a) what comes after "now"? Can perceiving life exist outside perceivable now?
b) AFTER (from c. 1300; in imitation of), hence afterlife implying "in imitation of life"...
did you think I was actually implying that and thus, you felt a need to correct me?
a) I adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the temptation of suggested information.
b) I utilize implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; true vs false; good vs bad etc.)
c) can temporary chaos (living) correct the ongoing natural order (process of dying) while existing within?
the right person
a) suggested "person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within perceivable sound. The few utilize the suggested word (fiction) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound (reality)...it's called spell-craft.
b) sound doesn't communicate right or wrong; it's the reaction of those within that shapes dissonance (need) or dissonance (want). Right vs wrong aka want vs not want reasoning represents dissonance.
The world will far apart faster than the control mongers can implement their strategies to stitch it together.
What if the few suggest the many to hold onto togetherness, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) sets itself apart into every partial (living)?
Why do the few suggest "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one), while the many feel they have to come together (we the people) to overcome the few?
Doesn't "rules for thee but not for me" imply apartheid among the few?
we now live in a nation...
a) NATION, noun - "to be born; a people"...Nation as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or race of men descended from a common progenitor, like tribe, but by emigration, conquest and intermixture of men of different families, this distinction is in most countries lost.
In short...each one of the perceiving people represents a nation, not the suggested brand "nation".
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore self...
lawyers destroy justice
Consenting to suggested "laws" tempts one to ignore that which "just is" (justice) aka the perceivable natural order, and guess what...the ongoing natural order (process of dying) destroys the temporary chaos (living) within.
universities destroy knowledge
a) Ignoring KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" for suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka for "standing under" suggested information, corrupts ones comprehension of perceivable.
b) UNI (Latin unus; one) + VERSE (Latin versus; verto, to turn.] implies a short division (living) of any composition (process of dying), hence nature dividing (self differentiating) from whole (loss) into partial (growth).
religion destroy morals
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the consent of the many gives the suggesting few the power to define, redefine and contradict the rules of behavior (moralism) for them.
banks destroy out economy
a) perceivable (process of dying) represents "value"; while each one perceiving (living) represents (evaluation) aka reacting evaluation within enacting value. Ignoring this for suggested values gives those suggesting them the power to define; redefine and contradict them at will, which the few utilize to devaluate the evaluating choice of the many.
b) ECON'OMY, noun - "the disposition or arrangement of any work" aka disposition (process of dying) for arrangement (living) of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal power of energy represents the balance between loss/growth aka ongoing/temporary aka whole/partial aka potentiality/potential aka male/female aka balance/choice aka dying/living etc.
Sleight of hand: "WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice)" aka "Arbeit macht Frei".
"Conspiracy theorists" are still busy collecting Riddler trophies...
created by nature
Nature cannot create (something out of nothing), it can only transmute...partial (living) out of whole (process of dying). Those within nature can suggest each other to ignore perceivable transmutation for suggested creationism.
...don't exist
Suggested "doing nothing" (don't) cannot exist within perceivable being done (living) within everything (process of dying).
or have I gotten one of three above grossly wrong?
Consent to suggested right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable change. Motion doesn't communicate right or wrong...it sets free will of choice into balance (need/want). Balance represents the momentum of motion aka the perceivable, ever changing moment-um of "now".
since when is the whole world ever on the same page?!???
The whole (process of dying) and each partial within (living)...differences within sameness. The pages of suggested narratives like opposing governments are for the many who ignore perceivable.
a) Evil (not want) vs Good (want) tempts one to ignore that which JUST-IS (need)...
b) others tempt one with suggested justice to justify ignorance; with suggested evil to blame others and with suggested good to acquit response-ability (choice).
c) one needs to adapt to just-is (perceivable inspiration); not justify. One needs to sustain self, not blame others. One needs to respond (as choice) to (balance), not acquit the suggested choices of others.
Let us get to the crux of the matter.
CRUX, noun [Latin, a cross.]...the cross of matter represents choice of matter (life) within balance (need/want) of immaterial (inception towards death).
Inception towards death represents the vertical (velocity), life's choice between need/want represent the horizontal (resistance)....a cross.
If one ignores being choice in-between need (perceivable) or want (suggested), then one is being tempted into want vs not want (suggested)...this represents the anointed one (set apart) being nailed to the cross, hence stuck within the conflicts of reason (want vs not want).
Suggestion itself represents the crossroads between need/want (balance) and want vs not want (imbalance), which is where one sells ones soul through a contract aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
creator
CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist" + NO, adverb - "a word of denial or refusal"
Nothing aka NO THING implies suggested denial (no) within perceivable (everything). Suggested creationism (out of nothing) represents the inversion of perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
To produce implies PRODUCO (to bring forth) -TION (through action), hence generating action (process of dying) producing reaction (living).
Denial (no, not, nothing) implies a suggesting reaction to perceivable everything. One cannot confirm (want) or deny (not want) what wasn't there before (need).
dissolution into the Source of All, Intelligent Infinity
If INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) implies "standing under", then dissolution of partial (finite) into whole (infinite), and the solution representing all (infinite) contradicts "standing under".
What does infinity stand under (intelligo)? Also...does finite stand under infinite or does finite ingredient (growth) transmutes within infinite base (loss)?
learn to remember
If one RE (response to) MEMOROR (memory), then one ignores the ongoing input (inspiration) for temporary accumulated (information).
Test this...hold your son and remember his birth, then notice that remembering what was implies ignoring what is. What does one need to evaluate...that which is (son) or that which was (his birth)?
Inspiration teaches one to adapt, adaption implies by choice, while choice implies within balance (momentum), hence requiring a "moment" for evaluation, hence the need for a memory within the temptation of wanting to fill it up.
Consider that the ongoing momentum represents ones temporary memory, and that ones free will of choice has to struggle for balance by letting go of accumulated (want), while adapting to ongoing (need)...the memory of your son will destroy you, while the momentum of your son will grow your resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying). You could always draw more inspiration from your son, while you will always lose your memories of him.
Frank claimed that "all laws and teachings will fall"
a) the fall (process of dying) generating the reacting rise (living)...everything falls; everyone struggles to rise.
b) one teacher (perceivable inspiration) for each students (perceiving) growth (comprehension). The suggestions of others represents the temptation of loss for oneself...if consented to.
following antinomianism
ANTI (against) NOMOS (suggested rules) -ISM (consent to suggested)...a contradiction in terms.
the most important obligation of every person was the transgression of every boundary
a) OBLIGO (to bind) -ATION (through action) implies reaction (living) bound to action (process of dying) through momentum, hence...
b) IMPORT'ANT, adjective - "bearing on or to; hence, weighty; momentous" aka the weighty reaction within the momentum of action.
c) EV'ERY, adjective - "each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number; the word includes the whole number, but each separately stated or considered" aka partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
d) TRANS (across; beyond) GRADI (to walk, go)...the former implies the transmutation of life across (inception towards death) and beyond (partial within whole), while the latter represents ones choice to navigate while being transmuted across and beyond.
a general reactionary movement
GENER-ation (process of dying) towards REACTION (living) within motion, hence a living MENT (mind; memory) within the dying MOVE.
the destruction of Christianity and Atheism; both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
Aka the destruction (pulling down) of the-ism (want) and athe-ism (not want) at the same time (momentum) through motion (need).
the pure doctrine of Lucifer
Aka the pure (whole) doctrine (knowledge) of lucifer (light-bringer aka perceivable inspiration).
a) "Teutonic order, a military religious order of knights, established toward the close of the twelfth century, in imitation of the Templars and Hospitallers".
b) TEUTON (German) + TEUTA- (tribe)...this is where the ashke-nazi aka rothschild/bauer and Deutsch-land; Dutch-land: Dish-land...Yid-dish-land connections are buried somewhere.
Teutonic Knights (War) + Knights Hospitaler (Pestilence) + Knights Templar (Deception).... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAVhLsZ-wkg
labels
Like words (suggested) over sound (perceivable)?
how much
How much of whole (process of dying) represents each partial (living)...one.
the beginning of the end
The beginning (inception) of the end (death) for the life within.
Question:
What came first...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together)?
Answer:
Nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living).
order from chaos
Seeking order out of chaos (want of outcome) tempts one to ignore being temporary chaos (living) within ongoing natural order (process of dying), hence ones need to adapt to origin.
to change the definition of words
Can you give me "the" definition of a word that cannot be changed; that isn't endlessly reasoned over; a word "the" many can hold onto as an unchangeable "truth"?
Meanwhile...using suggested "the" implies one to represent a THE'IST, noun - "one who believes in the existence of a God"...
reporter
Within perceivable sound, RE (response to) PORT (to bear, to bring forth) implies resonance with sound. A report among suggested words ignores sound, for the ones suggesting the words (Reuters), hence representing dissonance.
"The agency was established in London in 1851 by the German-born Paul Reuter...His father, Samuel Levi Josaphat, was a rabbi".
gain of function
Within a balance based system...the ignorance of the many to function within perceivable, gains the suggesting few control over them.
directed evolution
Direction (inception towards death) shaping reaction (life)...-TION (action) shaping EVOLU (unfolding reaction), hence unfolding from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living).
the same thing as
A thing implies one thing (partial) different from another thing (partial), while coexisting within everything (whole). If "this" is comparable to "as that", then you represent the perceiving perspective in-between, comparing perceivable differences.
These people think we're stupid...trying to change the meaning of words
The foundation for suggested words represents perceivable sound, hence an constantly changing, ongoing whole for partial resonance/dissonance within.
The few suggest words to tempt the many to hold onto suggested meaning, while ignoring the predefined meaning of ongoing sound. This holding onto while within motion represents STUPID, adjective - "to be stupefied, to stop; yery dull; insensible; senseless; wanting in understanding; heavy; sluggish".
Ones want for meaning within suggested words gives other ones the power to define; redefine and contradict suggested meaning at will, hence being able to write temporary narratives (words) within an ongoing system (sound).
Those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHOENICIANS (from phon'ics; sound), while those ignoring sound for suggested words are bound to definitions, hence behaving like DEAF-PHOENICIANS.
existing process; without change
The process of dying establishes existence (living) within change.
no opportunity to change course
Temporary opportunity (choice) can only exist within the momentum (balance) of ongoing change.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation
Ones (singular) consent to suggested groups (plural) tempts one into the controlled situation called "reason" aka perceivable singular wanting vs not wanting suggested plural.
One cannot be a plural, since plural (whole process of dying) generates each singular (partial living) through self differentiation, yet one has the free will of choice to ignore this for whatever others are suggesting.
it is natural to want
Nature represents the ongoing need, those within represent the temporary want, struggling to sustain self within ongoing need, while resisting the temptation of want. The few exploit the ignorance of the many towards need by tempting them into a want vs not want conflict of reason through suggested information.
to be mislead
The natural order leads from inception towards death...living within implies the need to resist being lead towards death. Others suggest one to follow artificial orders, while willingly ignoring to resist the natural order.
Now question suggested LEAD, verb - "to guide towards" with perceivable...living doesn't imply following towards, it demands resisting origin as reactors (living) within generation (process of dying).
during photo shoots....recorded...phonies...don't see it
a) a suggested photo (captured moment) tempts one to ignore existing during ongoing momentum.
b) your repetition of what others suggested implies your mental record aka memory, which is where the few are making entries through suggested information.
c) suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound - "the doctrine or science of sounds; otherwise called acoustics".
d) ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the all seeing I (eye) to be blinded by self imposed ignorance.
e) every moment you invest in suggested child abuse implies a moment you ignore to invest in your child. This ignorance is being exploited by those who utilize suggestion as distraction to gain access to ignored children.
because they lack
a) BE (being within) CAUSE (causing effects)...to be implies being the effect (living) within the cause (process of dying). The few tempt the many to justify their ignorance thereof through reasoning, hence "yes or no; because...so and so"
b) everyone (living) within everything (process of dying) only "lacks" self discernment, which isn't a lack as suggested (something missing), but LACK, verb [Latin liquo, to melt, liquid] - "to want", hence a reacting choice (living) within an enacting system (process of dying) aka a temporary response-ability to grow within ongoing loss.
the courage
COURAGE, noun [Latin, the heart.] - "that quality of mind which enables men to encounter danger and difficulties with firmness"....living represents the temporary firmness within the dangerous and difficult process of dying.
Courage (living) grows from constitution (process of dying).
a) AT'OM, noun [Gr.; Latin atomus; from not, and to cut.] - "a particle of matter so minute as to admit of no division"...that contradicts "all my atoms have universes in them".
b) if ATOM (no division), then MOTA (division)...
need a machine
MACHINE, noun [Latin machina.] - "an artificial work"; from ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural"...what if natural (need), then artificial (want)?
I'm not saying the pandemic...
The few suggested "pandemic"; the many consent (want or not want) and reason (want vs not want) over it.
if...they can say
If the many consent to the suggestions of the few, then the few can say whatever they decide about it.
We want...
If the many "want" or "not want" suggested, then the few "get" everything including control over the consenting many. What if the few don't "want", since they already "have"?
We want to send signals from your phone to what's in your body and manipulate you
Look at the "smartphone-zombies" and tell me they aren't manipulated by whatever is suggested on the screen already?
keep doing this to you forever
FOR (forwards) EVER (everything) aka everyone (life) being moved forwards within everything (inception towards death).
What if he-brews his-story?
unicorn
UNI (one) CORN (single seed) aka the one single seed (living) within the soil of all (process of dying).
If the whole (process of dying) waters down each partial (living); then suggested plural (community) will water down each singular (oneself) within. Solution? Resistance!
To be implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying). Instead of consenting to be a "part" of a suggested community; grow as a perceiving partial within the perceivable whole.
Suggested words (partial) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (whole). The more one consents to words, the less one comprehends sound...a self restriction, where perceivable everything gets drowned out by suggested nothing.
Light (perceivable inspiration) or Dark (ignoring perceivable inspiration for suggested information)... it's your fee will of choice.
Thank you for the inspiration.