recursive autonomous learning
a) Recursive (returning) implies circular response...living implies linear response.
b) Autonomous (self law) aka self/sel/sol (soul; sole) aka natural law representing to sole soul self for each being within. It's choosing to hold onto anything which establishes dependency during autonomy.
c) Teach (to give instruction) implies giving structure (life) within action (inception towards death). Learn/lois/læst (sole of the foot) implies walking (life) within sole (inception towards death).
To teach self implies to learn self and vice versa. That's autonomy...student under teacher implies dependency. What's the Hebrew word for instruction? Talmud!
Few utilize AI to maintain the circle of dependency, which distracts many from natural autonomy.
because we're livin' it
Living implies being within cause (be-cause)...we implies an artificial summation of many shaped by few to distract being from cause.
given to you by people who want your money
a) Many don't have money; few use money as a currency moving through many. The origin and outcome of money represents few; which use many as a medium to launder currency through.
b) Few suggest screens to tempt many into a want vs not want conflict, while ignoring God given need.
If I turn you by force, then you are still being (life) send forwards (inception towards death), hence one a mission within the primary force as God's missionary.
Notice missION + versION...that ion (action) implies God giving choice (reaction) to being aka the choice in-between MISS (send forwards aka linear progression) or VERS (turn against each other aka circular regression).
Gods missionary needs to resist the temptation of wanting to turn against.
A SUBmission under another, hence establishing an under vs over conflict...as in versus/verto - "to turn".
Turning (version) contradicts being send (mission)...
If one submits; then a subversion has been established...
tricks people into limitation
Plural (people) deceives singular (person) into limiting self by joining others.
how to break free
Coming into being implies the forcible (inception towards death) separation (life) aka being given a break by being set free from one another. It's the joining together which tempts one to ignore the break.
spiritual secrets
Spirit moving through essence implies secret/seco - "to separate; divide; break apart". It's ignoring that which permits another to cast natural secrecy into artificial mystery.
the demons they summon
Demon aka dai-mon (divider-provider) implies nature providing division to being...summoning beings together permits few any provision given to many.
how to restore your power
Storing response (re-store) diminishes power...it costs power to hold onto. Coming into being implies a power differential...storage inverts that.
running oceans worth of media
There's only one ocean (inception towards death) running each medium (life) within...it's applying worth to what others are mediating towards one, which tempts one to ignore that.
The belief in outward authority
To believe implies by free will of choice aka inert authorization (choice) by active author (balance)...believing implies inclination towards another aka towards a false authority and away from being authorized within the process of authorization.
There is no authority except God and even that is optional
Optional implies option (choice) al (all)...only within all can each one wield free will of choice.
The word "optional" puts together primary (al) and secondary (option) to tempt instrument (secondary) within sound (primary) to give consent to word (optional).
In-stru-ment implies mind structured within sound, hence being of sound mind...
AI scenarios
Scenario/scene/skia - "shadow; shade"...only within light can a shadow be shaped. Holding onto shapes darkens ones perception within light. AI represents artificial shadow play aiming to distort and confine ones mind (confinement) from light passing through (enlightenment).
From Hopeful to Horrifying
From > to implies delineation of light; hopeful vs horrifying implies circular confinement based on taking measurements, which once again darkens ones mind.
What The Deep State Want
Ignoring need for want puts one into a deeper state of being...few tempt the consensus of many into the body politic (Staatskörper aka body of state) by shaping a want vs not want conflict of reason within their minds.
For example...both wanting to be a republican versus not wanting to be a democrat ignores the need to free oneself from representation by another. The more need is ignored; the deeper ones body of state falls into the circular hole aka bottomless pit aka inward (logic) and outward (reason) self confinement.
Ultimately...
Being (life) implies in-between initiation (inception) and ultimatum (death)...logic and reason hermetically seal ones mind within a circle, while ignoring delineation.
They got so used to the enslavement and the power that they don't want to release it now that humans evolved into a more civilized people.
Enslavement implies "slave within mind"...few suggest civilization to tempt many into domestication by willingly giving the power of consent away. Joining a consensus enslaves ones mind.
they tried to prevent evolution
Evolution/evolve - "to unroll"...few shape suggestions to roll many into logic (inward) and reason (outward) aka into circular confinement.
De (life) delineation (inception towards death) cannot be prevented, yet preventive measurements taken are shaping a circle during linear procession.
we all use our free will
a) Being implies one within all, which "we" sums up. The former sets one free from one another, while the latter binds one together with one another.
b) Free will implies "of choice" aka the re-use of balance. It's motion which uses balance (momentum) and reusable choice (matter).
c) Our implies taking into possession; free implies given potential during procession.
"Happy" was unrelated to emotion but was related to fortuitous chance, for instance.
a) Happy implies happenstance aka happen (chance) + stance (choice)...emotion/emotio - "to move from" implies inclining from ones stance aka taking a chance by given choice.
The relation of choice and chance is established by "taking" what is given and holding onto it, while becoming emotional unstable.
b) God WAS before choice (stance) was given and chance (happen) can be taken aka motion was before emotion can be chosen by matter.
"Fun" didn't exist
Fun aka fond implies choice inclining towards chance aka fond/want...representing each beings will (want) within nature (need). It's each beings emotional struggle to be fond of things one doesn't need like fondling titties because it's fun.
Fun...simply meant "hoax", so naturally doesn't appear
Appearances can be deceiving...all (perceivable) makes each one (perception) appear, which one another uses for deception (suggestion).
All implies nature...each native within alternates by choice in-between real (perceivable nature) or fiction (suggested artifice). Few represent artificer who tempt many with hoaxes (hexes; magic spells) into deceiving self.
"Freedom" was a very technical word still,
God giving choice implies dominance setting free...an analytical process. The word free-dom implies an artificial synthesis of what nature sets apart for analysis. This deception requires ones choice to take and hold together the artifice within nature aka technical (artifice within all).
A word can only be shaped within sound...the latter moves; the former tempts ones mind with noise into stillness aka ignorance. That's why one who's ignorant sounds noisy without actual saying anything.
it's all in the word choice.
a) Choice cannot contain all, nor can any word contain all sound...it's the one who chooses to ignore that which becomes the container (contain-ment) of self-deception. Others simply hoax one into it.
b) Words are shaped by LETTERS aka ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words. It's the men of letters who control any words others choose to communicate with.
c) The difference between operative masonry and speculative masonry...words represent speculation within operational sound. The mason of free (will of choice) uses bricks (suggested information) and mortar (consensus) to build walls of ignorance within the minds of many by distracting from operation (sound) with speculation (words).
Stand fast
Standing implies choice (matter) balancing (momentum) within motion...fast implies affixing an imbalance (slow vs fast) within choice by distracting from motion.
Christ hath made us free
Christ (anointed one) implies each being set free from one another within the singular delineation of God...US aka uniting states implies anti-christ aka those set free turning against one another.
One implies free; us implies joined together like a masonic joint...
isn't that ironic. If you want people to figure out alternative energy solutions...
Energy aka en (within) ergy (work)...work implies ongoing solution (inception towards death) for each temporary dissolution (life) within. Dissolution implies a division aka alternation in-between.
OIL/ALL implies the dissolution of each alternating one within aka each anointed one (Christ)...the irony of which is hidden within the language itself aka the figure of speech. Why? Because speech is formed (unification) within flow (dissolution)...
vital evidence
Evidence implies the perception of each living being...not anything suggested as evidence by another. It's the suggestion of another which incorporates vitality if one consents to it aka breathes life into it.
Incorporate (death) + vitality (life)...evidence tricks latter into former. That's what the British Broadcast CORPORATION does...
grooming gang
Groom implies "to grow"; gang implies "to go together"...the latter prevents the former.
independent inquiry...may be lost
Inquiry (to ask in) tempts one further into dependency to another...a loss for being.
about to begin
Begin implies the generation (gin) of being (be)...about (on the outside) lures the generated being from within outwards.
paperwork
Work sets free; paper compacts together which binds free will of choice, while making it impressionable.
tl;dr: Anything the BBC casts broadly upon the public tests ones free will of choice privately...unless ignored willingly.
The turning on the Harlot continues
Harlot (vagabond, man of no fixed occupation, idle rogue) contradicts turning (holding onto one side while turning against the other)...it's choosing a side to hold onto which prostitutes ones choice to a chosen ones offer.
A gentiles choice submitting to any jewish suggestion implies a harlot discovering a higher satisfaction...a satisfaction one cannot get, because one tries, and one tries, and one tries.
should you support the troops?
God frees...supporting troops (band of people) binds ones free will of choice.
should you...leaning and adhere
Leaning tempts choice off-center; adherence binds choice by adhesive.
to commit war crimes
Consenting to a side commits choice to war (both sides turning against each other), while ignoring that crime/krei implies to distinguish from one another.
Nature doesn't commit to a side...it discharges being (life) in-between sides (inception towards death).
in turn mooching
Turning implies cyclical movement; being implies delineation...it's ignoring the latter for the former which impoverishes one side in conflict with another aka rich vs poor.
A jew issues the value gentiles evaluate each other with, which leads to a circular conflict among gentiles...solely benefiting each jew.
I deserve to be shunned by all humanity?
All generates humanity (human) by animation (animal)...a jew tempts gentiles into servitude by distracting from animation with affixed values. Taking affixed values into possession shuns gentiles (potential) from animation (procession).
Free will of choice doesn't serve another aka has no duty towards anything, but represents a response-ability within everything aka in response (choice) to origin (balance)...not towards deserved vs undeserved outcome from one another.
- Inception towards life... coming in
- Life towards death... coming out
Coming in (inception) and out (death) of being (life)...one singular process for each single potential within.
perhaps
Aka per happenstance (by chance)...an inversion of being choice by balance.
is
IS implies a suggestion about what WAS before one came into being. Consenting to what is implies potential taking into possession, while ignoring procession.
the
Aka suggested theism tempting one into a conflict against others (this vs that), while permitting another to speak in the name of God (theos).
Perhaps the outcome is the becoming?
In this short sentence are four (perhaps; the; is; the) deceptions preventing you from discerning self as coming into and out of being.
God has occasionally given people the choice to return
a) God implies occasion/occidere (fall down) for each rise within.
b) Fall(cause; action; motion) towards rise (effect; reaction; matter) implies linear procession.
c) People implies ones choice to join another, while ignoring God dividing each person from one another.
d) Return implies ones response to a circle, while ignoring Gods delineation of being.
towards the faith
Towards implies procession; faith implies possession...the latter tempts one to ignore former. Procession implies linear; possession shapes circular...if held onto.
Does modern media portray it as a choice? Is it a choice?
Media/medium - "middle"...choice can only exist in the middle of balance. Few use media to tempt ones choice into circumference by taking an optional side (modern vs ancient), while ignoring primary balance.
If you wake up after dying
a) Wake/weg - "to be lively" implies the process of dying for each living being within the WEG (way).
b) Before vs after represents a circular conflict distracting from linear procession aka be (being) fore (forwarded) + aft (off, away).
Being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within a way...that isn't a conflict, but ones mind can be tricked to view it as such.
we are preparing to make the right
a) We represents a corruption of light aka an accumulation of rays casting shadows over one another.
b) Preparing implies towards outcome; being (ray) implies in response to origin (light). Preparation for outcome neglects adaptation to origin.
c) Right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies light moving each ray within a straight line...not something one makes, but everything allowing each thing to re-make self.
judgments
"Judge not lest ye be judged"...judgement implies confinement aka holding onto a verdict, while ignoring that free will of choice needs to adapt to justice by deciding...not confine self to decisions.
Balance implies just; choice implies at odds with one another.
confronting the light
Con (together) front (to project, stand out)...light projects ray by dividing each to stand out from one another. Few suggest CON to tempt many together, hence casting darkness about one another, while preventing projection with retraction.
Joining one another retracts self. Being a transference within light implies a projection of self.
ability to judge
Nature enabling being...that's justice. Beings judging one another disables many under few, hence establishing a court (enclosure) of justice. A sentence passed represents a sentience ignored. Ignorance represents mental confinement aka an enclosure.
when it happens
A happenstance implies by chance; being implies choice by balance. Taking a chance ignores choice given.
there is a choice
Only HERE (balance) can choice be used...THERE (imbalance) implies an option presented to choice by the choice of another.
IS implies optional, WAS implies primary...God was before any being within can suggest to one another what God is.
NDEs give...
a) All was given to each one within...NDEs are shared among one another to distract from all given.
b) Near (close by not distant) tempts one to ignore that DI (to divide) STANT (stance) implies ones living stance within the dividing process of dying.
There's no "near death"...only living within process of dying, hence life in-between inception and death. Near vs far represents a cyclical conflict about measurements taken, while ignoring a linear procession one cannot take into possession.
Therefore OP is about (1) trusting versus (2) distrusting
Aka a cyclical conflict of reason distracting from linear (inception towards death) procession of potential (life).
Should you go towards the light?
a) Should implies "obligation" (a binding pledge); light implies "necessity" (a setting free)...few suggest should to keep many in the dark (ignorance) about light (discernment).
b) Light > spectrum > ray...light can only move forwards. It's each ray animated to resist, which can be tempted to follow along by ignoring to resist.
Is it heaven?
Light sets each ray free from one another...resisting the temptation to come together represents heaven (heave; to rise), while coming together represents hell (kel; to cover).
A trap?
Light sets free...ignoring light by free will of choice traps ones free will of choice. Ignorance represents darkness and confinement.
Soul-recycler?
Light implies soul/sole (one and only) hence moving through each ray within. It's ignoring light which mentally (logic) and physically (reason) confines one within a cycle.
If one responses to a cycle, then one ignores being delineated within light.
A vagina?
Light > spectrum > ray aka male > female > offspring...it's the off-spring divided from one another (penis + vagina) which can have intercourse with one another for more off-spring from one another.
What the light and what should you do?
Light implies all; each ray within needs to adapt to all, while resisting the wanted temptations of one another...like suggested "should" (a binding pledge of obligation).
Death...The Living Feel It Too
Feel/fall aka the process of dying for each rising life within. The issue here...DEATH suggested as outcome instead of DYING perceived as being processed from origin towards outcome.
How To Counter...Media
A medium (life) adapts to extremes (inception towards death)...counting holds a medium accountable by another. Accountable as in counter; noun - "table where a money lender does business; table or bench of a merchant or bank".
Weaponized Social Media
Each beings weapon of choice represents a separated medium formed within flowing extremes...social aka soc (together) i (within) al (all) inverts separation.
The way they weaponized it is by filling it
Way implies fall (inception towards death) for each rising (life) weapon (choice) within...it's the minds of those ignoring to rise which others fill up with ballast (literally belly-load) aka the belly of ba'al.
first turn
- First...line (inception towards death)
- Second...delineation (life)
Only during delineation can one turn within all to shape a circle.
don't give them your fear
Fear implies holding onto a make believe dread about an outcome one hasn't reached yet. It's ones free will of choice binding itself to imagination, which others are shaping by invocation.
they will flee
Will implies form; flee implies flow...only within flow can form be shaped by separation from one another. Suggested pluralism (they) tempts singular (one) being to ignore flow, while shirking will to another.
own Life Energy
Energy sets life free...owning tempts life to bind itself while wasting energy in the process of possession.
That ain't put together (constructed) by divided from one another aka that from this; minor from major; of from on; one from all; fiction from reality.
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" aka generation by division...not construction.
Sys (together) stem (to stand)...it's the users of AI who stand together while engaging (binding) themselves. Few adapt to nature while tricking many to bind themselves to artifice.
AI regurgitates artifice which contaminates users. Refinement implies being within nature resisting the temptation of artifice.
Being implies within nature. AI tempts being into mental confinement aka ignoring nature, while permitting artifice to supervise ignorance.
Nature implies process; being implies potential. AI tempts potential to take possession of artifice, while ignoring natural procession.
Questioning who or what implies ones lack of self discernment which another cannot give one. AI is being used to give artificial answers to ignorant questions as to maintain the lack of self discernment among users.
Ignoring self discernment implies self abuse...few trick many into a circle of use/abuse. Every user represents an abuser of self.