why do so many jewish men use that "look at me I'm a victim" whiny voice when talking?
a) sound (perceivable) authorizes instrument (perceiving)...taking the authority out of sound (through suggestion) tempts the instrument to ignore sound (perceivable) for word (suggested).
b) if the few appear weak, then the many are tempted to feel strong, while consenting to be governed by the few.
c) the ignorance of the many tempts the insolence of the few, hence those who stay content tempt others to respond with contempt.
d) victimHOOD offers both shelter and the means to wield persecution as defense, while offending others by persecuting them with guilt. The ignorance of the many to such suggested behavior of the few represents the HOOD...and only oneself can bring light (comprehension) into darkness (ignorance).
e) male implies expression, the so called jews tempt others to repress their expressions, hence exploiting the mimicry of female compression (internal kvetching) as temptation.
Sen.
SE- (apart, away from) SEN- (old)...the suggestions of the few represents the "old", while the consent of the many represents the "young". Consenting to suggested senators (old), draws the consent (young) apart/away from you.
Instead...grow resistance by adapting to perceivable (fountain of youth) while letting suggested temptations (old) die. Ones consent keeps the suggestions of others alive.
I vowed to never drink again and I broke that...
Your vow tempts you to define yourself by your weakness, instead try vowing to resist temptations, which will continuously grow your resistance without dangling your weaknesses as temptations in front of you.
Embrace the struggle to resist whatever tempts you to drink...what is it that you're lacking which you try to fill with booze?
a) resource aka RESPONSE TO (living) SOURCE (process of dying)...
b) renewable aka ABLE TO RESPOND (free will of choice) to NEW/NEWOS/NOW (balance aka momentum of motion aka perceivable moment)...
...is
Everything was (perceivable) before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is"...consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).
Regeneration (living) within Generation (process of dying)...unless ignored. Others suggest "running out" to tempt one to ignore being (perceiving) run within (perceivable).
Edit: From the alchemical perspective...element (re-generators) within compound (generation), hence transmuted ingredient within, out of and in response to dissolving/self-differentiating base.
Where does the criminal state known as The United States Government go from here?
UNITED; UNITY; UNUS - "one", hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union, uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference).
Meanwhile in reality...nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (process of dying) into partial (living) aka from oneness (perceivable whole) into each one (perceiving partial). The few suggest togetherness as the inversion of perceiving apartheid within perceivable wholeness.
In short...each one represents a part of all, others tempt one to pretend to be together, which when consented to, destroys the partials.
a) HAM (Greek heim, home)...ignoring perceivable allows others to burglarize it with suggestions.
b) HAM (home) BURGHER (freeman of a burgh; fortress) implies free will of choice as ones fortress.
WAYYY too much acid
a) inception towards death represents the only way for life.
b) being alive implies as free will of choice within a balance (need/want) based system.
c) balancing as choice implies being on EDGE, noun [Latin acies, acus, acidus aka acid].
d) do I really make this up under the influence of drugs or do others use any excuse to keep shirking response-ability for what they ignore? https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/acid
word combinations like you choose come from
If nature represents sound and those within represent instrument of choice within balance (resonance/dissonance), then sound represents the combined whole, while each instrument represents one partial within the combined whole.
Try humming (mimicry of ongoing sound); then try speaking while humming...no matter how many words you combine, you will run out of breathe within the ongoing sound. Nature doesn't combine, it sets itself apart, hence allowing the partial (perceiving) to experience the whole (perceivable).
Others suggest one to put back together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc. which tempts one to ignore apartheid (being partial within whole).
claim to not do drugs
Instead of reasoning (agreement vs disagreement) over suggested claims, ask yourself why one would use drugs? Sounds like escapism to me, hence a shirking of response-ability (free will of choice).
within where
What is easier...growing ones self discernment about "within where" one exits or blaming others for their behavior trying to question the lack of ones self discernment?
Within where do you exist? Do this question offend you? Does thinking about it feel like a struggle to you? Do you feel responsible to answer my question or do you want to shirk response-ability to question self, hence to grow self discernment about your position "within where"?
I realize you claim
If nature represents reality, then where, when, what and why does nature CLAIM, verb - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain"?
CuomoisaMassMurderer
a) does Cuomo require others to tell him what he is?
b) does Cuomo utilize the ignorance of the consenting masses as cover for what he does?
c) if you seek agreement from those who willingly ignore how Cuomo behaves, then you transgress against their beliefs.
d) if you seek agreement from those who already perceive how Cuomo behaves, then you shape a "norm" out of seeking agreement from others, hence becoming addicted to confirmation.
This behavior of wanting confirmation from others is what allows others to setup the conflicts of reason (agreement vs disagreement) as mass murder rituals.
In short...Cuomo doesn't need to kill, he suggests those who want or not want what he suggests to kill each other over it.
sophistry
Reasoning over suggested implies "making impure by admixture" (sophistication), hence ignoring pure (perceivable inspiration) for admixture (mingling with another) with impure (suggested information).
Try using implication aka IF (perceiving) THEN (perceivable) instead of reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested). Reason always represents a conflict one consents to participate within. Resisting reasoning will show one how others are tempting one to choose a side, while getting more and more agitated if consent isn't given to either side.
deep-state
a) voting implies consenting to submit self to others, hence putting oneself into a mental (ignorance) and physical (slavery) deep-state.
b) living within the process of dying implies as temporary growth within ongoing loss, hence a height-state struggling to sustain growth (comprehension) within a deep-state (ignorance).
test of loyalty
Voting represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka TEST (Latin testor; to make a will) of LOYAL (Latin lex, law).
a secret society called st. elmo hall
a) consenting to suggested information gives those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine, contradict and withhold it, hence claiming a secret (suggestion) within everything offered (perceivable) towards "free" will of choice.
b) all fraternities (brotherhood) utilize the ignorance of others as the "hood" to cover their behavior. It's on oneself to grow enlightenment (comprehension) while resisting the temptation of darkness (ignorance). The "hood" represents everything one ignores within ones surrounding (both mental and physical), and that's where others are hiding, while conspiring against oneself.
c) st.elmo aka SAINT (blessed) ELM (largest tree, cultivated for shade)...the few are blessing the ignorance of the consenting many for giving them shade as shelter from consequences.
d) PILGRIM (Latin peragro, to wander) implies as temporary (life) within the momentum of ongoing (inception towards death) aka sojourner (living) of the path (process of dying).
e) manchurian candidate aka MANCHU (pure) CANDERE (to shine) implies being able to shine (temporary growth) within pure (ongoing loss)...loss "washes the brain" of growth.
Related...MK Ultra aka ULTRA (beyond) aka BEING YONDER (within sight but not near) implies being within sight (perceiving within perceivable) but not near (ignoring it for suggested).
50,663 fatalities
56 (11) 63 (9) = 9/11 Fate (Latin fatalis)
database of adverse reactions
DATA (things given; known) BASE (as a foundation for) ADVERSE (action) REACTIONS (reacting to being enacted upon)...beautiful sleight of hand.
give us back something really worthy
That represents the exploited foundation...the want of value from others (suggestion), which ignores the need to evaluate (perceiving) real value (perceivable).
As long as the many believe that the apple represents value and not the system which allows those within to grow apples, so long can others tempt them with the apple...
-
paying for a suggested experience or struggling to express self...it's a choice.
-
if one moves on a medicine ball, then one will learn/teach self more about perceivable flat/round (balance), then reasoning about suggested flat vs round (imbalance) could offer.
-
a conflict (cowboy vs indians) implies reasoning over suggested labels, hence giving others the consent to define (cowboys vs indians); redefine (colonists versus indigenous) and contradict (cowboy Shapiro vs indian Warren) the definitions at will. Solution? Implication (if/then) instead of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief etc.).
-
person implies "per sonos" (by sound), hence a "reaction" to enacting sound.
-
if one within perceivable light chooses to frequently (repetition; reptile) adapt to it, then one gets illuminated (Illuminati). Light (comprehension) or Dark (ignorance)...it's a choice.
-
suggestion (want) represents the veil within perceivable (need) reality...if one consents to suggestion, then one views perceivable reality through the veil of suggested fiction, hence veil representing ones willing ignorance of perceivable, when consenting to the suggestions by others.
-
common need is being suggested as the veil for individual want.
-
the foundation for brainwashing implies temporary brain (life) being washed (inception towards death), hence the need to struggle within perceivable while resisting the temptation of suggested. Consenting to suggested represents "dirtying the brain", which allows others to utilize the process of dying (that which washes the brain) against all those who're willingly ignore to resist it.
-
conformity starts with spell-craft (suggested words over perceivable sound), hence parents branding their children with names, while binding them with choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law to function on "trust". This trust can then be banked (collected, harvested for interest; indebted; incorporated etc.) by others.
-
suggested escapism (wanting out) tempts one to ignore the need to grow self discernment (being within), hence being in-between entrance (inception) and exit (death) of life, struggling to sustain self.
leaders return
a) the leading process of dying demands resistance from those living within....others suggest one to follow.
b) if life is being lead from inception towards death, then re-turn (response to change ones position) implies going with the flow instead of resisting it.
want to be
Perceivable need sustains being; suggested want tempts one to ignore need.
a) each consenting voter represents a mind (ment) obtained (achieve) through suggested DEMOS (common people aka common-ists) + KRATOS (to rule)...
b) NAME (nombre; number) - "the designation of a unit", from UNIT (unus) - "one"...one doesn't need to be named...name implies one.
flooded like it says..
"The flood by way of eminence, the deluge" aka form (living) inundated within flow (process of dying), hence..."bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life" (Genesis 6:17).
It's the ongoing process of dying which represents both the breath of life (inception) and the destroyer of all temporary life (death).
in that book
A suggested book "binds" those consenting to it, hence RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) representing choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
Instead of consenting to the suggested book...ask yourself out of; within where and in response to what was it written? Does nature write? Does it make suggestions? Does it bind or does it set one "free" will of choice?
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life)...through the birth-channel; within current (cy) alongside (river) banks, while struggling to resist pirates (suggestion) out in the open sea (perception)...
put ten communists in a room and you'll get eleven answers about what communism is...
a) an -ist represents one who consented to a suggested -ism.
b) only those who suggest -isms can define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) it, while those who consent can only reason against each other about what it means.
communism is a very broad brush...
Nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)....others tempt one to ignore this for suggested togetherness aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; league of nations; european union, uniformity etc. or equality (same) through diversity (difference) or COM (with; together) -ISM (one consenting to the suggestion of another, hence partial submitting to other partial).
In short...common (process of dying) generates private (living); private needs to resist common, others tempt private to follow common (communism), while ignoring to resist.
smaller part vs bigger part
Tempts one to ignore being one (partial) within oneness (whole)...hence struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
weren't unified
UNITY (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)"...not suggested togetherness.
international communism
IN (within) NATION (a people) COM (with; together) -ISM (ignorance of perceivable for suggested)... the few suggest nation (plural) to tempt one to ignore NATION; noun - "a people", hence each singular one of them. Ones consent to suggested nationalism tempts the consenting ones together under the suggested umbrella "nation", which gives the suggesting few the power (mass consent) to define; redefine and contradict what "nation" means.
permanent revolution
a) suggested PER (forward; through) MANERE (to remain) represents the inversion of being that which struggles to sustain (life) while being moved forwards (inception towards death).
b) RE (response to) VOLVO (turn) tempts one to ignore being the resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Turning from resisting velocity implies going with it without resisting...
all at once
All (each partial) represents one (whole) in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss)...
Going against GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind) forfeits the SAN (together) HEDRIN (seat) of those controlling minds...
a monument there about what they were
https://img.gvid.tv/i/4Z7mrPe7.jpg
how they were destroyed.
Implication (if/then) destroys reason (want vs not want; yes vs no; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; black vs white; poor vs rich; good vs bad; left vs right; frosties vs smacks etc.)
There is no such thing as a digital army...
DIGIT (finger) ARMY (arm)...
a) everything implies perceivable, nothing represents ones choice to ignore perceivable for suggested.
b) suggesting what everything "is" tempts one to ignore that everything "was" before one could shape a suggestion about it...
c) to conspire requires another...everything sets itself apart from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). Nature inspires, those within are tempted to conspire against each other.
d) suggested CON (together with) SPIRE (Latin spiro; to breathe) tempts one to ignore that breathing represents perceiving partial (living) adapting to perceivable whole (process of dying).
Spirit (breathing) represents ones reaction to the entire enacting system, which nature teaches through each "off-spring", hence from breathing through the mother to struggling to sustain self after sailing through the birth channel.
tl;dr...one cannot define what "is", because everything "was" before any definitions can be shaped. Consenting to any suggested definition tempts one into a conflict of reason (is vs isn't)...a fictitious conflict, a self imposed division; a mental hamster-wheel for ignorance; the playground for all deception and conspiracies.
CharlieBucket
There's a hole in the bucket, dear Charlie...
a) all suggested words are shaped within perceivable sound...consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality). This represents spell-craft.
Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within and by perceivable sound.
b) those who adapt to perceivable sound (aka those with ears to hear) represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who ignore it for suggested word-based "definitions" represent DEAF PHONECTICIANS...
c) suggested "isn't" (is nothing) and "don't" (doing nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything is (perceivable) and that everyone within (perceiving) is done by it, hence reacting to it.
d) as for work...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...ask yourself if the internal/inherent power of energy represents ongoing loss (process of dying) and temporary growth (living) in balance with each other?
Sleight of hand...WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice).
Thank you for that reply
Thank you for the inspiration to write.
This is a lot to take in.
Everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving)...filling one mind/memory with suggested information is what tricks one to believe that one cannot handle everything nature has to offer, hence willingly repressing self from even trying.
to point this lost soul in the right direction?
a) there's only one direction (inception towards death) for each one within (life)...wanting suggested outcomes tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
b) consider generator (process of dying) for reactors (living)...
c) as for lost...temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception) implies adaptation by growth to loss aka SOUL, SPIRIT (Latin spiro) - "to breathe".
Instead of seeking among the suggested information by others for whatever you're looking for, try adapting to perceivable inspiration, while resisting suggested information and you will start to see (perceivable) without seeing through the looking glass (suggestion)...
a) consent implies ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable). Only suggestion tempts consents, while perception demands adaptation. You don't need to consent to what others are offering...you are being tempted to want or not want to.
b) AA suggests a SPONSOR, noun [Latin] - a surety; one who binds himself to answer for another and is responsible for his default". Why? To tempt one to ignore being the perceiving response-ability (free will of choice) within perceivable need.
c) contemplate the following...the outer jew suggests one to destroy self; the inner jew tempts one to consent. The more one ignores the inner jew, the stronger the outer jew becomes.
Alcohol represents suggested want vs not want temptation...thirst represents perceivable need. Do you need suggested alcohol to quench perceivable thirst? You don't need others to answer this, you need to struggle with the temptation to seek suggested answers from others, which will a) never quench your thirst; b) always tempt you to want more from them, which c) empowers others to exploit your lack of resistance by suggesting you both what you want and not want.
The few operate vineyards, because they comprehend that the effort it takes to make wine keeps one from the temptation to drown oneself with it...contemplate that metaphor for being the resistance (living) within the temptation (process of dying).
Alcohol isn't the issue, lack of self discernment is...the more you choose want (alcohol), the less you comprehend about need (thirst). Look at how Islam utilizes fasting to teach the need of hunger within the want of appetite...the more one resists appetite, the stronger ones resistance within hunger becomes, and of course what could taste better than the first bite to still hunger?
All addictions represent wanting more (suggested) than need (perceivable) offers...which tempts one to ignore that perceivable offers everything, while suggestion represents nothing.
Sleight of hand... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI