There's a link between authoritarianism and theistic religions
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies one binding self by consent to the suggested -isms of another, hence establishing another as authority over oneself.
especially Abrahamic religions
Suggested abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nations; european union aka uniformity; university; unicode; community-ism (communism); society-ism (socialism) aka miscegenation; mass migration; melting pot; multiculturalism etc...implies each one of a many consenting to suggested collectivism by a few; hence being herded together like cattle.
Nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (inception towards death) into each partial (life)...those within tempt each other back together; which then permits a chosen few to remain apart at the center of a collectivized many.
think of possibility with understanding...and ask not for a sign.
Sleight of hand through ace of base: "I saw the sign and it opened up my eyes...Life is demanding without understanding" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqu132vTl5Y
come to save
Coming (inception towards death) to be (life) implies exposure to harm...others suggest salvationism (to preserve from injury) as the inversion thereof.
Why? Because consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore resisting (life) perceivable temptation (inception towards death), and ones lack of resistance permits others to exploit ones weakness.
What is the Gospel?
A suggested good spell (gospel) to tempt one into a conflict of reason against suggested bad spell aka truth vs lies. Why? To distract from...
SPELL (a turn of work)...work implies energy (internal/inherent power) and action (inception towards death) turning into reactions (life) implies a turn of work.
free will of choice..
Addressing "free will of choice" implies using ones free will of choice to address...
proove you're not a bot
a) If you ask AI "prove you're not a human", then I can utilize free will of choice to contradict whatever proof it suggests.
b) can one prove "not; nothing; nothingness"?
c) if nature offers each one (perception) everything (perceivable); then why would one want proofs; affirmations; definitions etc. (suggested) from others?
busted him...
...cause bustin' makes me feel good.
leary exopsychology...larval
a) growing (life) pains (inception towards death). Suggested larva tempts one into hoping to grow out of it; while ignoring to be growth within loss.
b) exo (inception towards death) generates intro (life); which implies psyche (animating spirit)...suggested logy (logic/reason; logos/words) tempts one to ignore that.
See if you summon..."free-will-of-choice"
Which tempts one to overlook using free will of choice to summon.
Like who's this guy
a) different from other ones.
b) https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/guy
what's your real name
NAME (Latin nombre; number) + NUMBER (designation of a unit) + UNIT (Latin unus; one)...being implies one unit within reality. Others suggest branded names to distract one from discerning that.
where were you born
a) BORN (brought forth, as an animal) aka brought forth (life) through animation (inception towards death).
b) as for where? Center of surrounding aka local of circumference aka momentum of motion, hence from male (motion) through female (momentum) into trans-form.
Sleight of hand: "people ask my why I never find a place to stop and settle down, down, down...but I never wanted all those things people need to justify their lives, lives, lives"
If one comprehends "born to be alive"; then one can discern who; where; what and why aka discerning self.
what year
YEAR, noun - "whole circle"...if the circle is whole; then what else could there be? Why would one count a whole circle (Yiddish kikel; kike) when whole implies chosen one?
my brand name
If it's yours; then why do you give it to others? What if you were tempted to consent to a suggested brand, hence getting branded like cattle willingly?
I get all my tweets from the original...birds.
a) local truth (suggested words) within universal truth (perceivable sound)...the issue...oneself choosing to hold onto "truth" while ignoring that sound (entire; whole) moves every local instrument (partial) within.
b) universe aka VERSE - "line (inception towards death) of poetry (life)" within UNI (motion).
a limited set of rules can't define infinite truth (it's analogous to counting to infinity, no matter how high you count, you're no closer than when you began)
Counting implies holding onto finite units (partials), which in return tempts one to ignore being within infinite oneness (whole).
The trick...suggested analogism (an argument from the cause to the effect) tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within moving cause (inception towards death).
Ones consent (want or not want) to a suggested -ism, shapes an argument aka a conflict of reason (want vs not want) within ones mind/memory aka logic. This tempts one to view perceivable cause (momentum of motion) through the lens of suggested effects (affixed beliefs; upheld information; -isms etc.).
a limited set of rules
Unlimited (inception towards death) sets and rules limits (life) inherently. Being implies "free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance aka free (living) within dominance (process of dying).
Others suggest rules (laws of men) to tempt one to ignore perceivable RULE, noun (Latin rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight) aka straight (inception towards death) governing winding (life).
Sleight of hand: "take me to the magic of the moment(um)...in the wind of change (motion)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4RjJKxsamQ
needs to quit
Quitting implies departing from; being implies partial within whole. Ask yourself why you are struggling to depart from something, while being partial within whole?
working...going nowhere
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" implies that all power exists only at the center of energy, while being employed (partials) within work (whole).
b) "nowhere" represents a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...WHERE? NOW! Now implies position within momentum of motion; hence being able to perceive moment aka being able to momentary discern surrounding from center.
needs to stop
a) need implies want...need/want implies balance for ones choice within...balance implies momentum of motion. Suggested "stop" (cessation of motion) implies the inversion thereof.
b) "to" implies towards, hence motion..."towards stop" implies moving towards the cessation of motion, which in return implies that everything being moved would cease to be, which is kinda counterproductive for being alive.
I can keep going on.
Inception towards death goes on...life within cannot keep going on; since it's being run out.
You larvals don't have the attention span
Each one represents attention (life) within span (inception towards death).
even online psychologic screening tests
Being online (being on a leash), while responding to what others are suggesting on a screen (being screened) represents a world wide web of psychological testing.
big tech is profiling you
Click on the avatar in the upper-right corner....Account: My Profile aka ACCOUNT (a registry of a debt to another) MY (claim of possession) PROFILE (confining self within an outline).
This implies consensual self confinement within the suggested systems of others.
baby doing a fortnite
FORT'NIGHT, noun - "the space of fourteen days"...fortnite implies "for-teen" so the baby has to be escorted out asap. How did it get in? Bribed the bouncers with a sack of gold (obviously tungsten), while seeking a place to hide from the mohel.
Crowley called himself the beast
Nature doesn't call by name; it orders by designating units apart from one another. Suggested "beast" represents a compound of individual units aka BE (being) AST (astute), which implies being able to discern.
Calling oneself "beast" tempts others to ignore self (be) discernment (ast).
not because of astrology
Being (alive) implies within cause (inception towards death). ASTRO (star) can be utilized to discern ones position as center of surrounding; while LOGY (logic/reason + logos/words) tempts one into a conflict (reason) about suggested definitions (words).
Once again..."astrology" implies a compound distracting from individual units, and it's on oneself to discern that.
spirits aka demons
a) spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies solid (life) adapting within liquid (inception towards death).
b) demon (Latin dai-mon; divider-provider) implies divided solid (life) within providing liquid (inception towards death).
Using words as labels; definitions (definite; affixed) distracts one from that which one tries to define with labels...which is moving.
white/black magick...any form of magick is strictly forbidden
a) one can neither perceive white (pure light); nor black (destitute of light) since ones perception exists within perceivable spectrum, hence in-between white/black (balance) as spectrum; specter; observer (choice).
b) MAGIC (art of influencing hidden natural forces)...ones consent to suggested (artificial) tempts one to ignore perceivable (natural). Ignorance hides natural (spectrum) underneath artificial (black vs white).
Sleight of hand by Michael Jackson: (before jews) - "It doesn't matter if you're black or white" (after jews) - "Kick me, kike me; don't you black or white me".
c) strict implies restricted; being implies "free" will of choice. Choosing to bind self by consent to suggestions of others implies restricting self.
b) forbid implies FOR (forwards) BID (request aka response to suggested quest towards outcome). Being implies resisting (life) forwards temptation (inception towards death).
The opposite of bidding towards suggested outcome implies replying to perceivable origin.
one and only creator.
- CREATE (cause to exist; to bring into being from nothing)
If one creates, then one creates more than one. Only within oneness (whole) can ones (partials) transmute other ones. Others suggest creationism (out of nothing) to distract from perceivable transmutation (partials within whole).
The foundation for creationism (out of nothing) implies nihilism (nothing), hence ones ignorance of everything (perceivable reality) for nothing (suggested fiction).
Tatsuaki Okamoto
A recent revisionism of Satoshi Nakamoto? https://img.gvid.tv/i/97n6Mn3b.jpg
You can stop right here.
a) how could solid (life) within liquid (inception towards death) influence cessation of motion (stop) without ignoring position?
b) "here" implies within momentum of motion...others suggest obstructionism (stop) to tempt one to ignore perceivable motion; hence obstructing self with ignorance when consenting to the -ism.
that's nonsense.
a) how could one perceive (sense) nothing (non)?
b) that is (that's) implies that something is, which contradicts that nothing (non) can be perceived (sensed).
a) catastrophe aka KATA (down) STREPHEIN (turn)
b) downward loss (inception towards death) generates momentum for upward growth (life).
c) being implies strophe (partial) within cata (whole)...others suggest the poem "catastrophe" to destroy partial by putting it back together within whole.
what we're not being told
a) nature doesn't tell (to express in words)...it impresses sound (entire; whole) through each partial instrument.
b) others tell being pluralism (we); definitism (are) and nihilism (not) to distract from the aforementioned.
essentially biblical...
BIBLE (Greek; book)...a book; what's written within; whose writing and whose reading it...those all represent solid essence (particular nature) within liquid substance (whole nature).
based off of history
His-story implies particulars narrated by suggestion and held together by consent of listener. The base thereof implies motion aka whole for partials; perceivable for suggestions and that which sets apart for those within to be able to put back together.
the bible as a credible source
The source of cred; creed; belief; faith etc. implies ones consent by free will of choice to the suggestions by others. Ones given; others gain control over ones cred as their credit aka reputation derived from the confidence of others.
The source of anything solid can only be fluid, since fluid produces solid within the momentum of motion.
certain events
CERTAIN (assured in mind; affixed by consent) contradicts EVENT (to break forth; coming to be). The latter implies liquid; the former implies holding onto solid.
At beginning (inception) the outcome (death) for life is certain; because one exists within motion, hence caused (inception towards death) to be (life) aka being (living) within cause (process of dying).
a reference point
Reference implies view towards suggested outcome, which tempts one to ignore ones ongoing life-sentence. Others suggest points to tempt sentence to ignore self, and thanks to ones lack of self discernment...it works like a charm.
history tied together
Ones consent ties one to his suggested story, which tempts one to ignore that perceivable story; store; storage (momentum) implies motion. Being within momentum implies temporary access to perceivable moment through perceiving mind/memory. That's ones temporary access to an ongoing store.
the worlds first corporation
"corp-ora-tion" aka dead speech uttered within action. Perceivable sound implies living language; suggested words imply dead language.
The word "corporation" represents corp (dead); suggesting it represents ora (uttering speech) and the motion in-between shaping and uttering implies tion (action).
This can all be discerned if one resists the suggested definition (affixed meaning) of words.
The product they sold was basically culture with a built in religion.
Ones consent to a suggested (sold) product implies Latin religio; to bind anew, hence buyer (consent) binding self to seller (suggestion). Doing so tempts one to ignore the producing base (perceivable) of the free produce (perception).
into a nation
Nation (a people) implies each one person. Others suggest nationalism to tempt each consenting person into collectivism with others, hence part of suggested nation, rather than partial (person aka per sonos; by sound) within perceivable whole (sound; entire).
Example: israel is suggested as a jewish nation, yet Hebrew yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each one (life) within strive (inception towards death).
Mohammad claimed decent from Abraham
a) Abraham (father of multitude) implies suggested collectivism...hence all those who consent being collectivized by a few who suggest it.
b) decent (becoming) implies coming (inception towards death) to be (life) through differentiation of whole into partials.
c) Muhammad (praise worthy) implies selling (praise) suggested values (worthy), which tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable).
if history is fake then
a) his-story represents a suggestion by another
b) true (want) or fake (not want) represents ones consent to a suggestion by another
c) true versus fake represents a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to the suggestion of another.
d) reason (conflict) represents the inversion of implication (if/then).
If one resists suggested his-story; then one is free (will of choice) to utilize implication (if/then) within perceivable instead of reasoning (true vs false) about suggested.
the timeline aint right
If one resists suggested theism (the); nihilism (ain't) and reasoning (right vs wrong); then one can discern self (life) within line (inception towards death), and further discern between suggested time (past; present and future) and perceivable time; tempus; tempora (particular portion of whole duration), which implies particular portion (life) within whole duration (inception towards death) aka momentum of motion aka perceivable moment aka being "now"....never before; never after.
the relation between Catholicism and jews is weird also
a) only if one ignores ones consent to suggested Catholicism and judaism, which permits a suggesting other in-between perceivable and ones perception.
b) WEIRD, adjective - "skilled in witchcraft" aka crafting WITCH, verb - "to enchant; enchantment". Suggested enchants ones consenting mind.
i think they were gifted a position
a) ones consent to a suggested gift positions another within ones mind/memory.
b) being implies center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable)...consenting to suggested puts others into center and self into surrounding circumference. Those others can then cut off the useless circumference (circumcision), while erecting center.
c) POSI (situated within) TION (action) implies reaction (life) situated within action (inception towards death).
From Pledge Greatcross (Gaige Grosskreutz) to Paul Preacher (Paul Prediger) aka switching from criminal Saul to preacher Paul by pledging to the great cross.
No; not; nothing; nothingness aka suggested nihilism wielded by ones weapon of choice to deny anything "questionable" to ones ignorance.
You are a liar
That implies that I offered truth beforehand. Yet; according to you..."he ain't never done nothin for no one". If you're offended; then you took an offer I didn't made.
none of that is relevant to what I have said
Relevant implies "dependent on"...being implies IN (life) DEPENDENCE (inception towards death). Consenting to the suggestions of others makes one dependent to them, hence a many being exploited for dependence on a few.
Look at how many people are offering on the web and how many are offended by what's offered on the web...a perpetual conflict among the many; exploited; controlled and directed by a few.
And then there's one who adapts to everything nature offers; while resisting the suggested temptations by others...
you should ask Betty May who publicly exposed
Betti(ng) May expose addiction...
he brutally murdered
Like Hitler did to the jews?
I don't know
Knowledge implies perceivable; don't (doing nothing) represents suggested nihilism. Consenting to the suggestion (he brutally murdered) by another (betty may) tempts one to ignore perceivable.
As for Crowley...why hide something so deep (astrology) under something so shallow (satanism)?
Quoting Fatboy Slim
a) to quote implies by free will of choice; hence choosing to repeat from another. Quote originates from "weapon of choice".
b) quote in commerce (price of article) implies the suggested value of artifice, hence tempting others to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested); which devalues self.
c) why would you associate "weapon of choice" with a suggested idol (fatboy slim) instead of ones free will of choice? What if others utilize suggested idols as ammunition of weaponized choice?
fatboy slim
"Listen to the (perceived) sound of my (suggested) voice"..."Don't be shocked by the tone (Latin tonus; sound) of my (suggested) voice".
Can one discern perceivable (sound) underneath the noise of suggested (word)?
if you're just going to be a little bitch...
...then there must be a big bitch elsewhere. This is where I could insert a "yo mama" joke, but that would imply questionable behavior.
Aka the wickedest man in the world, luciferian godfather of the occult who was deported from Italy and permanently banned from France because of his disgusting satanic sex magick practices and ritualistic demon evocation.
Could this be a public distraction from him privately ghostwriting as Evangeline Adams? Does "The General Principles of Astrology" + "Your Place in the Sun" + "Your Place Among the Stars" sound like the works of the "wickedest man in the world"?
This idea of subverting fundamental metaphysical binaries
a) ones consent (want or not want) towards suggested idealism shapes binary conflict (want vs not want) within ones mind/memory...this conflict is called "reason".
b) the foundation of IDEA (form; look of a thing) implies flow aka shaping of a formed thing to look at.
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death), while ones consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to hold onto solid, while ignoring fluid.
philosophy
PHI (want of) LO (logic/reason + logos/word) SOPHY (knowledge)
Knowledge implies perceivable (need); reasoning (want vs not want) implies over suggested. Ones consent to suggested (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable (sound), hence falling for spell-craft.
there is some kind of pattern here
Suggested pattern (outline) tempts one to ignore being (life) within line (inception towards death).
wanting to know...points
a) suggested points (progressivism) imply end of sentence...consenting to it tempts one to ignore being sentenced to life.
b) wanting (suggested) tempts one to ignore needing (perceivable) aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...not the suggestions by others about it. Suggested tempts one to ignore self discernment as partial (perception) within whole (perceivable).
c) ones consent to suggested gives others the permission to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will.
Nature doesn't suggest information; it moves perceivable inspiration towards each ones perception. The former tempts one to "want" to hold onto; while the latter inspires one to discern the "need" to let go of.
organizations that are supposed to protect our children they themselves are the abusers.
a) the internal organ within external -tion (action) implies ones reaction.
b) choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested organizations implies misuse (abuse) of ones reacting choice.
c) sleight of hand...serve (inception towards death) to protect (life) aka serve loss to protect growth. How does one serve (render habitual obedience to) loss? By resisting it, and resisting fertilizes ones resistance (growth).
Protecting others implies sacrificing self; which in return hurts others.
a) problems (life) can only exist within solution (inception towards death).
b) PROB'LEM, noun (Latin problema; to throw forward) + SOLU (separating) TION (action) aka being separated reaction (life) within thrown forward action (inception towards death).
c) ALL implies solution; each ONE within implies problem.
...implies perpetual conflict (reason) against war.
...you'll will be stuck within a conflict of reason against those who love somebody.
...and ignore the only way (inception towards death) for being (life).
You do know (perceive) the only way; you simply chose to ignore it for other ways suggested to you.
Being (choice) implies within need/want (balance). Being moved from inception towards death implies the need for life to resist, and the wanted temptation for life to ignore resisting...different choices within same moment.
Sleight of hand: "Hear what Captain Planet has to say: "THE POWER IS YOURS!!"...With your powers combined I am Captain Planet!" That's suggested collectivism tempting one to ignore that "the power is yours" before you permit others to wield it.