Religion/religio - "to bind anew"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/religion
How can there be free-dom within bondage?
forced people to worship or threw them in the fire, so at least we're not there, yet
Amazon KINDLE FIRE...
Believing in government (control of mind) implies ones election to select others in charge over one.
As for support...flow (inception towards death) supports form (life). Trying to support each other destabilizes one. The strength of form isn't about how much form is accumulated together, but about how much each form resists the temptation of flow to bring back together.
Kamala Harris
Harris (that which is higher) and Lewis (that which is lower) + Kamala/Kabballah... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris#/media/File:Kamala_Harris_in_Selma_-_2018.jpg
What's in-between harris (higher) and lewis (lower)? The red tie...
As for her middle-name...DEVI (L)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Kali#etymonline_v_1770
the economy is already dead
Eco/oikos (habitation) + nomy/nem (to take)...if one (life) tries to take ones habitation (inception towards death) then one dies quicker.
Holding onto current/currency drowns one faster...
until the election
UNTIL implies your electing choice to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcome...hence waiting until.
Few trick many to think just like that when waiting until...the paycheck; the holiday season; the weekend; the electronic benefits transfer; the weather changing; halftime; Mr or Mrs right showing up; two more weeks; better times; apocalypse; salvation; the return of something etc.
It's simply about tricking life to play the waiting game instead of living...and it works effortlessly; especially with suggested fear/hope.
I bet
Again towards outcome while ignoring origin.
extend for now
That implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion; struggling to sustain self by resisting temptations...that's the only way to extend life now.
never add any value
a) Nature implies all value perceivable, the inception of each ones perception within implies added evaluation...the suggested values by others tempt one to devalue self. Only nature offers value.
I don't try to add value...I write about the origin of value (all perceivable) added (ones perception).
b) Nature allows each one within to draw from value (perceivable inspiration) or devalue self by holding onto suggested information.
c) If you respond to a comment linking one and a half decade of Mark Passio material with "you never add any value to any of the things you comment on"...then you try to insult all his listeners...the very thing you blamed him for.
Many common people (demos) voting establishes the strength (kratos) of representative few.
The math... minus choice of many equals plus choice of few.
a) If you're offended, then you took an offer willingly...
b) Mark Passio explains again and again to his listeners that "What on Earth is happening" starts at episode one...at the beginning. His "insult schtick" aims at each one of those listeners, who for over fourteen years ignore to listen from the beginning.
theological property
Theism (theo) and logism (logi) imply proposed suggestions...ones consent to a proposition by another tempts one to ignore property/properte/proprius - "ones own".
Ones consent to another ones suggestion shirks property (ones choice) to another (chosen one), while putting self into poverty.
jews believe
Be (being) + lieve/lief/leubh (to care; desire; love) implies a being holding onto a wanted suggestion from another, while ignoring the need to let go within perceivable, which burdens one.
This burden of belief is carried by gentiles, while each jew suggests the burdens for gentiles to willingly take upon self.
a) A bot test for many by few...voting.
b) MOGA aka make ophthalmology great again
You can tell by an examination of the photos
Photo/phōs - "light". Ones sight within perceivable light implies "affirmative"...few suggest photos from a "negative" to invert the perception of many.
Tricking many to reason against each other over photographic evidence...based on the inversion of light and the ignorance of videre (to see)...implies photology (light discourse), which keeps those participating in the dark.
it's all too easy to accept or reject the evidence of your own eyes when someone else has told you what you're seeing
Indeed, hence few tricking many to focus on photos (negated light); pictures (captured moments) and film (moving pictures).
a) Suggesting any -ism tempts consent, which cultivates ignorance of perceivable...if consented to.
b) Sceptic/spek - "to observe; hold onto" tempts one to ignore that agency/action/ag - "motion" cannot be held onto.
c) A challenger aka a claimant implies ones choice to claim (consent) from another (suggested); while ignoring that nature (perceivable) cannot be claimed aka held onto, since it moves.
d) Pseudo (suggested information) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable inspiration).
ethical skepticism vs pseudo skepticism
Both sides consent to the same suggested -ism, hence fighting each other from different sides of the same deception. These conflicts are called "logic/reason".
ZERO Arab leaders have done more than aw shucks.
Arab/arabha - "desert" aka "to abandon"...
"I followed arab leaders and they abandoned me...forsaken deserters"
a) Being (life) withIN FLUID (inception towards death) requires ones resistance...leading or following others tempts one to ignore that.
b) Fame/fama/bha - "to speak" implies shaping of artifice (words) within natural (sound)...holding onto artifice during natural movement tempts one to fall vertically aka to drop down.
c) Certain (inception towards death) generates sudden (life)...few suggested "sudden death" to tempt many to live uncertain.
favorite deceiver
a) De- ceive/capere/kap - "to take"...it's the viewers who take the narration given.
b) Narrate/narrare/gno - "to know" implies ones perception...not the suggestions by others. Those others suggest favoritism to distract one from self discernment.
gatekeeper
Free will of choice implies the key...choosing to keep anything locks oneself in. Ones consent implies the gate for the suggested information by others to keep.
others
If one focuses on another...no matter which one...then one narrows ones sight (perception) to what another shows (suggestion).
the final answer is whatever I need it to be
Being implies within need, suggested answers tempt one to ignore perceivable solution, and only during an ongoing process can a being come to be (life) in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
A jew adapts to solution; while tempting gentiles onto the quest for answers.
fundamental theorem
Only during fundamental (perceivable) can a theorem (suggested) be shaped...consenting to the latter tempts one to ignore former.
jewish math
- MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/math
A jew suggests math to mow down consenting gentiles for harvest, hence harvest/harvard mathematics...
In nature there can be only one...ones addition (inception); ones subtraction (death); ones multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and ones division (being one within all). Notice that neither requires one to count others...
why I was banned from Wheel of Fortune
a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "whole; entire"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound
Sound (whole) differentiates (partials); a jew suggests gentiles to consent "alike"...free will of choice has to be different to remain free.
b) You (phonetic jew). If one claims self as "me; myself or I", then one brands every other one as "you/jew"...that's what a so called jew utilizes to hide behind.
Adapting to sound implies PHONETICIAN (phonic; sound); consenting to words implies DEAF PHONETICIAN aka "definition"....that's one foundation of spell-craft aka of hiding sound underneath words.
tl; dr...instead of trying to label another, try discerning for self if what I'm writing about contradicts itself? Where am I lying; deceiving; misleading, or even attempting to get others to agree with me?
The propositions are boolean
a) Booleanism tempts ONE to consent to another ONEs suggestion, hence establishing a DUAL conflict of reason...that's where the "only two possible values" originate from.
b) In nature there can be only one value...motion, hence motion proposing momentum (inception towards death) for evaluation by matter (life).
From a christian perspective...only God proposes. George Boole proposed a suggestion (Satan), which tempts one to ignore perceivable (God)...one deceives self by consenting to ignore "you shall have no other gods before me".
which in logic means
a) Logic/logos - "word" implies suggested word tempting one to ignore perceivable sound. That's the foundation for idolatry...if one consents to hold onto the suggested meaning of words.
b) Shaping words within sound implies "spell-craft", which tempts those who consent into conflicts of reason aka logomachy (word magic) - "war of words"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Logomachy
either be true or false, but nothing else
a) True (wanting suggested) or false (not wanting suggested) ignores change (perceivable need).
b) If being alive is "true", then does changing into death makes being "false"?
What if being (life) can only exist within constant change (inception towards death)? Only within process of dying can life come to be aka springing off (offspring)...true vs false reasoning tempts one to ignore CHANGE, verb - "to cause to turn or pass from one state to another; to alter, or make different; to vary in external form, or in essence"
Holding onto a side (true of false) tempts one to ignore alternation. Reason/logic tempts alternating beings into static behavior, hence many becoming statistics for few.
c) How could nothing be? Is nothing true or false? Else/alius/alias/alien - "another"...how could another be nothing?
Creating a dialectic
a) Creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore transformation (within everything)...only within everything perceivable can ones perception be transformed.
Consenting to suggested creationism tempts one to de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) everything perceivable.
Right now...try to create anything suggestible without shaping it out of; within and in response to everything already perceivable. One cannot perceive creation, because everything perceivable had to be there for one to be able to perceive.
b) Dialect aka dia (two) legere (to speak)...who's the ONE speaking?
Can you show me TWO in nature without each ONE of whatever you're showing being apart from ONE another? Where does nature suggest one to count?
Notice that nature doesn't speak aka it doesn't articulate (word) natural (sound)...it moves sound within which artifice can be shaped.
there even is a center
Even (balance) generates odd centers (choice)...one can only wield choice within balance, and only within motion can there be balance (momentum) for choice (matter).
a jewish mind trick
The suggested label "jew" tempts one to mentally hold onto it, which in return tricks one to brand perceivable (sound) with suggested (word).
Trick/trigger/trekken - "to pull"...consent pulls suggestion into self deception, hence the happy merchant of temptation pushing suggestions.
Reading made Don Quixote a gentleman; but believing what he read made him mad...
I say yes...he says no
This implies a conflict of reason (yes vs no)...centered around conflict. A side cannot overcome its center, but sides fighting each other can be tricked to ignore center.
a) Plastic/plassein/plasma/pele - "to shape; mold; spread"...that implies the status quo of matter.
b) Father of the Plastics Industry...Leo (lion) Hendrik Baekeland (land of beacons); married to Céline Swarts (schwarz).
opposed to the WILL OF GOD
God implies need; will implies want...each one within God implies free WILL of choice, and many are tricked into opposing each other within conflicts of reason about suggestions by few.
diametrical
Dia/duo/dwo (two) + metric/meter/me (to measure)...ones consent to another ones suggestion implies measuring two aka dual-ism.
unfavourable sense
a) Favor implies negotiation by suggestion, which tempts one to ignore perception by sense.
b) Nature enables ones choice; choosing to favor another unfavors ones choice.
reign of evil
Reign/reg (move in a straight line) implies linear; good vs evil implies circular...few tempt one into circular reasoning, while ignoring being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death).
constitute the reign
Linear movement (inception towards death) sets each one within (life) apart from one another...few suggest many to stand (statuere) together (con) as the inversion thereof.
Prince of This World
King (motion) generates queen (momentum); which trans-forms into prince/princess (matter).
Few suggest Hebrew satan - "adversary, one who plots against another, oppose" to trick matter of many against each other.
everything is just trade
Everything (all perceivable) was offered for free (ones perception)...trading suggested for the price of consent makes one a trader/traitor/tradere - "to hand over" aka one who manually shirks response-ability (free will of choice) onto another (((chosen one))).
for the oldest
Forwards implies motion; young/old implies matter ignoring motion for trying to affix age/aiw - "life force". Holding onto, while being moved, drains ones life force.
multi-generational
One generator (inception towards death) for each one reactor (life)...multi/many implies willing slaves, selecting a chosen one as master among few.
Few cultivate many (suggested multiculturalism) to ignore RE (life) GENERATION (inception towards death).
everything is occult
Everything (all perceivable) reveals each thing (ones perception)...ignoring this for suggested occult/occulere (concealment aka concealing mind) covers ones perception.
Suggested IS hides all that WAS perceivable...if one consents to it.
defined magick as “the science and art of causing change to occur in conformity with the will”
a) Science/scio - "to know/to perceive" implies natural...to suggest implies artificial.
b) Ignoring perceivable (causing change) by consenting (conform with the will) to suggested (art) establishes an occurrence (meeting in argument) aka a conflict of reason among consenting many over suggestions by few.
c) Causing change implies motion...being (life) affected by change (inception towards death) implies matter.
d) Magic/magh - "to be able; have power" implies ones free will of choice being able to empower the suggestions by another, while ignoring to be (matter) enabled through balance (momentum) of motion.
e) Definition aka definite (affixed) + action/ion (moving) implies a contradiction in terms...suggesting this implies magic; consenting to it implies black-magic, hence disabling ones power through willing ignorance, while empowering others to cast shadows upon ones discernment.
a) Perceivable sound implies silence; suggested speech breaks that silence, and it's the quiet being, which utilizes its weapon of choice to speak out loud, within conflicts of reason against each other, about suggested words.
b) A being can only matter (life) within motion (inception towards death)...sound implies that motion, and holding onto words tempts a being to ignore it.