wicked ways
WICKED, adjective (to depart, to fall away)...being implies partial (life) within whole (inception towards death) aka wicked within way.
a) after wasting ones resistance within all those fictitious competitions with others (reasoning)...has one ever really LIVED/DEVIL? Turn around to see origin (perceivable) or keep looking forwards (suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.
b) DEVIL, noun (Latin , to calumniate) - "to accuse; to slander"...suggested information (fiction) slanders perceivable inspiration (reality) if one consents to it.
c) DETAIL, verb - "to relate, report or narrate in particulars"...whole (inception towards death) relates particulars (life). Therefore...the devil is in the details.
conflict is a telling line in the sand
a) inception towards death implies the only line for those living within, and whatever those within choose to hold onto implies sand, hence "sand running through fingers" allegory.
b) a tell/tale implies uttered words suggested to one another, which tempt one to ignore perceivable sound aka the ongoing line for each temporary construct shaped within.
Therefore; holding onto a word (truth) will run like sand through ones fingers (lie)...alchemical decomposition.
c) consenting (want or not want) to anything suggested, shapes a conflict of reason (want versus not want) among all those who consented, while permitting those who suggest control over both sides of every conflict.
Utilizing suggestion to tempt consent implies "taking the high-ground" aka consent (slave) submitting to suggestion (master).
seeking knowledge
a) seeking implies towards suggested outcomes; knowing implies in response (perception) to origin (perceivable).
b) nature doesn't suggest outcomes, it enforces ones adaptation (life) within origin (inception towards death).
There really is only good and evil and nothing in-between. Dualism is also the trademark of the occult world
a) ONLY, adjective - "single; one along; this and no other"
b) good AND evil contradicts "only"...there can be only one.
c) ones consent to suggested moralism establishes the good vs bad conflict of reason aka dualism.
d) ONEs consent to another ONEs suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable for suggested, hence keeping perceivable hidden (occult) from ones perception.
Looks like a false dichotomy
- In nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti
"in nomine" (in the name of) implies ones consent to the suggestion of another...that's the dichotomy (division into two classes).
"patris et filii et spiritus sancti"...that's the suggested, which those consenting ignore those suggesting it for.
In short...consenting to suggested implies dichotomy; the suggested implies distraction from dichotomy.
only two choices
a) reason/logic implies wanting vs not wanting suggested...two choices.
b) being implies each ones free will of choice.
c) suggested dualism (two) contradicts perceivable units (only)...there can be only one.
choice one (worship) or choice two (worship)
Worship implies one willingly submitting to another one, hence permitting another to define worth (wor) for ones living vessel (ship) within fluid (process of dying).
In reality...value (perceivable) generates evaluation (perception).
Constitutional
Constitute (to set into order)...only motion sets (life) into order (inception towards death).
rights
a) one can only exist in-between left/right...others suggest sides to distract one from being center.
b) RIGHT (Latin rectus; straight)...only within straight (inception towards death) can one curve (life). Curving; bending within motion implies decompression...
abstract
ABSTRACT', verb (Latin abstraho, to draw from or separate)...suggested (fiction) draws from perceivable (reality); ones consent to suggested separates one from perceivable through ignorance.
What do you imply by freedom
"Free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (life) within dominance (inception towards death).
Only within dominance (ongoing loss) can one be free (temporary growth); only within balance can there be choice.
There isn't an answer to that question.
Suggested answers and suggested questions tempt one to ignore being (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death).
break apart and rejoin
a) If being alive implies broken apart; then one needs to resist rejoining.
b) notice that a many are "joined" under control of a few who remain "apart".
c) JOIN, verb (Latin jungo; jugo; yoke) + YOKE, noun - "a mark of servitude; slavery; bondage".
a phrase that means
a) PHRASE, noun (Greek to speak) aka PHARISEES utilizing spell-craft...suggested words over perceivable sound.
b) ME'ANING, noun - "a settled aim or purpose, though not directly expressed"...now consider being directly (inception towards death) expressed (life).
What if others build settlements (settled minds) by tempting one to hold onto suggested information, while ignoring impressing (perceivable inspiration)?
the process of alchemy
a) synthesis (inception towards death) generates analysis (life). Being analysis implies RE (responding to) SOLVE (being solved by).
Being able to grow comprehension within perceivable implies "analysis"...consenting to the suggestions of others implies "synthesis".
Synthesis (loss) destroys analysis (growth)...if not resisted.
b) suggested theism (the) tempts one to ignore perceivable process, hence being (life) within procession (inception towards death).
c) alchemy aka AL (whole) CH'EMY (partials) aka AL (order) CH (chaos) EMY (emission) aka order (inception toward death) sending forth chaos (life).
simpler than that.
All implies one in energy.
a) nature doesn't propose; it offers everything perceivable to each ones perception; while forcing adaptation.
b) others utilize proposal (suggested information) to tempt one to ignore offer (perceivable inspiration). Ones consent permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the proposed within the ignored offer.
c) others suggest "doctor" (docked oar) to distract one from discerning self as vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death); hence in need to steer by free will of choice within dominance of balance (momentum of motion).
Pharmakeia is utilized as spell-craft (craft suggested words within perceivable sound); drugs (to dry out form within flow), and medicine (to medicate/taint minds).
So kill whites ok?
a) being implies in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light)...only those living in-between a white/black spectrum can be killed.
b) others suggest conformism to tempt one to seek confirmation (ok) from others.
Criticize jews not ok.
a) CRITIC, noun (Greek; a judge or discerner, to judge, to separate, to distinguish. See Crime)..."everyone is a critic" aka crime (life) within natural law (inception towards death) aka partial separated within whole aka perception being able to grow discernment within perceivable aka judge (choice) within justice (balance).
b) others suggest nihilism (not) to tempt one to ignore that perceivable cannot be denied; only ignored.
using extralegal
EXTRA (beyond) LEGAL (law)...there's natural law and everyone in it. Others suggest extralegal rules to tempt one to ignore natural law. Ones consent permits others to rule with extralegal means.
what needs to happen for the line to be drawn?
Being implies within a life-line (inception towards death), hence as a drawn life-sentence needing to resist origin...others suggest HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" to tempt one to ignore perceivable origin for gambling about suggested outcomes, hence "taking chances".
a) others suggest terrorism; radicalism and leftism, and if ones consents (want or not want); then one becomes terrorist; radicalist and leftist.
b) -ist implies consents to suggested -ism. Few suggest all -isms; to gain permission by consent of many, to brand many as -ists.
What if...is wrong
Right vs wrong (reason) contradicts if/then (implication)...if many reason; then few can exploit mass ignorance of implication.
Solve et Coagula.
Aka Solve (inception towards death) et Coagula (life) aka solvent (fluid) eats coagulate (solid).
The world will never be the same again
a) THE (suggested theism) WORLD (vault)...ones consent to the suggestions of others puts one into a vault of ignorance aka "the silent vaults of death, unknown to light".
b) being implies difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death)...others utilize suggested collectivism to tempt the many into the same vault of ignorance; while ignoring perceivable differences.
Expect the current thing
Waiting for it distracts from being thing (life) within current (inception towards death).
Being implies within momentum (moment) of motion (current)...ignoring this permits others to exploit it by suggesting "new" things "for-getting"...yet, whenever those in ignorance believe they got something; others keep taking it.
Sleight of hand: "Oops, I did it again...I played with your heart....Got lost in the game"
It sounds like she's...
a) jewish
b) She? Nah! Look at the continues effort to paint the picture of a strong woman... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4W6JHTCL.png
martial arts
a) MARTIAL (mortal; subjected to death) ART (artificial; in opposition to natural).
b) being implies defense (temporary growth) within offense (ongoing loss)...others suggest martial arts to tempt growth to fight each other instead of resisting loss.
The left vs right paradigm is a system of control...
...implemented by ones consent to a suggestion, within ones mind/memory, as "reason/logic".
MKUltra...
...was preceded by Project Artichoke aka choking on projected artifice; which implies oneself choking one the suggested information by others, when consenting to hold onto it.
Edit: Why choking? Because ones perception exits within the flow of perceivable (inspiration), and so choosing to hold onto suggested (information) implies a choke-hold.
CHOKE, verb - "to stop the passage of the breath", hence preventing inspiration aka IN (being within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) ATION (action).
The agentur of the illuminati owns
a) action (inception towards death) illuminates reactions (life)...hence; "spark of life".
b) others suggest the-ism to tempt one to consent to being owned by others.
all media
Each ones perception represents medium (Latin medius; middle) within all perceivable.
tech...influencer
Suggested tech aka techno-logy (artifice-reason) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (flow) moves ones perception (form). Influence implies being (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
Nazi ISIS
Aka ashke-Nazi Israels' Secret Intelligence Service
a) resisting suggested, while adapting to perceivable, grows ones resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
b) ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested; shapes a conflict of reason (want vs not want), while permitting those suggesting it to rebrand it at will, like into for example....winning (want) vs losing (not want).