The concept of monopoly is a feature of communism, fascism, capitalism and every other economic system in existence because centralization of power and resources is the natural trend of human nature. There is no way around this.
In theory all you need to keep free markets working is to break up monopolies when too much power has been centralized, but in practice every system will be gamed and attempts to re-decentralize in a controlled way will be corrupted.
Periodic resets or decentralization events are the only thing that corrects this natural tendency of centralization. These happen naturally when the greed of human nature and the complexity of large scale centralized system leads to breakdowns and revolutions.
What's happening now, though, I don't believe is a natural reset, but a controlled and manufactured reset, by TPTB, to move the population to a global system while maintaining (and actually growing) their power.
It's becoming sentient
Not that I think anyone is to be trusted, but most people who say stop war in Ukraine do have a plan, which is essentially give Russia most of the Donbas region as well as a guarantee that Ukraine will never be admitted into NATO, and in exchange Russia accepts some kind of "defanging" of its military potential (of which many options have been proposed).
You are asking the right questions. I have been having similar thoughts. I have no idea about Ballard, or Cavaziel or Gibson or the director, but the question of why are they allowing it, especially after suppressing this stuff for so long.
I've seen what look like ops on other sites pushing narratives around needing to prove your kids are yours and not some random kids that you kidnapped. They are trying to scare parents into digital ID of some kind (maybe using chips, as you stated). They are coming at it from all angles - virus/vaccine tracking, cyber attacks and disinformation policing, stopping "dangerous" views that disagree with the manufactured mainstream, keep your kids safe, etc.
People get over stuff (like the covid tyranny) and afraid to think just how evil those with power are but also just want to "get back to how things were" and so they either declare premature victory or stick their heads in the sand. It doesn't change the fact that this is the goal of those in power: a global system with absolute tracking and control.
Nothing is going to stop them from pursing this system, and they have been planning and implementing it for decades. We are just at the end exponential acceleration (which is why it seems fast and all of a sudden). They are not going to stop.
(I feel like a broken record but the only way to beat it is to not play their game, not be dependent on their system, build local networks of like-minded people that are as independent of the system as they can be, build regional coalitions of these networks for trade, passage, survival, etc. You can't beat them at their own game where they can change the rules at will, you need to play a different game. And don't get complacent when it seems like they have let up or given up, because they haven't.)
I noticed the same thing. From like April through October of 2021 it was like the first week of driver's training all over the roads. Literally.
One time a guy was driving in the middle left-turn lane at full speed with his right turn signal on. I waited for a mile, leaving plenty of room, for him to get over in front of me and finally just passed him. As long as I could see him in my rearview he was still in that center lane.
That stuff was rampant. Maybe it was because of all of the crazies that locked themselves in their homes for a year and lost their driving skills, but it lasted for 6+ months.
If you want to play their games, you need to have their credentials. It is extraordinarily difficult to try to maneuver around that. Professional jobs are 100% "their games". Illegals are not competing in the game, they are essentially NPCs (purely in the video game sense) and cannot have upward mobility, if that even remains a thing.
If you want to live on the periphery, and are willing do the hard work of figuring out how that life could work and raise your kids in that life, then it is more feasible. You mentioned Amish elsewhere, and that is a decent model. Plenty of them have the documents and play by the rules where they need to interact with government, banks, etc., but there is also room for plenty of their population to not need that stuff.
I thought deeply about this when we had our kids, but we're older and I couldn't convince my wife to do home births (we didn't vaccinate and are homeschooling though).
I think a better thing to research is how long can you delay it and not have problems (if you are going to do a homebirth). Try to find examples of kids getting birth certificates later on (1 year, 5 years, maybe 15 years). Is there some way you can claim "I meant to do it and then got distracted with life and forgot about it for 15 years"? That would buy you more time and put off the decision until the last possible moment (the point at which they need it if they are going to enter society).
If you do that, maybe document the birth event somehow, with some makeshift certificate or something that indicates "I documented the birth happened at this time" so you've got something to show if they question things. Then claim ignorance and forgetfulness. Again, though, before you go down that path find some clear legal foundation that shows it is possible to get one at some later time.
Yes, but don't put all your eggs in one basket. There are ways to disable that if they want to go that far (whether they will is an economic question, as is everything they do). Just have contingencies, ideally able to survive without power if you absolutely need to.
I'm doing solar, but also trying to get setup to be able to heat and eat without it if it comes to that.
Build community locally, preferably small town or rural, but even within large urban areas the same theory applies.
Create small networks of people who understand what is going on and find ways to live outside of the system to the degree possible, and to protect each other if things go further south. Those small networks can loosely ally with other such small networks for things like trade and security.
Lone wolf thing doesn't really work for most scenarios. And trying to beat those that control the system at the game they own and make the rules for doesn't really work either. Play a different game, and be prepared to survive when it escalates and/or collapses. Whatever that means where you're at (black markets, independent rural economies, whatever).
None of this suggests not continuing to participate in local/state politics if that's your game. And none of it suggests stopping waking others up either (and especially laughing openly at how ridiculous this shit has become and humiliating those that still buy into it).
Yeah, there is a massive, multi-pronged operation to make it harder and harder to live rural. One part is legislation on things like banning wood burning and forcing everything to be electric (then oops...we'll find out it's too expensive to continue to maintain the grid in rural areas). But then there are the things like this, and releasing tick-borne and mosquito-born diseases. All the same operation.
Btw, I don't know wtf your username means, I just know it's awesome.
I think he's being literal. In nature things make sense, but when he steps back into society it's like wtf is this madness.
Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq are roughly the models I'm advocating. None of those initiated a full on direct kinetic war, they moved out of the cities and defended what was rightfully theirs, and largely outlasted and maintained their ways of life to varying degrees. Asymmetric warfare.
And it kind of proves my point, they didn't go through every mountain rooting out opposition, because that is not economically viable. They mostly went after figureheads and those that were directly causing problems.
Same with "nations that tried to exit the IMF"...I'm not talking about creating a nation state, I'm talking about creating a parallel society that exists alongside the mainstream system but does not directly compete. Live on the outskirts of the system, interacting at the edges and the black markets within, and wait for its eventual collapse (comparable to the US eventually leaving Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq).
I agree, though, they do seem intent on exterminating us, but as far as saving our nation states, I don't think there is any coming back from where we're at. In that sense they've already won. Move to the outskirts and wait for it to collapse.
If things were to swing back hard the other way, I'd be afraid it was a setup like Germany after Weimar. That may have seemed great for a decade, but how did it end?
I just can't see how you win a kinetic war against the most heavily armed opponent in history though.
And I go back to everything is economics. It would be incredibly, prohibitively expensive to go after everyone that does not participate in their system, especially if there is no direct interference with their plans. The ROI is not there, nor is the public's appetite to participate in a long drawn out war against their own citizens, no matter how much the propaganda machine can brainwash them.
Yes, they would go after some of the more high profile people, to make an example of them, but it just isn't feasible to go after everyone.
As long as a parallel system has a complete enough economy to mostly survive without needing to depend on the mainstream, then it would mostly be safe.
EDIT: this is not to say don't band together and defend what is rightfully yours if and when they come for you, definitely do that. just saying offense is not the winning game that I can tell.
I don't know man, I've thought this through for a lot of years, and I'm fairly convinced it is the most viable path.
You're generally one of the smarter people on forums, so I'm interested to hear your reasoning, but here is mine:
Direct attack (of any kind) against them is pointless. You're not going to beat them at the game they own, control top to bottom and can change the rules for. Any direct attack and they will use it to end you (in whatever form that means in whatever the situation is).
The answer, to me, is the same as the rest of life in general, get others to play your game, and play to your strengths. It is just another form of asymmetric warfare. Build communities of people locally that can sustain a complete economy outside of the mainstream system, and build networks of those communities for trade, travel, protection, etc.
Economics rules all, and it is not economically viable for them to come after an entire decentralized society if it is not directly interfering with theirs. They would likely kill or imprison higher profile players at times to scare others from following, but not go after then entirety of the parallel societies.
The concept is similar to the Taliban and/or Ghandi and/or plenty of other examples of asymmetric long-term wins, even if those official stories are mostly BS.
Yes, they will make it extremely difficult for most to survive without full compliance, but there is always another way, IME. Eventually, this system they are building will collapse (I mean after the fake collapse they are currently orchestrating), though that could take 100 years or more.
Even if you don't buy into the full parallel society plan, mass noncompliance is the answer. Everything they are doing is dependent on almost total compliance. Even 10%, but ideally 30% and there is just way they can move down those paths.
That's why all of them are on SSRIs and have had previous interactions with psycholgists/psychiatrists. In addition to those people being easy to manipulate into action, it allows them to constantly push the "mentally ill people should not have guns" talking points.
And nobody ever asks "who is the final arbiter of mental illness?". Over half the country has diagnosed anxiety and other disorders. Mentally ill just means not able to adapt well to society, and it will soon be expanded to include anyone that questions authority (even moreso than it has already).
I think it's in the 30-35% range. I'm in tech, and it's about 90% compliance across tech, and I think most white collar work is about the same. Elderly is over 90% compliance. Blue collar, to me, seems to be closer to 50% compliance, and under age 30 also seems to be in the 50-60% compliance range.
It's more like the only winning move is not to play. Or more accurately, play a different game.
You are not going to beat them at the game they own, control and can change the rules for, so stop getting pulled into trying to play that game, and start trying to play your own game.
I feel like this is the only thing I say on these forums, but it is important, and there are people that have figured this out. Find others in real life. Start building networks and communities that can survive outside of this new system that is being installed.
What we had is gone. I honestly don't believe there is a direct path to get back to that. Building something similar in spirit but new, something that will be in place and can be sustained when the rest collapses, or that will allow us to continue outside of the matrix, is the only viable path I see.
I'm not saying give up completely on political or traditional approaches, especially at the local level, but I think the better odds and therefore more energy should go towards an alternate game.
Yes, they will come after some of us, especially higher profile people, to discourage others from trying. They can't come after all, it's just not economically viable. If/when they come, band together and defend the best that can be defended, but also remember it is a public relations war and information war above all, and also if you don't directly attack their game, there isn't a lot of economic incentive to spend resources on us.
If you just want to lay down and die, you will always find excuses and endless ways to be demoralized. If you want to succeed, you'll find a way. Life is usually that simple. Not always on an individual level, but overall the probabilities generally work out that way.
I don't know, man, seems legit. And I'm actually worried about myself now. I too have hands, and I took a picture of myself and drew lines between my eyes and from each eye to the tip of my nose. It formed a triangle.
Yep. To use the service you need both verified email and phone, and for 99.99% (even on here) that means they verifiably have you identified.
This was opened up to do exactly what you stated, and for no other reason. DO NOT USE.
And honestly, keep your digital footprint as small as you can. Communicate with people in real life. Share your opinions and mannerisms and secrets with real people that you know and trust, not digitally. They are doing all of these same things with all of your digital activity, this is just the next level.
You are correct. Nailed it. It's like Wargames, the only winning move is not to play.
It sounds like you know what you are doing, but I'll throw this out there in case it gives you any ideas:
We can't stop what is coming, very, very little chance of that. Waking people up does help, but they either control or have infiltrated almost all forms of communication and can usually steer things back to controlled ground or confusion (both work).
The only way is loosely interconnected small groups in real life. Build small communities that can survive outside of the mainstream system, and build relationships with other such small communities, so that you are not forced into the absolute control grid that is being built out. Help others in real life to not comply when more forceful mandates come (and they are coming, this is nowhere near done).
Also, don't stop seeking truth. Find ways to discuss and find the truth with in-person communities to the degree possible.
Good luck, and try to help as many as you can escape also, in real life. Most people are not capable of creating and executing on larger scale plans, but they still want out and will often put in work if they have help with a plan.
lol, yeah, that's gonna happen
I'm saying no matter what phase we're in, rolling over and dying only makes it easier for them.
Doom and gloom serves a purpose, which is to wake people up to what is happening, but there is a fine line to walk there. People do need to be woken up but then they need clear direction on what to do and how to do it (i.e. the grow food, raise animals, build community,...).
People can get stuck in the doom and gloom and start feeling helpless and spiral into a depression, and then they do nothing but roll over and die when they could have spent all of that time putting in the work necessary to avoid it.
I thought everyone already knew this was a global communist takeover by the elites. Covid was just one step in the overarching plan, and a large intent of covid was always mandatory vaccines (to get the digital ID in place). There were many steps before covid and there are many still to come.
But bruh, you are too doomy. You gotta break out of your funk. I know it's hard, but rolling over and dying just makes it easier for them.
The answer has always been and continues to be: do not comply with any of it, build local and regional community, build parallel economies within and between those communities, and if they come to take what is rightfully yours then you have every natural right to band together and defend it.
The system is theirs. They built it, whether you want to admit that or not. You can't beat them at their own game, and you can't force them to alter the system they built to accommodate you. You need to be a part of building a separate one, and that takes ridiculous amounts of work and sacrifice, but it is likely the only way.
Grow food. Raise Animals. Gain needed skills (construction, trades, naturopathic medicine, etc.). Get to know your neighbors. Trade locally.
Or sit around and doom. It makes things worse to be so defeatist, though. There is always a way. Always another angle. Always tradeoffs that mean weaknesses must exist in their power. That is a fundamental feature of the universe.
Nations, competition, decentralized power are what give us the degree of freedom and safety we have had, absolutely.
My point, though, is that depending on some lone savior is silly and is just capitulating to the game. If you are completely dependent on a savior then you are that person's slave, so them saving you just means you are changing masters, in essence.
If you're not willing to put in the work to build the systems yourself, and take responsibility for your survival, then you are beholden to the whims of those that provide those for you. And that's fine, at least 80% of people are that way.
Yeah, he's advanced the state of the art in many areas of tech, and he is incredibly driven. That's why I like him too, but I also don't ignore the tradeoffs and other sides of the stories. My problem is more when already powerful people get deified, the blind following can lead to dangerous places.
I don't have any thoughts on this one being true or not, but as to no fed or globalist benefit, not all ops are meant to directly cause immediate movement in a direction. There are plenty used for training, there are plenty used for research, there are plenty to move the needle in public perception, and most of them serve multiple purposes. But again, I have no idea on this one.