and which others utilize to mark one.
Marking soul/sole implies staining one and only (ones choice) with any suggestion by another one...a chosen one.
transfer (Hebrew haavara) agreement
Trans (across) ferre (to carry) aka nature carrying being (life) across (inception towards death)...not the self inflicted burden of carrying agreements or disagreements among one another.
propaganda by jews
Pro (forth) + pag (to fasten)...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consent by gentiles. Holding onto any suggestion by consent fastens what nature (perceivable) sets forth (perception).
A jew utilizes PRO to tempt gentiles to PAG...a jew cannot put anything forth which nature not already put forth; yet each gentiles has the free will of choice to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
Older people have ALWAYS said this about the younger GENERATION
Being implies generated within the way of all...not a young vs old conflict. Being implies linear progression; conflict implies circular revolt.
It's about maturity
a) Nature (inception towards death) brings being (life) to maturity. Even an immature life matures during the process of dying.
b) About/onbutan - "on the outside of; around the circumference of"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/about
Being implies at the center (perception) of circumference (perceivable), hence within. Few suggest whataboutism as a logic fallacy to invert ones position among many.
When we reflect
We (plural) prevents one (singular) from responding (re) flexible (flect)...plural constricts singular.
Reflection in nature implies light (motion) generating spectrum (momentum) to bend rays (matter) from one another...a singular process.
work ethic
Work implies energy moving; ethic implies matter within moving energy holding onto moral custom...ethic ignores work.
when I first started in construction
Construct implies putting together, ones start implies set apart from one another...the former implies synthesis; the latter analysis.
First implies nature...not what any being within constructs. Ignoring nature for construct implies being unproductive.
the work was too hard and quit quickly
Because others suggest one to work towards an outcome, which when consented to expels ones power quickly, while making it harder and harder to keep up with the demand (charge with a commission).
Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka cause generating effect aka all separating into each one aka nature generating being.
Being implies adaptation to origin...not working towards outcome. If one adapts to generation, then one re-generates.
Ask yourself this...if you work in construction, yet know that any constructed civilization falls, then why are you continuing to build on an uneven foundation?
Some things will never change.
Everything (cause) changes into each thing (effect)...never implies ones de-nial/nihilo (nothing) of everything perceivable for suggested nihil-ism by free will of choice.
Being implies destitution (life) during purification (inception towards death)...choosing either side destroys ones sight within the visible spectrum of light.