The world will far apart faster than the control mongers can implement their strategies to stitch it together.
What if the few suggest the many to hold onto togetherness, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) sets itself apart into every partial (living)?
Why do the few suggest "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one), while the many feel they have to come together (we the people) to overcome the few?
Doesn't "rules for thee but not for me" imply apartheid among the few?
What if the few suggest the many to hold onto togetherness, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) sets itself apart into every partial (living)?
Why do the few suggest "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one), while the many feel they have to come together (we the people) to overcome the few?
Doesn't "rules for thee but not for me" imply apartheid among the few?