God is the creator...We exist in God
a) Being within implies transformation; transmutation; transaction...suggested creationism tempts one to ignore/deny that.
CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist."
b) Label whole (God) as partials within implies ignoring/denying the transformation; transmutation; transaction; differentiation aka the setting apart of whole into partials internally.
LA'BEL, noun - "annexed to a will by way of addition; as a codicil; a writing by way of supplement to a will"...partial cannot supplement whole without ignoring that being partial implies yielding (supple) mind (ment) to whole.
tl; dr...label implies libel
a) Yes or no aka confirm or deny aka want or not want...what about need?
b) Is being a question or an answer... a quest towards a goal or a fulfillment of an origin?
Poor...doesn't
Poor vs rich + does vs doesn't implies reasoning over the suggestions by another...a conflict established by oneself and wielded against others.
know if his own
Knowledge can't be owned...if ones tries to hold onto it; then one gets owned by others.
pumps
If action (inception towards death) pumps; then reaction (life)...? How would you name the process of inflation (inception) and deflation (death) simultaneously within one body? Is it "pump up the jam" or "push it real good"?
offspring to pay support
Support aka SUB (under) PORTARE (to carry) aka parent carrying child to labor. The foundation for that implies support (inception towards death) generating off-spring (life). Notice that support becomes burden for off-spring...hence parent carrying child to labor becoming child laboring to carry parent.
It's "to pay" which corrupts ones mind (pay-ment) to give what is due for goods or services onto others, while ignoring the sustenance of self through one another.
a) Nuclear aka NUER (to shade) NUE (cloud) + CLEAR (transparent; allowing light to pass through; free from impurities)...
Consider shades (life) within light (inception towards death) aka matter within motion.
b) A nucleus implies "body about which matter is collected; to be surrounded with light" aka center (perception) within circumference (perceivable); able to collect (suggested).
c) Fake implies "of unknown origin"; being (perception) implies originating from knowledge (perceivable)...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies counterfeit aka imitated aka pretend to be.
Information implies fiat currency within inspiration.
d) "It was my imagination, and in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it." ~Herman Rosenblat...that isn't about a jew lying; but about the status quo of each gentile believing suggested truth.
real power is in the infrastructure
Aka within (in) fractured (fra) structure...aka fractal (perception) within structure of whole (perceivable) aka power of resistance (life) within power of velocity (inception towards death) aka fractured matter within structural motion.
The suggested information by others tempts aggregation of fractions; while ignoring perceivable structure, and ignorance diminishes ones power of resistance.
results in real action
Being implies resulting reaction (life) within real action (inception towards death). A reaction cannot act...only respond to being enacted upon. Motion exists before matter can respond to it.
The point is...
...a suggested end (death) to a perceivable sentence (life).
Time and place and purpose....not just one
Motion (time) generating momentum (place) for matter (purpose)...all for one and one for all.
How to corrupt this? By suggesting time (past; present; future) apart from motion; that place differs from ones position at center of all , and that purpose implies outcome, instead of ones response (matter) to origin (motion).
Everyone is in a group..
EVERY one implies ones consent to suggested pluralism; EACH one implies ones self discernment among others. Every implies the group one is being tricked to be a part of, each implies the nature of being a partial within a whole.
all alternate media seems to be related to one another
A chosen few mediate suggested information to a many, who by free will of choice alternate in-between wanting vs not wanting the suggested.
The relation between consent and suggestion implies a bondage aka restraint of a person's liberty by compulsion aka a vow, promise, oath, contract, or a law.
Either they are in sync through parroting or they are being directed either organically or artificially.
a) Same direction (inception towards death) generates different positions (life)...that's how a synchronous whole differs partials internally.
b) Position (life) within direction (inception towards death) implies resistance within velocity...others suggest one to follow directions towards outcomes, while ignoring to resist origin.
This consensual following of suggested orders/directions implies artificial synchronicity.
All the 'good guys' seem to be once again controlled in some way.
Good implies within a conflict of reason against bad. All these conflicts are controlled by those who suggest what others are reasoning about.
Example...few suggest porn; many consent to want (good) or not want (bad) it. This tempts many against one another within a controlled environment called "reason" aka want vs not want or good vs bad or moral vs immoral or hot vs not etc.
Being for or against suggested implies consenting to suggestion (fiction) over perception (reality), and the resulting fight (reason) is only among those consenting to fiction; not against those suggesting fiction within reality.
I don't want to bash the good
Already happening...do vs don't aka want vs not want aka good vs bad. Three conflicts of reason within one sentence uttered, and you're mentally engaged within all of them simultaneously.
Reasoning implies the bashing of self and others within a suggested ring, and it doesn't matter from what side one bashes at; who one bashes at; why one bashes at, or if one wins or looses...only that one willingly consent to remain within those conflicts of reason, where the many are grinding each others resistance to dust, while the few remain outside the ring...outside of reason (fiction); within implication (reality).
Why are the same celebrities always the source of the information
Because celebrating others tempts one to ignore being within source of inspiration...others suggest "always" to distract one from being (life) within way of all (inception towards death).
Information (suggested words) can only be shaped within inspiration (perceivable sound)...perception implies original; suggestion implies remake. Anything others are suggesting implies sloppy seconds to what nature is offering.
As truth fades; lies can be build upon indefinitely.
One is the choice; others tempt with sides...choosing either imbalances self.
Vanguard pump up the BTC
Mutt (Vanguard) vs Jeff (BlackRock)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_cop%2C_bad_cop
testum or small earthen pot, is derived from test
Derivation implies drawn from source of action...those within tempt each other to draw from reactions (suggestion), while ignoring source (perception).
Suggesting testum or small earthen pot as a vessel tempts others to ignore being matter within vessel (momentum) of motion. Meanwhile; ones consent to a suggestion implies ones submission to another, hence becoming a vassal (a subject; a dependant; a servant).
Made from
Made; make implies "to give being to, give form to, bring into existence"...only inception towards death can make life. Few suggest "Made in China" to distract many from being made within nature. It's about obfuscating the origin for those positioned within.
Another word for ground is property
Property; proper; propre - "one's own, particular to itself"...only within whole (oneness) can there be particulars (ones). Few suggest "own" to tempt many to want to posses, and consenting to such a suggestion puts ones choice into possession of a chosen one.
Property was passed on by a will to do so
Aka ones free will of choice consenting (buy) to the suggestion (sell) by the free will of choice of another aka falling for the happy merchant of temptation, while selling oneself out when buying into his schemes.
Others suggest a "will" to tempt one to ignore being free "will" of choice. Using ones choice to sign a will implies ones ignorance of self and willing submission to another.
called a 'will'
Nature doesn't call ones free will of choice...it forces adaptation. Others within nature "cry out; call for, summon, invoke; ask for, demand, order; give a name to, apply by way of designation" to tempt one to ignore adaptation by ones choice by abdication to a chosen ones will.
testor as owner/willer of the property/foundation.
Action (inception towards death) cannot be owned by the reactions (life) within...ignoring this permits others ownership over each ignorant sellout.
Words by relation.
RELA'TE, verb (Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce)...only nature produces (bring forward); those within need to resist (life) forwards momentum (inception towards death).
All suggested words tempt one to follow by consent.
Testi-mony is a foundation of principle.
Only motion implies foundation of principle (beginning) aka inception of matter. Whatever matter declares to each other by suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable foundation.
To establish the 'ground' of a principle...
Implies others suggesting information as principles to tempt ones consent to hold onto it within ones mind/memory aka "establish-ment"...suggestions by another established within ones mind by consent.
a 'test' is thereby given
Only nature gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...those within suggest tests to tempt one to TAKE them. Taking from another gives self (life) away (inception towards death).
ones' own foundation
Ones (living) foundation (process of dying)...how could one own it, while living in it/dying by it?
Compare an infant coming in and an elderly going out...then notice the lack of owned possessions. The many represent the living Gollum in-between; desperately holding onto matter (my precious), while ignoring motion.
Guess who suggests the ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; a circle; a kikel; a kike...
warning
Aka caution (life) within danger (inception towards death)...looking for warning signs by others tempts one to ignore self sustenance, which few exploit by plastering warning labels everywhere.
Choices
Aka suggested pluralism tempting one to ignore ones singular free will of choice.
arrived in the era
Era implies a fixed point in time...ones arrival (inception) as matter (life) implies into momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
a) Author implies singular (chosen one); readers imply common (each ones choice to ignore self for another).
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes the bond, that permits others to twist (thread) many ones together.
Biggest example...few weaving a world wide web to entangle many into endless threads of contention; argumentation aka conflicts of reason.
everyone...to the concentration camp.
a) CON (together) CENTRA (center within circumference; hence apart) TION (ation).
b) Being implies center (life) of action (inception towards death), hence living apart from one another...few CON (connect) many together.
c) Everyone implies suggested pluralism; each one implies perceivable singular.
Using the word "everyone" implies ignoring singular for a plural aggregation, hence establishing a connection; like RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) between ones consent and another ones suggestion.
Progress requires Chaos
a) Progress implies natural order (inception towards death) for disorder (life) within.
b) Requirement implies mind (ment) responding (re) to a question (quire) suggested by another, which tempts one to seek outcomes, hence progressing along faster within origin.
c) Others suggest chaos (orderless confusion) as the inversion of disorder (divided order). Why? So that few can fuse (fusion) many together (con).
Controlled Opposition
Opposition implies position (life) in front of (inception towards death); hence being moved by. Ignoring this by consenting to stand under the suggestions by another tempts one against others within conflicts of reason, while giving those suggesting control over both sides.
Why control? Because conflict against, while being moved by implies rolling (trol) together (con).
a founder needs only to listen to the community.
a) Foundation implies basis of an edifice; community implies aggregate upon the basis of an edifice...being implies edifice (life) within basis (inception towards death).
Aggregation isn't needed; it's wanted, hence tempting edifice to overburden self within basis.
b) LIST, verb - "to enlist; to lean or incline to a side; to desire"...aka ones choice to want (suggested); while ignoring need (perceivable).
LIST'EN, verb - "to obey; to yield to advice; to follow admonition; to attend"...hear/ear implies center of perceivable sound; which inspires resistance aka shelter from noise; not submission to suggested directions by others.
a) Initiation from above; degrees from below.
b) Suggesting in the name of foundation (founder) that others should climb to reach, will amass upon foundation a pile of those falling over each other climbing.
c) GAB - "to talk much; loquacity" aka babble/babel aka building those towers of confusion (babel) with idle chatter (babble) until they collapse upon foundation.
Foundation (mishnah) for towers (gemara) aka perceivable foundation (inspiration) for suggested towers (information) aka building (solid) while ignoring foundation (liquid).
Anyway...Fee for Vieh (German cattle).
Your probably right
That implies a right vs wrong conflict of reason; established by ones consent to suggested information.
NWO ideology
Consenting to suggested idealism and then reasoning (logic) about it; tempts one to ignore that there can be only one natural order aka one vault/world for each one within, and being within implies "now"...not "new".
destroy the current world order
Current (inception towards death) implies natural order for those being (life) destroyed within.
Nothing has changed
What if nothing implies ones denial of everything changing?
Form implies apart from one another; unless holding onto other form...the former is what you are, the latter what others suggest you to do.
If you seek something to agree with; to believe in; to consent to; to confirm as truth etc. then you are choosing to hold onto suggested in-FORM-ation.
Hence the struggle to communicate hidden knowledge to those hiding from it...
Emasculation in Society
Social implies "aggregated body"; hence many held together by each ones spend resistance...that's what weakens aka deprives of masculine strength aka emasculates oneself.
what defines a man
Define implies affixed...male (motion) through female (momentum) into trans-form (matter) implies ongoing. Ones consent to a suggested definition (deaf phonetician) tempts one to hold onto it; hence affixing it within ones mind, while ignoring perceivable motion (phonetician; phonics; sound).
many mentors...
...yet only ones mind/memory.
size of a man
All moves (male); its momentum (female) implies the vault/world for each transformed matter within...the size of each implies one.
Sizing others tempts one to ignore self.
They want...
Few distract from perceivable need by suggesting many what they want or not want....for example suggested pluralism (they); tempting perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
puts truth above emotions
Emotion implies "to move from"...holding up truth, while being (life) within motion (inception towards death) makes it harder for one to resist being moved.
Others suggest information (truth) and contradiction (lies) to tempt one to ignore inspiration (change) for desperately holding onto information, while fighting others within conflicts of reason over contradictions.
Instead of putting anything above...try rising (life) while falling (inception towards death).
I do not consent
Not implies nothing (Latin nihilo) aka suggested nihilism by others and ones consent to denial perceivable for it.
corporations raping the world
a) Corpus oration aka the language of death...life (perceivable sound) or death (suggested words).
b) RAPE, noun (Latin rapio, raptus; rap) - "a seizing and carrying away by force"...inception towards death implies being carried away within force; seizing anything implies ones free will of choice to want (hold onto) over need (letting go).
TEST; noun (Latin testor) - "to make a will"...taking a suggested test tempts one to ignore ones free will of choice.
It's the jews tho...