"51. With my Hawk's head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross." - https://genius.com/Aleister-crowley-the-book-of-the-law-chapter-3-heru-annotated // From Aleister Crowley (a known satanist)
I wonder how many of you know who really Jesus was... Even if you don't want to read the bible (I get it, it's quite long and sometimes very complex to understand), you can notice the changes that occurred during the Roman Empire. You don't sacrifice an animal annually for the "gods", do you? Well, you have Jesus to thank for that.
Did you know that being a gentleman wasn't even a thing before Christianity? Women were treated as cattle. Some countries still treat them like that and you can review how Christian they really are.
I know you are skeptical about Christianity, so I won't even bring up the bible in this discussion. Just rational thinking. Answer this ration question - would you hate a group of people that would die for high moral values? Because Christians were killed as entertainment during the Roman Empire. They later understood that you can't break the spirit of Christians, so they infiltrated it with the Catholic church. (If you need more info on that, research how many years after Jesus was the Roman church created and how).
You can call me whatever you want and the bible is teaching me to forgive you... Isn't that interesting? Today's psychology can prove that "turning the other cheek" is disarming the attacker in most cases. Giving the attacker the freedom to attack is not what they had in mind, thus it will restart their motivation to attack. Interesting how this was known 2000 years ago. Wouldn't that at least peak your interest to what other psychological truths the bible contains?
Alright, let's show the other side as a comparison. We know of secret societies as Templars, Illuminati, Jesuits, Rosicrucians, Masons, Hassassins, etc. Why would groups of angry, greedy people would combine their forces for a plan for a world domination if they don't even live to see it through? Think about it.
And look into yourself. You have moral standards. Don't you hate these satanists because of the injustice they create? Do you share your post or comment because you are trying to preserve the moral standards that you believe in? Aren't you the very answer to the injustice of those evil groups? Even without the bible, you can listen to your inner impulses and decide for yourself what is good and what is not.
Just give the bible an honest shot. Just give yourself an honest shot at prayer. Is the God in the bible asking from you to kill yourself or something like that? Or is he asking from you to care for those around you? You care. You want to share the truth and help someone from this nightmare that the world has become. Then just ask the God of truth to aid you. It's literally that simple.
If you had the key that opens the door the salvation, would you keep it to yourself or share it with others? Everything comes down to this. Would you help someone or make them suffer? There is a god that the satanists worship and it creates a world of nightmares. Could there be a God of truth that will help you when everything seems lost? There is, if you look for him.
And one last thing. I know I shouldn't quote the bible as I said that I will not in this discussion. But let someone find a reasonable explanation for this: "And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark— the name of the beast or the number of its name. Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666.…" - https://biblehub.com/revelation/13-17.htm
Why would the satanists expose their plan in the bible?
Do you think Sweden will be so opened for chipping if they read the bible? Do you think people will follow Elon if they read the bible? Do you think we would be in this situation if everyone read the bible?
Even Jesus allowed to be questioned. Yet, his works survive even to this day. As if he knew it...
"Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven." - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%205:16&version=KJV
If the ongoing process of dying represents the soil for the temporary living seed within, then cultivation (advance growth of seed within soil) implies ones struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Sleight of hand..."a calm (inception towards death) before the storm (life)"; hence STORM, noun - "violent agitation; tempest" + TEM'PEST, noun (Latin tempestas; tempus, time) - "continuance within velocity" aka the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying) aka oneself as "the eye (I) of the storm".
...implies ones consent to a suggested master.
a) hate implies vs love...both represent a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested information.
b) the more one falls for the temptation of wanting (love); the more others are tempted to not want that (hate) aka greed generating envy. Meanwhile; both sides are being tricked to use love vs hate as justification to ignore want vs not want, through a simple rebranding (revisionism) of idolatry (suggested over perceivable).
c) the few neither love (want) nor hate (not want) the many, they simply tempt the many to consent to suggested dualism (want vs not want) over perceivable oneness (need/want).
Need/want represents the balance for each ones free will of choice at the center aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested)...ones free will of choice. If one reasons about want vs not want, then that implies ones ignorance of need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
a) suggested COMPLEX, adjective - "composed of two or more parts or things; composite" tempts "one" to ignore perceivable apartheid aka being partial (living) within whole (process of dying), hence one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable).
It's the few who suggest the many complexity; togetherness; "united" nations; "united" states; european "union"; to join together; to become followers of leaders; tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); the internet (internal net) of things; e pluribus unum (out of many; one) and so on.
Meanwhile; nature sets itself apart...from whole (process of dying) into partials (living)...aka SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold; ] - "single; consisting of one thing".
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" + "there can be only one" + "alone aka ALL(in)ONE".
b) understanding represents ones consent to "stand under" another ones suggestions aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
Those wielding contract law represent the happy merchants of temptation, and those consenting to their suggestions become their compounded interest.
a) as form (living) within flow (process of dying)...each one represents ANIMAL (animated) HUMAN (heb. form; species), hence form (life) animated by flow (inception towards death).
The suggested labels "human" + "animal" tempt one to ignore being the perceiving form (human) within perceivable animation (animal).
b) the few use suggested progressivism (towards outcomes) to tempt the many to ignore being temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying), hence the reaction (resistance) to enacting origin (temptation).
Consenting to suggested (temptation) represents self sacrifice of growth (living) into loss (process of dying).
Everyone knows (perceives) everything (perceivable)...yet each ones comprehension has to be grown by oneself aka impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss).
a) the highest value (perceivable) in existence represents evaluation (perceiving)...everyone represents evaluation (living) within value (process of dying).
b) consenting to suggested values (moralism) tempts one to ignore ones choice of evaluation for the choices of others suggesting values. Those others then gain the power (ones consent) to define; redefine and contradict the suggested values at will, while ones evaluation will get devaluated through ignorance.
c) consenting to suggested moralism (rules of behavior) represents the domestication of ones free will of choice into the self inflicted submission to the suggesting choices of others.
Consenting to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration) allows those suggesting to ENTER TAME MINDS of those consenting. A tamed mind represents a mind ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying), hence a self destructive mind.
At least the lion sustains self by taking the lives of others, instead of reasoning over suggested rules of behavior (moralism) while dying.
a) suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) transmutation of ingredient (living) out of source (process of dying) represents flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death).
c) suggested chemistry (analysis and synthesis aka resolving and putting together) tempts one to ignore perceivable alchemy aka being set apart (living) while being resolved back together (dying); hence struggling to sustain apartheid (life as the ingredient) before being dissolved back into wholeness (process of dying as the base).