Dr. David Wood makes great points dissecting Islam
a) DAVID (king of israel and judah) from Hebrew Dawidh -"beloved friend"; hence beloved friend (david) erect penis (wood).
b) a docked oar (doctor) prevents a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) from steering.
c) a suggested point (end of sentence) tempts one to ignore ones ongoing life-sentence.
d) DISSECT (to divide) TION (action) implies action (inception towards death) dividing into reactions (life).
e) to dissect (divide) islam (submission) would imply ones consent to submit to the suggestion of another. This is being inverted by questioning how Islam divides others (broom used against Christianity), which represents a contradiction in itself, since one uses a broom to bring dirt together; not to set it apart.
Did Catholicism Create Islam?
Others suggest catholiscism; creationism; mohammedism and abrahamism, while ones consent to suggested RELIGION (Latin religo; to bind anew) implies ISLAM (submission).
are ...ism and Islam connected?
a) ones consent (islam; submission) connects one to the suggested information (-ism) by others.
b) nature sets itself apart aka from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception), while others tempt one back together with suggestions.
c) if one consents to suggested; then one establishes a connection in-between partials aka host inviting parasite.
- COINCIDENCE, noun - "meeting of two or more lines, surfaces, or bodies in the same point"
a) same line (inception towards death) differentiates (life) each one within.
b) https://img.gvid.tv/i/41YugBKq.jpg represents suggested symbolism of different lines meeting at same point aka intersection. This tempts one to ignore that each one looking at it views it through a different monitor and from a different position of being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
The symbolism (affixed) tempts one to ignore symmetry (fluid).
c) INTER (internal aka being within) SEC (Latin seco; to divide) -TION (action)...being implies reaction (life) divided within action (inception towards death).
d) the symbolism of intersection represents cross, which tempts one to ignore the cross each one bears aka vertical (need/want) within horizontal (growth within loss)...that's why one can choose (need over want) to broaden ones horizon (growth within loss).
work outside...more spiritual experiences than ever before
a) because one exists inside nature, and breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) implies ones adaptation as inside partial to outside whole of nature.
b) others tempt one with a suggested inside (home) to shelter from a suggested outside (society).
40 hours a week
Adapting to nature implies as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...ones consent to work in accordance with suggested time (part of duration) or suggested days of the week (daze of the weak) tempts one to ignore that. Others suggest "HOUR"; yet if it's "OUR", then why does it run out?
how do you know they have no autism?
a) an -ism implies ones consent to suggestions by others; so this isn't about what others have; but about what oneself holds onto.
b) autism was coined by Eugene Bleuler, who together with Sigismund Schlomo Freund conspired to "conquer psychiatry"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
Being implies one apart from other ones. Ignoring self (one apart) pronounces others (pluralism) as "they".
a) suggested ADL is in on of itself a cover for their former title...Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (Children of the Covenant).
b) COVENANT, noun- "a coming together" implies suggesting the many to come together; which permits the few to remain apart.
c) B'nai B'rith (Children of the Covenant) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; unicode; unicef; universal pictures aka mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot aka orbo ab chao (order out of chaos)...as in natural order (inception towards death) out of chaos (life) aka Virtus junxit, mors non separabit (Virtue has united, death shall not separate).
that epo0ch guy.. you know him?
I perceive (know) that EPOCH (Greek epokhe) - "stoppage, fixed point of time" contradicts being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
need some kind of "hotline"
"inception towards death" represents the hot-line; each one (life) struggles to remain cool within.
Sleight of hand: "Deep inside...The pressure's high...Just to stay alive... 'Cause the heat is on (whoo!)"
Me writing this tempts others to think I'm crazy, yet me singing it would tempt others to remember Eddie Murphy...that's fucking crazy.
I get red flagged...
...when consenting to hold the pole for others. The suggested rhetoric "flag" + "pole" implies "flaccid" and "penis". Whenever others suggest any kind of flag, respond with being "upright; not bending" aka erect.
to get the like "free will of choice" guy.
One already has "free will of choice"...others tempt one to ignore that. The more one ignores that; the more one wants help from others, while ignoring the need to sustain self.
directed energy weapons
Ones weapon of choice (life) directed (inception towards death) within energy (internal/inherent power)...nothing to be afraid of.
my head is getting sun-burned
Aka perceivable inspiring one to adapt by sheltering. Why do you think one head grows hair, while the other head is protected by a foreskin?
know law
aka to perceive (know) L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...all the suggested laws of men tempt one to ignore that.
Cause they'll lose, and you know it.
I perceive (know) that they represent effected growth (life) caused within loss (inception towards death).
i like you free will of choice
a) others suggest "username"...putting "free-will-of-choice" into their suggestion contradicts "using a name".
b) what comes first...being free will of choice or choosing to name self "free will of choice"?
you're my best bud
a) BUD; noun - "underdeveloped growth"...even ones "best" underdeveloped growth doesn't imply much.
b) consider why the many are tempted to call each other "buddies; brothers"; while the few conceal themselves within brotherhoods.
c) if buddy represents friend; then consider "friendship"...ships close to another are on collision course. Both collision and entanglement interfere with a ships freedom of motion.
can't read your shit cause it's too deep
Effect (perception) represents the deepest position within cause (perceivable)...ignoring this tempts one to bury self under the suggestions by others.
Reading to understand implies consenting to "stand under" those writing it. The shit I write about is about resisting to understand others, while growing comprehension as self.
i need more of who the real you is
a) perceivable reality represents ALL each perceiving ONE within needs...wanting "more" tempts one to ignore that.
b) you try to figure out others, hence what the few are up to. I write about each one of the many ignoring self for others; which in return permits few to ruthlessly exploit their ignorance.
In other words...the "chosen ones" you try to figure out represent the suggested inversion of "one's choice" aka your free will of choice, which you ignore when choosing to consent to the suggested choices by others.
dealing with...and looking for managers.
a) ones consent to the suggestions by others represents the deal; and once given consent, others gained power of consent to manage one with suggested.
b) DEAL; noun (Old English dæl) - "a part of a whole, a share" implies being partial (life) within whole (inception towards death) aka SHARED (divided) CUSTODY (preservation).
The process of dying preserves living; while each one living struggles to preserve self while dying. Loss divides into growth; growth sustains self within loss.
c) others suggest one what to look at; which tempts one to FOCUS (point of convergence; burning point of a lens; center of heat-accumulation etc.) while burning self out.
Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence solid within fluid...so for one to "see" implies looking at "sea", which cools one down.
Suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; hence "focusing" on it; while perceivable inspiration represents an ongoing flow-state one cannot hold onto. It's on oneself to discern the difference between holding onto (want) and letting go of (need). Try holding onto your breathe until you feel the burn and need to let go to cool down...
completely washed up
Another rhetorical sleight of hand for whole (inception towards death) washing up each partial (life). From inception towards death; life represents a mess...the ongoing motion aka natural order offering entrance (inception) and exit (death) always cleans up the living mess.
help me with the reading the talmud
TALMUD (instruction) teaches students the difference between reasoning over suggested (gemara) and implication of perceivable (mishnah).
This tremendously helps the few to control the consenting many, who reason against one another over the suggestions by the few. Why? Because the many believe conflicts of reason can be won, while the few comprehend that both sides within any conflict imply losing.
Gemara is utilized to control the many; Mishnah is utilized to protect few from the many.
Now the kicker...each one can only discern for self that nature doesn't offer anything to read, hence consenting to read the suggested talmud tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
Instruction aka IN (within) STRUCTURE (organ within animation) TION (action) implies being organ (life) within animation (inception towards death) aka reaction within action...that's what TALMUD implies; but one can only discern for self; not gain by reading the writings of others.
tl; dr...a book binds one to information; nature sets one free (will of choice) within inspiration. Only oneself wields the free will of choice to resist information (suggested) for inspiration (perceivable).
as bad as they claimed
a) your consent to suggested moralism (good vs bad) represents your claim aka asserted belief aka willing consent to hold onto.
b) ones consent to suggested pluralism (us) shapes other ones into "they/them", which tempts one to ignore that all (whole) represents one (partials) in energy, hence "all for one and one for all".
translate it for yourself cause
Others suggest "trans-late" to distract from being TRANS (transmuted) LATE (reaction) within TION (action) aka effect transmuted within cause.
solomon
a) SOLO (Latin solus; alone aka all in one) + MON (provider).
b) Those divided (life) are provided for (inception towards death).
lesser keys of solomon
a) divided partials represent lesser within providing whole.
b) form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies key (choice) within lock (balance).
Sleight of hand: "push it to the limit...open up the limit...welcome to the limit". That refers to ones choice within balance aka the lesser key for the divided one (solo) within provided all (mon).
worms in your stomach...
...feed upon what you hold onto.
preventing them from running away.
The opposite...the few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to shirk response-ability within origin.
Examples...blaming others implies running away from self. Suggested tempts one to run away from perceivable. Temptation (want) implies running away from resistance (need). Convenience implies running away from difficulty. Reason implies running away from implication. Want to hold onto implies running away from need to let go; mass migration implies many running away from few etc.
like the machines in the Matrix
Being implies within momentum (matrix of motion); others suggest artificial (Latin machina) to distract from that...artificial suggestion (being alike) over perceivable within nature (being different).
Ones consent to the suggestions by others represents hooking self (consent) to the machine (suggestion).
overrated
RATE (Latin ratus; reason), hence tempting one into a conflict of reason (over vs under).
they lie to the goyim about everything
a) everything (perceivable) doesn't suggest truth (want) or lie (not want)...it implies change (need).
b) many holding onto suggested truth (want) allows few to utilize ignored change (need) to contradict with suggested lies (not want).
c) ABOUT (around; on the outside)...if one ignores being within (perception) outside (perceivable), then others can suggest "aboutism" to tempt one to ignore perceivable outside for a suggestion from inside.
Meanwhile in the US Congress... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESPRVsGY2dw
as long as they say it is AI-generated
Saying (to utter in words) implies artificial (word) over natural (sound).
we should be questioning is our suppositions on the precise nature of our society and it's people.
That implies ones issues with others; while the jewish QUESTION implies seeking answers from others. Oneself is thereby complaining about others; while waiting for others to help one with getting to bottom of ones complains.
In reality...one represents problem (life) within solution (inception towards death), which implies one needs to sustain problem while being dissolved.
Others not only distract one with suggested questions and answers; but also with tempting one to seek solutions for problems, which implies dissolving self.
be questioning
A quest implies from start to finish; being implies from origin (inception) towards outcome (death). The former tempts one to want to finish; while the latter inspires ones need to resist origin before reaching outcome.
adl (anti-defamation league)
- DE (a Latin prefix, denotes a moving from, separation) + FAME (Latin famas; to speak) + LEAGUE (Latin ligo, to bind)
Ones consent binds one to the suggested words by others; which separates one from perceivable sound, since one ignores it. Being a person (Latin per sonos; by sound) implies being moved by sound; which is why ignoring it for suggested words tempts one to move from origin (sound) towards outcomes (words)...hence a many following the suggested orders by a few, instead of resisting natural order.
The entire shtick of goblin-jew fermenting the fires of anti-semitism by fueling it with outrageous accusations represents a distraction from the aforementioned, and only oneself can discern the difference between perceivable (reality) and suggested (fiction).
an act
Within direction (inception towards death) one (life) can only react.
Omitting the same line as the Led Zeppelin; Bob Dylan; Jimmy Page versions:..."Ever since I've been acquainted with Jesus, we haven't been a minute apart" which implies knowing to be Jesus.
Even most of the jew-tube uploads of the Josh White original omit that line. This one (6.6k views; 60 thumbs up) doesn't... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2Ld6SlKD8M
die easy
Easy (inception towards death) generates hard (life).
Sleight of hand: "It's a hard-knock-life" aka hard (heart) knock (beat)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH6MstVxehQ
will always be 42
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) + UNIT (Latin unus; one)...being implies one (life) within all way (inception towards death) with the free will of choice to ignore unit (oneself) for counting other ones.
b) 0 (nihilism) 1 (being) 2 (dualism)...anything else (collectivism).
one can split
Oneness (whole) already split into ones (partials), for ones to consider splitting further, hence diminishing self.
answer
Ones quest for suggested answers tempts one to ignore being problem (life) within solution (inception towards death)...dissolution implies problem for solid.
a) those who suggest chatGPT bate/bait others to consent; to provide information; to reason over suggested information and to show flaws in the delivery of suggested information.
b) the effort ones puts into a chat-bot will be utilized by those suggesting it against all those who put in less effort.
For example...all the early-adopters of bitcoin built the beast that devours all those who came in later. A pyramid scheme.
(jews are) trying to overcome contradictions, overarch differences, mediate rivalries and unify opposites
a) suggested information CONTRADICTS (to oppose by words) perceivable inspiration.
b) consent shapes rivalry over suggested, which represents "reasoning".
c) being implies perception within perceivable...others mediate through suggestions.
d) perception (evaluation) and perceivable (value) represent natural opposites within balance (momentum).
e) suggested "overcoming" tempts one to ignore coming (inception towards death) to be (life) within.
f) same (inception towards death aka ongoing loss) generates differences (life aka temporary growth).
g) oneness (whole) divides into ones (partials) internally, hence unify (Latin unus; one) opposites (whole/partial).
h) contribution aka CONTRIBUTE (to bring together) -TION (action)...a contradiction of action (inception towards death) setting itself apart into reactions (life), hence TRIBUTE (to give, bestow; divide; impart reactions) by -TION (action)...a CON is being played here.
i) RE (response to) VOLU (to turn) -TION (action)...velocity (inception towards death) turns into resistance (life) aka action turning into reactions.
j) overarch aka ARCH (part of a circle/kike); hence building a bridge into the passage of life (from inception towards death) as to establish a full circle (ouroboros).
doctrine allows change over time.
a) change (inception towards death) generates resistance (life)...others suggest doctrines to tempt one to ignore resisting.
b) DOCTRINAIRE - "one who theorizes without sufficient regard to practical considerations; one who explains things by one narrow set of theories, disregarding all other forces at work".
backward
Resistance (life) within forwards velocity (inception towards death) implies "warding back" to sustain self.
Natural order (inception towards death) needs to be resisted (life); suggested orders tempt one to follow...others utilize suggestion to reduces ones resistance. Why? Less resistance offers more opportunity for exploitation.
Came to reddit (read it)...couldn't read it. Hilarious.
Esoteric (perception) within exoteric (perceivable)...which one ignores when consenting to "stand under" the suggestions by others.
a) coming to be (perception) with-in-visible (perceivable).
b) seeing (formed perception) sea (perceivable flow) from within.
c) source generates resolution aka RE (living reaction within) SOLVERE (being dissolve; departed by) TION (impressing action aka motion from inception towards death).
a) suggested symbolism (affixed by ones consent) tempts one to ignore perceivable symmetry (fluid surrounding ones solid center).
b) ones consent to suggested nihilism (nonetheless) shapes the truth vs lie conflict of reason.
c) reason aka logic aka logos represents suggested (word) over perceivable (sound) aka spell-craft, and ones consent to suggested definitions tempts one to ignore fluid (perceivable) for affixed (suggested), since one holds onto suggested definitions within ones mind/memory.
Those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those consenting to suggested definitions represent DEAF-PHONETICIANS.
David doc-u-ment (docks your mind) if you consent to his suggestions.