wreck anything they acquire
a) ACQUI'RE, verb (Heb. to seek, to make towards, to follow)
b) those living within the process of dying need to resist the temptation to seek; make towards and follow.
c) consenting to suggested ENTER TAME MIND (entertainment) represents ones choice to seek suggested entertainment; to make towards suggested achievements and to follow suggested rules of behavior within environments controlled by others.
In short...wanting to acquire suggested implies ignoring the need to adapt to already perceivable. If this (living) chooses to ignore that (process of dying)...then the latter will wreck the former.
ea
a) the "arts" within electronic arts represents ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural". Therefore; ones consent to artificial (suggested) implies ones consent to ignore natural (perceivable).
b) living within the process of dying implies one to represent temporary magnetic within ongoing electric. Consenting to artificial electronics drains natural magnetic.
want money
Suggested M-ONE-Y represents an ownership claim over another (MY ONE). Therefore; those who consent to use suggested "money" submit to those suggesting it.
The few don't require to want "MY ONE" (money), they already have all the consenting ones among the many, hence being "the chosen ones" aka those chosen, elected (elite) by the consenting many.
a company who truly values
COMPANY, noun - "soldiers united under the command of a captain"...an order follower devalues self by ignoring to be evaluation (living) within the natural order (process of dying). The natural order needs to be resisted; yet tempts one to want to follow...free will of choice.
to see things burn down
This (process of dying) burns down that (living)...unless resisted.
being pure evil feels GOOD.
Notice that the "evil" play-through is always shorter than the "good" one...
the fact...state of being real.
- FACT, noun [Latin factum, facio, to make or do.]
Temporary living within the ongoing process of dying implies being done by and always in the state of making. Being implies within a moving system...others use suggested facts to tempt one to ignore perceivable "in the making".
Every suggestion represents a fiction within a perceivable system...if consented to.
what is happening is absolutely real
a) you represent the partial (living) within the absolute whole (process of dying).
b) the partial cannot define anything, only respond to the predefined whole.
c) if one suggests "this is", then one ignores that "everything was" before one could choose to shape the suggestion what "this is".
Everything perceivable exists before any suggestion can be made about it.
a different form than we perceive
a) one can only perceive moving differences, because the moving nature self differentiates from whole (process of dying) into partial (living), hence you representing "one" and not "two".
b) suggested "we" tempts "one" to ignore self. The few suggest collectivism (we) to tempt the many to ignore apartheid (one). The collectivized many represent the compound interest of the few.
compiled lines of codes interacting with a screen.
A suggested screen aimed at each ones consent to view, which when consented to, allows those suggesting to compile the viewers.
A simulation must be connected to its parent reality, which makes it inevitably part of it.
a) SIM'ULATE, verb [Latin simulo, from similis, like.]
b) wholeness (process of dying) generates apartheid (living)...the partial within whole represent the choice to sustain apartheid (need) or ignore it by reacting "alike" (want).
The living need to struggle to resist being dissolved by the process of dying; hence struggling to sustain self apart from one another. The few suggest the many the inversion thereof...coming together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; communism (workers of the world, unite!) etc.
c) suggested "alike" represents the choice to ignore perceivable "apart". The more the partial behaves alike, the less the partial (difference) comprehends about the whole (sameness).
It's not real because it's all in your head
The suggested words by others to describe the perceivable reality are being upheld within your memory. The fiction one upholds (suggested words) tempts one to ignore the reality (perceivable sound) one exits within.
Fiction (suggested information) represents each ones choice to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration).
where is my head, in a different universe?
a) your want to suggest "my head" tempts you to ignore that sameness (process of dying) owns differentiation (living).
b) to question "where" implies ones lack of self discernment....seeking answers by questioning others tempts one to ignore "self" discernment.
logic of real/unreal
Reasoning aka wanting vs not wanting suggested information, while ignore the need to resist want, while adapting to perceivable inspiration.
Logic/reason always represents a conflict....agreement vs disagreement; want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; real vs unreal; believing vs not believing; reality vs fiction; cats vs dogs; sony vs nintendo; burger king vs mcdonalds, soccer vs football, left vs right; us vs them; poor vs rich and so on.
Before one can consent to such a conflict (want vs not want), one exists as choice within balance (need/want). Therefore; ones free will of choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) shapes the want vs not want conflict of reason...the conflicts the few can generate; rebrand, keep going and fully control from both sides, while all reasoning within are within self inflicted ignorance about what they're doing.
Reality, is, instead, a ladder of many levels and nests, better understood through group/set theory
Reality represents everything perceivable, each perceiving one within represents the lack of comprehension thereof. One doesn't need to define reality, or redefine it for others; one needs to grow comprehension within predefined reality.
Nature represents the whole order (process of dying), those within represent the partial chaos (living)...hence struggling to sustain self. Others suggest the inversion thereof aka seeking order out of chaos instead of sustain temporary chaos (living) within the ongoing natural order (process of dying).
Understanding represents ones choice to stand under the suggested information by others, while ignoring to grow comprehension within perceivable inspiration. Nature inspires one to adapt by resisting; others tempt one to consent; agree; believe; submit; follow...
Growth (living) within loss (process of dying) implies the need to resist within wanted temptation.
the level our tech has risen to
- TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek art, and word or discourse.] - "a description of arts; or a treatise on the arts" + ART; ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural".
a) artificial (suggested information) in opposition to natural (perceivable inspiration). Tech isn't rising...tech users are drowning.
b) level ground (inception towards death) + growth/loss potential (life)...both coexisting within motion.
The more effort one puts into it; the more efficiently the accumulated effort can be used against those putting in less effort.
most people dont like this truth
That's because like vs dislike and truth vs false implies reasoning over suggested information one already consented to aka submitted to aka trusts in aka put faith into.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; like vs dislike; truth vs false etc.) prevents the conflict of reason.
the word is Emunah in the Hebrew
a) one is tempted to reason (want vs not want) over suggested information by others...an imbalance.
Both sides tempt one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration as free will of choice in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested)...a balance.
There's only choice in-between need/want; yet choosing want over need, shapes want vs not want imbalance.
b) the process of dying communicates itself as perceivable inspiration to everything living within...each one has the free will of choice to ignore this for the suggestions of one another.
One cannot make any suggestion without ignoring that only within already perceivable one can have the choice to shape suggestions. The main deception...suggested words shaped out of perceivable sound aka spell-craft.
How could the many ever comprehend the perceivable (sound) if they first consent to slap suggested (words) upon it? Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within, by, out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound. The former tempts one to reason (want vs not want), while the latter inspires one to imply (if/then).
the work of faith
EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.] - "internal or inherent power". Only within energy can one choose to have faith. All represents one in energy.
if you believe you act in accordance
a) if implies then (implication), while believe implies versus disbelieve (reason). Resisting the temptation to reason allows one to imply as the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying). Reason restricts one into conflicts; while implication allows one to grow (living) within loss (dying).
b) impressing nature (process of dying) doesn't require ACCORD', noun (Latin concors, concordo) - "agreement"...it demands adaptation through expression, hence everyone within nature representing expression (growth) within impressing (loss). Ignoring to express growth represents self repression within loss.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature" (Madonna).
c) within sound, one represents the choice in-between resonance (need) and dissonance (want)...not among choices, but as choice within balance. Agreement vs disagreement implies among suggested choices, while ignoring perceivable balance.
d) the living cannot act, only react within the process of dying.
Sleight of hand...suggested actors following directors implies "reactors", which tempts others to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death) aka reactors (temporary living growth) within generation (ongoing loss through process of dying).
If the few suggest the many to mimic "acting", then the consenting many ignore "reacting" to what generates them.
dave hammer...a nuclear engineer
NU'CLEUS, noun [Latin a nut.] aka "david's hammer...a nut engine".
tortured for their faith
a) having faith implies choice (consent) to choice (suggested) contract law, hence a self inflicted submission to the will of others, while ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) for the sustenance of self.
b) ignorance (choice of want over need aka suggested over perceivable) represents self inflicted torment, while the consequences thereof represent the inspiration to resist ignorance (need) and the temptation to blame others (not want).
The code...to live by unlocks
- CODE, noun - "collection of laws"
a) the natural order (process of dying) sets itself apart aka from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving), which is how the perceiving partial can grow comprehension about the laws of nature within the perceivable whole.
b) collecting represents ones choice of want (temptation to hold onto) over need (adaptation to being moved by).
c) living within the process of dying implies ones struggle to sustain apartheid aka to sustain partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
d) the few suggest collectivism to tempt the many to both ignore apartheid and to drown themselves in "debt" of collected information, instead of growing resistance by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
e) everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving)...self discernment needs to be grown by oneself to "unlock" comprehension of perceivable.
Ask yourself about the intrinsic values within anything you haven't figured out yet?
a calm cult
If the ongoing process of dying represents the soil for the temporary living seed within, then cultivation (advance growth of seed within soil) implies ones struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Sleight of hand..."a calm (inception towards death) before the storm (life)"; hence STORM, noun - "violent agitation; tempest" + TEM'PEST, noun (Latin tempestas; tempus, time) - "continuance within velocity" aka the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying) aka oneself as "the eye (I) of the storm".
to be enslaved...
...implies ones consent to a suggested master.
why would satanists hate them so much?
a) hate implies vs love...both represent a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested information.
b) the more one falls for the temptation of wanting (love); the more others are tempted to not want that (hate) aka greed generating envy. Meanwhile; both sides are being tricked to use love vs hate as justification to ignore want vs not want, through a simple rebranding (revisionism) of idolatry (suggested over perceivable).
c) the few neither love (want) nor hate (not want) the many, they simply tempt the many to consent to suggested dualism (want vs not want) over perceivable oneness (need/want).
Need/want represents the balance for each ones free will of choice at the center aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested)...ones free will of choice. If one reasons about want vs not want, then that implies ones ignorance of need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
complex to understand
a) suggested COMPLEX, adjective - "composed of two or more parts or things; composite" tempts "one" to ignore perceivable apartheid aka being partial (living) within whole (process of dying), hence one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable).
It's the few who suggest the many complexity; togetherness; "united" nations; "united" states; european "union"; to join together; to become followers of leaders; tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); the internet (internal net) of things; e pluribus unum (out of many; one) and so on.
Meanwhile; nature sets itself apart...from whole (process of dying) into partials (living)...aka SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold; ] - "single; consisting of one thing".
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" + "there can be only one" + "alone aka ALL(in)ONE".
b) understanding represents ones consent to "stand under" another ones suggestions aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
Those wielding contract law represent the happy merchants of temptation, and those consenting to their suggestions become their compounded interest.
sacrifice an animal
- AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] + SAC'RIFICE, verb - "to devote with loss"
a) as form (living) within flow (process of dying)...each one represents ANIMAL (animated) HUMAN (heb. form; species), hence form (life) animated by flow (inception towards death).
The suggested labels "human" + "animal" tempt one to ignore being the perceiving form (human) within perceivable animation (animal).
b) the few use suggested progressivism (towards outcomes) to tempt the many to ignore being temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying), hence the reaction (resistance) to enacting origin (temptation).
Consenting to suggested (temptation) represents self sacrifice of growth (living) into loss (process of dying).
Did you know
- KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
Everyone knows (perceives) everything (perceivable)...yet each ones comprehension has to be grown by oneself aka impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss).
high moral values
a) the highest value (perceivable) in existence represents evaluation (perceiving)...everyone represents evaluation (living) within value (process of dying).
b) consenting to suggested values (moralism) tempts one to ignore ones choice of evaluation for the choices of others suggesting values. Those others then gain the power (ones consent) to define; redefine and contradict the suggested values at will, while ones evaluation will get devaluated through ignorance.
c) consenting to suggested moralism (rules of behavior) represents the domestication of ones free will of choice into the self inflicted submission to the suggesting choices of others.
killed as entertainment
Consenting to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration) allows those suggesting to ENTER TAME MINDS of those consenting. A tamed mind represents a mind ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying), hence a self destructive mind.
At least the lion sustains self by taking the lives of others, instead of reasoning over suggested rules of behavior (moralism) while dying.
created and how
a) suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) transmutation of ingredient (living) out of source (process of dying) represents flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death).
c) suggested chemistry (analysis and synthesis aka resolving and putting together) tempts one to ignore perceivable alchemy aka being set apart (living) while being resolved back together (dying); hence struggling to sustain apartheid (life as the ingredient) before being dissolved back into wholeness (process of dying as the base).
Actual Christians
Actual implies action; faith implies reaction...
Wrong. I am of nature, I use words...Are you of nature?
a) wrong implies versus right aka ones choice to want (right) vs not want (wrong) the suggested information by another.
b) if one applies right (want) vs wrong (not want) to breathing, then one can comprehend that one needs to breathe, no matter if one wants or not wants to.
c) WRONG, adjective - "wrung, twisted or turned from a straight line or even surface"...aka ones ignorance of being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
I am of nature, I use words...
a) NATURE, noun - "born, produced"...the product (life) is still in the process (inception towards death).
b) to be processed implies to be moved forwards, which implies for those existing within forward motion (velocity) to represent resistance aka the struggle to resist (living) the temptation of being moved (dying).
c) if velocity meets resistance, then that generates friction; vibration...sound.
d) being choice within the momentum (balance) of moving sound implies one to represent resonance (need) or dissonance (want), hence resonance sustains life, while dissonance tempts towards death.
e) every word is shaped out of perceivable sound. The suggestion of every word represents the temptation to ignore perceivable sound.
f) choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law tempts one to ignore balance (perceivable) towards choice (perceiving) natural law.
g) if one consents to what another suggests; then one ignores the only origin for oneself; all others and whatever is being shaped within...hence the ongoing generator (process of dying) for every reactor (living) within.
are you of nature?
a) one doesn't need the agreement (want) or disagreement (not want) from other ones about perceivable reality...one needs to grow self discernment within perceivable reality, while struggling to resist suggested fiction.
b) Sleight of hand:
From your perspective - "I am whatever you say I am; because if I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
From my perspective - "the way (inception towards death) I am (life)"
c) to ask a question implies want for suggested outcomes (answer), which tempts one to ignore being temporary problem (living) within the solution of the ongoing natural order (process of dying)...hence struggling to resist being dissolved.
tl;dr...every suggested word (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable sound (reality)...the latter implies a moving system; while the former represents a temporary idol; brand; label for something within a constantly moving system.
This is why the few can effortlessly contradict any suggested word the many consent to believe to represent "truth" or "false".
I hope
Aka your want for suggested outcome (hope) tempting the not wanted outcome (fear), hence putting yourself into the hope vs fear; right vs wrong; want vs not want conflict of reasoning over suggested information.
Choice doesn't exist within a versus (want vs not want imbalance), but at the center (need/want balance)...unless ignored.
a) hope and fear (outcome) tempt one to ignore origin.
b) want and not want tempt one to ignore need.
c) right and wrong (suggested information) tempt one to ignore predefined (perceivable inspiration).
Nature isn't right; nature isn't wrong...nature IS for one to BE within. One cannot define what reality IS; only BE within predefined reality, while redefining BEING, hence shaping self.
believe themselves to be invincible
INVIN'CIBLE, adjective [Latin in and vinco, to conquer.]...the consent of the many to the suggestions of the few represents the willing submission of being conquered by GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind).
Furthermore; consent to suggested represents the "belief" of the many, while the few seldom are tempted to believe anything; since they wield the tool of suggested information over the many.
their deadliest sin
a) the few suggest moralism, which when consented to, domesticates the free will of choice by the many to rules of behavior suggested by the few.
b) SIN, noun - "voluntary departure of a moral agent from a known rule of rectitude or duty"...it's the process of dying which represents the "moral agent" (action defining manners) for the living reactions within, and the duty for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) implies adaptation...more specifically the choice to resist (living) temptation (dying) or fall for it.
c) judging the reactions of others as suggested "sin" represents ones choice to ignore reacting (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable). The natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) represents that which "just is" aka phonetic "JUSTICE".
accelerates daily until the tipping point
a) only if velocity (process of dying) remains the same can resistance (living) within momentum (balance) have the choice to accelerate (loss) or decelerate (growth).
b) momentum (balance in motion) represents the ever changing moment for ones free will of choice at the center...balancing for self sustenance, hence existing on the tipping point of need/want at every moment of existence.
we won’t want what they offer
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested information represents consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
Choice within balance implies within need (perceivable) or want (suggested)
Choice within imbalance implies within want (suggested) vs not want (suggested).
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...unless ignored for substitute offers (suggested).
What could another offer that nature doesn't already supplies?
they will release information that will mimic our initiatory procedure
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law...that's the initial procedure for all suggested information and therefore also the the mimicry within the perpetuation of suggested information.
The trick...natural law communicates perceivable inspiration to each ones perceiving mind aka an enacting system (process of dying) generating reactions (living). The many are being tempted to react to the reactions of the few instead of the enacting nature. This represents why the many want to follow the suggested leads of the few; while ignoring the need to resist being moved within perceivable nature.
we are helping the occult achieve their goals
a) suggested goals (outcomes) are for the many who ignore the need to resist perceivable origin. The suggested "one world government" represents a feared goal of the many, yet simply the perceivable origin for the few with eyes to see.
b) nature generates expression (living) through impression (process of dying)...no concealment, but enlightenment...unless ignored.
c) consenting to suggested information "achieves" within ones memory, adaptation to perceivable inspiration frees ones memory from achieved garbage. One who chooses to let go (suggested information) gains access (perceivable inspiration).
d) consent to suggested "we" (plural) conceals the perceiving one (singular). How could one grow if one consents to stand under (understand) others?
a) both agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) ignores the need to adapt to origin. It doesn't matter if one accepts or rejects breathing...nature forces one to breathe.
b) suggested words (fiction) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (reality), hence ignoring the conjunction between partial (perceiving) and whole (perceivable). Nature doesn't use words to communicate itself...
property rights and free will
a) PROP'ERTY, noun - "a peculiar quality of any thing; that which is inherent in a subject, or naturally essential to it"...the process of dying represents all perceivable value, while each one living within represents the perceiving evaluation. Enacting value for reacting evaluation.
b) RIGHT, adjective (Latin rectus, rego) - "to strain; stretch, straight; strained; stretched to straightness"...being alive implies being stretched from inception towards death, hence a lifespan aka SPAN, noun (Latin pando) - "to strain, stretch, extend".
c) "free" will of choice implies within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom...reaction (choice) within enacting (balance). Choice can only exist within the center of balance; while balance (momentum) can only exist within the center of motion.
resistance is futile
Temporary living within the ongoing process of dying implies one to be resistance (living) within temptation (dying), hence the more one struggles to resist the natural order, the longer one stays alive within it.
Resistance is fertile.
does not stand a chance
Both "not" (nothing) and "chance" (effect of an unknown cause) represent suggested fiction as the inversion of perceivable reality...being one-thing (living partial) within everything (whole process of dying) and therefore the reacting effect (living) of the generating cause (process of dying).
a) the living (temporary partial) cannot own anything within the process of dying (ongoing whole)...only utilize everything for the sustenance of self.
b) the few suggest ownership to tempt each one of the many to ignore being the vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
Sure one can pretend to own the current (currency) or the banks (riverbanks) or that a docked ore (doctor) will help to steer course etc. but holding onto anything doesn't keep the vessel (living) from drowning (dying)...
"Fat-Man" exploding a nut (nuclear explosion) "Little-Boy"...just pederast-sodomites having a laugh.
- NU'CLEUS, noun [Latin a nut.] - "any body about which matter is collected" + WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"
a) everyone (living) within everything (process of dying) represents a nucleus.
b) everyone represents the free will of choice to offend (want) or defend (need), hence the "weapon of choice".
make a post, plz.
a) nature offers everything (enacting) to everyone's free will of choice (reaction), hence...
b) https://pic8.co/sh/4W1Fo5.png
c) even a "pretty please with cherry on top" wouldn't tempt me that easy to ignore natural law.
Yes indeed. It's a conundrum.
- CONUNDRUM, noun - "conceit" + CONCEIT, noun - "to take or seize"
"yes" implies vs no...which represents ones choice to want (yes) vs not want (no) what another suggested. That represents the self inflicted conundrum for ones perspective.
It doesn't matter if one chooses to want (agreement) or not want (disagreement) what another suggests, only that one ignores perceivable (need) for suggested (want)...that choice of want over need represents the conceit within conundrum aka taking the suggested instead of adapting to the perceivable offered.
Hold your breath and wait...agreement (want) or disagreement (not want) are irrelevant to being forced to adapt (need). Perceivable nature doesn't represent a yes or no proposition, but the enacting whole to each ones reacting partial. Willingly ignoring perceivable for suggested only puts oneself into a conundrum.
Where any events tend to shape the same.
SHAPE, verb - "to mold or make into a particular form"...it's flow (whole process of dying) which molds (momentum) form (partial living) aka ongoing sameness shaping temporary differences through self differentiation by momentum (balance in motion). As the temporary difference within the momentum (balance) of ongoing sameness (motion)...one represents choice.
Others suggest sameness (e pluribus unum aka out of many; one) to tempt one to ignore apartheid (being partial within whole) aka being one difference within the momentum of all sameness.
Until it becomes formulation
To be implies being formed (reaction) through -ation (action)...hence coming (advancing within) flow.
Ominously
- OM'INOUS, adjective [Latin ominosus.] - "foreboding or presaging evil"
That once again represents ones want (good) vs not want (evil) of suggested outcome. Meanwhile...as choice within need (perceivable) or want (suggested) balance, one needs to resist origin (process of dying) for the sustenance of self (living) before reaching predefined outcome (death).
Death doesn't represents evil, it represents ongoing loss (inception towards death) generating temporary growth (life) aka the opportunity for one to exist as partial within whole. Others suggest good vs evil to distract one from the need to resist the solution (process of dying) of every problem (living).
in reality has hardly differed
The reality one perceives represents moving differences aka communicated inspiration for each one to sustain self aka sustaining apartheid by adapting to perceivable differences.
The few suggest sameness to tempt the many to respond "alike", while both pretending to be the same and ignoring the perceivable differences that would inspire them to sustain themselves apart from one another.
This ain't a sophisticated trick, but simply suggested information (fiction) as the inversion of perceivable inspiration (reality). The few simply suggest the many to do the opposite of perceivable reality. Within reality (living within the process of dying) the many represent resistance (living) within temptation (dying), yet ignoring this allows the few to tempt the many without much resistance.
Of course they used mythology to obscure it.
Being within (life) course (inception towards death) implies perceiving moving differences as inspiration for adaption. One can only adapt by choice (need/want) and so the need to adapt to perceivable can be tempted with the want for suggested.
The issue isn't about what the few are suggesting; but that each one of the many willingly consents to suggested over perceivable. There's only one origin for everything (flow) and it ain't all the other ones around oneself (form).
It gives it another layer of possibility when in fact it's simple repetition from where it was drafted.
a) the few utilize spell-craft to tempt the many to ignore perceivable (sound) for suggested (words), which when consented to allows the few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested (word) as an overlay for the perceivable (sound). In other words...the few brand the moving system with affixed labels to trick the many to ignore the moving system (perceivable inspiration) for the affixed labels (suggested information).
b) draft represents the velocity of motion, while repetition represents frequency of adaptation by resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying).
The destruction of Babylon among the countless after
Look at the TALMUD; noun - "instruction"...mishnah (ongoing) + gemara (temporary) aka perceivable + suggested.
If one comprehends this, then it becomes irrelevant what information is written in either suggested partial, only that the whole represents perceivable inspiration. Those instructed through the talmud a) repeat the temporary so long until the ongoing is comprehended, and b) it teaches them to exploit all those who reason about the temporary by suggesting them to ignore the perceivable. This is how the gemara is utilized to suggest the continued babylon to those who want to build their towers, while the mishnah represents the foundation of protection from fall after fall.
Also...COUNT, verb - "to number" represents the suggested temptation to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one" aka being ONE (living); designated within ONEness (process of dying), hence alone aka ALL(in)ONE...for all represents one in energy.
TWO, adjective [Latin duo.] - "one and one"...each one needs to be apart from one another as to be perceivable. Two doesn't represent a perceivable state, but suggested dualism aka togetherness as the inversion of apartheid.
even on advancement
Even a self restricted mind (ment; mentis; memory) is being advanced from inception towards death; hence existing within the constant flow of inspiration as the perceivable input for adaptation (need) or accumulation (want).
sense of future
Sensing implies perceivable origin (enacting) as perceiving consequence (reaction)...one doesn't sense outcome; one shapes self within origin before reaching predefined outcome. Others suggest wanted outcomes (progressivism) to tempt one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
That want for suggested outcomes represents the temptation to build the tower of babel with suggested information. Meanwhile; the outcome for life is predefined at inception as death, which implies being alive to represent the need to resist wanted temptations.
One needs to build (express growth); while resisting the temptation to want to hold onto (impressing loss) what one builds or what others suggest one to build.
Sleight of hand: sand mandalas (temporary growth within ongoing loss).
Stay safe, kid... https://pic8.co/sh/cBo7zL.jpg
- PRISON, noun [Latin prendo.] - "any place of confinement or involuntary restraint"
a) can one be without being within?
b) can a mind (Greek memory) exists without being confined within that which can be memorized?
c) can one be alive without being within the motion from inception towards death?
d) can the living exists without being confined in and restraint by the process of dying?
e) what if inception/death represents a balance, and the life at the center represents a choice? Could that imply being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom?
Can one be free without being dominated by that which sets the boundaries for ones free will of choice?
Sex and Circumcision - An American Love Story - by Eric Clopper
Free will of choice governs mind (memory)...unless ignored for the suggested choices of others, who by ones consent to their suggestions, gain the power to GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind; memory).
A VOTE, noun [Latin votum, from voveo, to vow. Votum is properly wish or will.] - "suffrage; the expression of a wish, desire, will, preference or choice, in regard to any measure proposed"...represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka a) submission of choice to choice of others; b) shirking of response-ability (choice) within perceivable (balance) and c) the suggested inversion of being perceiving (reaction) within perceivable (enacting) natural law.
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + RE (respond to) SOURCE (origin; first producer; the spring from which a stream of water proceeds).
Why would you blame form (life) responding to flow (inception towards death)?
They even call it HR DEPART (partial) MENT (mind)...
SUCCESS', noun [Latin successus, from succedo.] - "a termination which answers the purpose intended"...does the termination of life sound like a successful growth?
Sleight of hand from Loretta Lynn...
"Success put me in second place with you"
"Success has made a failure of our home"
"It's funny what success has done to you"