1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

This Isn’t Just...

Only within just can this + that choose to be unjust to one another.

first non-human mind

a) First light; then hu/hue (color); then mind being able to perceive differences.

b) Few plant non (nothing; nihilo; nihilism; denial) into the hive-mind of many to distract from the hue of man.

stops belonging

God moves being...beings trick one another into longing aka wishful thinking aka mentally holding onto ideals, which "stops" being from discerning God.

To stop implies a beings ignorance of being moved.

Foundation of a new

Aka ignorance of perceivable NOW for suggested NEW. There ain't no new God...only each being adapting to God now or ignoring the everlasting now for the temporal new aka materialism.

The problem we invented

Only during solution can there be pro (forwards) blem (to throw). God implies solution; being implies problem...unless adapting to God aka establishing resolution.

Analyzing the Kosmos

Kosmos aka universe aka uni (one) verse (to turn) implies a synthesis...the opposite of analysis.

The Illusion of AI's understanding

Only within natural can artificial be shaped...holding onto shapes deludes ones mind which makes the natural seem illusive.

If anyone builds it, everyone dies

Every implies the whole process of dying; one implies each living being within. The status quo of being alive implies during the process of dying.

Only during a process can the potential to build come into being.

The end of human dominance

Only withing hu/hue (color) can each ray come into being in-between beginning and end. Light dominates color; color sets ray free...that's the foundation of free-dom.

forecast from...

A contradiction aka fore (towards outcome) from (from origin)...few cast contradictions to tempt many to turn against one another.

Some things are more valuable than

Only within everything (whole) can each thing (partial) be summoned together, which diminishes evaluation (perception) of value (perceivable) with an artificial sum (suggested).

The six epochs of the universe

Six/sex/seco - "to divide"...if one divides uni (one) and verse (to turn), then one prevents conflict. Few suggest epoch/epokhe aka epi (on) ekhein (to hold) to tempt many into ignoring division (analysis) for unification (synthesis).

The next evolution

Evolution implies turning...the next round of the same circle tempts one to ignore what comes next in line...inception > life > death

The rise of the embodied avatar

Avatar implies crossing over (inception towards death); embody implies body within (life)...only during a fall across can a body rise. Fall animates rise.

Reality Not Found

Real implies ones response (re) to all (al)...if one ignores foundation (found) for nothing (not), then that implies fiction.

404

  • Inception > life > death...singular delineation.
  • Inception (1) > life (2) > death (3)...that's counting together what nature sets apart from one another.

Inception and death implies the same FOUR-ward motion for each ONE living within...unless ignored, then it becomes inception (4) > life (0) > death (4). Zero implies ones denial of being one within oneness aka the absence of all quantity considered as quantity with absence implying ones sense abstaining perceivable, while considering suggested.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Concave aka con (together) + cavus (hollow; whole)

a) Only within hollow can things apart be filled together.

b) A partial cannot perceive whole from within...only one another.

c) Few suggest "earth" to tempt many into a consensus, which confines many, while permitting few to shape it from outside.

centrifugal

Delineation implies motion > momentum > matter with matter being at the center of motion...others suggest fugal/fugitive (to flee) to tempt one off-center.

In other words...all perceivable delineates each ones central perception, while any suggestion by another decentralizes it.

images how it really is

Any image represents an artificial suggestion used to shape a consensus among others. Those within the consensus are turning against each other (is vs isn't) about artifice which represents an artificial centrifuge.

In short...suggestion shapes an inward (logic) and outward (reason) centrifugal force of imagination which tempts ones resistance off-center.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

some kind of dark overlay over what should be beautiful life

a) A dark overlay (ignorance) over what should be beautiful life (discernment)...a being cannot see lack of discernment while ignoring.

b) Understanding (standing under) permits another to overlay (lay over)...

look like humans

Hu/hue (color) implies the visible spectrum of light for each DIVERSE ray within...few suggest likeness to deceive many with looks. Look can be deceiving, hence the use of lookalikes.

sinister tech

Tech implies artifice; sin implies syn-chronization with artifice...it ain't the tech that's sinister, but the one ignoring nature for it.

electromagnetic

Aka elect (choice) + mag (to be able)...nature enables (magnetic) each beings free will of choice (electric). That's why choice needs to resist wanted temptation aka the magnetic attraction (temptation) outside of electric repel (resistance)

Glitch

From Yiddish glitsh - "to slip; glide"...if one ignores to resist while falling for temptation, then one slips/glide/glitches.

In other words...if choice inclines to any suggested side, then it imbalances itself. That's glitching.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

fixing spelling errors

Nature moves...motion neither can be fixed nor does it err. Few suggest spelling (spell-craft) to tempt many into ignoring natural for artificial...that's the error.

Doing this causes

Cause does effect...few suggest many that causes (plurality) can be affected. Consenting to that represents the artificial error which nature dissolves.

the tech is...advanced

Nature advances any tech/tekhnē (artifice) shaped within. Few shape artifice to tempt many to ignore being advanced.

AI has existed for...

a) Only during FOR (forward motion) can EX (expression) come into being.

b) Few suggest artifice to distract from natures forward motion, and intelligence to repress expression among many.

set it up this way

There's only one way (inception towards death) setting each being (life) within in-between up (living) and down (dying).

current technology

Current implies natures linear motion...technology implies a beings circular thinking (logy) about artifice (techno).

All this started with...

...all forwarding each one within.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

External flow (inception towards death) delineates internal form (life)...others trick form to shape a circle within self (logic), which then turns into a circle against others (reason). Why? To prevent those within a circle from thinking straight.

The issue with migration/migrare - "to move from one place to another" is that life can be migrated from inception towards death physically, while mentally moving thoughts in circles.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Impaling a jew doesn't loosen the bondage among gentiles, which is self imposed. Impaling a jew establishes a temporary vacuum for slaves who seek a master, and it's the slaves who give power to the master so the vacuum will be filled quickly.

If Vlad is busy impaling, then he can't also hold and rattle the chain of slaves, and so he outsources the master position aka head of states; teachers; politicians; leaders; kings; queens; popes etc.

Anyone looking at the outsourcing will come to only one conclusion...free the slaves; impale the masters. Conflict implies circular revolution and so the whole spiel about impaling comes back around poking Vlad in the ass.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you let it make your supply chain decisions

Nature supplies all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...others shape a supplement (suggested) to tempt ones free will of choice into chains.

Suggestion tempts one to deny what perception supplies...if you let it.

risk

Risk implies "exposure to mischance"...nature (balance) exposes being (choice) within a giving process. Another being shapes artifice to tempt ones given choice to take a chance, which represents gambling.

Sleight of hand: Risk the game by the (((Hassenfeld brothers))) aka Has-bro.

Risk represents a game of diplomacy, conflict and conquest...suggestion represents diplomacy, logic (internal) and reason (external) represents conflict, and consent to suggested shaping consensus represents conquest.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pentagon threatens to list Anthropic as "supply chain risk"

Aka Pentagon (pentagram; five-angled) threatens to list (to border; band; bind) Anthropic (anthros; male human being) as a risk to supplemental (easily bending mind) chains.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are...files covering up?

File/filum - "a thread, string; thread of fate; cord, filament"...files entangle ones mind in bondage, while covering ones discernment under ignorance.

Memory isn't for file-storage, but for adaptation to ever moving input.

Inquiring minds want to know.

Inquire; verb - "to ask for specific information". Knowledge implies ones mind coming into being within perceivable inspiration. The former tempts one to file/store/save/hold onto it, while the latter moves and cannot be held onto.

Inspiration implies singularity moving; information implies a synchronicity of ones consent to the suggestion of another aka the self inflicted burden of syn/sin.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

What would u call a PDF

Resist labels and describe demeanor like lusting after a child; raping a child; sodomizing a child; hurting a child; corrupting a child; exploiting a child etc.

Nature doesn't label anything; it differentiates each being from one another...beings use labels to distract each other from differences in demeanor.

6
free-will-of-choice 6 points ago +6 / -0

By making up laws. Natural law reveals; make-up conceals.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

we cannot prove it and so they just deny it.

Nature cannot be proven because proof is in the pudding/putting aka natural flow putting each being into form. If form shares proof with one another, then that denies flow.

Proof aka the firmness of mind implies ones ignorance of being moved.

secrecy

Secret/seco - "to divide"....that's how nature reveals all through each being within. Few use artifice (suggestion) to tempt many into hiding from natural (perception). Holding onto artifice shapes the firmness of ones mind aka ignorance.

secrecy due to national security

a) National aka native within all implies a division (seco) of all into each native.

b) Secret and secure imply the same root (seco; to divide) and if one discerns this, then secret reveals, while security generates each being without care or fear.

Carrying or fearing requires ones free will of choice to hold onto something, which in return conceals ones mind, while endangering ones being.

anti-Constitutional.

Con (together) stitut (set form) ion (action) al (all). All action sets each formed reaction apart from one another...not together.

It's ones consent to "con" which establishes the pro vs anti conflict, hence being conned (cheated; defrauded).

In reality we

Reality implies each ones respone (re) to all (al)..."we" represents the fiction shaped within reality to distract one within one another. Notice that one has to hold onto "we" otherwise one loses access to one another.

Letting go of we...sets one free.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

all the awakened

Only within all can there be a separation between awaken and asleep. Few tempt many into a conflict of reason (awaken vs asleep) to distract each anointed one (Christ) from all (God).

Jesus says "That which you have will save you if you bring it forth from yourselves."

Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self, while holding onto, which contradicts bringing forth. Meanwhile...Christ (to anoint) implies being brought forth through one another (inter-course) by separation from one another (off-spring).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you sick?

Sick/seek - "to pursue; chase"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/sick Nature doesn't pursue being; nature inspires being to resist the temptation of wanting to pursue, while chasing after artifice.

Are you begging for a break?

Begging implies wanting another to give for one to take...taking given implies a contract aka con (together) tract (to draw) which contradicts a break aka a setting apart from one another.

Begging contradicts breaking. Being implies given a break from one another aka an analytical process. Few shape suggestions to tempt a consensus among many who beg to take part in it.

Are you sweet?

Sweet/swoete - "pleasing to the senses, mind or feelings; having a pleasant disposition"...pleasing/pleading contradicts disposition.

Are you fresh?

Being implies in-between (life) fresh (inception) and rotten (death) aka adulteration in-between infancy and elderly.

Are you strung up by the wrists?

Aka strings attached to manual choice by ones consent to any suggestion of another.

Are you fracturing?

Being implies fracture (life) of whole (inception towards death).

Are you torn at the seams?

Nature tears being apart from one another...few suggest artifice to bind (seam) many together into consensus, which nature tears apart at the seams.

Whatever one mentally or physically holds onto...nature takes away. Holding onto implies the seam; the way of nature implies the tearing.

Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Natalie-imbruglia-torn-lyrics

  • Illusion never changed into something real
  • I'm wide awake and I can see the perfect sky is torn
  • You're a little late, I'm already torn

Would you do anything?

All does each; which allows each to re-do self within all. One cannot do without ignoring being (life) done (inception towards death).

Flea-bitten, moth-eaten?

Biting and eating implies a beings response to nature moving hunger through each being....holding onto anything during the natural process bites you, while eating you up.

They could be admitting guilt...

Admitting any suggestion from one another into the radius (radio) of ones mind (head) implies a self imposed guilt/gylt - "crime, sin, moral defect, failure of duty".

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

no alarms and no surprises

a) Alarm aka all'arme (to the arms) implies armament aka the implementation of suggested information into ones mind, which turns one against one another. Consenting to any suggestion implies taking a call to arms, which shapes conflicts of reason (war).

b) Surprise aka sur (over) prise (to take) implies a chosen one taking over ones choice if one consents to any suggestion aka if one gives self up by standing under (understanding) another.

No alarms and no surprises, please

There's the deception (please) added to the explanation (no alarms and no surprises)...pleasing/pleading implies seeking satisfaction which gives permission to another to overtake one.

Sleight of hand for satisfaction: "I can't get no satisfaction... 'cause I tried and I tried and I tried and I tried".

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Life Energy is the most sought after energy

a) Energy aka en (within) ergos (that works) implies living potential within the process of dying. That which works generates that within which allows that within to re-generate.

b) Sought after aka "afterthought" inverts the thought of be (being) fore (forwarded). Perceivable forwards each perceiving being, while any suggestion by another shapes afterthought aka artificial reflections mirroring real thought.

Afterthought tempts life (en) to reflect (bend; turn) from that which works (ergy).

make you forget about your connection to God

a) Forget (forward getting) tempts one to want to obtain by reaching forward, which inverts forgiveness (forward giving) aka God.

One needs to adapt to what all gives forwards, while resisting the want to get from one another.

b) Con (together) nect (to bind) ion (action)...an inversion of action setting reaction free from one another aka energy separating each power within aka God divining/dividing each anointed one (christ) from one another.

It's the anti-christ which tempts many to connect with one another... https://hebrewconnect.com/welcome

A lot of the mysterious stuff like rituals

Few cast many into a "lot", which makes self discernment a mystery; stuffs ones mind with worthless ideas, and inverts uniqueness into likeness...each of which distracting from ritual aka rite/reg (to move in a straight line) al (all) aka nature delineating being from one another.

weird geometric shapes

a) Only within a line can a shape be drawn...few draw shapes to mentally (ideals) and physically (idols) tempt many to take measurements (metric) during generation (geo), which represents geomancy aka the art of divination by means of signs derived from the earth.

b) Weird; adjective - "having power to control fate; force that sets events in motion or determines their course; what is destined to befall one" from wyrd - "fate, chance, fortune; destiny".

Furthermore weird/word - "that which comes"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird

If one ignores that which came into being (choice) for that which comes (chance); then one gambles on fate aka one's lot or destiny; predetermined course of life" aka death...a FATAL (fate) mistake for life.

The opposite of weird implies ordinary aka each being ordained within the natural order...not to be mistaken for following the orders of one another.

If anyone wants to help speed things up...

...then one participates in assisted suicide by means of suggested progressivism to speed (inception towards death) things (life) up.

Abandon fear (worry of the future)

Speeding up drives one towards the future aka life towards death...the origin of fear aka the abandonment of origin for outcome.

adopt

Adopt inverts Adapt aka taken for oneself, while ignoring to respond to all given...Jesus/je suis (i am) implies adoption; Christ (to anoint) implies adaptation.

happiness from God directly

Happiness/happy/hap - "chance, fortune" contradicts God directing choice...if taken into possession. Few suggest happiness to tempt many to gamble given choice by taking chance.

Sleight of hand for happiness... https://genius.com/Taylor-swift-happiness-lyrics

  • And in the disbelief, I can't face reinvention...I haven't met the new me yet
  • There'll be happiness after you...But there was happiness because of you

Aka being as the cause of happiness instead of God as the cause of being.

A better example... https://genius.com/Ace-of-base-happy-nation-lyrics

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

From the Hypernormalization vid: "The Bankers had a completely different view...they were just the representatives (life) of something that couldn't be negotiated (inception towards death)."

That's the foundation of the talmud with Gemara representing futile negotiations among gentiles; while each jew utilizes the Mishnah as that which couldn't be negotiated.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Agenda of the World Government: The rise and fall...

Only during delineation can being rise (life) within fall (inception towards death). Few are govern the minds of many with circular thinking from the one and only agenda/agent/action...delineation aka forward motion.

Fugger > Frank

a) Fugger/fugge (masonic joint) + Frank/franc (free)...the application of a masonic joint binds free will of choice.

b) Let me be frank...to join a bank by trust fucks one over. "The last name Fugger was originally spelled "Fucker"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family

c) Frank/franc (free) + Saxon/sek (to cut) + Anglo/ang (to bend at an angle) represent applied freemasonry...

Edit: 8th Prince Fugger von Babenhausen married into the Oettingen-Spielberg line...the 10th Prince of which was Ernst Albrecht...the father of Ursula von der Leyen.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

unless you eat...and drink...you have no life in you

Hunger/thirst animates life...eating and drinking implies the living body responding to it while being consumed by hunger/thirst.

There's no life without

Only within the process of dying can life come into being.

baptism

Only within flow (inception towards death) can form (life) come into being...others suggest baptism as a rite to drown form within flow, which inverts flow animating form to resist the temptation of drowning.

What's the path of least resistance? Going with the flow, while ignoring to resist...that's drowning aka the baptism of fire.

eucharist

Eu (to be) char (to like; want)...only within need (flow) can want (form) come into being. A being needs to resist want to sustain self. Others suggest a eucharist to distract from need by wanting from one another. It's ones consent to eucharism (communism) which makes one a eucharist aka food for the masses.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why didn't these soldiers think of this

Because a soldier "sold out to die" as a "soul dier" when following orders aka becoming "solid" while following fluidity.

Same trick with influencer suggesting information to solidify opinions among followers. PLEASE (draft) LIKE (uniformity) and SUBSCRIBE (following orders).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a newspaper in Israel basically claimed

a) News aka N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) implies each beings position at the center thereof...others suggest news to tempt one off-center by claiming any side within a resulting conflict...in this case east (israel) vs west (america).

b) Claiming a side establishes a circle within (logic) and around one (reason), which is why a jew suggests NEWS to tempt gentiles into a NOOSE.

c) Paper/papier - "document" implies DOCK YOUR MIND, which claiming any suggestion establishes, while allowing a pirate vessel to dock your mind (document); enter and tame your mind (entertainment) and control your mind (government)...

d) The base of all (basically) implies motion...which cannot be claimed by any matter within. A base is that (inception towards death) on which one (life) stands.

What's the opposite of basic? Advanced...it's base which advances each being within.

He is right and it’s unlikely Americans would ever support any way for ages to come.

Is vs isn't + right vs wrong + likely vs unlikely + would vs wouldn't + ever vs never + support vs contend + any vs none + for vs against + coming vs going...that's nine conflicts of reason within one sentence. That's war within the minds of gentiles based on jewish brainwashing aka setting up a rotating machine (reason) during the process of natural washing (implication).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vanderbilt sphere

a) Inner sphere (circular thinking aka logic) turning into outer sphere (reasoning against one another).

b) Vanderbuilt (to build wonder) aka amazement (a mental maze)

c) Sphere from German sperre (to lock)...

Flammarion engraving

a) L'atmosphère aka atmos (German atmen; to breathe) + sphere (German sperre; to lock)...perceivable animates perception; suggested locks it in.

b) Engrave aka within a grave aka suggestion excavating ones mind for the reception of a dead body...corpus oration (dead body speaking).

c) Flammarion aka Flam (flame) + marion/mary (to rebel)...perceivable animates perception aka heating up the flame of life, while suggested suffocates life until snuffed out, hence "rebel without a cause".

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • Financial adviser aka financ (end) i (within) al (all) ad (toward) viser (to see)...

Only within all (inception towards death) can each one (life) come into being... showing one another how to see towards the end of all makes one a financial adviser.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›