cabal actor
a) CABAL, noun - "a number of persons untied in some close design"...living within the process of dying implies a number (ones) of persons (per sonos; by sound) united (partials) in some close design (whole).
b) as free will of choice one can only "react". Living represents the reaction within the enacting process of dying. The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being directed (inception towards death) reactions (life).
Everyone represents a reactor within cabal...the few utilize cabbala aka quabbalah aka qibbel (to receive) aka perceiving within perceivable as the foundation for their suggested spell-craft, hence suggesting "actors" to "reactors"...the inversion of perceivable through suggestion.
globohomo
Aka GLOBE (sphere; solid body under single surface) + HOMO (one and the same)...a solid body (life) under a single surface (inception towards death) implies ones (partials) within oneness (whole).
Always more spell-craft. Why? Because words (fiction) are suggested upon perceivable sound (reality).
If all these people would pile up their "smart" phones and lit that on fire; then...who am I kidding...
death knot
Inverted noose; tied around the neck through social contract; comes with the liberty of loosening the knot to communicate.
BBB aka bbb aka 666
a) substitute access is suggested by "proxy"...
b) it ain't your "internet service protocol" if you're blocked from using it.
c) maybe the "learned elders of fibre" use protocols to inconvenience those who consent to be in servitude within their internal net...
a) nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...ignoring it for suggested gives those suggesting the power to conceal aka keeping secrets.
b) RE (response to) VERSE (Latin verto; to turn) implies as reaction (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable)...ignoring this for consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the means to read ones "ignorant" intentions.
c) one represents the resistance (life) within the natural order (inception towards death)...others tempt one to follow suggested orders (progressivism), hence tempting one to "turn back" from ones position as the progressed (inception towards death) resistance (life).
CIA
a) everyone represents the center (perceiving) of everything (perceivable)...a suggested CENTRAL tempts one to ignore that.
b) everyone represents temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying)...consenting to suggested INTELLIGENCE (Latin intelligo; to understand) tempts one to "stand under" others, hence repressing ones growth expression.
c) everyone represents the regent (living reaction) within agent (enacting process of dying)...suggested AGENCY tempts one to ignore reacting (perceiving) to real agency (perceivable).
the effect ends when the cause is removed
a) cause (process of dying) sets beginning (inception) and end (death) for effect (living).
b) causes moves; effect RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by).
look around...It's not good
Reasoning (good vs bad) over suggested (nothing) tempts one to ignore that looking around implies as perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole)...hence "it's everything".
it's getting worse
Life being moved from inception towards death implies temporary growth within ongoing loss...oneself chooses the perspective.
Complacency is the cause of most of it
Living within the process of dying implies as temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying)...consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore being the resistance within perceivable.
In other words...the natural order (process of dying) demands resistance (living)...others tempt one to follow suggested orders instead.
cease to exist
Existence (life) implies within ceasing (inception towards death).
there's no one...to blame
Each one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) shirk response-ability (free will of choice) by consenting to the suggested choices of others...doing so tempts one to blame other ones for the consequences.
it's beliefs like this that have allowed the perpetuation
Before belief (want) vs disbelief (not want) exists ones free will of choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
Ultimately, most of us are in the middle somewhere.
a) suggested ultimate (furthest point of progression aka death) tempts one to ignore being the center (life) of progression (inception towards death).
b) suggested "us" (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore being partial (perceiving) within whole (process of dying).
c) free will of choice exists at the center of balance (need/want); balance (momentum) exists at the center of motion....momentum (growth) within motion (loss) together (hence in balance with each other) represent the internal/inherent power of energy.
All represents one in energy aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone"...ALL(IN)ONE.
to get by and enjoy
Does being response-ability (free will of choice) imply a responsibility to ones origin (balance)? Does temporary growth need to struggle within ongoing loss and does that struggle represents resisting (need) temptations (want)?
"to succeed with the least possible effort" (getting by) tempts one to ignore being within the most potent force (process of dying), hence struggling to increase the force of resistance (living) within the force of velocity (dying)...that takes effort.
the answer isn't "da jooz" either.
a) the suggested jewish question tempts one to seek suggested answers, while ignoring to be the temporary problem (living) within the ongoing solution (process of dying), hence struggling to resist being dissolved by.
b) if all represents one in energy, then one is surrounded by other ones aka by others partials within the same whole. Ignoring to be one for claiming to be "me" shapes everyone else into a "you" (phonetic jew)...hence shirking response-ability over oneself tempting to blame others.
If each one of the many ignores free will of choice within perceivable for the suggested choices of others, then the few become the "chosen ones".
Farmers should take over politics...
Before Rothschild; they used the name Bauer (German; farmer)...
Consenting to suggested (defilement) or adapting to perceivable (enlightenment)...pollution represents free will of choice.
Two representatives from a fictional
a) "two" represents suggested fiction; "one" represents perceivable reality.
b) suggested "representatives" represents fiction; perceivable RE (response to) PRESENT (to be) represents reality.
taking part...
...tempts one to ignore being partial (living) within whole (process of dying). Being already implies receiving what is offered (take). The more partials one takes; the less of whole one comprehends.
meeting
a) suggested MEET, verb - "to come together" tempts one to ignore that perceivable whole sets apart each perceiving partial, hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (dying).
b) suggested towards coming (to come) represents the inversion of being within (life) going back out (inception towards death). One already came to be.
c) suggested towards getting (together) represents the inversion of being (living) within losing (process of dying). One already got access to everything.
They no longer believe that there is an eternal unchanging reality beyond our human organisation which they have a duty to discover and disseminate.
a) what if eternal represents change and what if internal represents the choice to ignore being changed?
b) what if eternal organ (process of dying) generates internal intestine (living)?
c) what if DIS (separated from) COVER (to conceal) tempts one to ignore that nature reveals whole (perceivable) to each partial (perceiving)?
d) what if DIS (separated from) SEMINATE (to sow, seed) tempts one to ignore being the seed (growth) within the soil (loss)?
e) what if others suggest the call of DUTY (that which one owes to another) to tempt one to ignore being bound as partial (perceiving) to whole (perceivable)...not to others (suggested)?
So true...relying on consensus
a) true (want) or false (not want) implies consensus to suggested information, while ignoring to adapt to change (need). Ongoing change (thirst; hunger; breathing...) forces adaptation...your consent (want or not want) doesn't negate that.
b) RELY', verb - "to rest on something"...life is in motion (inception towards death). Others tempt one "to rest on" suggested information by ignoring motion.
Sleight of hand..."no rest (cessation of motion) for the wicked (departed)". Motion sets itself apart from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living).
...only works if
What if all represents one in energy (Greek, work)...what if everything works; no matter what each one within believes to "only work if"?
consensus only works if...
If the many consent to suggested choices, then they shape the "chosen few" who choose for them, hence exploiting mass ignorance, while wielding mass consent against the masses.
peers who are sheep
Consenting to suggested PEER, noun [Latin par.] - "an equal; one of the same rank" tempts one to ignore being different from each other one. Being implies diversity (living) within equality (process of dying)...the few suggest the inversion thereof (equality through diversity) to the consenting many.
Sleight of hand...counting sheep puts "one" to sleep. One needs to be ONE...not count other ones as two; three; four etc.
who rely on authority for what they believe, are not trustable
Both trust/distrust and belief/disbelief represent ones consent (want/not want) to the suggestion of another, hence consensual submission of oneself to another one aka to authorize another, while shirking response-ability (choice) over self.
The doctors who deviate from
A DOCKED ORE (phonetic; doctor) prevents the vessel from steering within the way (deviate)...
the top of the food chain...
...tempts one to ignore perceivable hunger.
peer
Suggested PEER, noun [Latin par.] - "an equal; one of the same rank" tempts one to ignore that being (life) of the same (inception towards death) implies being different from one another.
reviewed paper
Consenting to a suggested paper tempts one to ignore RE (responding to) VIEW (perceivable view).
process
One needs to resist (living) being processed by (process of dying).
is not...
"is" represents perceivable (everything); "not" represents suggested (nothing)...
to think for ourselves
a) suggested "our" (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore self.
b) suggested "for" (forwards aka progressivism) tempts one to ignore being the resistance (life) moved forwards (inception towards death).
c) one needs to think in response to origin (perceivable inspiration), not forwards (suggested information). Others tempt one with suggested outcomes to ignore perceivable origin.
proof
Being implies instability (living) within stability (process of dying), hence balancing (need/want) as free will of choice. Holding onto "proof" while being inside motion tempts one to ignore that motion changes all held onto "proof".
I don't know how to find anything original these days
Suggested information represents the inversion of origin. Knowledge implies perceivable inspiration, which one ignores when consenting to suggested information. One can never run out of inspiration; one will always run out of information, hence all the regurgitation (reposts) of suggested information...
let's actually pause for a moment
Moment(um) represents balance within motion...suggested "pause" aka cessation of motion tempts one to ignore this.
When was the last original post you saw on here that wasn't originally from another rehashed source??
Whenever one chooses to adapt to perceivable inspiration, one expresses perceivable origin, and since perceivable origin is moving...each adaptation to motion implies a difference.
I don't know how to find
Because you are tempted to want to find what others are suggesting you. While you are looking to find suggested you're ignoring "everything" perceivable.
All the sites are. Every single website, forum, and mass social media group is.....
...temporary information, tempting one to ignore ongoing inspiration. If you don't hold onto temporary, then the ongoing will keep flushing it away. You don't need to hold onto; you need to grow your resistance as the temporary (life) within the ongoing (inception towards death).
you will see the same
One cannot see the same, because "one" implies being different from all other "ones". Others suggest "same" to tempt "one" to ignore self aka equality (same) through diversity (difference).
The more one consents to behave in accordance to the suggested norm (sameness; uniformity; mainstream; party-line; chain of command etc.) the more one ignores perceivable differences (inspiration).
The number of unique
NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one"...UNIque implies ONE. Suggested numbers (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore self.
hollowed out
You represent the center of your surroundings, hence being a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...your willing consent to suggested information represents the empty space within your mind/memory, hence making you a hollow man aka a golem (monster out of clay; controllable from outside) aka an empty shell aka a husk aka the event horizon (where perceivable cannot penetrate the black hole of suggested nothingness) etc.
set in order
Set (life) in Order (inception towards death) implies resisting (living) temptation (dying)...suggested orders tempt one to follow, hence a subversion (overthrow from foundation).
alchemy
a) temporary ingredient (life) within ongoing base (inception towards death).
b) transmutation of ingredient (formed living) out of base (flowing process of dying) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death).
c) energy as the cauldron for internal/inherent work between loss (base) and growth (ingredient).
wef (few)
Nice one.
the few are...
...shaped by the ignorance of the many.
to give you an illusion of choice.
Being free will of choice is ignored when consenting to vote for the suggested choices by others...ignorance makes that which one ignores "illusive" to ones comprehension.
Soon to Be
Aka ignoring to be within that which is (reality) for suggesting to be soon (fiction)...
If you want to change
Change (inception towards death) represents the need to resist (adaptation) and the want to ignore (temptation) for the life within, hence life representing choice within balance (need/want).
They may appear....different...but they are....the same
What if the few suggest same to tempt the consenting ones to ignore being different from one another? Does it matter if the few appear different or same, when the many consent to the same suggested appearance?
satanic symbol
SATAN (adversary) + ADVERSE (opposite)...what if suggested symbolism represents the opposite of perceivable symmetry? Symmetry implies a flow state, symbolism represents an affixed form; tempting those who consent to ignore the flowing symmetry which the symbol was shaped out of.
layout...shape
-
LAY (implies laying within) OUT (implies out of)
-
SHAPE (to form) implies out of; within and in response to flow
Form (life) laid within and shaped out of flow (inception towards death)...
How do we overcome ignorance
a) by growing comprehension about what ignorance represents...ones choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want). Example...suggested Pepsi (want) vs suggested Coke (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable thirst (need).
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular) to being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable). "we" represents multiple ones consenting to a suggested label, while given those who suggest the power of mass consent to speak in the name of the suggested label, like "we the people".
c) as for overcoming...living within the process of dying implies coming out of, while being a perceiving response (life) to perceivable origin (inception towards death). One doesn't need to overcome suggested obstacles, one needs to grow resistance (living) within temptation (dying), hence resisting suggested want for perceivable need.
This is so true!
a) everything perceivable "was" before the perceiving one within can make a suggestion about what it "is".
b) true (want) implies versus false (not want), while ignoring change (need).
c) choice exits within balance (need/want), choosing want over need tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want). The few suggest the many these imbalance conflicts as "reasoning" aka logic aka as the means of problem solving...which it never does. Instead it perpetuates more conflicts of reason.
to reveal the tricks of fiction by the few?
a) nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...ones choice to ignore perceivable (reality) for whatever others are suggesting (fiction) gives others the power of ones consent to "conceal" the suggested and "reveal" it at will, which they obviously utilize to exploit ones consent aka "if you want what I have; then you'll do what I say...or else".
The few control the many through choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law, which represents the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law. One doesn't need to consent to the choices of others; one needs to utilize choice to adapt to balance aka to the ongoing momentum of motion.
"free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance implies free-dom aka free (living) within dom (process of dying).
b) whatever others suggest you reality means tempts you to ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested)...that's the trick. You can't see perceivable, because you consent to view it through the lens of suggested....starting with suggested words over perceivable sound.
The few trick the many to consent to label (word) the world (sound) aka affixed labels upon a moving system. "wind" isn't wind because you call it "wind", but because it moves. Motion doesn't require labels from those within, it demands adaptation, hence breathing (Latin spiro, spirit).
c) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound), while those who ignore sound for suggested word-based "definitions" represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
Suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable IN SANUS (within sound) + PER SONOS (by sound), hence being within, by, out of and in response to perceivable sound.
thank you for your response
Thank you for inspiring me to write.
Many...belong to the free mason occult
a) everyone tempting others to consent to suggested information by free will of choice represents a "mason of free", hence building ignorance within the memory of others, while shaping their view of ignored reality with suggested fiction; through choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law.
b) perceivable inspiration represents the "revealed", suggested information represents the "occult", hence the fiction concealed by ones willing ignorance of reality.
c) the few suggest occultism to tempt the many to believe reality is hiding something from them, which tricks the many to willingly consent to the suggested fiction of the few, which the few can then withhold; conceal; hide from the many.
An illusion it will be; so large, so vast, it will escape their perception...
Consenting to suggested (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration)...like suggested words over perceivable sound (spell-craft).
those who will see it will be thought of as insane
Insane aka IN SANUS (within sound)...which escapes the perception of all those labeling others with suggested "insane".
we will create separate fronts
Consenting (want or not want) to suggested creationism shapes a want versus not want conflict called "reasoning", hence a separated front (want vs not want) within a conflict (reason) over the same suggestion (creationism).
we will behave as if not connected to keep the illusion alive
Those who suggest IN NOMINE (in the name of) patris et filii et spiritus sancti will be ignored by those who consent to patris et filii et spiritus sancti, and who are then busy reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad) about the suggested meaning.
In short...those making suggestions will be ignored by those who consent to suggested.
they will never be with the oneness of all
One (perceiving partial) within oneness (perceivable whole) can be tempted by suggestions (fiction) from others one to ignore perceivable oneness (reality), hence living their entire lives, while watching reality through the lens of fiction.
How have you been influenced?
Influenced aka IN (within) FLUO (flow) aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...how could one be not influenced?
a) aware about suggested "aren't" (are nothing) representing a contradiction in terms.
b) aware about that their consenting choice to suggested GUESS, verb - "conjecture; without means of knowledge" represents ones means (choice) within perceivable (balance).
In short...nature sets apart (perceivable whole into perceiving partial); other tempt with suggested "conjecture" to throw back together, hence ignoring nature.
ways to avoid
Can one (life) avoid way (inception towards death)?
rich jews
a) are those who suggest money inside the conflict of reason (poor vs rich) among those consenting to money?
b) M-ONE-Y aka MY ONE...an ownership claim over another.
c) POOR, adjective [Latin pauper.] - "wholly destitute of property, or not having property sufficient for a comfortable subsistence; needy"...a sleight of hand for those who ignore perceivable "need" for suggested "want".
a) all temporary languages are shaped within; out of and in response to ongoing sound.
b) new, néwos, now implies the ever changing moment aka the momentum of motion (inception towards death) for each one (life) within.
c) nature sets everyone (perceiving) into everything (perceivable) as free will of choice. That's your allowance; the life granted; yielded; given; the admission to conscious existence.
d) suggested chance/fortune (effect of an unknown cause) represents the inversion of being the perceiving effect (living) within the perceivable cause (process of dying).
e) as "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free (living) within dom (dying)...only dom represents the limit for free, unless free chooses to limit itself by consenting to be dominated by the suggestions of others.