Hmm, don't know it can be turned off. Turning it off is simple, let Russia claim some shit, and then drawing up a truce, containing it. Why not let them. Because it empowers Russia and potentially any rogues. They've won something. But it can be turned off as easily. Nato haven't committed. What they have is made it harder for Russia. If it nukes, Ukraine. What gain have Russia really got? It won't Nuke Europe. That could end Russia and the World. But it sets a dangerous precedent. They might go off again the next time somebody else decides to Taiwan, or where ever. So there is the conflict of proxy being played, it is escalating into greater dangers of involvement.
But it also has another design. Because it is dragging, and as it does it is forcing agenda through. Agenda is looking to collapse and force another method of change. It is selling the climate changeable Eeeveees for even more electricity.
And it can erupt. Nobody wants war, they want profit, but they'll just as easily sleep walk right into it. No, not quite. They want to win. Or at least control the outcome. But it isn't as easily controlled. Because they're so unpopular. Never seen such a miserable bunch in all my life of such bullshit issues and methods. They could as easily blunder into it just to kill off all the inflation. Who knows.
They've armed Ukraine. It isn't direct. Ukraine aren't Nato. Or the EU. There are some defense pacts to further arms aid and training. Standard issue. Where there is room to negotiate, it's not all yours, and it never was, and to poke Russia with. If Ukraine beats Russia. I mean hahaha, a clown did all of that. But, ot can be turned off, it is dragging as agendas unfold, or it could become direct. I doubt it will.
It could deal in all of 10 seconds later, because in 20 odd years later they'd only want Ukraine back again. Go on and nuke it, there it's nobody's. Not being harsh either, pragmatic. It would be nobody's. But not before it drags all its agendas through. Debatable what they all are, except buy more coupon electricity, because the weather somehow demands it. Buying electricity is much better for the government. They're not buying gas from Russia. Something.
Or there will be that war. Why not? Because there won't be that war. It gains nothing else.
Turkey wants war with Greece, and is backing the war on Armenia by Azerbaijan right now. Iran has sent over 100K soldiers to the Armenia border a couple weeks ago, as their ally.
The west is threatening to validate the theft of Kosovo from Serbia in the next few weeks, and Serbia has vowed to invade if that happens.
Western Europe is going insane with nazi propaganda, and will suicide if they think it will hurt Russia.
Kyrgyzstan and another stan (Tajikistan?) are currently killing each other with artillery, tanks, and infantry.
And of course China, who are just waiting for a bit more destabilization to hit the Taiwan sweet spot.
Zee nukes are so coming? Because Russia can't draft its satellites? China can't take Taiwan. And Turkey wants more of the Med? What. Quick, nuke everybody.
A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.
So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.
The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.
But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation. Yes an asteroid could hit, and the Sun can nova. But it hasn't yet. Another 2 more weeks. In its scenario there is no provision for it. It happens. It will. They're as prepared for it today as they will be. They won't break protocol. It is speculation. Any preparation remains under protocol. It isn't inciting the public into a what if. There will continue to be its what if. It's the sun after all. It is suggesting an immediate cycle. Speculation. A concern perhaps. But will follow any protocol. There is no other preparation. You would be absurd to suggest 8 billion people hibernate underground until it could or might. They won't be saved in its erratically claimed event.
Hmm, don't know it can be turned off. Turning it off is simple, let Russia claim some shit, and then drawing up a truce, containing it. Why not let them. Because it empowers Russia and potentially any rogues. They've won something. But it can be turned off as easily. Nato haven't committed. What they have is made it harder for Russia. If it nukes, Ukraine. What gain have Russia really got? It won't Nuke Europe. That could end Russia and the World. But it sets a dangerous precedent. They might go off again the next time somebody else decides to Taiwan, or where ever. So there is the conflict of proxy being played, it is escalating into greater dangers of involvement.
But it also has another design. Because it is dragging, and as it does it is forcing agenda through. Agenda is looking to collapse and force another method of change. It is selling the climate changeable Eeeveees for even more electricity.
And it can erupt. Nobody wants war, they want profit, but they'll just as easily sleep walk right into it. No, not quite. They want to win. Or at least control the outcome. But it isn't as easily controlled. Because they're so unpopular. Never seen such a miserable bunch in all my life of such bullshit issues and methods. They could as easily blunder into it just to kill off all the inflation. Who knows.
They've armed Ukraine. It isn't direct. Ukraine aren't Nato. Or the EU. There are some defense pacts to further arms aid and training. Standard issue. Where there is room to negotiate, it's not all yours, and it never was, and to poke Russia with. If Ukraine beats Russia. I mean hahaha, a clown did all of that. But, ot can be turned off, it is dragging as agendas unfold, or it could become direct. I doubt it will.
It could deal in all of 10 seconds later, because in 20 odd years later they'd only want Ukraine back again. Go on and nuke it, there it's nobody's. Not being harsh either, pragmatic. It would be nobody's. But not before it drags all its agendas through. Debatable what they all are, except buy more coupon electricity, because the weather somehow demands it. Buying electricity is much better for the government. They're not buying gas from Russia. Something.
Or there will be that war. Why not? Because there won't be that war. It gains nothing else.
We cant let Russia have Russian territory becouse reasons and corruption and reasons
You're not paying attention.
Turkey wants war with Greece, and is backing the war on Armenia by Azerbaijan right now. Iran has sent over 100K soldiers to the Armenia border a couple weeks ago, as their ally.
The west is threatening to validate the theft of Kosovo from Serbia in the next few weeks, and Serbia has vowed to invade if that happens.
Western Europe is going insane with nazi propaganda, and will suicide if they think it will hurt Russia.
Kyrgyzstan and another stan (Tajikistan?) are currently killing each other with artillery, tanks, and infantry.
And of course China, who are just waiting for a bit more destabilization to hit the Taiwan sweet spot.
Zee nukes are so coming? Because Russia can't draft its satellites? China can't take Taiwan. And Turkey wants more of the Med? What. Quick, nuke everybody.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kmgaxrrjog
It's going to happen one way or another.
A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.
A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.
So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.
The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.
But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation. Yes an asteroid could hit, and the Sun can nova. But it hasn't yet. Another 2 more weeks. In its scenario there is no provision for it. It happens. It will. They're as prepared for it today as they will be. They won't break protocol. It is speculation. Any preparation remains under protocol. It isn't inciting the public into a what if. There will continue to be its what if. It's the sun after all. It is suggesting an immediate cycle. Speculation. A concern perhaps. But will follow any protocol. There is no other preparation. You would be absurd to suggest 8 billion people hibernate underground until it could or might. They won't be saved in its erratically claimed event.