defining words by 'free' will
DEFINE, verb (Latin to end, to limit, from finis, end) - "to mark the limit; to circumscribe; to bound" contradicts FREE.
Free will of choice binds itself to suggestions by others when consenting. Ask yourself who benefits...those bound to suggested definitions of words or those suggesting them? Can free will of choice exist without either binding self to suggestions or suggesting others to bind themselves?
it creates
- CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/create
Suggested creationism (out of nothing) is build upon suggested nihilism (nothing), which tempts one to ignore that nature produces from whole into partials aka from surrounding into center aka from external into internal aka from loss into growth aka from order into chaos aka...motion (male) to momentum (fe-male) to trans-form (off-spring).
are you compelled by the disruption...in your conscience?
Being conscious implies as partial among other partials (moving differences) aka disruption of whole into partials through the momentum of motion as the status quo for inspiration.
If everything were the same; then what would inspire one to express self? What would differentiate one from another? Hence internal differentiation aka disruption of ongoing order (inception towards death) into temporary chaos (life).
As for compel aka COM (together) PELLERE (to drive)...a distraction from impel aka being driven apart within whole.
It's ones consent to the suggestions by others which compels information together within ones mind/memory, which represents internal compartmentalization.
In short...anything contradicting motion stands out like sour thumb, and so I utilize it as inspiration to draw from. What contradicts motion the most? Those within holding onto anything.
You will always be correct in half a sense due to the duelist nature of words.
a) artifice of words can only be shaped within nature of sound.
b) sound offers oneness (whole) to each one (partial)...suggested words tempt ones consent to agree or disagree with the offer. In other words...sound flows through each one, no matter if one agrees or disagrees, while each formed word one agrees or disagrees to hold onto, while ignoring the ongoing flow of sound.
It's ones consent to hold onto a suggestions, which establishes the dual-ism within perceivable oneness.
c) suggesting "will always be" tempts one to ignore that all way establishes each ones being with a will. Consenting to the former establishes the dualism of always vs never, while adapting to the latter implies different beings (partials) within same way (whole).
Ones consent implies free "will" of choice, hence utilizing ones will to ignore all perceivable way, when submitting to the suggested will of another.
correct
Consenting to dualism establishes correct versus incorrect reasoning, which tempts one to ignore implication of CORRECT (to set straight) and IN (being within aka life) CORRECT (set straight aka being moved from inception towards death).
Straight (inception towards death) generates curves (living growth within loss)...
You're performing a sematic trick
a) form (life) implies per (by) flow (inception towards death). Others suggest perform to distract consenting form from perflow.
b) semantics represents idolatry aka labeling form within flow, while tempting each other to ignore flow (sound) for form (word), when consenting to hold onto the suggested meaning/definition/brand/idol/symbolism/information etc.
c) the foundation of trick implies folding (information) the unfolding (inspiration) by tempting others to consent to hold onto the folded... FOLD (inclosure for sheep), hence the wool of ignorance over ones eyes.
Nature unfolds oneness (whole) into ones (partials)...others fold ones into two; three; four etc.
COUNT (collecting units) generates ACCOUNT (registry of a debt or credit), hence ones creed (consent) putting one into debt (uphold information) to others (suggestion). Those others can then put the NEEDLE (perceivable need) to the RECORD (suggested want) which sets the record straight.
DISC (width of aperture aka growth potential) + JOCKEY (a cheat; one who deceives or takes undue advantage in trade).
it still serves a long-winded (to you a wall) purpose
a) being implies short (life) within long (inception towards death) + winded (growth within loss aka resistance) within straight (velocity).
c) PUR'POSE (that which a person sets before himself as an object to be reached)...person aka per sonos (by sound) implies sound as the origin "for being", hence whole existing "be-fore" each partial being.
PURPOSE aka Latin PRO (before) PONO (setting; placement), then memory (ment) of ones position (place) implies momentum of motion...not suggested outcomes, others objectify as trinkets to tempt one to subjectify self to suggested progressivism.
d) masons of free (will of choice) utilize suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within ones mind/memory. For the masonic few; the ignorance of the many represents a "wailing wall", a wall a chosen one faces; laments; mourns; bewails; while filling the cracks with more and more suggested prayers. Even fertilizing the wall (davening) or holding a hand against it is utilized to prevent it from collapsing.
deeper insight
Consenting to hold onto suggested information buries ones sight deep under it, while permitting others to layer more information upon it. Ones perception within perceivable implies center within surrounding; expression within impressing; resisting temptation within velocity of inspiration aka interior at the surface of exterior aka perceivable represents the outermost boundary (surface) for each ones perception within.
In short...limited sight (life) within unlimited surface (inception towards death). Others tempt one to understand aka to stand (deep) under another.
the limitation of words
Aka ones consent to suggested THE-ism limiting one to the authority of another suggesting words. Resisting the temptation of suggestion allows one to draw all perceivable sound from each suggested word.
Words don't limit sound...one limits self when ignoring sound for words.
Words are not an infinite offer. That would be the inspiration behind the words.
Using "not" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothing) while ignoring everything perceivable. Suggestion doesn't represent an offer; it represents the temptation for one to ignore that only perceivable offers.
Merchants of temptation trick one into a trade (suggested for consent)...consenting (want or not want) to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable offer (need). Afterwards not wanting "offends" ones wanting. That's how the few invert offer (perceivable) into offense (suggestion), which tempts the many into conflicts (reason) against one another.
Infinite is a non-understandable term in reference to things that exist.
a) "non" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism, hence ones submission to "stand under" another. If one resists self repression, then one can express self by compressing (comprehension) impressing (perceivable). Solid (life) can only compress within momentum (inception towards death) of fluid, by resisting it...not by yielding to other solids.
b) REF'ERENCE - "a sending, dismission or direction to another for information" tempts one to ignore being (life) directed (inception toward death) within inspiration.
c) "things that ex-ist" implies finite expressions. Infinite impression inspires ones growth of self discernment through adaptation to implication (if/then)...adapting implies as free will of choice.
That's the moment where finite ignores infinite, while getting lost in thought.
Consider that Inspiration precedes expression.
a) suggested PRECEDE (lead the way) aka PRE (before) CEDERE (to yield) tempts one to ignore that inspiring expression implies ones resistance.
b) consideration (to fix the mind on) tempts one (solid) to ignore inspiration (fluid). Ones consent to the suggestions by others shape affixed information, which one then fixes ones mind on.
c) IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of solid to fluid) TION (action aka fluid for solid reactions).
It's written that In the beginning was 'the' word...
a) writing symbols (information) copies symmetry (inspiration). Center cannot write without surrounding to write within, about and in response to.
b) generation (motion) establishes beginning (inception) and end (death) within its momentum as reactions to source. Beginning and end represent limitations inside an unlimited source.
c) "in the...was..." implies inside of outside, so outside was before the-ism could be suggested inside.
d) without outside (balance) no inside (choice). Sound (whole) doesn't require choice; instrument (partial) does...otherwise being couldn't prepare (instruo) mind (ment) to play and "all work an no play makes jack a dull boy".
not one...but that which inspires all subsequent
Oneness of sound inspires each one subsequent instrument (prepared mind) and sequence (natural order of succession arranging minds) implies motion. Whole moves; partials react to being moved.
Others suggest BUT (except; besides; unless) to distract from oneness; whole (sound); energy (internal/inherent power). Use implication to discern that...if energy; then "except; besides; unless"...what else?
subsequent equals defining
How could a substance within sequence define abstract sequence? What if substance can only discern self; which in return allows exponential growth within abstract, hence comprehending more and more about perceivable abstract before losing ones stance (growth) to it (loss), hence being reabsorbed into it?
I can read the writing on this wall plainly
Plain (inception towards death) doesn't put a wall before existence (life)...choosing to ignore perceivable plain for suggested plans (or planets) build a wall of ignorance within ones mind/memory.
As long as one reads; so long does one binds self to the writing of another.
I do understand...
...yet while standing-under I ignore being (life) done by (inception towards death).
motive and context
Motion (motive) sets itself apart (from whole into partial); choosing to weave together (context) tempts one to ignore self for others.
Context (suggested) tempts one to ignore motive (perceivable).
Others suggest motive to mean "incite to action", which tempts one to ignore that motion (action) incites ones reaction. Ones consent to suggested motive permits others to suggest context.
consistent if not repetitive
Velocity (consistent loss) generates resistance (growth)...resisting implies frequency (repetition) of choice. Resistance is fertile...unless ignored.
Same (inception towards death) offers difference (life)...resisting sameness; grows difference. Resist nihilism (not) and reading the same will inspire one to adapt differently. The more one does that; the more inspiration one will draw from what before seemed like the same information.
How often can you say "word" before noticing sound underneath? If you run out of breath, then the word disappears, yet you still draw in from sound...
a theory that i 'get' but don't exactly share
a) if each one got perception; then perceivable was shared onto each one.
b) EXACT (precise; not different in the least)...being implies one different from one another. Others suggest exact to tempt many ones to conform to rules, while ignoring that nature sets apart aka differentiates.
c) don't aka doing nothing...care to elaborate how that works?
map is not the territory
a) all is one in energy
b) MAP (representation of the surface) + TERRITORY (domain) represents ones free will of choice (to represent surface) within dominance of balance (as the surrounding domain of centered choice).
c) ...is not. Can you put any perceivable inspiration before "is not" or only suggested information?
Notice that within all that I write; I seldom describe what something "is not". What if expressing everything that was prevents one from the temptation to suggest what something "is not"?
Are you trying to bring us together through an understanding?
I describe the contradictions of ones consent to suggested pluralism (us); collectivism (together) and conformism (understand) within perceivable reality...a reality that sets one apart from one another; which establishes the potential for self expression (need) or repression (want) depending on ones free will of choice.
Are you...?
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am...if I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
From ones perspective: "the way (inception towards death) I (life) am"
Whatever another suggests to the question "are you?" tempts one to ignore that everything about the other was perceivable before the suggestion could be shaped.
Words would be only the spoken vehicle for this inspiration, not the inspiration itself
Few drive the vehicle of words; many are just in it for the ride. Most won't realize that sound drives them over a cliff unless resisted. A driver gets inspired to adapt to ongoing threats; while a passenger gets tempted to enjoy the surrounding passing by.
I will not downdoot you
Others suggest voting to tempt one to reason (updoot vs downdoot) against others; while ignoring free will of choice to sustain self.
I never claimed you to be a natural child
a) pro-claim-ing "You are a bastard" implies a natural child... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bastard
b) claiming tempts one to ignore being within nature. Why? Because claiming tempts one to hold onto; while ignoring that nature implies being moved forwards.
never...nor
Aka nothing ever (never) + denying subsequent proposition (nor), hence nor contradicting never. Hilarious.
What else but a natural child could one be?
He is a false prophet.
- PROPH'ET, noun (Latin propheta) - "one that foretells future events; a predicter; a foreteller".
a) ones free will of choice implies reaction to origin (dominance of balance), while the suggested choices of others tempt one towards outcomes.
b) consenting to a suggested PROPHET permits another to PROFIT off ones consent.
c) look at my profile...(Post Score 0), hence no offers; only annotations made in response to others (Comment Score 10395). What prophet doesn't offer?
And a bastard.
a) being offended implies ones consent to a suggested offer. Notice that you went from being offended to being offender; just like the victim/perpetrator cycle within this topic.
b) B'ASTARD, noun - "a natural child; born out of wedlock" aka born (off-spring) out of matrim-ony (ones mother). Others suggest WED (closely attached) LOCK (confined) as the inversion of being born apart (off-spring).
Nobody trusts you
a) trust (trustee) binds one to the choice of others (recipient); while ignoring "free" will of choice.
b) "nobody" implies ones trust (consent) to suggested nihilism (no; not; nothing).
what you just said is a fabrication designed to push your own narrative
a) NARRATIVE (particulars of event)...being implies particular (life) of event (inception towards death). Ignoring this for suggestions by others represents the fabric over ones own perception.
b) DESIGN (to delineate a form)...motion delineates (inception towards death) form (life).
Because you are a terrible person.
a) TER'RIBLE (Latin terreo, to frighten)...implies ones consent to be afraid of something suggested by others.
b) person (Latin per sonos; by sound) implies out of perceivable origin, while fear implies towards suggested outcomes.
c) others suggest "because" to tempt one to ignore being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
when deprived of their regular fix
Obelix not getting any more potion from "Getafix", while carrying around "Idefix" (fixed idea; obsession).
a) eating implies ones choice to adapt to hunger (need) or for fall for the temptation of appetite (want).
b) others suggest food to tempt one to reason (want vs not want) over appetite, while ignoring hunger.
termination
Natural order (inception towards death) inspires resistance (life), while tempting with termination...suggested orders tempts compliance, while permitting others to terminate ones resistance.
Terms (perceivable or suggested) and conditions (resistance or compliance). Your issue...applying perceivable resistance to suggested conditions.
asking department
a) asking (question) for suggested information (answer) departs ones mind from perceivable inspiration.
b) DEPART (desist; stop to proceed) tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within procession (inception towards death)...others suggest desist as the inversion of resist.
my appeal...
...represents my submission to a higher authority; which me resisting compliance contradicts, hence me being put down without further ado.
Twitter has followed
Using "twitter" makes one a consenting follower.
purged from the web
- PURG'ED - "purified; cleansed; evacuated"
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/purged
Most are still entangled; insnared; entrapped within the world wide web, while getting devoured.
Amendment made all of us slaves
AMEND (to free from faults) MENT (mind/memory)...ones free will of choice to consent to the suggestions by others; amends ones mind/memory with the suggested.
Slave (consent) sets master (suggestion) by submission of self to another.
diplomatic immunity
a) DIPLOMA (document)...consenting to suggested doc-u-ment; docks your mind.
b) being (life) implies exposed to (inception towards death), hence IN (within) MUNUS (charge)...others suggest immunity as "exempt" (not subjected to), which represents the inversion of being subjected to natural law.
Sound implies simplicity; words shape complexity...one gets lost in complexity (suggested information) when ignoring simplicity (perceivable inspiration).
From your perspective...a wall of text. From my perspective...a drop of expressed inspiration; drawn from an infinite offer.
You do serve an important purpose here.
a) import implies from origin; purpose implies towards outcome. Being implies EX (expressing) PORT (to carry in form).
b) others suggest progressivism to tempt one towards outcome; while ones consent imports suggested into self (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration). Nature doesn't inspire one to reach outcome; but to adapt to origin.
c) SERVE (Latin servo; to keep), hence becoming a slave to others, when consenting to hold onto suggested. Meanwhile; inception towards death doesn't allow life to keep anything; "only" to utilize everything.
That's my belief
Belief tempts one to hold onto; "being life" needs to be let go of.
Others (Bon Jovi) suggest that "It's my life", while offering a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."this ain't a song for the broken-hearted; No silent prayer for faith-departed". Being implies departed within whole; hence broken by division into units.
But you, I and we need to use words
a) no other life-form shapes words out of sound to communicate.
b) agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) with a suggested word; tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable sound, hence ones consent to words shaping the conflicts of reason.
c) definite (affixed) contradicts -tion (motion)...it's ones consent to hold onto definitions, which affixes them within ones mind/memory.
d) what is it that one needs to describe to others with labels? Will a penis not find its way into a vagina without exchanged words? Isn't getting hard, and getting wet inspiration enough for intercourse?
e) consider this...if others cannot take words from one; can oneself resist using words from others? That represents ones inner struggle with outside temptation.
both divide by definition and unite by spirit
a) divide implies whole (oneness) into partials (ones), and unite implies UNIT (Latin unus; one). Others suggest dualism (both) and collectivism (unite) to distract one from discerning and sustaining self.
b) SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiro) - "to breathe; air in motion; breath; animal excitement aka animation (motion) exciting mind/memory (momentum)" implies ones adaptation to that aka reaction (growth) adapting to action (loss).
Others suggest spiritualism (consisting of spirit); hence CONSIST (standing together; to be in a fixed or permanent state). That represents the inversion of spirit (adaptation to motion), and ones consent to the suggested -ism tempts one to hold onto; to affix it.
Don't we.
Aka suggested nihilism (doing nothing) and pluralism (we), tempting one (unit) to ignore being done by everything.
You and I as separate, yet identifying as we?
a) Identical (same) contradicts "you and I" (different). Ones consent to suggested identitarianism represents mass consensus, hence tempting each "different"one choosing "alike" to believe to be the "same".
b) Apartheid requires ones resistance; togetherness tempts one to submit to others; while ignoring to resist for sustenance of self.
c) Whole separates one (partial) from other ones (partials), which in return establishes each ones potential to grow self discernment or fall for the temptation of collectivism by hanging onto others.
d) ones claim over self (me; myself or I) shapes everyone else into a "you". Claiming self gives "yous" (jews) power of one. Why? Because each suggested CLAIM - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain" is aimed at others, hence shaping other ones into "chosen ones".
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a) suggested words (spell-craft) tempt one to consent to be spell-bound.
b) consenting to definitions (words) tempts one to ignore adapting (spirit) to motion (sound). Holding onto anything within a moving system tempts one to ignore being moved for that which one holds onto.
Notice how often people drowning ignore adapting to water by trying to hold onto anything floating. There's this vid of old white dude trying to save young black dude from drowning and the younger drowns both of them by holding onto.
c) as to why sharpening teeth with articulation of words (fiction)...because fiction (words) can only be shaped within reality (sound), and if one comprehends the difference; then it's just another unit of inspiration to draw from.
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
a) ABC (Latin abecedary) aka "abracadabra".
b) five of one represents one counting other ones as five, hence consenting to suggested collectivism. Each different symbol is shaped within the same symmetry (formed partials within flowing whole).
c) being choice within balance implies "on the razor's edge"...that's sharp.
going back and forth between A and not A
a) "between" implies self as life in-between inception towards death; while "not" implies one ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
A label (word) tricks one think it defines something; but underneath everything (sound) moves.
b) only while being (life) directed (inception towards death); can one freely (free will of choice) choose to wander (exchange; transform) around (up/down; left/right; back/forth).
the nature of words
The nature (perceivable) of words (suggested) implies ones ignorance of reality for fiction by consenting to suggested THE-ism (ones submission to authority of others).
Nature doesn't offer words; those within sound shape words to distract each other, which only works if ones consent to another ones offer, hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
'make a point' out of the whole
Whole introduces (inception) partial sentence (life) towards point (death)...others suggest one to "make a point" (end of sentence) as to distract from ones life sentence, hence tempting those within "out of". A suggested inversion.
Here's one: "How many..."
Each one.
why choose the DE-fining, when REfining
a) being implies finite (growth) within infinite (loss)...choosing others implies ignoring infinite for finite, hence the scarcity racket.
b) as for REFINE (depurate; free from impurities)...that implies being (free will of choice) within pure (balance). Ones choices of want over need soils self within pure, until natural order (inception towards death) cleans up chaos (life).
to better effect
Cause (inception towards death aka value) generates best effects (life aka evaluation). The more one evaluates cause; the better ones effects will be.
Others utilize effect (suggested) to distract from cause (perceivable), which affects one if consented to.
removing impurities
Being implies within (im) that which is free from mixture (pure), while responding (re) to being moved.
The suggested word "remove" implies change of place; while being "re-move" implies ones place (life) within change (inception towards death), hence reacting (re) to it changing (move).
Without self discernment (position within change) the suggested words of others change ones position.
If A, then not A.
a) implication (if/then) implies motion...if nothing (not); then no motion.
b) not implies conflict of reason (everything vs nothing). Others suggest reasoning over suggested (words) to distract from implication within perceivable (sound).
If sound; then words. If words; then agreeing vs disagreeing with definitions. It's oneself that corrupts implication with reason and others suggest words (logos) to tempt reason (logic).
Georgia Guidstones: "let these be guidestones to an age of reason".
Each as a new dimension
a) new, néwos, now...there's only now (perceivable moment-um within motion) for those within, hence nothing new under the SUN; SOL; SOUL; SOLE (one and only) aka "there can be only one" aka "one for all and all for one" aka "alone"...ALL(in)ONE.
b) dimension aka DIS (apart) METIRI (to measure) ION (action) aka partial reactions measuring each other within whole action. Oneself represents DI (partial) within MENT (mind/memory/momentum) of ION (whole/motion).
learning to spell
SPELL - "a charm consisting of some words of occult power" aka temptation to conceal perceivable (sound) with suggested (words) by consent.
Check out the lyrics of "I Put a Spell On You"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffB5ZwJ41AM
who pays the tap
a) tap implies letting fluid out...being implies fluid (inception towards death) putting solid (life) in (inception) and out (death).
b) others suggest currency based on nothing (0) and ones (1) consent to hold onto it.
c) Holding onto suggested by ones consent implies CREED (credit; faith; belief; consent etc.) which represents the credit one discharges (debt) onto others.
How do they fidget the numbers
By suggesting each ONE of the many to ignore perceivable UNIT (Latin unus; one) for suggested numbers (the designation of a unit reference to other units). In other words...by getting one to count others (2,3,4,5...) while ignoring one (1) self.
There's only one nature (whole) and each one (partial) within. Others suggest one to question "how many", while seeking answers by preserving a reckoning; computing; counting particulars.
In short...by tricking you to ignore FIDGETY -"restlessness" of motion, hence "no rest for the wicked (departed)"
what should be a failed business
BUSINESS (employment) implies ones mind/memory (ment) utilized (employed) within motion. The memory (momentum) of motion can neither fail, nor succeed as long as motion continues....those within can be tricked to believe in succession (order following) and failure (cessation of supply aka supply chain issues aka scarcity).
You tell a story about victim turning perpetrator and perpetrator turning victim...a self eating cycle (ouroboros). It consumes everyone within unless oneself chooses to grow out of it.
And no other children can be molested by him.
Did you also take on the burden of leaving him be for 20 years to continue abusing children?
a threat
Ones consent to suggestions by others threatens one to be lured by them. Using other children; Clinton; 911 or mankind afterwards only shirks onto others what oneself consented to.
victim
You chose to hold onto victim hood until becoming perpetrator, hence perpetuating the abuse cycle.
I pray...
...still submission to others instead of sustaining self. PRA'YER, noun - "asking for a favor". Notice that the suggested "Headmaster's prize" represented a favor from others. You're still victimizing yourself, while using a dead pedo as a justification.
Any moment on your knees signals prey (pray) to predators...
a) ones consent to suggested "headmaster" tempts one into a vulnerable/submissive position, which in return permits others to exploit one.
b) did you grew up being taught anything about others luring with suggestions?
c) he bound himself to you for a moment; you bound yourself to him for two decades. What have you learned from that? Did you feel relief when he let go back then, and did you feel more relief when you let go of him 20 years later?
Have you really let go of him when you're now choosing to "live to tell about it"?
bots like this
Can you show me a "bot" that can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
still not
a) Still implies "cessation of motion", hence only within everything moving can one suggest stillness....others suggest nihilism (not; nothing) as the inversion thereof.
b) If nothing can have cessation of motion, then that implies nothing can move. How could something moving be nothing?
I have a block feature
Aka ones free will of choice to ignore...others suggest "block-features" to tempt one to consent to suggested (fiction); while ignoring perceivable (reality).
the mods
Others suggest the-ism to tempt one to submit to their authority; while ignoring to utilize ones free will of choice to moderate self.
Furthermore; choice can only exist within balance; which represents limit (moderation) for choice. Only within "dom"-inance of balance can there be "free" will of choice aka free-dom.
Edit: ones consent to suggested the-ism implies ones submission to others, hence ISLAM.
at it again
"again" implies "a gain" by frequency of adaptation to perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for consent to suggested information.
dagooo
What did you gain by suggesting "dagooo" again?
freewill
Free implies within dominance; while will (want) implies within need...both imply a division through motion from one another. Why write them together?
Hey look EVERYBODY...it's
Suggested dehumanization in the name of others.
fr3ewillofdaajoooo
a) mocking free will of choice implies ones ignorance of being free will of choice, hence ones lack of self discernment.
b) for many "free-will-of-choice" represents a suggested name; while few discern the implication of each one representing free will of choice. Putting in the effort represents a testament (test of mind) for ones self discernment.
c) why would you exchange "choice" for "joooo" instead of "will"? Doing so shapes a "jooo" into a chosen one.
double speak
Using suggested words over perceivable sound implies "one corresponding to the other" (double). Therefore; "double" represents the status quo for speaking, which tempts one to ignore that nature doesn't speak (articulation of sound), because sound represents natural; and words represent artificial.
2.0
Aka ones consent to suggested nihilism (0) and dualism (2), while ignoring perceivable units (1). Furthermore; the point "." (end of sentence) implies ones consent to suggested progressivism, while ignoring ones ongoing life-sentence.
to re-write every word in the English dictionary
a) Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary is right now on it's eleventh edition, which implies that those who dictate expressions by words are editing definitions; hence continuously changing them.
b) the few suggest written dictionaries, while the many consent to RE (respond to) WRITE (written by) them.
tl; dr...how about adding an example for a re-written word to your accusatory comment?
I said all of us, as a whole. and i am part of that "we"
a) perceivable whole implies more than any suggested "us".
b) part of suggested tempts one to ignore being partial within perceivable whole, while giving those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict what "all; whole; us etc." means.
c) why is it that a few can control a consenting many by suggesting "we the people"; yet among the many one can suggest "we must do something" without getting anywhere?
in who's property are we tenants?
a) PROP'ER, adjective (Latin proprius) - "peculiar; naturally or essentially belonging to a person"...belong implies being short essence (life) within long abstract (inception towards death).
Others suggest belonging to mean "appended; holding onto", which tempts one to ignore that abstract (ongoing) generates essence (temporary) through motion. Essence holding onto implies ignorance of abstract, hence lack of self discernment.
Try holding onto your breath and wait for abstract to teach essence a lesson.
b) TEN'ANT, noun - "one who has possession of any place; a dweller; permanent resident"...being implies temporary resident (life) within possession of continuance (inception towards death).
Loss posses growth; growth resists temptation of loss to sustain self.
c) only within whole can there be partials (who). Who refers to persons; while person implies per sonos (by sound), hence being partial within SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole".
can we grow to be more, are we more or less than we could be?
a) nature offers infinite loss (inception towards death) towards finite growth (life). The limit to ones growth implies self; hence perpetuation of self implying intercourse with another for off-spring.
b) more (want) vs less (not want) tempts one to ignore being growth (need) within loss (want). Growing implies resisting loss; while loss tempts one to ignore resisting.
Sleight of hand: path (inception towards death) of least resistance (life).
c) being (alive) implies within origin (process of dying)...others suggest "could" and "should" to tempt one to ignore that.
how did humans originally get here
- HU'MAN, adjective (Heb. form, species)
- AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul)
a) Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) aka animation specifies human aka whole generates partials.
Others suggest "human" and "animal" to distract one from discerning to be animated (animal) form (human).
b) origin of flow/form implies ENERGY (Greek; work) - "internal/inherent power".
not how each person got here
a) person (per sonos; by sound) implies being (instrument) within everything (sound)...others suggest nihilism (not) to tempt one to ignore that.
b) the opposite of "each" isn't "neither", but whole; entire; all; sound; energy.
I don't identify with the 'we'
a) "I" implies ones consent to suggested collectivism, hence claiming and holding onto "me; myself, and I", while ignoring that whole (oneness) holds each partial (ones).
b) "don't" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring to be center of surrounding "everything".
c) "identity" implies ones consent to suggested identitarianism (sameness); while ignoring to be different (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
d) "with" others tempts one to ignore being "within" whole.
e) "the" implies ones consent to suggested the-ism (submission to authority), while ignoring to be set free (will of choice) within momentum (balance) of whole (motion).
That represents six times consent given to suggested (i don't identify with the) and one time denial of consent to suggested (we)...it's a start.
We don't get to know where we are, what we are, or how we got here
Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving partial (one) to ignore self-discernment within perceivable whole.
- Where? Center of surrounding.
- What? Growth within loss.
- How? Internal division of whole into partials.
the same impending cliff
a) IMPEDANCE; noun - "resistance (life) due to induction (inception) into an electrical circuit (inception towards death)".
b) growth (resisting life) within loss (velocity of dying) represents a cliff-hanger.
c) sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life)....others invert this by suggesting equality (same) through diversity (differences).
d) "the same" implies each different ones consent to suggestion of same THE-ism, hence a many consenting to authority of suggesting few aka one choosing "chosen ones" among others, hence establishing an ELITE (selection; choice).
free masonry
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build walls of ignorance within the mind/memories of others.
religions of self operating human management systems.
a) religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones willing consent to bind self to the suggestions by others.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the power of ones consent to manage ones mind/memory (Latin mentis) with suggested information.
c) suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; while ignoring that perceivable inspiration needs to be let go of. The few not only suggest information to tempt one to ignore inspiration; they also utilize ones remembrance as a MUSE (to reflect, ponder, meditate; to be absorbed in thought; to loiter, waste time) of inspiration.
This tempts one to ignore ongoing inspiration for continuously pondering over upheld information within ones mind/memory.
That's reasoning within your head only, while seeking others to confirm or deny information.
a) nature provides solution...suggested answers and questions tempt one to ignore resisting (life) while being dissolved (inception towards death) within solution.
b) TION (action) doesn't DEFINE (affix) RE (reaction)...it sets it free (will of choice).
c) if you resist suggested definitions and re-definitions; then you'll sense the only solution.
Aka to store an ending within memory. That contradicts being...how could sentence (life) file point (death)? It's the ongoing process of dying which generates a temporary life sentence within storage; memory; momentum.
It's reasoning which tempts one to seek an end to conflict, while implication (if/then) goes on from the moment of inception to the moment of death. Reasoning represents the perpetuation of conflict, hence viewing the world in confronting opposites (dualism).
You view others as compelling disruptions...I represent free partial (life) impelled within dominant whole (inception towards death).
Only if one consents; can the suggestion of another disrupt one, at which point one compelled self to another.
Each one exists at a different position, while seeing a different perspective. Are you open to perceivable ONE (1) underneath suggested TWO (2)?