What sanctions? Europe no Russian gas. Serves American interests. American exports its gas. It wanted sanctions on Nord Stream 2 anyway, to sell gas.
If the EU block fails, American interests profit. It picks up how much direct trade to each individual nation. Although Nato insures it doesn't fail any alliance. But why would the bloc fail? It could collapse and it would still be Europe. Until members actually left the bloc, it's still the EU. And 10 seconds later they'd be allied again relying on trade and finance and adopting laws and movement. But even if Europe collapsed that isn't Nato.
You misunderstood that much.
Dark winter is by design and it ain't even Russian. Russia are just easier to blame for all of it. You buy propaganda like a good soldier. Some big huge check move at the West. While Ukraine is doing what. Because you have too. Russia are a prop, and has a stake in all of it. It has gas. But it doesn't mean much if Europe turned it off. They literally did. Sanction Russia, Europe did that. Russia then goes they won't. Yawn. Who did what? Why? Not fucking how.
Who is pulling the strings? Why. Why then. Like freaking clockwork. There's the climate. There's the EV. But how can they stop the gas. I mean. It was just an accident right. Because that's convenient. No sooner has it all but stopped. Like magic. What? No wait. Russia did that?
They need somebody to blame. Then the peasants paying more think the gas is off. But it's still going to the EV factories, or whatever other bullshit they want to claim they're not using gas for. Meanwhile electricity rockets from all those costs and investment. Easy. Look how quick the EV has been forced. And it's all Russia's fault.
But you wanted it to collapse so you could. Hahaha. Sell EVs?
Makes no difference to the fact it does. Despite of its hegemony or power.
Easier to shout it doesn't, despite of the absolute fact that it does, and more than almost anybody else on this Planet. Whether reluctant or vassal or compliant. It makes no difference to that status of being aligned and allied.
Tedious proposal shouting the USA is not the foremost global superpower because it has no friends.
Dream on. No need to read. I have heard most musings about it, and the complaints there in.
I think this link is nonsense. But not the story. Mayans in the Americas go back a long time. Does it mean aliens? Or just survivors.
Imagine there is a World ending event? But Mickey Mouse, not quite today, probably Spiderman, or Antman, is what the lost tribe of children remember, but they can't watch Disney anymore. How would they remember it. Next Mickey I meant the blessed Antman becomes a god. The children remembered of the time before, and the children's children went to bed listening to the stories. Next they're saying prayers and carving little statues. Before you know it, Antman saved them from god forbid.
No. Not literally bug men. Nickname. Associated with an animal because it's about the only thing that the tribal can do when drawing comparisons. Like all North American tribes.
The qualities of the ant are its hive, dedicated chambers, cities. Using workers, soldiers, and a ruler, the queen, or etc. Why antenna? Mandibles are a greater characteristic, so its butt, and the numerous legs, crawling. Were they literal. No. Apart from in the way they colonised. Look at the Aztecs. Big ziggurat, and looking down from any height, are a bunch of? Aztec food production was done how. Incas are steppe farmers some of the absolute best in the World.
Interesting they survived cataclysm underground and Hopi came from a City?
Hopi were a splinter tribe of a colonised America. Mayans wiped out in the Cataclysm. Evidence goes back to a long time. New evidence shows directly into the younger dryas.
Russia just aligned Nato interests. Into a United front against a common foe. Solidifying Nato per say. But it has massively put pressure on the bloc, no gas. NATO still has gas.
There is far more Nato spending than in history, currently. It serves what masters. Not the EU. Defenses treaties which go outside of the bloc. American, British, etc etc. It has non member heads the UK is top of it currently, but this changes around. It has budgets and trade away from Europe, American, and British arms, etc.
The EU bloc however strains over its bullshit. Not completely, but it's not as united. Plenty of individual nations in it thinking WTF at certain policies, movement, trade, laws. Plenty of citizens. But unless a bigger collapse becomes worse, it's not something that Europe won't manage. Besides it would faster become the EU again anyway all of 5 minutes later if it did collapse. It still trades, moves, and etc.
USA interests move around Europe through NATO. You have this big defense budget where are they buying this and that and this from. No sooner a heap of other goods and services.
Europe ain't powerless either, despite the bloc perhaps being problematic. It is as individual nations, you're trading invidually not with who somebody else says you cannot. The EU's biggest problem is often that, a dumb law, means they're all adopting it, same with trade. Germany doesn't want it, Poland doesn't get it. Etc. Nato operates outside of this to extents and reasons. But it's far more interlinked than you can imagine.
Dream on America has no allies, just the majority of the globe.
But we are both speculating on what occurs.
Russia cannot lose at Home. If it does. It loses far more. If it withdraws it loses. It won't at Home. So this will play out for much longer. In the meantime collapse is happening. It means what today? War is often far more likely. Except that isn't quite the same historic option outside of proxy. But supply lines are changing. Prices rising. Unrest occurring. Until who knows?
I find the meme laughable. The timing speculative, but as always who folds what, at what cost, and what occurs.
No.
Nato still holds Europe together.
It however is a great big asshole. Contrary policy. Trade. Laws. And almost everything the EU comes up with as a bloc. An asshole even to its own individual nations. Where it is far more profitable to trade directly to each member. Instead of an asshole shitting on all of them. Except it becomes a larger problem for meddling competition Russia or otherwise. So Nato. So the asshole.
That is simple. It gets a lot more complicated. But there is a problem with the EU running the bloc. Not Nato protecting it.
Can't have one without the other. The EU formed because of Nato. But Nato can exist without the EU but it makes it far more problematic.
It won't get broken up without France exiting.
If it gets broken up it. They're all trading on the Euro. Huge collapse. Don't see it. Almost opposites. If it collapses they come up with an even worse EU. Which is exactly what they're doing. An even worse EU with more offshore windfarms. Windfarms generating even more offshore policy. Then they'll just do it all again anyway 5 minutes later. If the EU broke up, 10 minutes later it would be the EU again. Don't know about Brussels. They'd probably say Brussels can't join. But you know.
This meme is stupid. Putin goes Russia loses. Russia won't lose at home either. It won't recover if it backs away from the Ukraine. It is all in. Out it loses more. I find the timing off. Perfect for the next layer of dystopia. But it saw an opening. What that means is there's a much longer game being played out across the entire geopolitical board. How it all turns out is still a ton of speculation.
Why? The mission was kinda fake. But a hair's spec of crystal is a new element called a moon crystal of the goddess Chang's snatch. Formed because the moon, no atmosphere, was bellowing a bunch of lava into space?
At least the Moon is finally being recognised for potential mining, and further exploration. It has the Helium 3 for unlimited nuclear energy, if it can be extracted.
You're dumber than a sack of regurgitated feltched butt juice. Because you went and gobbled it all up right out of a big dumb flat ass, and it squashed your face, mashing your flatten head. Until the only thing you spew is feltched up shit, and it's called the theory of a flat ass.
On your way. Dumbass
Yes, dumb women are probably worse. At least you can call a dumb bloke a retard. But oh no never a woman because of feelings. Until no sooner is the dumb woman telling everybody else what to say and it's based on her feelings. Until you cannot call anybody retards. The dumbest today. Some kind of aspirations. Don't call anybody else retarded. Now why is that. Hahaha.
No, but seriously there is a modern scourge, and it is a generic blight of the dumbest. Blokes and woman. Until everybody else is apologising to the dumb people's feelings. Woke. Quickly cancel the clever. Just make it even dumber instead. Somehow it will appeal to them.
But okay we are talking about authority. Far easier giving an idiot that chance because a smart person might actually fix it. No point. It's supposed to get stupid first. Look at it.
There are a lot of dumb fellows out there as well. Too many today. It's like an entire generation of some of the dumbest people blighting culture and humanity, today. The dumbest, based on emotions, never logic. These people when put into power or public service grease the cogs, having no experience outside of programming. They have no logic outside of their authority. An entire culture full of them.
But the fact is you're right, yes men, or also yes women. Easier to dangle a bone at, fetch the position, and then they will roll over for it, licking straight out of the dog's bowl. No other rationality. Just another face now do as you're tasked.
Italy is in the shit anyway. Economy flying off the rails and a constant change of corrupt governments. But of course it can always get even worse if they shove the stereotypes out there.
But he is King. Shouldn't be is an opinion irrelevant of that fact. Yawn. Bore somebody else.
God damn what if. But I mean I got too, why not, bring back the death penalty. Hang them off of the tower. How much tourism would that provide? Changing of the guard. Replaced with a little public execution. I mean it would totally draw the crowds. People would stop watching football at least.
I don't understand a word of that.
Topically we are debating if there will be a newer mint recognising the King on its tender. Undoubtedly. It after coronation sometimes prior becomes another formality of the crown.
What is being proposed however is bullshit. But not improbable. The Euro, Dollar, and Sterling are trading very close to the same value. It means exactly what as we progress into the future? God forbid today. But cashless is a word that holds little recognition towards the tender being exchanged. It often simply provides credit for further debts. I don't know why you'd get excited by it.
A cashless society? I doubt it, but I don't discard it.
However if going by history is the simple recognition of the tender held and exchanged. It changes to match the current head of state, or the crown. It therefore puts the king on its face, and that is a process taking time. Older tender isn't worthless for a number of years. But it simply and slowly changes into the current tender minted and the duties that are provided. It provides value, more so to many collectors away from any exchange. This has happened since currency, and their heads of state, going back to Roman Emperors. Perhaps there's taxation, but it occurs regardless of any tender used.
A formality, yes it should be minted. Not for cashless. But for value. Any coins now become collectable value.
The Anthem has changed as well as a host of formalities that crown provides, stamps are another.
It draws value. It also keeps the dating current. Up to date within the times lived in.
Never cashless there is no value.
Yawn. If you don't understand the cause and effect, than I pity your beliefs. They're easily controlled. It was simple power. A secular god to control the rest of the pantheon, easily identifying the faithful. Until beliefs are never controlled because they spawn contradiction, and zealotry. Yet again branching into which god serves its subjects. Until beliefs often become more powerful than those who profit by them, beliefs changing in those robbed of their faith. This is why religion dies. You cannot control believers, only profit off of them. Changing into far easier managed institutions of service. Until there are only the faithless, subjugated. Or perhaps their belief that god returns, and he'll bring an end to all those others ignoring him. Hahaha. See how that works? Now bow and say your prayers.
Or perhaps we should debate how religion instills belief to bring an end on the unfaithful?
In either event it provided power to those who profited off it. They have the perfect means of control. Adapting into far easier methods. Or simply inciting against any others.
Poetry of the Vorlons. Another form to fill in for the inspectorate of does fuck all but wastes your time making you complete another form for the department of nonsense and after being passed around and filling in all the forms, they're stacking up by now, finally to be recited with some very bad poetry, until your ears are bleeding from the nonsensical script. How did these people even get a job. They have no imagination, completely programmed by an assumption of importance that somehow and mysteriously they're magically providing a service. What did they even do, nothing, at all, except recite some very bad poetry. Welcome to another government department of it doesn't know its ass from its face.
I'm sorry were we talking about art?
Yawn. Yawn. You bore to death with a speculative argument.
Sanctions. You dumbass. There are no sanctions except the sanctions the West places. Perhaps it causes a counter action. But if the West placed sanctions any counter action is already considered. They did that, so the other acts, how. Are you stupid. It's obvious. If I am going to this, it's obvious they'll do that. No fucking surprise. It's obviously expected.
Or please convince me how Russia did anything first. No they're a prop. A prop being used to cause agenda. Russia didn't turn off the gas, Europe did. It sanctioned. It went into the Ukraine. Any action from Russia is already considered. Or surprise me, because it's no surprise.
After considering all of that. How complict are Russia? They're being prompted into a course of action already expected. To lose, no, Russia won't lose at home so easily. To cause an agenda. It is selling EVs today, or non fossil fuels. See how easy they're forced? Like that. Simple.
Does Russia lose, not with nukes. Not with Putin either.
So what happens, EVs get forced like that. As well as other collapse causing a shift towards them.
Who knows the rest, because war can still happen. But it depends on how much Russia loses? It won't at home. Not so easily.
The West haven't lost anything. It was expected. Prompted. Purposeful. Unless of course War or a greater collapse occurs they simply lose control of. But at this point it's obviously tedious.
They both profit off any sheep herded. Buy change because it is the other side's fault. Simple not stupid.