allowing...to do terrorism
Who suggests terrorism and who consents to suggested TERROR (Latin terreo, to frighten; fear) by being afraid? Who but oneself can choose to admit (allow) fear to terrify self?
unwanted wars
What if ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested (want); while ignoring perceivable (need)...shapes war aka conflicts of reason (want vs not want).
them going after...amendment.
AMEND', verb (Latin emendo; menda, mendum, a fault) + MENT (Latin mentis; mind). Who wields the faulty mind...the one suggesting false flags or the one consenting to the suggested?
Following the activity...is key
If reaction (life) follows action (inception towards death); then that implies KEY, noun - "a fastener; that which fastens".
What if one already is unlocked aka "free" will of choice? What if inception opened the door for ones life? What if others suggest lockdowns and chains on blocks within crypts etc. to tempt one to seek keys as to set free and unlock self? What if ones consent to a suggested fastener (key) binds one to those suggesting, while fastening ones demise within the process of dying?
intentional form of mockery
a) INTENT (eager in pursuit of an object) + MOCK (to mimic; to imitate)...others suggest objects to tempt ones consent to mimic following aka self subjection.
b) LAS VEGAS aka SIN (departure of moral agent) CITY (center)...the suggestions by others tempt one from center (perception within perceivable) into surrounding, hence from being regent (life) within agent (inception towards death) into reacting to others aka self subjection.
In short...if form (life) ignores flow (inception towards death); then it mocks (mimics) other form.
Sleight of hand: "If you (form) like to gamble; I'm your man (flow)...you win some; lose some; it's all the same to me"
https://img.gvid.tv/i/rXS5ZaAD.jpg
CHIP; CHEAP - "bargain" aka a contract by which one party binds himself to transfer the right to some property, for a consideration, and the other party binds himself to receive the property and pay the consideration.
"As Satan is my master...I will get you, Chip" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eu0PtSdSNo
admiralty
AD'MIRAL, noun (Latin amira, amiras, admiralis, an Emir; Heb. to speak) aka utilizing suggested words to tempt others to ADMI'RE, verb (Latin admiror, ad and miror, to wonder) - "to regard with wonder or surprise, mingled with approbation, esteem, reverence or affection".
Tempting ones approbation of words within a sound system, which tempts one into probation... a moral trial judged by others.
It's a toilet.
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/toilet
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lavatory
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bog
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/outhouse
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/privy
Neither definition describes anything related to alvine discharge (excrement)...why is that? What word was used in 1828 to describe such a place and why was it changed?
not grammar therapy
All suggested words (spell-craft) imply grimoire/grammar (incantation); which distracts one from Greek THERAPEIA (curing; healing; servicing) self within perceivable.
You can't you just make dumber products
a) nature produces everything within...the more those within ignore that; the less quality the produce has.
b) DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking"...nature doesn't utter suggested words (speak); it moves perceivable sound. If nature (whole) implies dumb; then those within (partials) imply dumber.
Look where that nozzle is. It's right there where a human pisses and shits...It pisses everywhere look.
Why would one look at the suggestion of that? How funny is it to suggest others to look at such? Who but the one consenting is a fault for looking?
Let's translate that...suggestion tempts others to soil self. Who benefits from others soiling self? Those who sell toilets. Why sell a functional toilet, instead of keep advertising others to soil self?
Any human, except another con artist, understands this.
Standing under (understanding) implies being conned by those above to submit.
saving resources
a) being implies RE (-sponding life) within SOURCE (inception towards death).
b) Others suggest save (to preserve from injury) aka salvationism to distract one from being (life) within harms way (inception towards death). RE cannot SAVE itself within SOURCE...it can only momentarily sustain self as resistance (growth) within velocity (loss).
Or use the shower.
SHOW'ER, noun (Hebrew; to be rough, to shudder) aka inequality, aversion aka being odd (life) within equal (inception towards death) as adverse reaction (resistance within velocity).
Look into why jews resist baby-showers...not calling attention to good things, so as not to bait ayin hara (the evil eye).
"bad" implies a conflict of reason (good vs bad); while "bot" suggests dehumanization (robot).
Conflict implies WAR; dehumanization implies STRIFE; suggesting each implies PESTILENCE, and consenting to either implies DEATH....revealing that which was covered before implies APOCALYPSE.
a) hope implies towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring being within perceivable origin.
b) nature doesn't provide DEFINITE (fixed) it sets each one within "free" (will of choice) into momentum (balance) of motion.
nation/ nationality
Nation implies each one of "a people". Nationality implies many ones consenting to suggested nationalism by a few; which permits a few to shape a many.
ethnicity
In Septuagint: Greek "ta ethne" translates to Hebrew goyim, plural of goy "nation".
race
a) Latin raddix; radius; ray...ones growth outwards aka from center (life) into surrounding (inception towards death). Others suggest one to consent to race-ism, which results in lots of growth-diminishing conflicts.
b) one isn't part of a "race"...one (life) is being raced from start (inception) to finish (death), hence being busy pushing it to the limit (growth) while on the highway to the danger zone (loss).
language
Latin lingua "tongue" aka shaped within perceivable (sound) as suggestible (words). Ones consent to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).
In short...language implies spell-craft, yet it's on oneself to resist the crafted spells of others.
religion
Latin religio - "to bind anew" aka one binding self through consent to the suggestions of another, which in return distracts those bound with the suggested and away from those suggesting it.
Example...suggested "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" tempts those who consent to ignore those who suggest "in nomine" (in the name of).
country
a) nature designates units (Latin unus; one)...others suggest collectivism, which tempts one to COUNT units. The more one counts others, the less one comprehends about one-self.
b) others suggest country (surrounding) and city (center) to distract one from being center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable).
Gentiles fleeing cities into countries permits jews to erect locally at each center, while cutting off their circumference aka circumcision.
citizenship
a) being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...that's the foundation for all water allegories. Each ship needs to steer self; while resisting the want to be commandeered by another.
b) CITIZEN aka inhabitant aka IN (being within) HABITARE (to live) TION (action) aka reaction (life) within action (inception towards death).
The issue...others suggest one to be an inhabitant of a city (center), which when consented to, places those suggesting at the center and oneself into surrounding. Accepting citizenship implies self destabilization.
residency
Wherever one resides; one exists as center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...others tempts one with suggested labels into surrounding, while ignoring ones center position.
Example: Being alive implies residing in-between inception and death...others suggest RESIDENT EVIL to tempt one into a good vs evil conflict, while ignoring EVIL/LIVE.
Also BIOHAZARD aka bio-logical-hazard...logic (reasoning over suggested) represents the hazard within bio (naturally perceivable).
know who YOU are?
The foundation for YOU implies one claiming self as "ME; MYSELF or I"; which in return shapes every other one into a YOU (phonetic jew).
Nature designates units (Latin unus; one) through differentiation of whole into partials...it doesn't brand anything; nor can those within hold onto suggested brands (burned offerings) for very long without ending up as kindling to one another.
Edit: forgot the foundation...WHAT implies energy (internal/inherent power) because what else exists outside of energy?
hate tech
a) hate implies a conflict of reason...love vs hate.
b) reason aka logic implies ones consent to artificial (tech) over natural.
why product is a con
Because only nature produces (all perceivable towards each ones perception), while any technology (reasoning over suggested) represents a CON (a negation; arguing against proposal).
Why fit it, and not separate
Because if one consents to the suggestion of another, then one ignores being separate from one another. Consent fits suggestion...others exploit suggestion to fit ones consent to the suggested.
Look where...
...that represents one suggesting in the name of another; hence perpetuating suggested con onto others. No such thing as bad publicity.
how the fuck does this tech has no regulation or common sense
Because each one senses (perceives) everything (perceivable) by self, unless ignored for suggestions by others, hence falling for common-ism (communism); while getting regulated by the chosen ones suggesting it.
literally design it to break
a) being implies shaped into form by breaking whole (inception towards death) into partials (life).
b) "to" aka towards aka motion generates momentum by breaking itself inherently/internally, which results in being, hence "to be".
c) ignoring perceivable (motion) for suggested (literal definitions aka affixed meaning) tempts one to ignore the aforementioned.
It has become such a joke
a) comedy (life) can only exist within drama (inception towards death)...ignoring this permits others to suggest cruel jokes.
b) JOKE; from joque; juego; jogo; jeu; yek - "to speak"...nature doesn't utter words; it moves sound.
(((they))) decided we were.
a) black and white were suggested by few, and each one of many decided to consent, while ignoring that one cannot perceive white (pure light) or black (absence of light)...only the visible (sensible) spectrum within, hence one being "insence of light".
b) singular (one) consenting to suggested pluralism (we) ignores self for others, hence blocking ones discernment of self; while permitting others control over a monolithic block of ignorant ones.
White implies pure light; black implies absence of light...being implies within visible spectrum of color, hence hue (color) man. Others suggest sides (black vs white) to distract one from being center (spectrum) aka species; special; particular.
open source
Each ones perception implies access to open source (perceivable)...the suggestions by one another tempt one to close self within source.
Look at the fruits of that movement (Ron Paul libertarianism)
Each one of those minds was moved to consent to a suggested -ism, hence ignoring self for another...growth requires ones expression; not repression of self to another.
a) even (inception towards death) generates odds (life).
b) FEL'LOW, noun (Heb. to tie or connect, to be joined or associated) - "one of the same".
Each different one (life) implies of the same (inception towards death); yet ignoring this for the suggestions by one another, can tie/connect/join/associate one with others.
c) DEGREE, noun - "a step; a distinct portion of space of indefinite extent; a space in progression".
Aka distinct (life) within progression of indefinite (inception towards death)..."one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind".
d) REBECCA (Hebrew ribhqeh) - "connection"...the inversion of being one apart from one another.
e) beehive aka BE (apart) HIVE (together).
AI says they're not...
Aka artificial suggestion of nihilism.
IDEN'TIFY, verb (Latin idem, the same)...directly contradicted by listing differences.
a) Pedophile aka PAIDOS (child) PHILOS (loving)...notice that this label doesn't imply the abuse of children. It's like using GAY (merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome) to label sodomites.
It's the idol-worshiper aka those who consent to suggested labels; who permit others to use labels to cover behavior underneath.
b) Christ as anointed one implies one-self being consecrated with oil while going through the birth-channel.
c) CUCK from cukken; kuka; kakka - "to defecate" aka DEFECATE (Latin Dregs) - "to purify from admixture".
RELIGION (Latin religo; to bind anew) tempts one to mix; hence others suggesting abrahamism (father of multitude) to tempt each singular one to mix with one another. Consenting to any suggested religion destroys the singular ones, which for those suggesting religion represents a purification of admixture.
In short...a few utilize suggested religion to purify an ignorant many with the temptation of self destruction.
the life, the truth and the way
Way (inception towards death) moves life...choosing to hold onto suggested truth tempts one to ignore that.
a) form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies disruption aka a rupture of whole into each partial.
Being implies chaos (temporary growth) within order (ongoing loss)...only within order can one shape chaos. It isn't chaos which disrupts order; but order (process of dying) that internally ruptures into chaos (living).
b) ones consent to a suggested -ism, tempts one to ignore HUMAN (Hebrew form; species) within ANIMAL (Latin anima; animation) aka a trans-mutation of form within flow.
Only within motion can form be shaped, hence each shaped form representing a transmutation aka RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by) aka form responding to being presented by flow.
c) immortal implies within (im) subjection to death (mortal) aka being alive. Suggested immortality (ongoing life) tempts one to ignore that mortal implies as temporary form subjected to ongoing flow.
The few trick the many to be afraid of running out of life; when its the ongoing process of dying each temporary life is running back into.
d) technological implies TECHNO (artificial in opposition to natural) LOGIC (reasoning over suggested while ignoring perceivable). It ain't the technology suggested, but ones consent to it that makes it work.
You started you response with YES, which implies both you being inside a conflict of reason (yes vs no) and your consent to something suggested to reason over. You did this to yourself, you are doing it to yourself; and you free "will" of choice it again unless choosing otherwise.
YES implies you falling for logic (reason); which in return shapes whatever I wrote into the techno (artificial). Nature (perceivable) is still there; available even if one chooses to ignore it.
to connect the dots
Natural order (inception towards death) connects the dots (life)...before that the dots are being set apart from one another, hence being sentenced to life until point of death.
Top-3 cultural subversion psyops of all time
a) oneself (1) counting time as past (1) present (2) future (3) instead of change (1). Ones (life) withing change (inception towards death) implies each single unit (Latin unus; one).
b) PSYCHO (animating spirit) LOGICAL (reasoning about suggested) OPERATE (to be in effect) TION (action)....permitting logic in-between psy and op subverts self.
c) consenting to suggested culturalism permits others to cultivate for one.
3d (three dimensional)
a) Each ORTHO (straight) GRAPHIC (described) PROJECT (thrown forwards) can only exist within TION (action), hence within ongoing motion...with ones perspective measuring (dimension) it from within.
b) Ones (1) consent to a description by another one (2) shapes the described into yet another one (3) unit within whole. Singular ones consent to another shapes duality; while the consented to suggestion shapes trinity...each distracting one from self.
The law will...outlaw
Being implies as free will of choice within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ind)...ignoring this for suggested theism (the) permits others to shape rules (laws) for one to follow.
Ignoring in-law (perceivable) shapes out-law (suggested)...the former sustains life within; the latter tempts life out.
we need
Perceivable need sustains perceiving singular (one); suggested pluralism (we) tempts singular to ignore self for others.
a) action (inception towards death) controls reactions (life) aka velocity (ongoing loss) drawing resistance (temporary growth) by force.
b) to believe implies ones consent to the suggestions by another; hence permitting another to control one by force of suggestion.
c) being implies difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
d) voting for representatives diminished KRATOS (strength) of DEMOS (people) into the hands of a chosen few.
e) suggested commonwealth (republic) tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable). The highest value implies evaluation and each one already wields it...others suggest a common wealth to collectivize both consenting evaluation and suggested values into their coffers.
Sound (phonic) makes surrounding (circle; ring) for each instrument within.
SOUND (entire; whole; all) makes SPECIAL (particular aka ones within all). Being special implies being insane (in-sanus; within sound) and person (per sonos; by sound).