a) when you run the world economy so frugal that you don't even have enough to grow hair...
b) E'RA, noun - "affixed point in time"...free will of choice implies within ongoing balance...ignoring this for suggested "free will" without choice affixes one within imbalance aka reasoning against other choices.
spokesperson
Perceivable sound doesn't speak...a PER (by) SONOS (sound) within ignores that when speaking, hence when uttering suggestible words within perceivable sound.
Gelatin's 'The B-Thing'...
a) suggested uniformity (sameness) tempts "one" to ignore perceivable UNI (Latin unus; one) FORM (differentiated through flow).
Same flow (inception towards death) generates different form (life)...suggesting form to behave the same tempts each one to ignore perceivable differences, hence ignoring to sustain difference (living) within sameness (process of dying).
Cultivating death by suggesting life to mimic its behavior...how?...by suggesting progressivism aka going with the flow, following orders, attaching oneself to the chain of command, being lead by others, hope towards outcomes; adhering to the main-stream etc.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the power to conceal it. Meanwhile...nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving).
c) if the many consent to the suggestions of the few, then the selected few (elite) will stand out as the "chosen ones" from all the other ones, which the few conceal by setting substitute authority in-between themselves and their followers, hence those who suggest "in the name of" the few.
Among the many who ignore to see perceivable, those suggesting in the name of others have to be "seen", hence standing out differently among all those who behave the same. Meanwhile...anyone among the many standing out will be easily seen by the few (tallest nail gets the hammer) and resented by the many who just want to follow suggested orders and behave like the "norm".
I love...
Aka I want what another suggests, which implies I consent to a conflict of reason between all those who want vs not want what others are suggesting. This conflict gives those suggesting the power to define (international world cup); redefine (nation vs nation) and contradict (black vs black) what others are reasoning over, while controlling both sides of the conflict.
This way the many can be tempted by a few to become willing spectators of controlled conflicts of reason, while ignoring that the few use their ignorance to attack on international level, from within nations and to the point of replacing the spectators who are still looking at the distraction because they "enjoy things"...
consume your life
Living implies within the process of dying, hence ones partial struggle to resist being consumed by the whole.
a) choosing want over need implies holding onto while ignoring to resist temptation by letting go.
b) the few suggest progressivism in combination with affirmation to both keep the many going (hence spending resistance towards outcomes) or tempt them to shirk responsibility of resisting (hence holding onto affirmation gained).
c) those who ignore balance can be tempted to ignore the consequences of their growth (the loss of others) by distracting and directing them with idols achieved or yet to gain.
d) consenting to suggested implies RE (response to) PRESENT (presented by), hence giving those suggesting the power to set "representatives" before the consenting ones, while keep suggesting in the name of (in nomine) those representatives.
Those who suggest don't even require puppets to speak for them...anything representing the initial suggestion is enough to motivate those who already consent to push forward until they spend all their resistance against whatever they are being directed at or until another representative tempts them to change course.
no different from the elites who perpetrated it
a) elite (from French élite "selection, choice") implies ones free will of choice to either adapt to the perceivable world itself or to the suggested choices by others. Choosing others makes them ones "elite" aka ones selected choice aka the consequence of ones choices.
b) ignoring to represent free will of choice (singular) for suggested choices (plural) tempts one to ignore being different for attaching oneself to likeness under the disguise of sameness...hence you perceiving it as "no different".
perpetual MASS DEATH
Like living (partial) within the process of dying (whole)...what do you think the few are emulating with their suggested agendas other than the perceivable status quo?
Oneself can grow any of the shown...if one chooses to RE (respond to) SET (being set by)...instead of following what others set out for one to respond to.
we're seeing a rise in racism, sexism, and nationalism
- RACE, noun [Latin radix; radius; ray; radiate.]
- SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.]
- NATION, noun [to be born]
The few suggest -isms to redefine perceivable meaning like a nation to represent a place instead of each one within, or sex to represent togetherness (lust) instead of apartheid (the distinction between male and female) or race as color instead of growth potential.
when those things were the norm
As suggested by the few who domesticate the many to behave according to the "norm", hence following orders instead of being the resistance (life) within the natural order (inception towards death).
The "norm" is where everybody knows your name... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXED2AVlbR0 hence everybody reacting like sheep and in accordance to the norm.
systematically deprived artists of the resources necessary to produce the new
a) the system (process of dying) which generates the resources (living)
b) ignoring to RE (respond to) SOURCE (origin) by consenting to suggested ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural" tempts one to ignore perceivable (natural).
c) new, néwos, now implies the perceivable, ever changing moment (um of motion) for those within.
The few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt with "new", while those who consent are ignoring perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything), Hence, as temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of ingredient (living) out of base (process of dying) alchemy.
In short....wanting "new" tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to "now".
d) production cannot be deprived, the produced can lack self discernment, while ignoring to have access to everything produced...NATURE, noun [Latin from born, produced] .
refusal to give up on the desire for the future
Temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) needs to resist the want to hold onto...the few suggest outcomes (future) to tempt the many to want to hold onto the hope to gain (desire).
Meanwhile...temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying) requires one to resist (need) temptation (want)...not wait for what temptation has in store down the line.
Exiting the Vampire Castle
It's worse...choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law shapes everyone suggesting into a vampire being let into oneself by consenting.
Sleight of hand:
"Must be a reason why I'm king of my castle...Must be a reason why I'm free in my trapped soul"
"It started in my mind...Not limited by where I'm at in my life...Only I can ever change it up"
thesis, antithesis, solution ( I forget the term)
a) hegelian dialectic
b) thesis represents suggested information, which tempts others to consent by wanting or not wanting it.
c) consenting (want or not want) to suggested causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want), hence a conflict (antithesis) about suggested (thesis).
d) after consenting to suggested, those suggesting gain the power (of consent) to define, refine and contradict the suggested meaning at will, hence tempting both thesis and antithesis with suggested solutions to their problems.
e) DIALECTICS, noun - "that branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning"....suggestion represents the weapon to divide the consenting many into reasoning.(Georgia Guidestones - "let this be an age of reason")
f) before want (suggested) exists need (perceivable)...choosing want (fiction) ignores need (reality)...consenting to suggested fiction allows those suggesting it to shape it as an overlay upon ones perspective of reality.
g) solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life)...problems (living) need to resist being dissolved by solution (process of dying).
Why do they pretend to know the best course of humanity towards "progress"?
a) because the few suggest progressivism, while the many consent to follow, which allows the few to misdirect the many.
b) if knowledge implies "perceivable", then those who don't ignore it for "suggested" know the only course for life...from inception towards death, hence being resistance within progression.
Why is fucking children "progressive"?
Progression (inception towards death) destroys children (life)...fucking (lust) feeds progression. Therefore...progression equals temptation and needs to be resisted.
Why they say being "assigned a gender at birth" is oppression?
Because GENeration (process of dying) implies division into regeneration (living), hence SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female".
Ignoring generated division (perceivable differences) for suggested sameness (any ideology, in this case gender) tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self by "expression" (growth within loss through resistance). Those who ignore to express are repressing themselves, which implies that what they consent to believe (gender-ideology) represents oppressive thoughts aka the burden of impositions.
...ism is a religious cult
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents contract law, "-ism" represents the sales-pitch to gain consent to suggested, hence binding consenting choice to suggesting choice, which then allows those suggesting to cultivate the behavior of those consenting.
gnostic doctrine
GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + DOCTRINE, noun [Latin , to teach.] implies teaching (doctrine) oneself by adapting to perceivable inspiration (knowledge).
Ignoring this by consenting to suggested Gnosticism (or any other -ism) allows others to indoctrinate one with suggested information.
Everything needs to be "oppression"
Everything perceivable is "impressing" upon each one perceiving it from within, which when consented to allows to express growth (living) within impressing loss (process of dying).
Ignoring perceivable for suggested, accumulates all the suggested within ones consenting memory, hence burdening oneself aka repressing self through oppression by others...all consensual.
where their arrogance comes from
AR'ROGANCE, noun [Latin arrogantia, from arrogo, to claim; of ad and rogo, to beg, or desire.]...that describes the many who claim the "truth" while begging for more desired definitions from the few, whose orders they're following.
Ones choice of want over need represents claiming over sustaining aka holding onto other partials (living) instead of resisting whole (process of dying).
The many represent the arrogant, while the few represent the insolent reaction to arrogance.
occultism
Consenting to suggested -ism gives those suggesting the power to withhold, conceal, hide the suggested (occult). Meanwhile; nature reveals everything perceivable to everyone perceiving it. Concealment implies ones mind (ment) choosing to conceal self from perceivable (need) by choosing to ignore it for suggested (want).
Suggesting dehumanization (block this bot) in the name of (Jesus); while branding oneself as the penis of Michelle Obama...
The want to hold onto grows the fear of losing, which allows exploitation by suggesting the hope of safekeeping.
Another aspect to consider...suggesting others that a well represents a wishing-well if one throws coins (gold; silver; copper; nickel; aluminum etc.) into the well can trick others to poison the water with metal.
This ties into catching the jew collecting the thrown away coins, blaming him for poisoning the well, and then throwing the jew down the well (as if that mitigates the poison)...
coin could be
COIN, noun - "money stamped" aka a mark upon M-ONE-Y (my one). Those who ignore perceivable value for suggested values are being marked by the authority of others. Those who utilize coins without authority represent counterfeit.
In short...those who consent to suggested coins ignore being within perceivable.
be a small act
One represents the reaction (choice) within small/large (balance).
"money is not my God" dropped by someone thinking of something they love
a) resisting suggested money as ones God doesn't work when spending it for suggested wishing-wells.
From a different perspective...the want of money turning into not wanting money anymore, while exchanging what one not wants (money) for what one wants next (wishes)...that all represents ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable). That one is either gonna come back to spend more money on wishes, or goes back to money based on unfulfilled wishes. A gambler addicted to losing.
b) love implies versus hate aka a rebranding of wanting (love) vs not wanting (hate) suggested...a conflict of reason. The more one loves (want), the more others are tempted to hate (not want)...both ignore being the choice within balance (need/want).
Could send our path in a different direction for all we know.
One path (inception towards death) for each one within (life)...suggested directions tempt one to ignore this. Furthermore, suggested "our" and "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
Utopia through Negation
a) suggested utopianism (nowhere) tempts one to ignore everything perceivable, hence being within everywhere.
b) suggested negation (stop thrust) tempts one to ignore being expression (living) within impressing (process of dying). One cannot negate the perceivable natural order...only ignore it for suggested orders.
c) through implies from whole through partial, hence internal motion...both suggested utopia and negation tempt one to ignore this.
to destroy reality by removing
a) perceivable reality (process of dying) builds (inception) and destroys (death) everything living within.
b) removing implies RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by).
c) the few suggest the many to seek "order out of chaos", which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (life) within the ongoing natural order (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid (partial) within wholeness (whole) by resisting (living) temptation (dying).
barriers of distinction
Nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). The partials perceive the perceivable whole as moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation as to sustain self while struggling to be dissolved.
The few suggest the inversion of perceivable apartheid...togetherness. Hence, e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united nations; united states; european union; uniformity; university; unity, ubisoft, universal studios, universal basic income; unicef or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) or Liberté (free), égalité (same), fraternité (together) etc.
In short...the more one consents to put suggested together, the less one can distinct perceivable differences.
Sleight of hand...a suggested puzzle (partial) tempts one to ignore the perceivable picture on the box (whole), hence tempting one to put together (suggested) what's already there (perceivable).
logos vs gnosticism
a) GNOS'TIC, noun nostic. [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...consenting to suggested -ISM tempts one to ignore perceivable GNOSTIC.
b) suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable PATHO (suffering) GENESIS (generation) aka suffering (living) within generation (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self temporarily within the ongoing.
Furthermore, the suggested word tempts one to ignore perceivable sound. Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in-sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within, by, out of and in response to perceivable sound.
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who consent to suggested words for definitions represent DEAF-PHONETICIANS.
a) wanting to steer the dis-favorable simulation implies "reacting" to suggested, while ignoring being acted upon by perceivable.
b) the few suggest simulation aka SIMILIS (alike) -ATION (through action) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being a different reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying).
c) the few suggest favoritism (friendly disposition) to tempt each one of the many to ignore ones position as partial (living) within whole (process of dying) hence detached from other ones, not attached by affection (friend)...unless ignored.
One doesn't need friends...wanting or not wanting suggested friends, shapes the want (friend) versus not want (foe) conflict of reason, hence shaping enemies.
d) if look at the picture and consider who suggested the goys to use money, and to pay money for their wishes, then you can see the jew reaping what he sowed. All by consent.
zero-hedge...on a long enough timeline, the survival for everyone drops to zero
a) the long enough timeline represents the ongoing process of dying.
b) the drop of survival to zero represents living within the process of dying, hence being moved from inception towards death.
c) consenting to suggested zero (nothing) puts a hedge (ignorance) around the perceiving "one" within everything perceivable.
setting the record straight
The straight (inception towards death) setting the queer (life) into momentum, represents the mind/memory to RECORD, verb [Latin recorder, to call to mind, to remember, from re and cor, cordis, the heart or mind.]
should know
Suggested "should" tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
That being said...everybody knows...
"Everybody knows that the dice are loaded...Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed"
"Everybody knows the war is over...Everybody knows the good guys lost"
"Everybody knows the fight was fixed...The poor stay poor, the rich get rich"
"That's how it goes...Everybody knows"
The few suggest the many to WISH, verb - "to have a desire, or strong desire, either for what is or is not supposed to be obtainable", which in return allows the few to obtain, whatever the many consented to pay for their wishes, without much resistance from them.
Why the lack of resistance? Because the want (wish) to obtain ignores the need to sustain by resisting the temptation of want.
the problem with Jan 6 was that it looked like...
...what others directed it to be and suggested one to consent to view as.
The only reason individuals submit to any kind of outside law...
...represents ones willing ignorance of being within natural law, for reasoning among others over suggested laws by others.
shared
Consider being free (living) within shared (process of dying)...what would would happen if one ignores that for sharing what others are suggesting?
to act when confronted
a) to stand in direct opposition (confront) implies "reacting" to being opposed.
b) being able to react (choice) implies being within enacting (balance).
the Right
a) sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."the RIGHT to be LEFT alone" aka right/left (balance) and to be alone aka ALL(in)ONE aka free will of choice.
b) if one consents to believe in suggested "rights", then one submits self to suggested liberty of others aka "give me liberty or give me death". What one ignores when consenting as choice to suggesting choice, is that "free" will of choice represents LIBERTAS; LIBER -"free".
they do not question because they were never suggested to
a) notice that the many keep seeking answers from the few, hence already consenting to be on the quest (question) to follow orders.
b) following implies the want to follow suggested over the need to resist perceivable.
c) consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable.
NPC for security
A non player character shirks responsibility for a game deemed dangerous onto others, while following them towards the consequences of going into danger.
to fix them from deep within
a) the "deepest" place within a balance based system implies ones free will of choice, the more one chooses to adapt to balance, the more one grows.
b) to fix tempts one to ignore being temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death), hence being let loose to consciously participate within the whole.
Others suggest one to want to fix aka to "heal the world by bringing together" (tikkun olam), which tempts the partial (living) to ignore resisting the whole (process of dying).
Nature sets itself apart, the ones within need to struggle to sustain apartheid within wholeness, while others tempt one to put back together, while holding onto.
c) if choice represents the deepest part of existence, and the many are burying it underneath willing ignorance, then ones attempts to suggest them other choices keeps piling ignorance upon it. Only ones expressed growth can inspire others to resist the temptation or repressing self.
work you way in and do the programming.
a) work (energy) to way (process of dying) to wanderer (living) aka action/reaction as the internal/inherent power of energy.
b) programming others implies by suggestion; yet the ignorance of perceivable makes one programmable by the suggestions of others. You ain't helping the many, you are trying to wrestle control over the many from the few when attempting to program them. If you succeed you would become the parasitic few.
Seems like an Herculaneum task...
Try Sisyphus... http://toursmaps.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/the-myth-of-sisyphus_12.jpg Whenever your efforts helped you raise to the top; the ignorant responses of others discard it exponentially faster, while tempting you to make your way back down to the lowest common denominator for the next attempt.
purpose of the government
a) PUR'POSE, noun [Latin propositum, propono; pro, before, and pono, to set or place.]....origin controls (govern) mind/memory (ment), hence that which exists before one is being set into it.
b) ignoring perceivable origin for suggested outcomes (purposes) gives others control over ones misdirection.
c) "the" government implies ones consent to suggested THE-ism (belief in higher authority), which also sets one into a conflict of reason against aTHE-ism (disbelief in higher authority).
to help
HELP, verb - "to aid; to assist; to lend strength or means towards effecting a purpose"...the ongoing process of dying represents the purpose which aids, assists, lends strength and predefines meaning for the temporary effects living within.
Each one exists within help with the free will of choice to draw help from it or harm self by ignoring it.
I mostly use stinging-nettle for tea, so I'm unsure if one can read anything more than "ouch" into them?
One represents resistance (life) within current (inception towards death)...others suggest WIRE, verb - "to bind with wire" as to contain resistance within directable (anagram for creditable) current (like currency)...