Why do they pretend to know the best course of humanity towards "progress"?
a) because the few suggest progressivism, while the many consent to follow, which allows the few to misdirect the many.
b) if knowledge implies "perceivable", then those who don't ignore it for "suggested" know the only course for life...from inception towards death, hence being resistance within progression.
Why is fucking children "progressive"?
Progression (inception towards death) destroys children (life)...fucking (lust) feeds progression. Therefore...progression equals temptation and needs to be resisted.
Why they say being "assigned a gender at birth" is oppression?
Because GENeration (process of dying) implies division into regeneration (living), hence SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female".
Ignoring generated division (perceivable differences) for suggested sameness (any ideology, in this case gender) tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self by "expression" (growth within loss through resistance). Those who ignore to express are repressing themselves, which implies that what they consent to believe (gender-ideology) represents oppressive thoughts aka the burden of impositions.
...ism is a religious cult
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents contract law, "-ism" represents the sales-pitch to gain consent to suggested, hence binding consenting choice to suggesting choice, which then allows those suggesting to cultivate the behavior of those consenting.
gnostic doctrine
GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + DOCTRINE, noun [Latin , to teach.] implies teaching (doctrine) oneself by adapting to perceivable inspiration (knowledge).
Ignoring this by consenting to suggested Gnosticism (or any other -ism) allows others to indoctrinate one with suggested information.
Everything needs to be "oppression"
Everything perceivable is "impressing" upon each one perceiving it from within, which when consented to allows to express growth (living) within impressing loss (process of dying).
Ignoring perceivable for suggested, accumulates all the suggested within ones consenting memory, hence burdening oneself aka repressing self through oppression by others...all consensual.
where their arrogance comes from
AR'ROGANCE, noun [Latin arrogantia, from arrogo, to claim; of ad and rogo, to beg, or desire.]...that describes the many who claim the "truth" while begging for more desired definitions from the few, whose orders they're following.
Ones choice of want over need represents claiming over sustaining aka holding onto other partials (living) instead of resisting whole (process of dying).
The many represent the arrogant, while the few represent the insolent reaction to arrogance.
occultism
Consenting to suggested -ism gives those suggesting the power to withhold, conceal, hide the suggested (occult). Meanwhile; nature reveals everything perceivable to everyone perceiving it. Concealment implies ones mind (ment) choosing to conceal self from perceivable (need) by choosing to ignore it for suggested (want).
a) because the few suggest progressivism, while the many consent to follow, which allows the few to misdirect the many.
b) if knowledge implies "perceivable", then those who don't ignore it for "suggested" know the only course for life...from inception towards death, hence being resistance within progression.
Progression (inception towards death) destroys children (life)...fucking (lust) feeds progression. Therefore...progression equals temptation and needs to be resisted.
Because GENeration (process of dying) implies division into regeneration (living), hence SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female".
Ignoring generated division (perceivable differences) for suggested sameness (any ideology, in this case gender) tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self by "expression" (growth within loss through resistance). Those who ignore to express are repressing themselves, which implies that what they consent to believe (gender-ideology) represents oppressive thoughts aka the burden of impositions.
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents contract law, "-ism" represents the sales-pitch to gain consent to suggested, hence binding consenting choice to suggesting choice, which then allows those suggesting to cultivate the behavior of those consenting.
GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + DOCTRINE, noun [Latin , to teach.] implies teaching (doctrine) oneself by adapting to perceivable inspiration (knowledge).
Ignoring this by consenting to suggested Gnosticism (or any other -ism) allows others to indoctrinate one with suggested information.
Everything perceivable is "impressing" upon each one perceiving it from within, which when consented to allows to express growth (living) within impressing loss (process of dying).
Ignoring perceivable for suggested, accumulates all the suggested within ones consenting memory, hence burdening oneself aka repressing self through oppression by others...all consensual.
AR'ROGANCE, noun [Latin arrogantia, from arrogo, to claim; of ad and rogo, to beg, or desire.]...that describes the many who claim the "truth" while begging for more desired definitions from the few, whose orders they're following.
Ones choice of want over need represents claiming over sustaining aka holding onto other partials (living) instead of resisting whole (process of dying).
The many represent the arrogant, while the few represent the insolent reaction to arrogance.
Consenting to suggested -ism gives those suggesting the power to withhold, conceal, hide the suggested (occult). Meanwhile; nature reveals everything perceivable to everyone perceiving it. Concealment implies ones mind (ment) choosing to conceal self from perceivable (need) by choosing to ignore it for suggested (want).