Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
I hate bullshit tech (m.youtube.com)
posted 2 years ago by Ep0ch 2 years ago by Ep0ch +7 / -3
10 comments share
10 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

hate tech

a) hate implies a conflict of reason...love vs hate.

b) reason aka logic implies ones consent to artificial (tech) over natural.

why product is a con

Because only nature produces (all perceivable towards each ones perception), while any technology (reasoning over suggested) represents a CON (a negation; arguing against proposal).

Why fit it, and not separate

Because if one consents to the suggestion of another, then one ignores being separate from one another. Consent fits suggestion...others exploit suggestion to fit ones consent to the suggested.

Look where...

...that represents one suggesting in the name of another; hence perpetuating suggested con onto others. No such thing as bad publicity.

how the fuck does this tech has no regulation or common sense

Because each one senses (perceives) everything (perceivable) by self, unless ignored for suggestions by others, hence falling for common-ism (communism); while getting regulated by the chosen ones suggesting it.

literally design it to break

a) being implies shaped into form by breaking whole (inception towards death) into partials (life).

b) "to" aka towards aka motion generates momentum by breaking itself inherently/internally, which results in being, hence "to be".

c) ignoring perceivable (motion) for suggested (literal definitions aka affixed meaning) tempts one to ignore the aforementioned.

It has become such a joke

a) comedy (life) can only exist within drama (inception towards death)...ignoring this permits others to suggest cruel jokes.

b) JOKE; from joque; juego; jogo; jeu; yek - "to speak"...nature doesn't utter words; it moves sound.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Ep0ch [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

It's a toilet. Not grammar therapy. It would've been humor if you could laugh. You can't you just make dumber products. No understanding.

Look where that nozzle is. It's right there where a human pisses and shits. If you've defecated on it where is that spraying. The seat breaks by sitting on it. It pisses everywhere look. They compensated by raising it off the floor. Imagine the puddle under it. Disgusting. Imagine cleaning it. Gross.

Any human, except another con artist, understands this. And regulator shouldn't import them. Rejected saving this planet its resources. It then blames on cows. No it's Tech. Get rid of fucking stupid renditions.

The bidet was perfect already. Or use the shower.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

It's a toilet.

  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/toilet
  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lavatory
  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bog
  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/outhouse
  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/privy

Neither definition describes anything related to alvine discharge (excrement)...why is that? What word was used in 1828 to describe such a place and why was it changed?

not grammar therapy

All suggested words (spell-craft) imply grimoire/grammar (incantation); which distracts one from Greek THERAPEIA (curing; healing; servicing) self within perceivable.

You can't you just make dumber products

a) nature produces everything within...the more those within ignore that; the less quality the produce has.

b) DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking"...nature doesn't utter suggested words (speak); it moves perceivable sound. If nature (whole) implies dumb; then those within (partials) imply dumber.

Look where that nozzle is. It's right there where a human pisses and shits...It pisses everywhere look.

Why would one look at the suggestion of that? How funny is it to suggest others to look at such? Who but the one consenting is a fault for looking?

Let's translate that...suggestion tempts others to soil self. Who benefits from others soiling self? Those who sell toilets. Why sell a functional toilet, instead of keep advertising others to soil self?

Any human, except another con artist, understands this.

Standing under (understanding) implies being conned by those above to submit.

saving resources

a) being implies RE (-sponding life) within SOURCE (inception towards death).

b) Others suggest save (to preserve from injury) aka salvationism to distract one from being (life) within harms way (inception towards death). RE cannot SAVE itself within SOURCE...it can only momentarily sustain self as resistance (growth) within velocity (loss).

Or use the shower.

SHOW'ER, noun (Hebrew; to be rough, to shudder) aka inequality, aversion aka being odd (life) within equal (inception towards death) as adverse reaction (resistance within velocity).

Look into why jews resist baby-showers...not calling attention to good things, so as not to bait ayin hara (the evil eye).

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy