The world will far apart faster than the control mongers can implement their strategies to stitch it together.
What if the few suggest the many to hold onto togetherness, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) sets itself apart into every partial (living)?
Why do the few suggest "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one), while the many feel they have to come together (we the people) to overcome the few?
Doesn't "rules for thee but not for me" imply apartheid among the few?
a) NATION, noun - "to be born; a people"...Nation as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or race of men descended from a common progenitor, like tribe, but by emigration, conquest and intermixture of men of different families, this distinction is in most countries lost.
In short...each one of the perceiving people represents a nation, not the suggested brand "nation".
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore self...
lawyers destroy justice
Consenting to suggested "laws" tempts one to ignore that which "just is" (justice) aka the perceivable natural order, and guess what...the ongoing natural order (process of dying) destroys the temporary chaos (living) within.
universities destroy knowledge
a) Ignoring KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" for suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka for "standing under" suggested information, corrupts ones comprehension of perceivable.
b) UNI (Latin unus; one) + VERSE (Latin versus; verto, to turn.] implies a short division (living) of any composition (process of dying), hence nature dividing (self differentiating) from whole (loss) into partial (growth).
religion destroy morals
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the consent of the many gives the suggesting few the power to define, redefine and contradict the rules of behavior (moralism) for them.
banks destroy out economy
a) perceivable (process of dying) represents "value"; while each one perceiving (living) represents (evaluation) aka reacting evaluation within enacting value. Ignoring this for suggested values gives those suggesting them the power to define; redefine and contradict them at will, which the few utilize to devaluate the evaluating choice of the many.
b) ECON'OMY, noun - "the disposition or arrangement of any work" aka disposition (process of dying) for arrangement (living) of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal power of energy represents the balance between loss/growth aka ongoing/temporary aka whole/partial aka potentiality/potential aka male/female aka balance/choice aka dying/living etc.
Sleight of hand: "WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice)" aka "Arbeit macht Frei".
Western movies have become unwatchable, but the CGI is incredible, spectacular, mind-blowing.
(((They))) have always run Hollywood, of course, but if you read through the credits nowadays, it's almost all (((them))) in all areas. Except CGI.
Cohencidence?
What if the few suggest the many to hold onto togetherness, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) sets itself apart into every partial (living)?
Why do the few suggest "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one), while the many feel they have to come together (we the people) to overcome the few?
Doesn't "rules for thee but not for me" imply apartheid among the few?
a) NATION, noun - "to be born; a people"...Nation as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or race of men descended from a common progenitor, like tribe, but by emigration, conquest and intermixture of men of different families, this distinction is in most countries lost.
In short...each one of the perceiving people represents a nation, not the suggested brand "nation".
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore self...
Consenting to suggested "laws" tempts one to ignore that which "just is" (justice) aka the perceivable natural order, and guess what...the ongoing natural order (process of dying) destroys the temporary chaos (living) within.
a) Ignoring KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" for suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka for "standing under" suggested information, corrupts ones comprehension of perceivable.
b) UNI (Latin unus; one) + VERSE (Latin versus; verto, to turn.] implies a short division (living) of any composition (process of dying), hence nature dividing (self differentiating) from whole (loss) into partial (growth).
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the consent of the many gives the suggesting few the power to define, redefine and contradict the rules of behavior (moralism) for them.
a) perceivable (process of dying) represents "value"; while each one perceiving (living) represents (evaluation) aka reacting evaluation within enacting value. Ignoring this for suggested values gives those suggesting them the power to define; redefine and contradict them at will, which the few utilize to devaluate the evaluating choice of the many.
b) ECON'OMY, noun - "the disposition or arrangement of any work" aka disposition (process of dying) for arrangement (living) of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal power of energy represents the balance between loss/growth aka ongoing/temporary aka whole/partial aka potentiality/potential aka male/female aka balance/choice aka dying/living etc.
Sleight of hand: "WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice)" aka "Arbeit macht Frei".