Major events have just happened after. Shaping the geopolitical board.
But anybody could've predicted them.
Russian conscription. Russian recognition of territories. UK economy has been killed by the tory death squads, in 5 minutes of a new government. Italy's new government might bring change to a collapsing economy and block.
None. I stayed in Italy years ago for about 6 months. Just over a hour outside Milan to the North.
But the point, punchline being, any nation who thinks they're nationalising in the EU is attempting an oxymoron.
It's laughable, Ironic, and Stupid.
Yes they need some agreements, trade, and movement undoubtedly, but not at the cost of their laws, borders, and businesses. No Italy won't nationalise. Until there's a bigger collapse. If it wants its borders and laws. Captain obvious.
I am surprised there are people who vote for it, thinking something else. It's actually really funny. They think it will be different. They think a new PM is going too. All of 5 minutes later the EU debts mean Italy hasn't changed anything else. 5 minutes later another deal to take even more migrants in. It's quite funny. Even if they stop the migrants for 5 minutes. How is all the rest of the inflation. The price of those debts.
The Thing about the Italian PM. If she was so serious about reclaiming Italy. Addressing immigration, and all the etc. Then she wouldn't do it from the EU. Italy will strike another deal with Europe two seconds later the minute it makes its own immigration policies. As it did with the former PM. He was turning boats around sending them to France and Spain. What went wrong. He's no longer PM. But in all of a few seconds he had to make another deal with the EU and take them back in.
No, she's status quo, project all the right promises when needed to gain a seat. But I doubt much will change, until it fails even more.
Or surprise me. But it all seems rather convenient. It always is, another promise to do nothing else. Because it's only when things really fail that they really get addressed.
Completely indebted to the EU. Project what the people want. Up until Europe calls its debts in. They decide in some other forum off in Brussels what Italy should do. But at least the people have a face to blame when they don't get what they want. They never get what they want except inflation. I meant immigration.
Nationalise Italy. An oxymoron. The EU did that already.
Yawn. It hasn't drafted on a mobilisation scale since WW2. No wonder some want to dodge it. Since communism less have been recruited into its armed forces. A generation has seemingly passed.
But imagine if that draft was in Europe or America. Hahaha, rolls on the floor laughing. No chance. It would almost be easier just to nuke it. Instead of draft it.
Dark days ahead in any event.
What is World currency? It implies a single currency. It would be a bigger problem. Think about it for one second. With the Euro came a bunch of shit laws. Some of the worst laws. Have to take a bunch of migrants in. Just to have the same currency. It didn't stop taxes or inflation either. Suddenly you've created an oxymoron. If you meant a World currency. It is the biggest form of globalism. I honestly don't think you know what you mean.
He could have cut stuff in.
The mountain is McGillivary. Literally right off the Trans Canada highway right there. One of the nearest summits to the road. Under it is a fallout shelter, it was supposed to be the Bank of Canada's archives.
Nearby is a Canadian Military Base. Aircraft base. The surrounding mountains are often drilled on by the Military. Mountain training.
Local legend has Sasquatch sightings all over the place. Literally further up the highway North West, is a Sasquatch, park. Another place in those mountains, is called Giant's Opening or something.
He could've cut almost anything into that footage. He could've used his mate to be that agent.
But supposing it was genuine you have a mirage. And a conspiracy. Dead from. Just hits the Internet. It resembles a person. Only because he says it is. But sure it could be like a climber, with a backpack, legs. Except supposedly 100 ft tall on his zoom. Who knows.
Smells like a prank.
It would seem. But then he could have pranked the whole thing.
Edit; He pranked the whole thing. There's a fallout shelter from the Cold War under the mountain he's filming. It's right by that road, same shots. It has public access, no longer active. Nearby in the wider area is a Canadian military base. That area is hot on the Sasquatch in that region. Presto. Make a hit on it. Is there more speculative.
But his death could have been from anything.
Rather going ohhh, what have locals seen. It's a big road there. Somebody else would have seen it. The activity choppers and shit, are also doing something, they'd been more frequent.
Big fallout shelter up there. Not sure where, but a huge fallout archive shelter. A relic of the Cold War. If it's there it might still be active. That's what I've just found. Plus military are constantly drilling on those mountains.
Mystery solved. Not sure what he caught on camera. It could be anything. Whoops I'll get some mounties or shit. Hardly. Bigfoot knocking at my door. Fuck off.
His death could have been from anything else. Who knows and who cares.
It is a reasonable assessment and a very good presentation. But I don't think it's accurate, there are far too many variables. Yes I agree there is orbit, alignment, conjunctions. Perhaps these cause it to flare or nova. But I don't think it quite works like this. Namely that timing. Every 12,000 years the sun goes poof. Just because it does. No. Sorry. I don't accept that. Because it doesn't. It's a Sun not a freaking stopwatch. It would react differently every single time. Varying. And there is a lot of space between us and a direct hit. Even if we're bang in alignment. And depending on how we're facing is how much damage that causes. Even on a nova. However I don't rule anything out. But you'll find there is a lot more pressure the Sun can cause on our plates, streams, caps, shield, and fields. These can react. As they have in that period causing the ice-age or supervolcano. Besides we might have possibly had impact as well. All within the last 100k. So no. I won't accept the nova is that highlighted event, occurring in that frequency. I don't accept it is just our Sun that is fully responsible.
Hmm no, not the ICBM, but it could be. Whoops. But then, we're talking fallout. Then we're talking a much larger international response. Fallout causes, it gets grim. Tactically there are smaller payload nukes, cruise primarily, that could fully cripple Ukraine, in limited strikes. They'd draw huge condemnation. But unlike a city killer, ICBM, are namely hitting military. Not everything else.
But who knows the longer this drags. Nukes are an option that can be deployed and increase in factor the more this conflict continues.
It's still a theory the solar flare, it has to be big enough and a direct hit. And further the amount of damage is absolutely debatable. How much of the planet is hit, where, what damage. Theoretical. You're citing every 12k years, nope. That isn't factual at all. There have been supervolcanoes in that time period. And supposedly cosmic impact, meteor, comet.
The Sun is in a cycle currently, but some of this cycle has been documented in the last 12k years with both periods of warming and cooling occurring.
You've got a theory. Where solar activity and alignment are causing concerns. But I'm not completely buying that link at all. Another 2 more weeks.
More immediately back to nukes. Unpredictable apart from Russia could lose a lot more support, both at home and abroad. But if Russia are only looking to win and if they are pressed, they are a definitive option not to be so easily dismissed. Why would it draw a direct nuclear war? It wouldn't. In fact it would be much easier to condemn Russia internationally, if they are localised to the current conflict. But as they have gone off, yes there is a risk it could draw Nato further into it. They might support the Ukraine even more directly, because any international response would call to send investigators, decying war crimes. Although who knows. At this stage the odds of their usage only increases. Because Russia has acquired territory under attack, and it will defend it under its sovereignty. It is a nuclear power and it has that option, an increasing consideration when under attack.
No, but it certainly hypes these rumours. Trending on social media. Controversially if it was COVID. See how that works. Who in China actually reads or sees it is an even bigger question?
No major press outside of India has even aired it.
None will. It would cause a bigger diplomatic incident. It won't be verified, until it is dismissed. They wouldn't air it. Not until the conference, confirms otherwise speculation, stepping down or who knows, and then they still wouldn't air it. If they did it causes a huge vacuum and unrest in China. Riots. Etc.
There are other reports of bad health from earlier in this year. Potentially terminal, brain aneurysm. But there is far more speculation. Besides he just met Putin like a week ago.
Obviously a trollfarm.
Yawn. Troll farm. Before the party conference. It has happened before. The same trolls did this in 2012. He gained a further term.
You realise he is the head of the military. Therefore a coup remains highly improbable, meaning completely unlikely. And it just had a huge communist purge. He also just sentenced his main political rival. Those odds are very unlikely. Not something China would advertise, or indeed promote. A communist coup in communism, clearly communism went wrong. Laughter and applause.
But he reportedly has health conditions. There is speculation of unpopularity. But a house arrest. Tedious.
A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.
A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.
So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.
The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.
But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation. Yes an asteroid could hit, and the Sun can nova. But it hasn't yet. Another 2 more weeks. In its scenario there is no provision for it. It happens. It will. They're as prepared for it today as they will be. They won't break protocol. It is speculation. Any preparation remains under protocol. It isn't inciting the public into a what if. There will continue to be its what if. It's the sun after all. It is suggesting an immediate cycle. Speculation. A concern perhaps. But will follow any protocol. There is no other preparation. You would be absurd to suggest 8 billion people hibernate underground until it could or might. They won't be saved in its erratically claimed event.
Rumours largely from India. Baseless. Proved false or exaggerated.
There is however a possibility he won't get another term. Health, and some unpopularity. But even that is huge speculation.
The rumours out there are largely trolls at it, not the first time either, 2012 saw similar stories.
Who knows until their Party Conference later.
I have discussed this numerously. It is boring.
Do I agree with that assessment, no, I'm falling to sleep.
There's this person who thinks that zee nukes are coming. Zee nukes will kill all zee westerners. Because zee monkey people will inherit zee earth.
I mean come on. It's not quite like that. And it won't be.
Nobody wants to lose, they want to profit and control the outcome of war for their own gains and agendas.
I honestly cannot think of why they want to do that, it's much simpler to just nuke all zee monkey people's.
I mean seriously there is a danger of it escalating, but it will be a last resort. If it does. Instead it will drag until there's a truce. What truce will there be. They both get buffers, except for piggy in the middle, it's the buffer, and it has lost a few more ham slices. It can deal tomorrow. But it has another agenda. It's simply driving change. I mean look at it. Change occurs, more expensive electricity for the even more weathering Eeveees, because they really help the government, I meant the weather, Eeveees change the climate. Then the West gets to let India feed the World. But at least India can try to for a change, they're all vegans in India. No. But they want to be. Right?
Or did you think there's gonna be a bunch of nukes, because that's the best way to change things? No. I didn't think so. It use a catalyst, like war, to cause change.
If they were so serious about it. We'd be in war already, it's probably easier stealing the Russian gas, easier than driving Eevees. A computer does that.
Hmm, don't know it can be turned off. Turning it off is simple, let Russia claim some shit, and then drawing up a truce, containing it. Why not let them. Because it empowers Russia and potentially any rogues. They've won something. But it can be turned off as easily. Nato haven't committed. What they have is made it harder for Russia. If it nukes, Ukraine. What gain have Russia really got? It won't Nuke Europe. That could end Russia and the World. But it sets a dangerous precedent. They might go off again the next time somebody else decides to Taiwan, or where ever. So there is the conflict of proxy being played, it is escalating into greater dangers of involvement.
But it also has another design. Because it is dragging, and as it does it is forcing agenda through. Agenda is looking to collapse and force another method of change. It is selling the climate changeable Eeeveees for even more electricity.
And it can erupt. Nobody wants war, they want profit, but they'll just as easily sleep walk right into it. No, not quite. They want to win. Or at least control the outcome. But it isn't as easily controlled. Because they're so unpopular. Never seen such a miserable bunch in all my life of such bullshit issues and methods. They could as easily blunder into it just to kill off all the inflation. Who knows.
They've armed Ukraine. It isn't direct. Ukraine aren't Nato. Or the EU. There are some defense pacts to further arms aid and training. Standard issue. Where there is room to negotiate, it's not all yours, and it never was, and to poke Russia with. If Ukraine beats Russia. I mean hahaha, a clown did all of that. But, ot can be turned off, it is dragging as agendas unfold, or it could become direct. I doubt it will.
It could deal in all of 10 seconds later, because in 20 odd years later they'd only want Ukraine back again. Go on and nuke it, there it's nobody's. Not being harsh either, pragmatic. It would be nobody's. But not before it drags all its agendas through. Debatable what they all are, except buy more coupon electricity, because the weather somehow demands it. Buying electricity is much better for the government. They're not buying gas from Russia. Something.
Or there will be that war. Why not? Because there won't be that war. It gains nothing else.
Maybe, but the nuclear Winter.
Prices soaring. Unrest occurring. Russia has mobilised, and not since WW2, although it's less today, partial but still carries historic weight, committed, supply and conscription, turning the machine of war. The referendums have happened, they're Russian. Attacking those separatist regions is attacking Russia. Any threat was quite severe on how it could respond, quite tactically.
Problematic if Ukraine has been getting increasing missiles and artillery.
It's not a stopwatch and it's subjective to how any cycle occurs. If indeed there is a definite pattern. There isn't at all. Apart from inconclusive events have impacted our geology in the last 100k years. Of this the supervolcano, ice-age, and impact or nova. Until even the geology has been fed into narratives. The main narrative of evolution. It needed neanderthals in caves from an ice-age without it recognising impact, because no civilization existed prior to cavemen. Despite documenting the Supervolcano.
This is remarkably laughable in the British Natural History museum. One exhibit claims out of Africa, the next claims a supervolcano, another theory was the supervolcano caused evolution. Finally there was this other fucking ice-age after. You can literally go to the exhibits from the paleontology monkey skulls, reading the labels, going into the geology volcanoes and earthquakes, or which ever first, and the labels clearly conflict in the information provided. Hilariously. Above. Supervolcano ice-aged them out of Africa? Did it evolve the monkeys? Or did they leave their caves after an ice age and build pyramids next? I mean it's the thing to do after being in a cave. But prior to them leaving Africa there was this big huge eruption. Maybe they changed those labels now. God damn, it was ridiculous.
Okay, but no. There is no definite answer, just contrary theories.